[cifs-protocol] FW: FW: Inconsistencies in ad-schema docs and text files SRX090109601490
johndun at microsoft.com
Fri Jan 8 09:22:42 MST 2010
Thanks for your question. Someone on my team will be contacting you soon to assist with this matter.
Senior Escalation Engineer Microsoft Corporation US-CSS DSC PROTOCOL TEAM
Email: johndun at microsoft.com
From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abartlet at samba.org]
Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 10:11 PM
To: Interoperability Documentation Help
Cc: pfif at tridgell.net; cifs-protocol at samba.org; Andrew Tridgell
Subject: Re: [cifs-protocol] FW: FW: Inconsistencies in ad-schema docs and text files SRX090109601490
On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 09:07 -0700, Richard Guthrie wrote:
> Attached are schema files for Windows 2008 and Windows 2008R2/Windows 7. The Windows 2008 schema should not have any issues based upon initial validation against the Windows 2008 schema. The release notes for the Windows 2008R2/Windows 7 schema are as follows (All issues are under investigation at this time):
> 1. cn: Computer - Schema pulled from Windows 2008R2 shows two additional attributes for systemMayContain msTSSecondaryDesktopBL, msTSPrimaryDesktopBL. These are not present in the latest documentation for this attribute.
> 2. cn: Domain-DNS - defaultSecurityDescriptor in does not match the schema pulled from Windows 2008R2 3. cn: inetOrgPerson - defaultSecurityDescriptor does not match the schema pulled from Windows 2008R2 4. cn: Object-Class - searchFlags do not match the schema pulled from Windows 2008R2 5. cn: Sam-Domain - defaultSecurityDescriptor does not match the schema pulled from Windows 2008R2 6. cn: Schema - This attribute may be missing from the schema documentation. It shows up in the Windows 2008R2 schema so it is being investigated.
> 7. cn: Top - There appears to be a discrepancy with the generated Windows 2008R2 schema and the documented schema for systemMayContain attribute.
Did anyone ever solve these, and can I get a correct file for the final release of Windows 2008 R2? Do you have a script to validate these?
We are finding far more errors than just the above (diff to follow shortly), as it seems these files are still generated by hand (why?!?)
Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.
More information about the cifs-protocol