[cifs-protocol] FW: FW: Inconsistencies in ad-schema docs and text files SRX090109601490
hongweis at microsoft.com
Fri Feb 12 17:32:28 MST 2010
Thanks for the clarification! It helps a lot. Do you mean "identical" to the Windows 2008 R2 schema implemented on a windows DC ? Does "Exact Value comparison" mean to compare the elements between the schema file we sent you and a real Windows 2008 R2 schema ?
From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abartlet at samba.org]
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 5:58 PM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: tridge at samba.org; CIFS Protocol
Subject: RE: [cifs-protocol] FW: FW: Inconsistencies in ad-schema docs and text files SRX090109601490
On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 22:55 +0000, Hongwei Sun wrote:
> We are in the process to update our MS-ADA* documents to reflect all the changes you made to the schema. I just want to confirm how you got these changes and if all these changes are essential. Your comments in diff below mentioned only the typos.
> "The schema from WSPP had a number of typos that prevented it from
> working. These changes allow it to work with Samba, and allow w2k8r2
> to run DCPROMO against Samba successfully"
> How about the other changes, especially all these attributes adding
> SystemFlags: 0 ? If you don't have these changes, does it affect the
> functionality of W2k8 R2 to join Samba domain ? Have you got the
> other changes by comparing with an existing W2k8R2 schema ? The
> following is the list of attributes that affect schema documents.
We didn't do this as a 'does this make things break', but as 'what is required to make the schema come out identical again'.
We don't trust that we can write tests that can prove that a different schema is equivalent for all client software, so instead we go for exact value comparison.
Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.
More information about the cifs-protocol