[cifs-protocol] S46 test - should ioctl invalid code error code be in spec?

tridge at samba.org tridge at samba.org
Sat Jun 7 00:35:13 GMT 2008


At the plugfest this week we ran the WSPP SMB2 tests, and in test S46
Samba4 failed as we returned STATUS_FS_DRIVER_REQUIRED and we failed
the test as it was looking for STATUS_INVALID_DEVICE_REQUEST. 

In the spreadsheet describing the tests, it says that this behaviour
is normative, and comes from section If you look in
then you'll see that it lists the error code as coming from the object
store, and only lists the STATUS_INVALID_DEVICE_REQUEST as being
"windows behaviour" in the WB parts of the spec.

So perhaps this windows behaviour should now be considered normative
and moved into ?

Cheers, Tridge

More information about the cifs-protocol mailing list