[cifs-protocol] RE: CAR - problem with MS-ADTS docs on
hongweis at microsoft.com
Tue Apr 28 22:08:30 GMT 2009
We will rename POSSSUPNOSUBCLASSES to make it easier to read by adding underscore as you suggested. It will appear in a future release of MS-ADTS document. Thanks for your suggestion!!
From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abartlet at samba.org]
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 1:34 AM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: tridge at samba.org; pfif at tridgell.net; cifs-protocol at samba.org
Subject: Re: [cifs-protocol] RE: CAR - problem with MS-ADTS docs on possibleInferiors
On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 16:03 -0700, Hongwei Sun wrote:
> Thanks for pointing out the problem in the description of POSSSUPERIORS(). We revised the definition of the function in section 184.108.40.206.2 of future release of MS-ADTS. Please let us know if there is any problem.
Can you please rename POSSSUPNOSUBCLASSES? It's a real mouthful and really, really painful to read. A few underscores would make the world of difference.
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc. http://redhat.com
More information about the cifs-protocol