[distcc] using distcc to speed up gcc bootstraps
neil at daikokuya.co.uk
Fri Aug 23 12:14:00 GMT 2002
Alexandre Oliva wrote:-
> So you're saying you don't care about distcc and you think it's not
> important to preserve the directory where the source file was
> preprocessed in the debugging info? Or are you just saying you have
> some better way to achieve this goal that you failed to mention?
I've not thought about it; I just don't like the idea.
> > If this does go in, I don't think it should go in until 3.4 branches,
> Why? It's fully backward-compatible, and it adds information that
> helps GCC do a better job.
Because we're fixing bugs now. I've not be doing stuff that I want
to do, because we're in stage 3.
> > and I don't think it should be in cpplib (it should be in cc1).
> So how do you suggest it to emit a single <directory> directive right
> after the initial source file name?
As part of cc1's preprocessed output code.
More information about the distcc