[cifs-protocol] clarification about paragraph 126.96.36.199.2.4 in MS-ADTS
Sebastian.Canevari at microsoft.com
Mon Jul 25 09:27:20 MDT 2011
Someone from my team will contact you shortly to follow up on this question.
Thanks and regards,
Escalation Engineer, US-CSS DSC PROTOCOL TEAM
7100 N Hwy 161, Irving, TX - 75039
"Las Colinas - LC2"
Tel: +1 469 775 7849
e-mail: sebastc at microsoft.com
Exeeding your expectations is my highest priority. If you would like to provide feedback on your case you may contact my manager at allisong at microsoft.com
From: Matthieu Patou [mat at samba.org]
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 4:55 AM
To: Interoperability Documentation Help; pfif at tridgell.net; cifs-protocol at samba.org
Subject: clarification about paragraph 188.8.131.52.2.4 in MS-ADTS
Paragraph 184.108.40.206.2.4 says:
"siteLink, siteLinkBridge, nTDSConnection objects, and any object whose
parent is a site or
subnet object: FLAG_CONFIG_ALLOW_RENAME."
When you use the term parent do you mean direct parent or any parent at
any level, that is to say if CN=mysite,CN=configuration,DC=domain,DC=tld
has an object class of "site" is
concerned by this rule or just the direct childs ?
Samba Team http://samba.org
Private repo http://git.samba.org/?p=mat/samba.git;a=summary
More information about the cifs-protocol