[cifs-protocol] clarification about paragraph 3.1.1.5.2.4 in MS-ADTS

[Obaid Farooqi]

Hi Matthieu:
I'll help you with this issue and will be in touch as soon as I have an answer.

Regards,
Obaid Farooqi
Escalation Engineer | Microsoft

Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority.  If you would like to provide feedback on your case you may contact my manager at allisong <at> microsoft <dot> com


-----Original Message-----
From: Matthieu Patou [mailto:mat at samba.org] 
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 4:55 AM
To: Interoperability Documentation Help; pfif at tridgell.net; cifs-protocol at samba.org
Subject: clarification about paragraph 3.1.1.5.2.4 in MS-ADTS

Hello

Paragraph 3.1.1.5.2.4 says:
" siteLink, siteLinkBridge, nTDSConnection objects, and any object whose parent is a site or subnet object: FLAG_CONFIG_ALLOW_RENAME."


When you use the term parent do you mean direct parent or any parent at 
any level, that is to say if CN=mysite,CN=configuration,DC=domain,DC=tld 
has an object class of "site" is 
CN=foo,CN=subsite,CN=mysite,CN=Configuration,DC=domain,DC=tld also 
concerned by this rule or just the direct childs ?

Regards.

Matthieu.

-- 
Matthieu Patou
Samba Team        http://samba.org
Private repo      http://git.samba.org/?p=mat/samba.git;a=summary