Re: What is the best way to separate compiler and assembler phases?
bje at redhat.com
Wed Feb 26 20:54:54 GMT 2003
>>>>> "Stuart" == Stuart D Gathman <stuart at bmsi.com> writes:
Stuart> Having lurked for a while, I realize that not all compilers
Stuart> produce assembler code as an intermediate step. Some
Stuart> directly produce an object file. But for those that produce
Stuart> assembler as an intermediate, what is the best way to run
Stuart> the compiler and assembler on different machines - while
Stuart> keeping the overall distcc architecture?
There aren't too many that produce object files directly (at least
that I can come into contact with). Can you give me an example?
More information about the distcc