[cifs-protocol] [EXTERNAL] Re: [MS-APDS] NETLOGON_TICKET_LOGON_INFO message - TrackingID#2405210040011397
Jo Sutton
jsutton at samba.org
Thu Aug 1 02:41:55 UTC 2024
Hi Sreekanth,
Yes, I think I used the updated IDL. I’ve uploaded
netlogon_ticket_logon_info_2.zip, which contains a trace of Windows
Server 2022 sending RPC_NT_BAD_STUB_DATA in response to my
NetlogonTicketLogonInformation message.
Cheers,
Jo (she/her)
On 20/07/24 2:32 am, Sreekanth Nadendla wrote:
> Hello Jo, Have you used the new IDL file from the updated MS-NRPC
> specification? Please feel free to collect the data and upload it to the
> workspace shared with you.
>
> Regards,
>
> Sreekanth Nadendla
>
> Microsoft Windows Open Specifications
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Jo Sutton <jsutton at samba.org>
> *Sent:* Friday, July 19, 2024 12:31 AM
> *To:* Sreekanth Nadendla <srenaden at microsoft.com>;
> cifs-protocol at lists.samba.org <cifs-protocol at lists.samba.org>
> *Cc:* Microsoft Support <supportmail at microsoft.com>
> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: [cifs-protocol] [MS-APDS]
> NETLOGON_TICKET_LOGON_INFO message - TrackingID#2405210040011397
> Hi Sreekanth,
>
> Thank you for your helpful response! It seems I still haven’t got it
> quite right, as Windows responds with RPC_NT_BAD_STUB_DATA when I send
> the NetlogonTicketLogonInformation message. May I upload more traces
> next week so I can find out where I’ve gone wrong?
>
> Cheers,
> Jo (she/her)
>
> On 19/07/24 6:40 am, Sreekanth Nadendla wrote:
>> Hello Jo, please review the latest copy of [MS-NRPC]. It has the
>> updated IDL definitions as well. As of now, [MS-APDS] is still being
>> updated. The following information should be helpful in the meantime.
>>
>> MS-APDS Section 3.2.5.1 shows messagetype field should be set to
>> 0x00000026. The actual design did not introduce such message type. We
>> are using a new logonlevel i.e. NETLOGON_LEVEL of
>> NetlogonTicketLogonInformation and a new validationLevel i.e.
>> NETLOGON_VALIDATION of NetlogonValidationTicketLogon.
>>
>> 1.
>> From MS-APDS Section 3.2.5.1, we see the
>> NETLOGON_TICKET_LOGON_INFO is layered on top of generic pass
>> through structure however MS-NRPC section 2.2.1.4.6 defines
>> TicketLogon as a new NETLOGON_LEVEL struct which refers
>> to NETLOGON_TICKET_LOGON_INFO.
>> The NETLOGON_TICKET_LOGON_INFO message does not utilize
>> Generic Passthrough as described in MS-APDS 3.2.5.1. Instead, you
>> will be using /LogonLevel/ parameter 8
>> (_NetlogonTicketLogonInformation
>> <https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flearn.microsoft.com%2Fen-us%2Fopenspecs%2Fwindows_protocols%2Fms-nrpc%2F8c7808e5-4e5c-420e-9c90-47286da2218f&data=05%7C02%7Csrenaden%40microsoft.com%7C2515a7bc13144af3cc4508dca7abc215%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638569603359118378%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=%2FtE6Ss0vWtLxTmXsBSe5ohH1goBxxe2Y3V0B0sw6Grk%3D&reserved=0>_ <https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/openspecs/windows_protocols/ms-nrpc/8c7808e5-4e5c-420e-9c90-47286da2218f>)
>> 1.
>>
>> 2.
>> Generic Passthrough returns
>> NETLOGON_VALIDATION_GENERIC_INFO2. But the new TicketLogon will
>> return NETLOGON_VALIDATION_TICKET_LOGON.
>> 1.
>> As NETLOGON_TICKET_LOGON_INFO message does not actually utilize
>> Generic Passthrough, you will use /ValidationLevel/ parameter is
>> 7 (_NetLogonValidationTicketLogon
>> <https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flearn.microsoft.com%2Fen-us%2Fopenspecs%2Fwindows_protocols%2Fms-nrpc%2F95154ae4-d305-43e5-82e4-d5353e0f117c&data=05%7C02%7Csrenaden%40microsoft.com%7C2515a7bc13144af3cc4508dca7abc215%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638569603359128324%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=HEAC75E4vE%2FFZ1zNL%2FybUhn2cuJWnBwK7kF5eCiJ5fA%3D&reserved=0>_ <https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/openspecs/windows_protocols/ms-nrpc/95154ae4-d305-43e5-82e4-d5353e0f117c>),
>> 1.
>>
>> 2.
>>
>> You can find a list of applicable Windows OS versions that have this
>> security update from the following link (click the “More…” link below
>> the title)
>>
>> 3.
>> _https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsupport.microsoft.com%2Fen-us%2Ftopic%2Fkb5037754-how-to-manage-pac-validation-changes-related-to-cve-2024-26248-and-cve-2024-29056-6e661d4f-799a-4217-b948-be0a1943fef1&data=05%7C02%7Csrenaden%40microsoft.com%7C2515a7bc13144af3cc4508dca7abc215%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638569603359131478%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=lGbdEN3ijr6GYYLFlXxh59zHmrZX4EPcCxraajgVBmY%3D&reserved=0
> <https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsupport.microsoft.com%2Fen-us%2Ftopic%2Fkb5037754-how-to-manage-pac-validation-changes-related-to-cve-2024-26248-and-cve-2024-29056-6e661d4f-799a-4217-b948-be0a1943fef1&data=05%7C02%7Csrenaden%40microsoft.com%7C2515a7bc13144af3cc4508dca7abc215%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638569603359134592%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Xzicp6rrAiWgKaKG78mgejCwXErzG%2BktBsTJBGvPAtQ%3D&reserved=0 <https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/topic/kb5037754-how-to-manage-pac-validation-changes-related-to-cve-2024-26248-and-cve-2024-29056-6e661d4f-799a-4217-b948-be0a1943fef1>>_
>>
>> This list does not include Server 2025, but it also contains this
>> update.
>>
>>
>> Please let me know if you have additional questions.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Sreekanth Nadendla
>>
>> Microsoft Windows Open Specifications
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> *From:* Jo Sutton <jsutton at samba.org>
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 16, 2024 12:33 AM
>> *To:* Sreekanth Nadendla <srenaden at microsoft.com>;
>> cifs-protocol at lists.samba.org <cifs-protocol at lists.samba.org>
>> *Cc:* Microsoft Support <supportmail at microsoft.com>
>> *Subject:* Re: [cifs-protocol] [EXTERNAL] Re: [MS-APDS]
>> NETLOGON_TICKET_LOGON_INFO message - TrackingID#2405210040011397
>> For completeness’ sake, I ran the same procedure against a Windows
>> Server 2022 host, and got exactly the same STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER
>> error. For MessageType I tried both 0x00000003 and 0x00000026 (and many
>> other values, for good measure).
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Jo (she/her)
>>
>> On 10/07/24 2:08 pm, Jo Sutton via cifs-protocol wrote:
>> > Hi Sreekanth,
>> >
>> > I’m afraid that using 0x03 for the message type still gets me
>> > STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER codes.
>> >
>> > 0x03 is the message type corresponding to KERB_VERIFY_PAC_REQUEST, which
>> > is used for the older method of PAC verification. But the message I’m
>> > attempting to send is NETLOGON_TICKET_LOGON_INFO ([MS-APDS] 2.2.2.1),
>> > which includes the entire Kerberos ticket and is used in the newer
>> > method of PAC verification.
>> >
>> > What do I need to do to get Windows Server 2019 to accept a
>> > NETLOGON_TICKET_LOGON_INFO message? I don’t see any information
>> > indicating that Windows Server 2019 doesn’t support such messages.
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Jo (she/her)
>> >
>> > On 10/07/24 7:12 am, Sreekanth Nadendla wrote:
>> >> Hello Jo, can you change the message type from 0x00000026 ( byte
>> >> sequence seen as 26 00 00 00 below) to 0x00000003 (to indicate
>> >> message type of KerbVerifyPacMessage) and try this again ?
>> >>
>> >> 0:002> db ProtocolSubmitBuffer L0x5e0
>> >>
>> >> 00000218`69819c80 26 00 00 00 00 00 11 00-21 00 31 00 c0 05 00 00
>> >> &.......!.1.....
>> >> 00000218`69819c90 00 00 02 00 00 00 00 00-00 00 00 00 c0 05 00 00
>> >> ................
>> >> 00000218`69819ca0 61 82 05 bc 30 82 05 b8-a0 03 02 01 05 a1 0d 1b
>> >> a...0...........
>> >> .. ..... .. ..... .. .....
>> >> .. ..... .. ..... .. .....
>> >> .. ..... .. ..... .. .....
>> >> 00000218`6981a250 85 1d 35 87 38 7d b1 5b-52 c0 c3 e4 30 c8 77 7d
>> >> ..5.8}.[R...0.w}
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >>
>> >> Sreekanth Nadendla
>> >>
>> >> Microsoft Windows Open Specifications
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> *From:* Jo Sutton <jsutton at samba.org>
>> >> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 2, 2024 6:23 PM
>> >> *To:* Sreekanth Nadendla <srenaden at microsoft.com>;
>> >> cifs-protocol at lists.samba.org <cifs-protocol at lists.samba.org>
>> >> *Cc:* Microsoft Support <supportmail at microsoft.com>
>> >> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: [cifs-protocol] [MS-APDS]
>> >> NETLOGON_TICKET_LOGON_INFO message - TrackingID#2405210040011397
>> >> Thank you, Sreekanth. I’ve uploaded a trace and network capture of a
>> >> call to NetrLogonSamLogonEx() attempting to validate a service ticket.
>> >>
>> >> Cheers,
>> >> Jo (she/her)
>> >>
>> >> On 3/07/24 2:02 am, Sreekanth Nadendla wrote:
>> >> > Hello Jo, you may have gotten an invitation to upload files by now.
>> >> > Please check your e-mail folders and let me know otherwise.
>> >> >
>> >> > Regards,
>> >> >
>> >> > Sreekanth Nadendla
>> >> >
>> >> > Microsoft Windows Open Specifications
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> > *From:* Jo Sutton <jsutton at samba.org>
>> >> > *Sent:* Monday, July 1, 2024 10:01 PM
>> >> > *To:* Sreekanth Nadendla <srenaden at microsoft.com>;
>> >> > cifs-protocol at lists.samba.org <cifs-protocol at lists.samba.org>
>> >> > *Cc:* Microsoft Support <supportmail at microsoft.com>
>> >> > *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: [cifs-protocol] [MS-APDS]
>> >> > NETLOGON_TICKET_LOGON_INFO message - TrackingID#2405210040011397
>> >> > On second thoughts, I’d rather not send traces via unencrypted email.
>> >> > Can you provide somewhere for me to upload them?
>> >> >
>> >> > Cheers,
>> >> > Jo (she/her)
>> >> >
>> >> > On 2/07/24 1:57 pm, Jo Sutton via cifs-protocol wrote:
>> >> >> [moving back to cifs-protocol]
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hi Sreekanth,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Call me Jo :)
>> >> >>
>> >> >> As I can’t seem to upload the traces via the link you sent me,
>> >> I’ll try
>> >> >> to email them to you directly.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> The reason for asking about NETLOGON_TICKET_LOGON_INFO is that we’re
>> >> >> looking to address
>> >>
>> https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbugzilla.samba.org%2Fshow_bug.cgi%3Fid%3D15249&data=05%7C02%7Csrenaden%40microsoft.com%7C2515a7bc13144af3cc4508dca7abc215%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638569603359137640%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=7XY3SGgdQpHefyyQ%2F9Ty2l0sjhU9spfRNiJXzdurNdU%3D&reserved=0 <https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15249> <https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbugzilla.samba.org%2Fshow_bug.cgi%3Fid%3D15249&data=05%7C02%7Csrenaden%40microsoft.com%7C2515a7bc13144af3cc4508dca7abc215%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638569603359140497%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=P7Er2U7F%2FiCKPw%2B6F4JlERaJeZe038mtuGXjjVFmh9s%3D&reserved=0 <https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15249>> <https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbugzilla.samba.org%2Fshow_bug.cgi%3Fid%3D15249&data=05%7C02%7Csrenaden%40microsoft.com%7C2515a7bc13144af3cc4508dca7abc215%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638569603359143252%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=hAveIaSvu7oBnJbP6ZaYUJSkaRDT9fPlNxevg7YyXPs%3D&reserved=0 <https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbugzilla.samba.org%2Fshow_bug.cgi%3Fid%3D15249&data=05%7C02%7Csrenaden%40microsoft.com%7C2515a7bc13144af3cc4508dca7abc215%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638569603359146018%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=yk%2BHKoqtQ%2FIj9gDibqKzOJ72O1mCxvMFSl%2BYAAmhv24%3D&reserved=0 <https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15249>>> <https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbugzilla.samba.org%2Fshow_bug.cgi%3Fid%3D15249&data=05%7C02%7Csrenaden%40microsoft.com%7C2515a7bc13144af3cc4508dca7abc215%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638569603359148736%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=XJlJJhKHczhzw5c%2BvtFBIaDQCTnNscJXtCA2TPUPC%2Fk%3D&reserved=0 <https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbugzilla.samba.org%2Fshow_bug.cgi%3Fid%3D15249&data=05%7C02%7Csrenaden%40microsoft.com%7C2515a7bc13144af3cc4508dca7abc215%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638569603359151445%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=WHzdEQPRmyxUB6aQjv9Qj4LPu1uwlW47hjC7SiCCohE%3D&reserved=0 <https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbugzilla.samba.org%2Fshow_bug.cgi%3Fid%3D15249&data=05%7C02%7Csrenaden%40microsoft.com%7C2515a7bc13144af3cc4508dca7abc215%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638569603359154173%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=3GWeALNrJs73UjUgcBMjrRxdME4SoGlf%2FNsDrgjArDo%3D&reserved=0 <https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15249>>>>.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Cheers,
>> >> >> Jo (she/her)
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On 14/06/24 3:39 am, Sreekanth Nadendla wrote:
>> >> >>> Hello Joseph, I've sent you instructions to download time travel
>> >> trace
>> >> >>> tool to collect traces for lass process earlier. But we were
>> >> informed
>> >> >>> by Andrew Bartlet that the reason why you've raised the login issue
>> >> >>> with [MS-APDS] NETLOGON_TICKET_LOGON_INFO is that you are
>> looking to
>> >> >>> resolve a privilege escalation problem via enforcement of PAC
>> >> >>> verification. I could not see how these two issues are connected
>> >> >>> hence I'm unable to continue the investigation on my own (while you
>> >> >>> are away dealing with a personal issue).
>> >> >>> Please let us know whenever you are ready and we will gather the
>> >> >>> details, data to investigate the issue you are experiencing.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Regards,
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Sreekanth Nadendla
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Microsoft Windows Open Specifications
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> From: Jo Sutton <jsutton at samba.org>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Sent: Monday, May 20, 2024 9:49 PM
>> >> >>> To: cifs-protocol at lists.samba.org <cifs-protocol at lists.samba.org>;
>> >> >>> Interoperability Documentation Help <dochelp at microsoft.com>
>> >> >>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [MS-APDS] NETLOGON_TICKET_LOGON_INFO message
>> >> >>> [Some people who received this message don't often get email from
>> >> >>> jsutton at samba.org. Learn why this is important at
>> >> >>> https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification
> <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification>
>> <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification
> <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification>>
>> >> <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification
>> <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification
> <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification>>>
>> >> > <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification
>> >> <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification
>> <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification
> <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification>>>> ]
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Hi dochelp,
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> I’m trying to follow [MS-APDS] 2.2.2.1, “NETLOGON_TICKET_LOGON_INFO
>> >> >>> Message”, in order to create a NETLOGON_TICKET_LOGON_INFO message
>> >> that
>> >> >>> will be accepted by Windows Server 2019. However, in my attempts
>> >> so far,
>> >> >>> all I’ve got is STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER codes from
>> >> NetrLogonSamLogonEx.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Although [MS-APDS] doesn’t mention it, I assume
>> >> >>> NETLOGON_TICKET_LOGON_INFO should contain an unsigned 32‐bit
>> >> MessageType
>> >> >>> field, set to 0x00000026, that indicates the message is a
>> >> >>> NETLOGON_TICKET_LOGON_INFO message. Other than that, I’m not sure
>> >> what
>> >> >>> I’m doing wrong. Are the ticket fields arrays, are depicted in the
>> >> >>> diagram, or pointers, as claimed in the documentation?
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> I can provide traces showing the problem if you would like.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Cheers,
>> >> >>> Jo (she/her)
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> >> cifs-protocol mailing list
>> >> >> cifs-protocol at lists.samba.org
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.samba.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fcifs-protocol&data=05%7C02%7Csrenaden%40microsoft.com%7C2515a7bc13144af3cc4508dca7abc215%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638569603359156944%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=EhQT6jFY2Y2nkBHHgbv2sgAAUWswrKJYJEsm9%2B%2BboQA%3D&reserved=0 <https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol> <https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.samba.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fcifs-protocol&data=05%7C02%7Csrenaden%40microsoft.com%7C2515a7bc13144af3cc4508dca7abc215%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638569603359159676%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=oyfphvgOYrP1048%2BcS7DSkPNMsu%2Fv9JTsMEcaRQax%2FA%3D&reserved=0 <https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol>> <https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.samba.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fcifs-protocol&data=05%7C02%7Csrenaden%40microsoft.com%7C2515a7bc13144af3cc4508dca7abc215%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638569603359162377%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=ljYl8cnegs5RL6G5o3elasICBHIzibyS%2Buv%2FPlMR4sQ%3D&reserved=0 <https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.samba.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fcifs-protocol&data=05%7C02%7Csrenaden%40microsoft.com%7C2515a7bc13144af3cc4508dca7abc215%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638569603359165080%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=ntn5nGpX2Pdtm9giZ0xVnIwtiSmtz4w8W9tAhxpqLe0%3D&reserved=0 <https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol>>> <https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.samba.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fcifs-protocol&data=05%7C02%7Csrenaden%40microsoft.com%7C2515a7bc13144af3cc4508dca7abc215%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638569603359167775%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=JO3PzGktUxz5h7W7NGS1FV17CQPLiM38S09ND2yq%2Bw0%3D&reserved=0 <https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.samba.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fcifs-protocol&data=05%7C02%7Csrenaden%40microsoft.com%7C2515a7bc13144af3cc4508dca7abc215%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638569603359170469%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=rB0WKynZuip6%2F5qd6EgAmclKRc7YFLzaOuc%2FBYFn65o%3D&reserved=0 <https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.samba.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fcifs-protocol&data=05%7C02%7Csrenaden%40microsoft.com%7C2515a7bc13144af3cc4508dca7abc215%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638569603359173145%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=YzKMSnMPfSK27kJKsxxzBtOEJRvd1zbxbJL%2BJWzKpmU%3D&reserved=0 <https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol>>>>
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > cifs-protocol mailing list
>> > cifs-protocol at lists.samba.org
>> >
>> https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.samba.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fcifs-protocol&data=05%7C02%7Csrenaden%40microsoft.com%7C2515a7bc13144af3cc4508dca7abc215%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638569603359175873%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=DWb6euDhkPfO8oFFd0QVF8nwfJ%2BqM%2FAn3iuy3MyqkLM%3D&reserved=0 <https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol> <https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.samba.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fcifs-protocol&data=05%7C02%7Csrenaden%40microsoft.com%7C2515a7bc13144af3cc4508dca7abc215%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638569603359178593%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=slAyU44l1mxExOPPD0fHFxX3%2FMxehVZFC%2F62ee9%2BRAE%3D&reserved=0 <https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol>>
More information about the cifs-protocol
mailing list