[cifs-protocol] RE: [Pfif] erroneous references to little-endian
billwe at microsoft.com
Fri May 1 08:50:39 GMT 2009
Thanks! That change is indeed set for the upcoming release. Nice to work with you again...
MCSE, MCTS / Senior Escalation Engineer, US-CSS DSC PROTOCOL TEAM
8055 Microsoft Way
Charlotte, NC 28273
TEL: +1(980) 776-8200
CELL: +1(704) 661-5438
FAX: +1(704) 665-9606
From: Steve French [mailto:smfrench at gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 1:54 PM
To: Bill Wesse
Cc: pfif at tridgell.net; cifs-protocol at samba.org
Subject: Re: [Pfif] erroneous references to little-endian
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Bill Wesse <billwe at microsoft.com> wrote:
> Good day once again Mr. French! I have verified that our [MS-SMB] working document has already incorporated the necessary deletion of the DialectCount field (2.2.4). The changes will be available in a future document refresh; notifications concerning protocol documentation updates to the Open Specifications are announced via our Protocols Perspective e-Newsletter.
> I also checked Network Monitor 3.3 smb2.npl, which has the 'struct SMB2ResponseNegotiate.DialectCount' field defined, and have filed a bug against that. Please read on for further information about this!
> Thank you very much for bringing this to our attention. Please let me know if this answers your question satisfactorily;
> so, I will consider your question resolved.
Sounds fine. Note that the most recently released (dated 4/11 but
only released in last few weeks or less) MS-SMB2.pdf still contains
this error, so I will look for it in the May updates.
More information about the cifs-protocol