[ccache] base_dir and symbolic links
wettstae at gmail.com
Sun Sep 17 08:43:11 UTC 2017
> Seems like a pretty niche use case, but if you can come up with a
> patch that doesn't break too much of current behaviour - why not.
Thank you for considering it. A patch is in the attachment.
> Worst case, it could be an option (that defaulted to false) ?
I would not consider this the worst case. For me, it would be still
more convenient than keeping my own modified version around.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 1275 bytes
Desc: Do not make path canonical before making it relative
More information about the ccache