[Samba] Strange behaviour when joining the domain

Felipe Augusto van de Wiel felipe at paranacidade.org.br
Fri Sep 15 14:05:31 GMT 2006


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 09/15/2006 10:56 AM, Christian Tardif escreveu:
> Felipe Augusto van de Wiel wrote:
>>     Hmmm, AFAIK, the master should be on the PDC. My best
>> guest (if I understood correctly) is that your problem is the
>> use of slave LDAP as PDC.
> 
> You're probably right, but the fact that I'll have more than 
> one samba server to be served by the same directory tree does
> not allow me to go into this direction. I HAVE to stick with
> a master/slave scheme.

	No problem at all. But the PDC and the master should
work together. I have a network with one master (PDC) and
eight slaves (BDCs).


> Unless
> you have a way to permit machine accounts to be created on a local
> directory tree while users are on a master directory tree and replicated
> locally.

	On my network it is alittle bit different because we
keep manual control of all the machines on the domain, so we
create them manually. :)


> I don't think I had any problem when I did my first testss. The 
> ldap database whas, in fact, locally defined.

	As I said, you can have multiple servers, as long as
the PDC plays with the LDAP master. :)   The don't need to be
in the same machine.

	Kind regards,

- --
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel <felipe at paranacidade.org.br>
Coordenadoria de Tecnologia da Informação (CTI) - SEDU/PARANACIDADE
http://www.paranacidade.org.br/           Phone: (+55 41 3350 3300)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Debian - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFCrMrCj65ZxU4gPQRArHAAKCSIjIO5okSy0eCYtqh8bCKReMmLwCgnr9Q
mVEdRn9NU99NUNvdGXrXQTU=
=FvEg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the samba mailing list