[cifs-protocol] [REG:113102210883291] - [MS-SMB2] NT_STATUS_REQUEST_NOT_ACCEPTED?

Volker Lendecke Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE
Fri Nov 15 09:39:17 MST 2013

On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 04:19:52PM +0000, Edgar Olougouna wrote:
> Agreed, you are right. The break to L2 does require a
> response whereas the break L2->None  does not. The break
> L2->None is to inform the client so it arrives at the same
> consistent state.

Ok, thanks. What's the way I can keep informed about the
doc updates?


SerNet GmbH, Bahnhofsallee 1b, 37081 Göttingen
phone: +49-551-370000-0, fax: +49-551-370000-9
AG Göttingen, HRB 2816, GF: Dr. Johannes Loxen
http://www.sernet.de, mailto:kontakt at sernet.de

More information about the cifs-protocol mailing list