[distcc] why always compiling local if host not accessible ?

Heiko_Elger at arburg.com Heiko_Elger at arburg.com
Tue Jan 27 06:21:56 GMT 2004





distcc: version 2.12
OS: Windows XP Professional
cygwin: latest version

Hello,

I'm sorry - I send this quistion again cause there was no response ...

Why is distcc always compiling locally if it cannot contact a distcc server?

IMHO it would be better if this job is requeued to the new host list, in which
the not responding host is removed, instead of always be compiled on the
localhost.


What's your opinion?



Mit freundlichen Gruessen
best regards

   Heiko Elger



********************

ARBURG GmbH + Co
Heiko Elger
- Softwareentwicklung - / - Research and Development -
Arthur-Hehl-Strasse
D-72290 Lossburg
Tel.: +49 (0) 7446 33-3659
Fax.: +49 (0) 7446 33-3365
mailto:heiko_elgerNOSPAM at arburg.com
http://www.arburg.com

Bitte entfernen Sie "NOSPAM" von der  Email-Adresse
Please remove "NOSPAM" from the email address

(Embedded image moved to file: pic00041.jpg)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: pic00041.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 631 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/distcc/attachments/20040127/06f4fa56/pic00041.jpg


More information about the distcc mailing list