[cifs-protocol] [REG:111072568497582] clarification about paragraph 3.1.1.5.2.4 in MS-ADTS

[Matthieu Patou]

Hi Obaid !
On 17/08/2011 23:44, Obaid Farooqi wrote:
> Hi Matthieu:
> Please let me know if my response resolved your problem.
Yes,

Sorry for the late answer, I'm a bit out of sync right now so don't 
hesitate to remind me to answer you !

Matthieu.
>
> Regards,
> Obaid Farooqi
> Escalation Engineer | Microsoft
>
> Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority.  If you would like to provide feedback on your case you may contact my manager at allisong at microsoft.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Obaid Farooqi
> Sent: Monday, August 08, 2011 5:12 PM
> To: 'mat at samba.org'
> Cc: 'pfif at tridgell.net'; 'cifs-protocol at samba.org'; MSSolve Case Email
> Subject: RE:[REG:111072568497582] clarification about paragraph 3.1.1.5.2.4 in MS-ADTS
>
> Hi Matthieu:
>
> In the context of MS-ADTS, the general convention is that the term “parent” means the immediate parent and term “ancestor” means immediate parent as well as indirect parents.
>
> The term parent in the text from section 3.1.1.5.2 that you inquired about adheres to the above definition.
>
> Please let me know if it answers your question. If it does, I’ll consider this issue resolved.
>
>
> Regards,
> Obaid Farooqi
> Escalation Engineer | Microsoft
>
> Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority.  If you would like to provide feedback on your case you may contact my manager at allisong at microsoft.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Obaid Farooqi
> Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 2:52 PM
> To: 'mat at samba.org'
> Cc: pfif at tridgell.net; cifs-protocol at samba.org
> Subject: RE: clarification about paragraph 3.1.1.5.2.4 in MS-ADTS
>
> Hi Matthieu:
> I'll help you with this issue and will be in touch as soon as I have an answer.
>
> Regards,
> Obaid Farooqi
> Escalation Engineer | Microsoft
>
> Exceeding your expectations is my highest priority.  If you would like to provide feedback on your case you may contact my manager at allisong<at>  microsoft<dot>  com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matthieu Patou [mailto:mat at samba.org]
> Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 4:55 AM
> To: Interoperability Documentation Help; pfif at tridgell.net; cifs-protocol at samba.org
> Subject: clarification about paragraph 3.1.1.5.2.4 in MS-ADTS
>
> Hello
>
> Paragraph 3.1.1.5.2.4 says:
> " siteLink, siteLinkBridge, nTDSConnection objects, and any object whose parent is a site or subnet object: FLAG_CONFIG_ALLOW_RENAME."
>
>
> When you use the term parent do you mean direct parent or any parent at any level, that is to say if CN=mysite,CN=configuration,DC=domain,DC=tld
> has an object class of "site" is
> CN=foo,CN=subsite,CN=mysite,CN=Configuration,DC=domain,DC=tld also concerned by this rule or just the direct childs ?
>
> Regards.
>
> Matthieu.
>
> --
> Matthieu Patou
> Samba Team        http://samba.org
> Private repo      http://git.samba.org/?p=mat/samba.git;a=summary
>
>
>
> Microsoft is committed to protecting your privacy.  Please read the Microsoft Privacy Statement for more information.The above is an email for a support case from Microsoft Corp.REPLY ALL TO THIS MESSAGE or INCLUDE casemail at microsoft.com IN YOUR REPLY if you want your response added to the case automatically. For technical assistance, please include the Support Engineer on the TO: line. Thank you.


-- 
Matthieu Patou
Samba Team        http://samba.org
Private repo      http://git.samba.org/?p=mat/samba.git;a=summary