[cifs-protocol] [REG:110040646791367] : RE: Numerical value of FLAG_ATTR_REQ_PARTIAL_SET_MEMBER

[Hongwei Sun]

Nadya,

   The definition of the valid systemFlags can be found in 2.2.10 and 2.2.11 of MS-ADTS.  The numeric values of the two flags you mentioned are:
 
	PS (FLAG_ATTR_REQ_PARTIAL_SET_MEMBER or FLAG_CR_NTDS_DOMAIN, 0x00000002)   2.2.10 MS-ADTS  System Flags

      CR (FLAG_ATTR_IS_CRITICAL, 0x00000001)                                     2.2.11 MS-ADTS  schemaFlagsEx Flags

  Please let us know if you have more questions.

Thanks!

Hongwei           
        

-----Original Message-----
From: cifs-protocol-bounces at cifs.org [mailto:cifs-protocol-bounces at cifs.org] On Behalf Of Nadezhda Ivanova
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 7:07 AM
To: Interoperability Documentation Help
Cc: cifs-protocol at samba.org
Subject: [cifs-protocol] Numerical value of FLAG_ATTR_REQ_PARTIAL_SET_MEMBER

Hi,
I am not able to find the actual numerical value of FLAG_ATTR_IS_CRITICAL (systemFlagsEx) and FLAG_ATTR_REQ_PARTIAL_SET_MEMBER for systemFlags. I am working on access checks for DRS replication and this blocks my work, so I would appreciate a fast response...

Regards,
Nadya
_______________________________________________
cifs-protocol mailing list
cifs-protocol at cifs.org
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol