[cifs-protocol] [REG:111020102754615] behavior of windows with/without the DS-Replication-Get-Changes-In-Filtered-Set right
mat at samba.org
Wed Feb 23 23:24:23 MST 2011
On 24/02/2011 01:21, Bryan Burgin wrote:
> Regarding this issue "what is exactly 'the filtered attribute set'?", I'm going to go ahead and close this incident since I didn't hear back. However, if there are lingering questions please let me know.
> As for your question re DIRSYNC DirSyncControlValue size byte count v attribute count and upper/lower limits (the second of your three DIRSYNC questions), I found some information (and provided you that information separately). Ifiled a request with the product group with my observations to get their clarification. I'll send you more information when I get it.
> Regarding your third issue "server behavior with dirsync control when the search base is not a root of a nc"/receive LDAP error 50 LDAP_INSUFFICIENT_ACCESS_RIGHT when LDAP_DIRSYNC_OBJECT_SECURITY not set and LDAP error 53 LDAP_UNWILLING_TO_PERFORM when set: I'll send you separate mail.
So I should expect news on this soon.
Thanks for your help.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bryan Burgin
> Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 1:40 PM
> To: 'mat at samba.org'; 'pfif at tridgell.net'; 'cifs-protocol at samba.org'
> Cc: MSSolve Case Email
> Subject: RE: [REG:111020102754615] behavior of windows with/without the DS-Replication-Get-Changes-In-Filtered-Set right
> Sorry for the delay in this. Re "what is exactly 'the filtered attribute set'"? The term "filtered attribute set" is mentioned several times in [MS-ADTS] and are discussed at [MS-ADA3] 2.233 "Attribute serachFlags" as fRODCFilteredAttribute and [MS-ADTS] 2.2.9 "Search Flags" RO (fRODCFilteredAttribute, 0x00000200): Specifies that the attribute is a member of the filtered attribute set.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matthieu Patou [mailto:mat at samba.org]
> Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 2:35 PM
> To: pfif at tridgell.net; Interoperability Documentation Help; cifs-protocol at samba.org
> Subject: behavior of windows with/without the DS-Replication-Get-Changes-In-Filtered-Set right
> Dear doc team,
> This page,
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc223347%28v=prot.10%29.aspx, says:
> "If the flag is not specified, the server MUST do the following:
> If the server is running Windows Server(r) 2008 operating system or Windows Server(r) 2008 R2 operating system and the client has requested any attributes in the filtered attribute set, the server checks that the client has the DS-Replication-Get-Changes-In-Filtered-Set control access right (section 184.108.40.206.7.71
> or else returns the /insufficientAccessRights/ error to the client."
> The flag that we are talking about is LDAP_SERVER_DIRSYNC_OID.
> I either have some problems to understand the meaning of "requested any attributes in the filtered attribute set" or I have problems requesting them or something else as I'm unable to test this particular case.
> In w2k8r2 I created a user and granted him DS-Replication-Get-Changes, but not DS-Replication-Get-Changes-In-Filtered-Set so I'm expecting that when I add the filter "(samaccountname=ad*)", in the ldap request, that the system will reject my request but it's not so I'm wondering what is exactly "the filtered attribute set" ? Can you clarify this point ?
> Matthieu Patou.
> Matthieu Patou
> Samba Team http://samba.org
> Private repo http://git.samba.org/?p=mat/samba.git;a=summary
Samba Team http://samba.org
Private repo http://git.samba.org/?p=mat/samba.git;a=summary
More information about the cifs-protocol