[cifs-protocol] RE: MS-SAMR missing SID name use type ?

[Obaid Farooqi]

Good Morning Ronnie:
I haven't received the information I requested in the following email. Please provide the information. We need this to move forward in this case.

Thanks
Obaid Farooqi
Sr. SEE | Microsoft

-----Original Message-----
From: Obaid Farooqi
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2008 10:45 AM
To: ronnie sahlberg
Cc: pfif at tridgell.net; cifs-protocol at samba.org
Subject: RE: MS-SAMR missing SID name use type ?

Hi Ronnie:
I need some clarification on your question. Please provide the answers to following questions:

1. Please specify the setup in which you see this in wireshark.
2. The exact scenario in which you see it.
3. Please send Wireshark or netmon trace where you see this emun member. Please also specify frame and byte where you see it.

Thanks
Obaid Farooqi

-----Original Message-----
From: ronnie sahlberg [mailto:ronniesahlberg at gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 11:35 AM
To: Interoperability Documentation Help
Cc: pfif at tridgell.net; cifs-protocol at samba.org
Subject: MS-SAMR missing SID name use type ?

Hi,

I am a pfif subcontractor.

The IDL in MS-SAMR describes the types of sids as :

typedef enum _SID_NAME_USE {
    SidTypeUser = 1,
    SidTypeGroup,
    SidTypeDomain,
    SidTypeAlias,
    SidTypeWellKnownGroup,
    SidTypeDeletedAccount,
    SidTypeInvalid,
    SidTypeUnknown,
} SID_NAME_USE, *PSID_NAME_USE;


I believe there might be one additional value for this enum to
describe a sid for a machine/computer :

SidTypeComputer = 9   (or something similar)


This assumption is based on Wireshark and Samba4 code.


regards
ronnie sahlberg