[cifs-protocol] [REG:113102210883291] - [MS-SMB2] 3.3.5.22.1 NT_STATUS_REQUEST_NOT_ACCEPTED?
Volker Lendecke
Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE
Fri Nov 15 09:39:17 MST 2013
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 04:19:52PM +0000, Edgar Olougouna wrote:
> Agreed, you are right. The break to L2 does require a
> response whereas the break L2->None does not. The break
> L2->None is to inform the client so it arrives at the same
> consistent state.
Ok, thanks. What's the way I can keep informed about the
doc updates?
Volker
--
SerNet GmbH, Bahnhofsallee 1b, 37081 Göttingen
phone: +49-551-370000-0, fax: +49-551-370000-9
AG Göttingen, HRB 2816, GF: Dr. Johannes Loxen
http://www.sernet.de, mailto:kontakt at sernet.de
More information about the cifs-protocol
mailing list