[cifs-protocol] 115070812924583 No mention of deviation from MS-KILE regarding non-gssapi or absent checksums in AP-REQ
Andrew Bartlett
abartlet at samba.org
Thu Jul 30 21:18:19 UTC 2015
On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 18:37 +0000, Sreekanth Nadendla wrote:
> Hello Andrew,
> I've verified this and we are adding the following text In MS-KILE
> section "3.4.5 Message Processing Events and Sequencing Rules", to
> explain the deviation you have reported.
>
> When the checksum field is not present, the application server SHOULD
> process the requests as though none of the flags (RFC 4121 section
> 4.1.1.1) are set and SHOULD NOT check channel binding information
> (RFC 4121 section 4.1.2.1).
That is almost correct. It also needs to say 'or if the checksum is
not of type GSSAPI_CHECKSUM'. BTW, is a non-GSSAPI checksum ever
checked?
Thanks,
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartlett
https://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team https://samba.org
Samba Development and Support, Catalyst IT
https://catalyst.net.nz/services/samba
More information about the cifs-protocol
mailing list