[cifs-protocol] RE: Regarding [MS-KILE] 22.214.171.124 Three-Leg
DCE-Style Mutual Authentication
johndun at microsoft.com
Tue Aug 19 15:45:33 GMT 2008
I'm sorry but I really don't understand what you mean by: "The interaction with the new SPNEGO (also keyed off the use of AES) bumps up the sequence number by one."
Could you please provide me with more specifics/details? The reason that I ask is that the initial investigation by my Product Team indicates that this isn't happening in the code.
From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abartlet at samba.org]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 12:54 AM
To: John Dunning
Cc: metze at samba.org; pfif at tridgell.net; cifs-protocol at samba.org
Subject: Re: [cifs-protocol] RE: Regarding [MS-KILE] 126.96.36.199 Three-Leg DCE-Style Mutual Authentication
On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 08:52 -0700, John Dunning wrote:
> Hello Andrew,
> Do you have any new status for this? Have you determined if this is still a problem for you?
The interaction with the new SPNEGO (also keyed off the use of AES) bumps up the sequence number by one.
Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc. http://redhat.com
More information about the cifs-protocol