[cifs-protocol] RE: MS-SAMR missing SID name use type ?

Andrew Bartlett abartlet at samba.org
Fri Oct 24 02:48:11 GMT 2008


On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 17:22 -0700, Obaid Farooqi wrote:
> Good Afternoon Ronnie:
> I am still waiting for your response. We need this info to move forward on this case.

> 
> I believe there might be one additional value for this enum to
> describe a sid for a machine/computer :
> 
> SidTypeComputer = 9   (or something similar)
> 
> 
> This assumption is based on Wireshark and Samba4 code.

Because of the long history of Samba - without suitable documentation
for the most part, sometimes myths and legends build up.  That said, I'm
unable to produce this value on the wire for LSA lookup names.  

What we are asking is for is some research and clarification (if
possible).  We can't ask you how we got this in the first place, but we
were hoping you might be able to do some digging, to check the IDL and
see if this value ever occours in this enum in windows (ie, is this a
cut-down enum), or if there is another similar (but not identical) enum
that we might have got confused with.

Thanks,

-- 
Andrew Bartlett
http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/cifs-protocol/attachments/20081024/be3836a2/attachment.bin


More information about the cifs-protocol mailing list