libglade dependency (was Re: [distcc] distcc-2.11.1 on Solaris)

[Lisa Seelye]

On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 10:08, Martin Pool wrote:
> The dependency can be removed only by doing by hand some things
> currently done by libglade.
> 
> Let's see what the Gentoo people have to say.  They're likely to want
> GTK+-only as well.

If the dependency can be safely removed -- that is, if its feasible to
rewrite the glade portions to pure gtk -- then I'm all for it.  No one
likes to pull in unneeded deps (unless they're testing a distcc
cluster).

-- 
Regards,
-Lisa
<Vix ulla tam iniqua pax, quin bello vel aequissimo sit potior>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/distcc/attachments/20031008/8d29e9a6/attachment.bin