[distcc] Re: What is the best way to separate compiler and assembler phases?

Ben Elliston bje at redhat.com
Wed Feb 26 20:54:54 GMT 2003

>>>>> "Stuart" == Stuart D Gathman <stuart at bmsi.com> writes:

  Stuart> Having lurked for a while, I realize that not all compilers
  Stuart> produce assembler code as an intermediate step.  Some
  Stuart> directly produce an object file.  But for those that produce
  Stuart> assembler as an intermediate, what is the best way to run
  Stuart> the compiler and assembler on different machines - while
  Stuart> keeping the overall distcc architecture?

There aren't too many that produce object files directly (at least
that I can come into contact with).  Can you give me an example?


More information about the distcc mailing list