[cifs-protocol] [REG:111082453208213] RE: typo in ms-frs1.pdf ?
mat at samba.org
Wed Aug 24 15:23:33 MDT 2011
Ah ok, sorry the wording was not clear to me I might miss understood it,
it's referring to the next command and I thought it was referring the
On 24/08/2011 23:00, Hongwei Sun wrote:
> It seems that this is not a typo. The COMM_COMMAND is the command to be sent as the result of the processing of CMD_NEED_JOIN. It should be CMD_START_JOIN as indicated in the sentence above. If you look at the next section for " COMM_COMMAND Is CMD_START_JOIN" , you will see the similar thing.
> Please let me know if this answers your question. If you see a behavior on wire that is contradictory to the documentation , please share the trace.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cifs-protocol-bounces at cifs.org [mailto:cifs-protocol-bounces at cifs.org] On Behalf Of Matthieu Patou
> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 6:08 AM
> To: Interoperability Documentation Help; pfif at tridgell.net; cifs-protocol at samba.org
> Subject: [cifs-protocol] typo in ms-frs1.pdf ?
> Hello Dochelp,
> In paragraph 220.127.116.11.2 COMM_COMMAND Is CMD_NEED_JOIN
> It is said that:
> "The downstream partner sent CMD_NEED_JOIN to inform the upstream partner that a Join operation is needed (section 18.104.22.168). The upstream partner MUST respond with a CMD_START_JOIN packet.
> COMM_COMMAND MUST be CMD_START_JOIN (0x122)."
> I think there is a typo and the line should be COMM_COMMAND MUST be CMD_NEED_JOIN (0x121), traces between 2 Windows DCs seems to confirm.
> Can you confirm too ?
> Matthieu Patou
> Samba Team http://samba.org
> Private repo http://git.samba.org/?p=mat/samba.git;a=summary
> cifs-protocol mailing list
> cifs-protocol at cifs.org
Samba Team http://samba.org
Private repo http://git.samba.org/?p=mat/samba.git;a=summary
More information about the cifs-protocol