[cifs-protocol] [REG:115100613235242] Send oplock breaks unencrypted, as lease breaks are sent plain?
edgaro at microsoft.com
Tue Oct 6 16:07:08 UTC 2015
[Case number in subject]
[bcc dochelp, cc casemail]
Glad to hear from you. We've created the case number 115100613235242 for this inquiry.
I will look into this and follow-up soon.
From: Volker Lendecke [mailto:Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE]
Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2015 10:51 AM
To: Interoperability Documentation Help <dochelp at microsoft.com>
Cc: cifs-protocol at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [cifs-protocol] Send oplock breaks unencrypted, as lease breaks are sent plain?
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 04:35:36PM +0200, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> Testing leases and oplocks against Windows 8 over encrypted smb3 I see
> that I get lease breaks in plain text, unencrypted, but oplock breaks
> are sent encrypted by Windows 8. Samba does the same, however a
> Windows 8 client seems very unhappy with our unencrypted oplock
^^^^^^^^^^^ obvious typo: We send oplock breaks encrypted, is what Win8 does but which seems wrong.
> it just seems not to respect them. If we modify Samba to send oplock
> breaks unencrypted, Windows 8 client is happily downgrading the
> oplock, everything is fine.
> Where in the documentation can I find what is correct? And, where is
> the bug? Client or server?
> If required, I can provide network traces.
> With best regards,
> Volker Lendecke
> SerNet GmbH, Bahnhofsallee 1b, 37081 Göttingen
> phone: +49-551-370000-0, fax: +49-551-370000-9 AG Göttingen, HRB 2816,
> GF: Dr. Johannes Loxen http://www.sernet.de, mailto:kontakt at sernet.de
> cifs-protocol mailing list
> cifs-protocol at lists.samba.org
SerNet GmbH, Bahnhofsallee 1b, 37081 Göttingen
phone: +49-551-370000-0, fax: +49-551-370000-9 AG Göttingen, HRB 2816, GF: Dr. Johannes Loxen http://www.sernet.de, mailto:kontakt at sernet.de
More information about the cifs-protocol