[distcc] .ORDER or similar support in distcc

[Martin Pool]

On  5 Jan 2004 Ralf Beckers <ralf.beckers at chipvision.com> wrote:

> On Sunday 04 January 2004 02:36, Martin Pool wrote:
> > The order in which targets are built is an issue with Make, not with
> > distcc.
> > I don't know any GNU Make feature similar to .ORDER, though you can
> > perhaps get close by running the commands explicitly.
> 
> I found how to declare the order in which the targets must be build. The 
> following link gives a full explanation: 
> http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/help-make/2002-11/msg00026.html 
> 
> In short you must add a prerequisite after the specific target like
> 
> move_after_built: compile_before_move

That is not quite the same thing; .ORDER specifies sequencing but not
dependency (I think.)  But if it works for you, that's good.  It's
generally better to just specify dependencies anyhow.

-- 
Martin 
                               linux.conf.au -- Adelaide, January 2004
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/distcc/attachments/20040109/3b568e74/attachment.bin