[cifs-protocol] [REG:111091961780016] Re: - About stage_header data

[Obaid Farooqi]

Hi Matthieu:
Can you please provide information requested in the my previous email?

Regards,
Obaid Farooqi
Escalation Engineer | Microsoft

Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority.  If you would like to provide feedback on your case you may contact my manager at allisong at microsoft.com


-----Original Message-----
From: Obaid Farooqi 
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 12:44 PM
To: 'Matthieu Patou'
Cc: MSSolve Case Email; 'pfif at tridgell.net'; 'cifs-protocol at samba.org'
Subject: RE:[REG:111091961780016] Re: - About stage_header data

Hi Matthieu:
I looked in code as well as debugged it  and it is not obvious why the state be set to 6. Is it possible that the parser is not parsing the data correctly?
You can send me the whole packet that is sent by the Windows server and I'll hand parse it to see if that is the case or if you prefer, you can hand parse it yourself and let me know.
If it is possible for you to get a time travel trace of ntfrs.exe on the Windows Server that sent CMD_RECEIVING_STAGE, that would be great.
The file transfer space is ephemeral  so please let me know when you can send the traces and I'll set up a file transfer space for this and will send you the latest version of the Time travel trace installation binary.

Regards,
Obaid Farooqi
Escalation Engineer | Microsoft

Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority.  If you would like to provide feedback on your case you may contact my manager at allisong at microsoft.com


-----Original Message-----
From: Obaid Farooqi
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 12:34 PM
To: "Obaid Farooqi" <obaidf at microsoft.com>
Cc: "MSSolve Case Email" <casemail at microsoft.com>; "pfif at tridgell.net" <pfif at tridgell.net>; "cifs-protocol at samba.org" <cifs-protocol at samba.org>
Subject: [REG:111091961780016] Re: - About stage_header data

Hello Obaid, 

> Hi Matthieu: 
> Can you please elaborate more on the following question? 
> "Can you tell me what is the use of the command's flag for the
upstream partner (the receiver of the file)." 
> 
> The flags for CHANGE_ORDER_COMMAND are documented in section 2.2.3.2.
Can you please be more specific? 
My question is this status information just informative, or should the upstream partner do some checks on it, and what about for the downstream partner. 

The fact it's stated that the downstream partner MUST set a particular value seems to indicate that checks are made on this attribute. 

Matthieu. 

--
Matthieu Patou
Samba Team
http://samba.org 



Microsoft is committed to protecting your privacy.  Please read the Microsoft Privacy Statement for more information.The above is an email for a support case from Microsoft Corp.REPLY ALL TO THIS MESSAGE or INCLUDE casemail at microsoft.com IN YOUR REPLY if you want your response added to the case automatically. For technical assistance, please include the Support Engineer on the TO: line. Thank you.