[cifs-protocol] [REG: 110062157456375] [MS-ADTS] 188.8.131.52.3 msDs-supportedEncryptionTypes usage
edgaro at microsoft.com
Thu Jun 24 15:39:35 MDT 2010
I am researching this issue and will update you as soon as I have news.
From: Edgar Olougouna
Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 11:02 AM
To: 'abartlet at samba.org'
Cc: Bill Wesse; Matthieu Patou (mat+Informatique.Samba at matws.net); 'pfif at tridgell.net'; 'cifs-protocol at samba.org'
Subject: [REG: 110062157456375] [MS-ADTS] 184.108.40.206.3 msDs-supportedEncryptionTypes usage
I have created case number 110062157456375 for your inquiry regarding msDs-supportedEncryptionTypes usage. One of my teammates will be in touch with soon.
From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abartlet at samba.org]
Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 1:56 AM
To: Bill Wesse
Cc: Matthieu Patou; pfif at tridgell.net; cifs-protocol at samba.org
Subject: Re: [cifs-protocol] Status: SRX091220600031 [MS-ADTS] 220.127.116.11.3 msDs-supportedEncryptionTypes usage
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 16:44 +0000, Bill Wesse wrote:
> Good morning Matthieu. Thanks for your patience. Our documentation team has responded to 3 of the four cross-reference requests. Details are shown below, as well as an attached pdf ([MS-ADTS]_Changes.pdf) showing new text for that document.
I've just started looking at this area again, and am very glad to have found this thread, because I think there needs to be a few more links or references here. There is no information in MS-KILE to indicate that this attribute changes KDC behaviour, for example.
Where should I look to understand how this attribute changes the KDC, other than the blog post (which is not precise regarding differences between AS-REQ and TGS-REQ use of the keys)?
More information about the cifs-protocol