smbsh progressy
Edan Idzerda
edan at mtu.edu
Mon Oct 5 03:06:29 GMT 1998
On Mon, 5 Oct 1998, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> smbsh is working on Solaris 2.5, after adding $(LIBS) to the
> smbwrapper.so line. I'm building on Solaris 2.6 right now. I'll also
> give RedHat Linux/alpha a try; it's likely to work.
smbwrapper.so will build fairly easily under Solaris 2.6,
but it won't *work* without the xxx64 functions.
I think the biggest thing I had to wrap around #ifdef's
were the kernel_stat parts and the stat family of functions.
I would hate to feel so silly that you just added some
autoconf tests and then it just worked fine under Solaris 2.6 :)
I'm currently LD_PRELOADing lib{socket,nsl} ... I suppose
linking it in would be slicker :)
> whereas most other utilities won't require it. Couldn't smbwrapper
> live without smb.conf, if it is missing?
smbclient seems to do fine without it; I agree that smbwrapper.so
should try to do the same thing.
I'm still having some trouble chdir()'ing into the /smb hierarchy.
I cd to /smb but ls is getting _readdir64.
With all the success people seem to be having under 2.5, I suppose
I'll get another cvs update and see what other changes have been
committed.
- edan
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list