[distcc] load management
Dan Kegel
dank at kegel.com
Mon May 3 04:36:52 GMT 2004
Martin Pool wrote:
>>That sounds like the way Microsoft thought when they were designing
>>ActiveX!
>
> There's no call for that sort of language. :-)
Yeah, sorry, I knew I was hitting below the belt!
> I think what you have is just timidness, rather than well-founded
> concern.
Probably. As long as the user has to affirmatively give
an option or use a special command to get the sticky daemon,
it's probably ok.
> Where is the hole? Or, in what way is automatically starting the
> daemon when an option is given any different from starting it
> manually?
People don't like it when you do things behind their back,
that's all. (I especially hate library functions that
silently create threads. I may be projecting here.)
- Dan
--
My technical stuff: http://kegel.com
My politics: see http://www.misleader.org for examples of why I'm for regime change
More information about the distcc
mailing list