[Samba] byte range lock for Write starting on Zero and negative length ( -9223372036854775808 )
Antonio
nop07408 at sapo.pt
Fri Feb 2 12:30:11 UTC 2024
Dear All,
I'm sorry to bother the list with a problem that I am not sure
originates in Samba.
File server (no domain) is serving a mix of Windows 10 and Centos 7
clients, I have strange byte range locks.
- Server is Samba 4.17.5 / Kernel 5.14.0 Rocky 9.2
smbstatus -B gives:
- When client is Windows 10:
Byte range locks:
Pid dev:inode R/W start size SharePath Name
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1551641 2431:14156401:0 W 1000013752 1 /home/geral/DAT
APLIC/CC/ENCOMEND.DBF
- When client is CentOS 7 (Samba 4.10.16 / kernel 3.10.0)
Byte range locks:
Pid dev:inode R/W start size SharePath Name
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1835914 2431:14156401:0 W 1000013752 1 /home/geral/DAT/APLIC/CC
ENCOMEND.DBF
These are correct and the expected behaviour on both cases, files are
shared and the 1 byte locks for ~write~are correctly honoured.
Problem is with new clients CentOS Stream (Samba 4.18.6 / kernel 5.14.0)
Byte range locks:
Pid dev:inode R/W start size SharePath Name
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1832643 2431:14156401:0 R 0 -9223372036854775808
/home/geral/DAT APLIC/CC/ENCOMEND.DBF
The file gets locked for ~read~ starting at Zero and with a strange
(negative) size. No other client can access the file...
The application is an "Harbour Project" production control, accessing
many DBF/NTX files. It has been behaving rock solid for many years, many
thanks to all the Samba Team.
Linux clients (Centos7 / Centos Stream ) access the server via automount
cifs shares:
$cat /etc/auto.geral
geral -fstype=cifs,rw,noperm,credentials=/root/smb.creds ://sol/geral
Windows clients access the server via normal network shares:
net use f: \\sol\geral
The Linux executable is a single file served by the Samba server, so
both clients (Centos7 and Centos Stream) use the same executable.
My question: Has anyone seen this before, and could kindly give any
advice in which direction to search for a solution ?
I have searched the list archive, read everything related to "byte range
locks" but found no clue...
Thanks a lot.
António Vila Chã
More information about the samba
mailing list