[Samba] questions regarding 40G Samba Server
Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator
goetz.reinicke at filmakademie.de
Wed Jul 13 06:54:22 UTC 2016
Thanks! single- vs. multi threaded is a good hint.
/Götz
Am 13.07.16 um 08:35 schrieb Garland McAlexander:
> CIFS is single threaded, if you plan on using it with a large amount
> of users, you'll want to have faster cores. NFS is multi threaded, so
> you can take advantage of additional cores better. Depending on how
> many users you are serving, it sounds like a six core E5 (higher per
> core clock) would fit well.
>
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 2:29 AM, Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator
> <goetz.reinicke at filmakademie.de
> <mailto:goetz.reinicke at filmakademie.de>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> forgot that... CIFS and NFS. May be we split both to different
> servers.
> One CIFS, one NFS.
>
> Regards . Götz
>
>
> Am 13.07.16 um 08:26 schrieb Garland McAlexander:
> > What shares will you be using? (NFS, CIFS, etc)
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 2:11 AM, Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator
> > <goetz.reinicke at filmakademie.de
> <mailto:goetz.reinicke at filmakademie.de>
> > <mailto:goetz.reinicke at filmakademie.de
> <mailto:goetz.reinicke at filmakademie.de>>> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > we expect a growth in bigger file transfers (files n*10 GB up to
> > multiple 100GB) on a regular base from a smaller number of users
> > combined with the "normal" office use with word files, mail
> > profiles etc
> > from about 500 users.
> >
> > We plan a new Fileserver/Storage Head with 40Gb NICs client and
> > storage
> > side.
> >
> > What would be regarding to samba be of more importance:
> multiple Cores
> > or more MHz per core?
> >
> > Any suggestions? Feedback? Thanks! and regards . Götz
> >
>
<...>
More information about the samba
mailing list