[cifs-protocol] [REG:111082453208213] RE: typo in ms-frs1.pdf ?
hongweis at microsoft.com
Wed Aug 24 15:00:18 MDT 2011
It seems that this is not a typo. The COMM_COMMAND is the command to be sent as the result of the processing of CMD_NEED_JOIN. It should be CMD_START_JOIN as indicated in the sentence above. If you look at the next section for " COMM_COMMAND Is CMD_START_JOIN" , you will see the similar thing.
Please let me know if this answers your question. If you see a behavior on wire that is contradictory to the documentation , please share the trace.
From: cifs-protocol-bounces at cifs.org [mailto:cifs-protocol-bounces at cifs.org] On Behalf Of Matthieu Patou
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 6:08 AM
To: Interoperability Documentation Help; pfif at tridgell.net; cifs-protocol at samba.org
Subject: [cifs-protocol] typo in ms-frs1.pdf ?
In paragraph 188.8.131.52.2 COMM_COMMAND Is CMD_NEED_JOIN
It is said that:
"The downstream partner sent CMD_NEED_JOIN to inform the upstream partner that a Join operation is needed (section 184.108.40.206). The upstream partner MUST respond with a CMD_START_JOIN packet.
COMM_COMMAND MUST be CMD_START_JOIN (0x122)."
I think there is a typo and the line should be COMM_COMMAND MUST be CMD_NEED_JOIN (0x121), traces between 2 Windows DCs seems to confirm.
Can you confirm too ?
Samba Team http://samba.org
Private repo http://git.samba.org/?p=mat/samba.git;a=summary
cifs-protocol mailing list
cifs-protocol at cifs.org
More information about the cifs-protocol