[distcc] A patch to introduce recursive mkdir and more

[Lisa Seelye]

On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 23:39, Martin Pool wrote:
> What is wrong with portage running with (for example)
> DISTCC_DIR=/tmp/portage.distcc and then setting the same variable when
> a user wants to monitor portage's distcc use?  Then any user who has
> permission to read that directory ought to be able to see the tasks...

This seems an optimal solution.  I'll propose it to the Portage dev
team.  It seems the best move.

And "Oops" on the free() thing. ;-)  My C isn't quite that strong yet.

-- 
Regards,
-Lisa
<Vix ulla tam iniqua pax, quin bello vel aequissimo sit potior>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/distcc/attachments/20030911/759a2366/attachment.bin