[distcc] distcc & glibc-2.2.5 & gcc-3.2

[Alexandre Oliva]

On Oct 10, 2002, Martin Pool <mbp at sourcefrog.net> wrote:

> The problem is that in this context distcc incorrectly thinks the .S
> file is the name of the compiler.

And it couldn't possibly tell otherwise should the .S file be
executable.  One more reason to prefer explicit compiler names.  (Not
that I'm against the convenience of being able to omit it, I just
don't take this risk myself)

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                 aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist                Professional serial bug killer