[cifs-protocol] [REG:117052515795488] : Q4 of 4: Client behavior guidance of DRS_GET_TGT flag in GetNCChanges

[Sreekanth Nadendla]

Hello Andrew, I’m resolving this incident 117052515795488 as duplicate of the issue raised by Tim Beale (117060115827644). Just an FYI.

Regards,
Sreekanth Nadendla
Microsoft Windows Open Specifications

From: Sreekanth Nadendla
Sent: Thursday, June 8, 2017 5:05 PM
To: "abartlet at samba.org" <abartlet at samba.org>; "cifs-protocol at lists.samba.org" <cifs-protocol at lists.samba.org>; "garming at catalyst.net.nz" <garming at catalyst.net.nz>
Cc: "MSSolve Case Email" <casemail at microsoft.com>
Subject: [REG:117052515795488] : Q4 of 4: Client behavior guidance of DRS_GET_TGT flag in GetNCChanges

[dochelp on bcc]
[+casemail]

Andrew,

Today we create four cases per your request.  This thread concerns issue Q4 of 4:

Case 4: Client behavior guidance of DRS_GET_TGT flag in GetNCChanges
The request is to provide clarity so that the server side can implement  DRS_GET_TGT poperly.
DRS_GET_TGT flag syncing particular link values.
Needs tag object clarification, when linked object is deleted, or not present, etc.
[MS-DRSR]
4.1.10 IDL_DRSGetNCChanges (Opnum 3)
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd207691.aspx
4.1.10.5 Server Behavior of the IDL_DRSGetNCChanges Method
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd207741.aspx
4.1.10.6 Client Behavior When Receiving the IDL_DRSGetNCChanges
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd207757.aspx


Regards,
Sreekanth Nadendla
Microsoft Windows Open Specifications

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/cifs-protocol/attachments/20170608/25aac392/attachment.html>