[Samba] Won't %L work anymore?
Gary Algier
gaa at ulticom.com
Thu Dec 5 16:04:01 GMT 2002
Thanks! That did the trick.
BTW: The workgroup, and a bunch of other things, were identical between the
different virtual servers. Only the shares differed. I did, however, move
all the rest of the [global] parameters into the master smb.conf.
Buchan Milne wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>>Message: 6
>>Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 16:43:01 -0500
>>From: Gary Algier <gaa at ulticom.com>
>>To: samba at lists.samba.org
>>Subject: Re: [Samba] Won't %L work anymore?
>>
>>A followup to my own post:
>>
>>I went ahead and implemented a configuration with %L. It works great.
>>One problem: Micro@!#$t broke Win2k with SP3.
>>
>>My test PC was running Win2k SP2. When it connected to the server it
>>seems to have supplied the "netbios name" of my server. I went into
>>my boss's office to show him how great this works and his Win2k SP3
>>did not show the same shares. They showed the shares that would
>>show if the "real" host name is used.
>>
>>Here's my basic config:
>>
>>System OS: Solaris 2.6
>>Samba: 2.2.7
>>Hostname: tea
>>IP addresses assigned: 172.25.0.13 (tea) 172.25.0.33 (cup) 172.25.0.34
>
> (mug)
>
>>Partial configs:
>> /etc/samba/smb.conf:
>> [global]
>> interfaces = 127.0.0.1 172.25.0.13 172.25.0.33 172.25.0.34
>
> #You probably want to try adding right here:
> netbios name = beverages
> netbios aliases = tea cup mug
>
>> include = /etc/samba/smb.conf.host-%L
>> /etc/samba/smb.conf.host-tea:> [global]
>> workgroup = MTLAUREL
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> I don't think this will work if you have different workgroups listed
> here, I suspect you would have to run seperate smbd's with different
> config files if you want to do this.
>
>> netbios name = TEA
>
> Unnecessary, use netbios aliases instead.
>
>> ...
>> [some-shares]
>> ...
>> /etc/samba/smb.conf.host-cup:
>> [global]
>> workgroup = MTLAUREL
>> netbios name = Cup
>> [other-shares]
>> ...
>>/etc/samba/smb.conf.host-mug:
>> [global]
>> workgroup = MTLAUREL
>> netbios name = Cup
>> [more-shares]
>> ...
>>
>>So, am I crazy to think of using %L? Should I use another (hidden) %
>
> code?
>
>>Should I hack in %s (for sockname) or %l (for alternate %L) as the result
>>of getsockname()? Will this even work? Is this any different in samba 3?
>
>
>
> - --
> |--------------Another happy Mandrake Club member--------------|
> Buchan Milne Mechanical Engineer, Network Manager
> Cellphone * Work +27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x121
> Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
> GPG Key http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
> 1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQE971hprJK6UGDSBKcRAoWwAJ9Cs3Nrj0Nt1CRpJ+KXg2F0H8AEQQCeKJKz
> O4KUgm7icTFgpol4tVHUqCQ=
> =Wu93
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
--
Gary Algier, WB2FWZ gaa at ulticom.com +1 856 787 2758
Ulticom Inc., 1020 Briggs Rd, Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054 Fax:+1 856 866 2033
More information about the samba
mailing list