[Samba] locking.tdb size
Christian Kujau
lists at nerdbynature.de
Wed Jul 13 01:48:06 MDT 2011
Hi,
I'm running samba-3.5.6 (Debian/stable, PowerPC) on a small LAN (really
small, 1 Mac client, 1 Windows client) serving 3 shares (1 ro, 2 rw) to
both of them and I noticed that /var/run/samba/locking.tdb sometimes grows
to several megabytes in size.
My /var/run is a tmpfs mountpoint, 10MB in total. locking.tdb is
currently 4MB in size, sometimes it grew even bigger and one time
even exceeded 10MB, IIRC. While 10MB are not much, this has been far more
than needed for years now.
I cannot say when I noticed that locking.tdb grew bigger than usual;
maybe(!) it started to act like that after the upgrade from Debian/lenny
to squeeze (samba-3.2.5 to samba-3.5.6), but I cannot say for sure.
I've found older posts with similar topics[0] and in [1] (from 2009) it
was stated that:
> 2mb is small, it *will* grow larger than this. Putting these files on
> tmpfs is not a good idea.
I keep monitoring the size of my locking.tdb for some time now and most of
the time its size is about 60 or 200KB. Only sometimes it grows to MB
ranges. The test in [1] was not able to reproduce the issue, so I still
don't know what would make locking.tdb growing like this.
Looking into locking.tdb via strings(1) reveals a lot of entries that are
not active any more, as the client who was accessing these files is no
longer online. smbstatus -L shows only a few (less than ten) locked files.
Right now, smbstatus -L shows only 3 locked files, yet locking.tdb is
still ~4MB and not shrinking.
Does anybody have an idea what to make of this?
Thanks,
Christian.
[0] http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2003-October/075116.html
[1] http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2009-February/146638.html
--
BOFH excuse #333:
A plumber is needed, the network drain is clogged
More information about the samba
mailing list