[cifs-protocol] Two Windows 7 machines running same command, with different operations
Stephen Martin
sm at hypersrv.com
Fri Mar 24 15:16:20 UTC 2017
Thanks, I too thought thay maybe this list was not right, Do you know a
better suited one? There is not much in the Windows world most of the
list are for SAMBA.
My server implementation is a Windows server 2012, How do you know what
version it is using? I cannot see one in the wireshark diessection and
the Windows 7 clients dont seem to have a way to check. The server
however, now you have prompted me to check does say:
*EnableSMB2Protocol : False*
PS C:\Users\administrator.PABLA> Get-SmbServerConfiguration
AnnounceServer : False
AsynchronousCredits : 64
AutoShareServer : True
AutoShareWorkstation : True
CachedOpenLimit : 5
AnnounceComment :
EnableDownlevelTimewarp : False
EnableLeasing : True
EnableMultiChannel : True
EnableStrictNameChecking : True
AutoDisconnectTimeout : 0
DurableHandleV2TimeoutInSeconds : 30
EnableAuthenticateUserSharing : False
EnableForcedLogoff : True
EnableOplocks : True
EnableSecuritySignature : False
ServerHidden : True
IrpStackSize : 15
KeepAliveTime : 2
MaxChannelPerSession : 32
MaxMpxCount : 50
MaxSessionPerConnection : 16384
MaxThreadsPerQueue : 20
MaxWorkItems : 1
NullSessionPipes :
NullSessionShares :
OplockBreakWait : 35
PendingClientTimeoutInSeconds : 120
RequireSecuritySignature : False
EnableSMB1Protocol : True
*EnableSMB2Protocol : False*
Smb2CreditsMax : 2048
Smb2CreditsMin : 128
SmbServerNameHardeningLevel : 0
TreatHostAsStableStorage : False
ValidateAliasNotCircular : True
ValidateShareScope : True
ValidateShareScopeNotAliased : True
ValidateTargetName : True
EncryptData : False
RejectUnencryptedAccess : True
On 24/03/2017 14:12, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 12:58:32PM +0000, Stephen Martin via cifs-protocol wrote:
>> I am trying to track down a performance issue we are having with some of
>> our workstations. It would appeart that some of our Windows 7 machines
>> access SMB files differently and I believe this may be the cause of the
>> performance issues
> Not sure this is the right list, but: -- why are you using SMB1??
>
> What's your server implementation?
>
> Volker
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/cifs-protocol/attachments/20170324/5afea320/attachment.html>
More information about the cifs-protocol
mailing list