From royt at subexgroup.com Tue May 1 12:20:07 2001 From: royt at subexgroup.com (Roy Thomas) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:31 2003 Subject: FW: Accessing NT shared directory from win98 - Samba Message-ID: <01C0D239.0FA56400.royt@subexgroup.com> Hi Thanks a lot for the points suggested. I tried the procedure given by you. but i still get the problem..... Following is my Setup........ Logon Server - PDC- (Linux/Samba Domain - Hostname MYPDC) 1 NT wkstn and 1 Win98 wkstn connected to this.... User1 logons to NT wkstn, User2 logons to win98 wkstn... But from win98 wkstn when User2 tries to access the share on WinNT wkstn on which he has been given permission...he gets an error 'User account expired ' I checked the smbstatus which gives the correct user logged on to win98 PC but when i checked the login failure Audit(event viewer) on winNT PC it says login failure User:NT AUTHORITY/SYSTEM instead of the right username( MYPDC/User2)..... hope i was clear in explaining my problem.... please let me know what could be the problem Regards Roy -----Original Message----- From: MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1) [SMTP:don_mccall@hp.com] Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 7:58 PM To: 'royt@subexgroup.com'; 'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org' Subject: RE: Accessing NT shared directory from win98 - Samba Hi Roy, Some more information needed: If I read you right, you are trying to access a share on an NT workstation from a win98 pc. You mention they are both in the SAMBA domain - does this mean to you that the win98 pc is set up to login to the samba domain, and the NT Workstation actually has a machine account on the Samba PDC for the domain? If this IS the case, do the following test: have the win98 pc that is having the problem attach to a share on the SAMBA server that is the pdc for the domain. use smbstatus to verify that the win98 pc is actually attaching AS the user you expect, and not as some guest user. Then, go into user manager gui on the NT workstation, and click on 'policies', 'audit', and check 'audit these events' and check success and failure for "Logon and Logoff". Then try accessing the share again from the pc. Once you have failed, use event viewer gui on the Nt workstation, and view the audit log, to see WHO you tried to log in as, and what failed. It's possible that the user you find mentioned in this audit log is a 'local' user (see user manager again) and that machine has a password expiration for that user, or all users in general... Just some things to try, Hope they help, Don -----Original Message----- From: Roy Thomas [mailto:royt@subexgroup.com] Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 9:53 AM To: 'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org' Subject: FW: Accessing NT shared directory from win98 - Samba Hi would be great if someone could help me on the win98, winNT directory share problem mentioned below Thanks Roy -----Original Message----- From: Roy Thomas [SMTP:royt@subexgroup.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 5:42 PM To: 'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org' Subject: Accessing NT shared directory from win98 - Samba Hi all I am facing problems when a workstation with win98 is accessing a shared folder from WinNT workstation on Samba Domain. It gives me following error message " \\dir not accessible The User account has expired " Would be great if someone could guide me on this. Thanks Roy From greg at leiinc.com Tue May 1 14:02:56 2001 From: greg at leiinc.com (Greg J. Zartman, P.E.) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:31 2003 Subject: Local Profiles References: Message-ID: <004301c0d247$6cc47820$6f00a8c0@logeng.net> Sam, Yes, I was able to setup local profiles. Here is what I did: # Set to use local profiles and logon.bat logon script logon script = logon.bat logon home = logon drive = logon path = Regards, Greg ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sam Johnston" To: Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 10:15 PM Subject: Local Profiles > Did you work this out? I'm having the same problem. > > The solutions that I've seen so far say to set logon drive and logon home to > blank. I'm not having any luck with this. Is there some other settings > that need to be made in smb.conf to force Samba to use local profiles? > > > From jeremy at valinux.com Tue May 1 15:14:32 2001 From: jeremy at valinux.com (Jeremy Allison) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:31 2003 Subject: ZDNet reviews Samba 2.2 Message-ID: <20010501081432.B29714@valinux.com> eWeek reviewed Samba 2.2 at : http://www.zdnet.com/eweek/stories/general/0,11011,2712294,00.html - they seem to like it ! It's certainly encouraging to get trade coverage like this, I'm hoping the more people who report Samba use in their organisation to press outlets will encourage them to cover more Open Source/Free Software products ! Cheers, Jeremy Allison, Samba Team. -- -------------------------------------------------------- Buying an operating system without source is like buying a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions. -------------------------------------------------------- From bgjohnson at tasc.com Tue May 1 15:56:34 2001 From: bgjohnson at tasc.com (Johnson, Byron G.) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:31 2003 Subject: Disappearing Shares Message-ID: I am running 2.2.0 on a RH 6.2 system. My network consists on one Linux box and a bunch of W2K machines. I can browse the Linux shares from the W2K boxes okay and can mount the W2K shares on the Linux box BUT 1. When I execute the command to mount a W2K share, it takes about 5 minutes for the command to complete (return to the prompt) AND 2. With one exception, after the W2K shares are mounted, the W2K shares disappear after a few hours and the directory where a share was mounted is empty. At that point, I have to re-mount the W2K shares. There is one W2K share that does not disappear and seems to have been there for several days. Any ideas where I can start? -- Byron G. Johnson Business Development Manager, Enterprise Security <<...OLE_Obj...>> 4801 Stonecroft Blvd Chantilly, VA 20151-3822 Voice: (703) 633-8478 Fax: (703) 449-1087 Cellular: (703) 819-6423 Pager: (888) 751-4116 Home: (703) 753-0204 E-Mail: bgjohnson@tasc.com From txkjohn at hotmail.com Tue May 1 16:22:22 2001 From: txkjohn at hotmail.com (John Humphrey) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:31 2003 Subject: LDAP support Message-ID: I'm getting mixed signal. Does Samab 2.2.0 support LDAP authentication? If not, what release is expected to include it? Thanks. John Humphrey _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com From tech_fixer at yahoo.com Tue May 1 16:25:40 2001 From: tech_fixer at yahoo.com (Jose Rodriguez) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:31 2003 Subject: Win2K wont join Samba domain - Help! Message-ID: <20010501162540.11233.qmail@web3102.mail.yahoo.com> Hi, and thanks for taking the time to read this message. I've got a win2k PC I want to join into a Samba domain. Problem is that when I try to join the domain from win2k the following message pops up: "No mapping between account names and security ID's was done." I also tried using the root acount to join the domain, but it didnt work. The machine accounts are created in passwd and smbpasswd files. Also added root as a user in smbpasswd, as per some email in this list. In addition I set the "add user script" parameter in smb.conf to: "/usr/bin/adduser -n -g macines -c NTMACHINE -d /dev/null -s /bin/false %m$", as per emails and Howto's. I've read the Howto's, Faq's and emails on the list, but found no answer. Could it be a bug? Am I mising something? Please advise if possible. Thanks again. Jose Rodriguez. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices http://auctions.yahoo.com/ From joseph at cheek.com Tue May 1 16:32:25 2001 From: joseph at cheek.com (Joseph Cheek) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:31 2003 Subject: ZDNet reviews Samba 2.2 References: <20010501081432.B29714@valinux.com> Message-ID: <3AEEE519.6040108@cheek.com> gotta love the text at the bottom of the article: Check prices: Samba Samba 2.2.0 [we've reviewed this piece of free software, let's see how much it costs!] Jeremy Allison wrote: > eWeek reviewed Samba 2.2 at : > > http://www.zdnet.com/eweek/stories/general/0,11011,2712294,00.html > > - they seem to like it ! > > It's certainly encouraging to get trade coverage like > this, I'm hoping the more people who report Samba use > in their organisation to press outlets will encourage > them to cover more Open Source/Free Software products ! > > Cheers, > > Jeremy Allison, > Samba Team. > From awilliam at whitemice.org Tue May 1 16:43:47 2001 From: awilliam at whitemice.org (Adam Tauno Williams) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:31 2003 Subject: LDAP support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20010501124347.0eb78c3c.awilliam@whitemice.org> >I'm getting mixed signal. Does Samab 2.2.0 support LDAP authentication? If >not, what release is expected to include it? Thanks. No, Samba 2.2.0 does NOT support LDAP authentication From thudak at sistina.com Tue May 1 17:16:18 2001 From: thudak at sistina.com (Tom Hudak) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:31 2003 Subject: success! Message-ID: <20010501121618.F19295@localhost> I just want to thank Gerald & Jeremy for their quick reply's and whoever else gave me a shout (you know who you are.). I got my w2k vmware session connected to my PDC without a hitch, and I can even add users that are available on my PDC. Very slick. All I need now is account administration on the PDC via w2k on my lappy in a vmware session and I've got remote admin capabilities on all my systems! WOOHOO! Thanks guys. I'm gonna see how well 2.2 works on GFS (maybe multi-initiator) and see if I corrupt the fs. If only I could have a samba cluster, doing PDC, running on GFS... I would be a happy admin. Thanks to all, -- Thomas J. Hudak Systems Administrator Sistina Software Inc. - www.sistina.com Phone: 612.379.3951 Page: 612.318.1967 Fax: 612.379.3952 Key fingerprint = BEC6 3181 4C9B A7BB AF11 4717 6F85 B346 380D 523E -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-ntdom/attachments/20010501/94e9f689/attachment.bin From jeremy at valinux.com Tue May 1 17:43:23 2001 From: jeremy at valinux.com (Jeremy Allison) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:32 2003 Subject: success! In-Reply-To: <20010501121618.F19295@localhost>; from thudak@sistina.com on Tue, May 01, 2001 at 12:16:18PM -0500 References: <20010501121618.F19295@localhost> Message-ID: <20010501104323.B6446@valinux.com> On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 12:16:18PM -0500, Tom Hudak wrote: > I just want to thank Gerald & Jeremy for their quick reply's and whoever else > gave me a shout (you know who you are.). I got my w2k vmware session connected > to my PDC without a hitch, and I can even add users that are available on my > PDC. Very slick. All I need now is account administration on the PDC via w2k > on my lappy in a vmware session and I've got remote admin capabilities on all > my systems! WOOHOO! Thanks guys. > > I'm gonna see how well 2.2 works on GFS (maybe multi-initiator) and see if I > corrupt the fs. If only I could have a samba cluster, doing PDC, running on > GFS... I would be a happy admin. > Thanks to all, I don't think GFS supports POSIX fcntl locks across systems, which makes it currently unsuitable for a backend Samba filesystem. If you know different I'd be happy to be corrected. Jeremy. -- -------------------------------------------------------- Buying an operating system without source is like buying a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions. -------------------------------------------------------- From kenp at mtu.edu Tue May 1 19:35:03 2001 From: kenp at mtu.edu (Ken Palosaari) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:32 2003 Subject: win2k wkst joining samba 2.2 pdc Message-ID: hi, I am having some trouble getting my windows 2000 pro workstation to join my samba 2.2 pdc. It is my understanding that this should work automatically with out me having to add the machine to the smbpasswd and passwd files, is this not the case? The error I receive is "The account used is a computer account. Use your global user account or local user account to access this server" The account I am using is specified as a domain admin in the smb.conf and the accont is both in the /etc/passwd and smbpasswd file. domain admin users = admin I am using the admin account when trying to join the domain. I can successfully log in using this accont from a windows 98 pc. Any help would be appreciated thanks Ken From fcarreiro at loweryinc.com Tue May 1 19:51:08 2001 From: fcarreiro at loweryinc.com (Frank Carreiro) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:32 2003 Subject: disappearing shares. Message-ID: <3AEF13AC.3080109@loweryinc.com> I have similar problems with RH 6.2 and 2.07. I understand the problem is with smbfs which started as a "non-samba" product bundled into the linux kernel. On the samba web site I noticed that Andrew Tridgell has taken over maintenance of smbfs http://va.samba.org/samba/smbfs/ Sent him a couple of emails with my message log which shows several interesting error messages. Haven't heard back from him yet. I suspect this has something to do with the windoze 2k auto disconnect. If a connection is idle for 15 minutes windoze disconnects the linux mount screwing linux up (basically the share disappears). If you cd into the share and type "ls" you get an i/o error message for your troubles. Check out Micro$oft's side and read article ID: Q138365. You can try increasing the idle time (or disabling it) and see if that helps. My NT admin is unwilling to disable the feature so I'm hopefully another solution will present itself. My message logs show many retry's and the occasional fail message. (I always grimace when I see that). You can always remount to a new mount point but that's a band aid and not a solution. Rebooting fixes the problem for a bit. Still not a good solution. BTW, you mentioned a system has the share mounted for days. By any chance is that share regularly used? Is it mounting to a win2k box also? I've also rewritten smbfs/proc.c increasing the timeout from 5 to 30 seconds which "seems" to have helped a little (SMB_RETRY_INTR increased). I suspect if the win2k server is VERY busy auto disconnect will still occur and trash your mount point. Haven't had alot of time to investigate this further. I noticed this issue has come up several times in the samba mail list archives. Hopefully we can get some discussion going. I can't believe there aren't that many people using smbfs. It's a handy tool and I use it all the time :-) Frank Carreiro UNIX Systems Admin. HS&A > nning 2.2.0 on a RH 6.2 system. My network consists on one Linux box > and a bunch of W2K machines. I can browse the Linux shares from the W2K > boxes okay and can mount the W2K shares on the Linux box BUT > 1. When I execute the command to mount a W2K share, it takes about 5 > minutes for the command to complete (return to the prompt) AND > 2. With one exception, after the W2K shares are mounted, the W2K shares > disappear after a few hours and the directory where a share was mounted is > empty. At that point, I have to re-mount the W2K shares. There is one W2K > share that does not disappear and seems to have been there for several days. > > Any ideas where I can start? > > -- > Byron G. Johnson > Business Development Manager, Enterprise Security > <<...OLE_Obj...>> > 4801 Stonecroft Blvd > Chantilly, VA 20151-3822 > Voice: (703) 633-8478 > Fax: (703) 449-1087 > Cellular: (703) 819-6423 > Pager: (888) 751-4116 > Home: (703) 753-0204 > E-Mail: bgjohnson@tasc.com > > > > --__--__-- > From gcarter at valinux.com Tue May 1 20:07:17 2001 From: gcarter at valinux.com (Gerald Carter) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:32 2003 Subject: win2k wkst joining samba 2.2 pdc In-Reply-To: ; from kenp@mtu.edu on Tue, May 01, 2001 at 14:35:03 -0500 References: Message-ID: <20010501150717.C11702@queso.plainjoe.org> On Tue, 01 May 2001 14:35:03 Ken Palosaari wrote: > > I am having some trouble getting my windows 2000 pro > workstation to join my samba 2.2 pdc. It is my > understanding that this should work automatically > with out me having to add the machine to the > smbpasswd and passwd files, is this not the case? Did you read the latest version of the HOWTO in Samba-HOWTO-Collection on samba.org? What is your 'add user script' defined as? Does it work when you run it manually? What server os are you using? Cheers, jerry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) From alankemp at bigfoot.com Tue May 1 20:15:42 2001 From: alankemp at bigfoot.com (Alan Kemp) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:32 2003 Subject: Creating log files Message-ID: <000901c0d27b$7ff002a0$207ba8c0@jedi> Hi, I have set up samba 2.2 as a PDC. However, I have not been able to find any information regarding getting samba to log various events. In particular I want to log which user has logged in, what time and which computer they are on. Is this possible with samba? Or am I going to have to write some cunning logon batch files :-) Alan ----- alankemp@bigfoot.com www.alankemp.f2s.com From kenp at mtu.edu Tue May 1 20:34:57 2001 From: kenp at mtu.edu (Ken Palosaari) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:32 2003 Subject: win2k wkst joining samba 2.2 pdc In-Reply-To: <20010501150717.C11702@queso.plainjoe.org> Message-ID: Yes I have read the latest HOWTO, I didn't realize you would need a add user script for win2000, I was under the impression win2k would make entries in /etc/passwd and sambapasswd automatically, I didn't realize it required the script for 2k. So I tried adding the entry manually now I get a "The procedure number is out of range." error. below is the entry in my smbpasswd: suntest(51)% sudo cat /samba/private/smbpasswd # Samba SMB password file pctest$:506:882D8750941D0A28D109DED161091DFE:4D76E00AC502B4F367A64E700A775FE0:[W ]:LCT-3AEF1A34: and here is the entry in my /etc/passwd: pctest$:x:506:5000:NTMachine:/dev/null:/bin/false My samba server is a sun ultra 10 running solaris 8 thanks Ken On Tue, 1 May 2001, Gerald Carter wrote: > On Tue, 01 May 2001 14:35:03 Ken Palosaari wrote: > > > > I am having some trouble getting my windows 2000 pro > > workstation to join my samba 2.2 pdc. It is my > > understanding that this should work automatically > > with out me having to add the machine to the > > smbpasswd and passwd files, is this not the case? > > Did you read the latest version of the HOWTO in > Samba-HOWTO-Collection on samba.org? What is > your 'add user script' defined as? Does it work when > you run it manually? What server os are you using? > > > > > > Cheers, jerry > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services > \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com > http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org > http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org > > "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." > - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) > > From bferrell at microdisplay.com Tue May 1 20:48:50 2001 From: bferrell at microdisplay.com (Bruce Ferrell) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:32 2003 Subject: Can someone tell me what this means? Message-ID: <3AEF2132.2AC662A8@microdisplay.com> The following is an extract from my nice Linux 2.2.0 PDC. ZAPPA is a workstation on my network. I see this over and over and over. DOmain logins are pretty well hosed and I have no clue what to do. HELP!!! [2001/05/01 13:35:03, 3] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(248) process_logon_packet: SAMLOGON request from ZAPPA(xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) for ZAPPA$, returning logon svr \\ROMULUS domain MDC code 13 token=ffff [2001/05/01 13:35:03, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(70) process_logon_packet: Logon from xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx: code = 0x12 [2001/05/01 13:35:03, 3] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(205) process_logon_packet: SAMLOGON sidsize 24, len = 96 [2001/05/01 13:35:03, 3] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(212) process_logon_packet: len = 96 PTR_DIFF(q, buf) = 88 [2001/05/01 13:35:03, 3] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(232) process_logon_packet: SAMLOGON sidsize 24 ntv 1 [2001/05/01 13:35:03, 3] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(241) process_logon_packet: SAMLOGON user ZAPPA$ [2001/05/01 13:35:03, 3] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(248) From gcarter at valinux.com Tue May 1 21:40:54 2001 From: gcarter at valinux.com (Gerald Carter) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:32 2003 Subject: win2k wkst joining samba 2.2 pdc In-Reply-To: ; from kenp@mtu.edu on Tue, May 01, 2001 at 15:34:57 -0500 References: <20010501150717.C11702@queso.plainjoe.org> Message-ID: <20010501164054.O11702@queso.plainjoe.org> On Tue, 01 May 2001 15:34:57 Ken Palosaari wrote: > > Yes I have read the latest HOWTO, I didn't realize you would > need a add user script for win2000, I was under the > impression win2k would make entries in /etc/passwd > and sambapasswd automatically, I didn't realize it > required the script for 2k. the script is only requied for NT/2k if you do not manually create the machine trust accounts. If you want to use the "create this account on the fly" thing, then you do need it. > So I tried adding the entry manually now I get > a "The procedure number is out of range." error. > > pctest$:506: > 882D8750941D0A28D109DED161091DFE: > 4D76E00AC502B4F367A64E700A775FE0: > [W ]:LCT-3AEF1A34: Hmm...these hashes are not the reight valkue, that's for sure. How did you generate this entry? > and here is the entry in my /etc/passwd: > > pctest$:x:506:5000:NTMachine:/dev/null:/bin/false ok. > My samba server is a sun ultra 10 running solaris 8 Cheers, jerry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) From acocozzo at id.maidaeng.com Tue May 1 21:47:48 2001 From: acocozzo at id.maidaeng.com (Anthony Chris Cocozzo) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:32 2003 Subject: Domain Admin In-Reply-To: <20010501190128.D792D55F0@lists.samba.org> Message-ID: <000201c0d288$5d4ebb80$4d01a8c0@id.maidaeng.com> Here is the setup: RH7.0 with all updates applied and samba 2.2 installed and running. I have several W98 clients and 2 NT4 clients. Browsing and shares all work like a charm. What I can't seem to figure out is how do I give the people with the NT boxes (me being one of them) sufficient rights to adjust the time, install programs, etc when we are logged into the domain. I am using the net time command in a login script and it keeps telling me I don't have sufficient rights to change the time. I am stumped. Any help would be greatly appreciated! Anthony Chris Cocozzo Maida Engineering, Inc. From pgoetz at math.utexas.edu Tue May 1 21:58:35 2001 From: pgoetz at math.utexas.edu (Patrick Goetz) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:32 2003 Subject: various small problems with (bugs in?) Samba 2.2 Message-ID: Here is a collection of problems I've encountered with Samba 2.2 1. Log files I configured Samba with --prefix=/opt/samba. Consequently, by default, I get log files /opt/samba/var/log.nmbd and /opt/samba/var/log.smbd . I'd prefer have a single log file in /var/log, however, adding the line log file = /var/log/samba.log to the [global] section of smb.conf and restarting the daemons doesn't seem to do anything -- the logs still get written to /opt/samba/var/*. 2. PID files Ideally I'd like to be able to have an init.d script to start|stop|restart smbd and nmbd. Unfortunately I can't find any place where a pid file is written, although the man page for smbcontrol mentions an nmbd.pid. Since nmbd always seem to start with 2 copies anyway, I'm not sure a single pid file would help anyway, though. I thought smbcontrol was something like apachectl, but it appears not to be; i.e. the man page gives no indication of how one would use it to start stop smbd/nmbd. The Debian version of Samba 2.07 does come with a init.d/samba script (albeit a terribly fubar'ed one) which must work for 2.07 -- is there any way to get this functionality in 2.2? 3. Domain Users On a W2K machine (with Samba 2.2 PDC), whenever I try to add "Domain Users" to the list of users with permissions on, say, the spool director (although the same thing happens in any permission granting situation), I always get the message "Unable to lookup user names for display" and nothing is added to the list of users with permissions. Adding individual users from the domain works fine. Perhaps I'm confused about what "Domain Users" means -- I just assumed it meant grant this permission to anyone connecting from this particular NT domain. From acocozzo at id.maidaeng.com Tue May 1 22:09:24 2001 From: acocozzo at id.maidaeng.com (Anthony Chris Cocozzo) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:32 2003 Subject: Domain Admin In-Reply-To: <20010501190128.D792D55F0@lists.samba.org> Message-ID: <000301c0d28b$6199cb50$4d01a8c0@id.maidaeng.com> Here is the setup: RH7.0 with all updates applied and samba 2.2 installed and running. I have several W98 clients and 2 NT4 clients. Browsing and shares all work like a charm. What I can't seem to figure out is how do I give the people with the NT boxes (me being one of them) sufficient rights to adjust the time, install programs, etc when we are logged into the domain. I am using the net time command in a login script and it keeps telling me I don't have sufficient rights to change the time. I am stumped. Any help would be greatly appreciated! Anthony Chris Cocozzo Maida Engineering, Inc. From jjs at acis.com.au Tue May 1 23:13:17 2001 From: jjs at acis.com.au (Justin Smith) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:32 2003 Subject: Problems with Samba 2.2.0 W2k domain Message-ID: <200105012313.JAA03685@bowan.acis.com.au> Well My Bad, Dont know what went wrong, but Uninstalling samba removing all the binaries a new download and compile of 2.2.0 and Im kicking along. Chances are I was not using the binaries I thought I was..*slap* From David.Bear at asu.edu Wed May 2 01:39:40 2001 From: David.Bear at asu.edu (iddwb) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:32 2003 Subject: why so many broken pipes? Message-ID: Using samba 2.0.7 on both FreeBSd and Linux. This error is all over the event logs. It doesn't seem catastrophic as samba keeps running. But why do I get it? and can I make it go away? [2001/02/27 17:14:10, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(540) write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Broken pipe [2001/03/02 15:58:57, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(540) write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Broken pipe [2001/03/30 18:13:47, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(540) write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Broken pipe From surajrai at yahoo.com Wed May 2 01:47:09 2001 From: surajrai at yahoo.com (Suraj K. Rai) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:32 2003 Subject: Samba 2.2 and Win2K Domain Admins Message-ID: <20010502014709.31228.qmail@web11606.mail.yahoo.com> I think there has been a number of posts regarding domain admin support with Win2k on this list but so far I have not seen any of these concerns been addressed. Has anybody been able to login to a Win2K machine using admin privelges. I tried putting the userid in the "domain users" parameter but it did not work. Thanks, S.r. ===== Suraj K. Rai surajrai@yahoo.com http://surajrai.tripod.com __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices http://auctions.yahoo.com/ From kenp at mtu.edu Wed May 2 02:31:30 2001 From: kenp at mtu.edu (Ken Palosaari) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:32 2003 Subject: win2k wkst joining samba 2.2 pdc In-Reply-To: <20010501164054.O11702@queso.plainjoe.org> Message-ID: On Tue, 1 May 2001, Gerald Carter wrote: > On Tue, 01 May 2001 15:34:57 Ken Palosaari wrote: > > > > Yes I have read the latest HOWTO, I didn't realize you would > > need a add user script for win2000, I was under the > > impression win2k would make entries in /etc/passwd > > and sambapasswd automatically, I didn't realize it > > required the script for 2k. > > the script is only requied for NT/2k if you do not manually > create the machine trust accounts. If you want to use > the "create this account on the fly" thing, then you do > need it. > > > So I tried adding the entry manually now I get > > a "The procedure number is out of range." error. > > > > pctest$:506: > > 882D8750941D0A28D109DED161091DFE: > > 4D76E00AC502B4F367A64E700A775FE0: > > [W ]:LCT-3AEF1A34: > > Hmm...these hashes are not the reight valkue, that's > for sure. How did you generate this entry? > I used the "smbpasswd -a -r pctest" I believe, I did it the way it sayd to in the FAQ for pdc 2.2 > > and here is the entry in my /etc/passwd: > > > > pctest$:x:506:5000:NTMachine:/dev/null:/bin/false > > ok. > > > My samba server is a sun ultra 10 running solaris 8 > > > > > > > Cheers, jerry > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services > \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com > http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org > http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org > > "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." > - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) > From justindd at iastate.edu Wed May 2 04:08:43 2001 From: justindd at iastate.edu (Justin D Davis) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:32 2003 Subject: Unix PW Sync Message-ID: <5.0.1.4.2.20010501230544.00b071d0@justindd.mail.iastate.edu> It appears the Unix PW sync doesn't work in 2.2.0. When I tried with it off, things worked okay. When I turned it on, the Unix PW's were changed, but the windows PW's were not.... On a side note I'm not sure what is wrong with the access denied message, but my Turtle Beach AudioTron will just keep trying on a share where it is not a valid user. If I make it a valid user, then set read list = everyone but the audiotron, then there is no problem....ah...the things we have to put up with for not running MicroShaft OS'es..... From mballen at erols.com Wed May 2 06:42:09 2001 From: mballen at erols.com (Michael B. Allen) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:33 2003 Subject: ZDNet reviews Samba 2.2 In-Reply-To: <20010501081432.B29714@valinux.com>; from jeremy@valinux.com on Tue, May 01, 2001 at 08:14:32AM -0700 References: <20010501081432.B29714@valinux.com> Message-ID: <20010502024209.A1037@nano.foo.net> On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 08:14:32AM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote: > eWeek reviewed Samba 2.2 at : > > http://www.zdnet.com/eweek/stories/general/0,11011,2712294,00.html "... had to reverse-engineer the proprietary protocols Microsoft Corp. uses to authenticate users and systems over the network-using, in many cases, nothing but a packet sniffer." I'm just curious but can someone describe to me what it's like trying to decode RPC messages? That's nothing like RAP calls right? How in the world do you know what the fields are? How can you even tell, for example, wheather or not some bytes are two sorts or an int or dead space? Mike -- signature pending From tpot at samba.org Wed May 2 06:51:44 2001 From: tpot at samba.org (Tim Potter) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:33 2003 Subject: ZDNet reviews Samba 2.2 In-Reply-To: <20010502024209.A1037@nano.foo.net> References: <20010501081432.B29714@valinux.com> <20010502024209.A1037@nano.foo.net> Message-ID: <15087.44672.130766.849666@linuxcare.com.au> Michael B. Allen writes: > On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 08:14:32AM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote: > > eWeek reviewed Samba 2.2 at : > > > > http://www.zdnet.com/eweek/stories/general/0,11011,2712294,00.html > > "... had to reverse-engineer the proprietary protocols Microsoft Corp. uses > to authenticate users and systems over the network-using, in many cases, > nothing but a packet sniffer." > > I'm just curious but can someone describe to me what it's like trying > to decode RPC messages? That's nothing like RAP calls right? How in the > world do you know what the fields are? How can you even tell, for example, > wheather or not some bytes are two sorts or an int or dead space? That was Luke Leighton's handiwork. Once he worked out it was in DCE/RPC format most things could be decoded with only a large amount of head against wall bashing. (-: It's interesting to note that the order and size of the arguments on the wire are pretty much the same as they are in the MSDN. Running netmon also provides a lot of clues. Tim. > > Mike > > -- > signature pending > From Adrian.Blount at alphawest.com.au Wed May 2 08:26:10 2001 From: Adrian.Blount at alphawest.com.au (Adrian Blount) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:33 2003 Subject: Samba 2.2.0 and windows groups Message-ID: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Greetings all, I've got a case where a user wants to enable access to a number of samba shares based upon which windows group they are in. From what I understand this can only be accomplished using the recent 2.2.0 release of samba. To this end I have installed 2.2.0 with security=DOMAIN and all the relevant stuff but am not sure how to actually configure the shares or user mapping/authentication to use windows groups. I can't find any reference in the doco except to mention that this stuff is experimental, which, given that this integration seems to be the grounds for a major release of samba, is not very encouraging. The scenario in more detail is thus... SHARE1 needs to be READ-ONLY for members of NTGROUP1 SHARE1 needs to be READ-WRITE for members of NTGROUP2 SHARE2 needs to be READ-ONLY for members of NTGROUP3 SHARE2 needs to be READ-WRITE for members of NTGROUP4 and so on.... I think I need to use the 'user map' function and map "USER1 to NTGROUP1", "USER2 to NTGROUP2" and then use the 'valid users' keyword in each share to say that "USER1 is a valid user for SHARE1". I know for a Unix group I can just use USER1=@UNIXGROUP1 in the map file. Am I on the right track or am I way off and in need of a serious re-schooling on samba/windows interaction? Any help/suggestions/pointers-to-doco appreciated greatly! Adrian Blount Security Engineer AlphaWest Pty. Ltd. Phone: +61 8 9429 6100 Fax: +61 8 9429 6130 E-Mail: adrian.blount@alphawest.com.au http://www.alphawest.com.au -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 6.5.8 iQA/AwUBOu9UsgwwgWQLj7MREQIitgCfV6Tj+84cPc9qkGV6K8gT5KCvezkAoP19 OB4oHPK4oO1iy8wR/IYNZGOa =iULG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- AlphaWest Disclaimer --------------------------------------------------------------------------- If this communication is not intended for you and you are not an authorised recipient of this email you are prohibited by law from dealing with or relying on the email or any file attachments. This prohibition includes reading, printing, copying, re-transmitting, disseminating, storing or in any other way dealing or acting in reliance on the information. If you have received this email in error, we request you contact AlphaWest immediately by returning the email to postmaster@alphawest.com.au and destroy the original. This email is confidential and may contain privileged client information. AlphaWest has taken reasonable steps to ensure the accuracy and integrity of all its communications, including electronic communications, but accepts no liability for materials transmitted. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- From mballen at erols.com Wed May 2 08:51:59 2001 From: mballen at erols.com (Michael B. Allen) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:33 2003 Subject: ZDNet reviews Samba 2.2 In-Reply-To: <15087.44672.130766.849666@linuxcare.com.au>; from tpot@samba.org on Wed, May 02, 2001 at 04:51:44PM +1000 References: <20010501081432.B29714@valinux.com> <20010502024209.A1037@nano.foo.net> <15087.44672.130766.849666@linuxcare.com.au> Message-ID: <20010502045159.A4955@nano.foo.net> On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 04:51:44PM +1000, Tim Potter wrote: > > > > I'm just curious but can someone describe to me what it's like trying > > to decode RPC messages? That's nothing like RAP calls right? How in the > > world do you know what the fields are? How can you even tell, for example, > > wheather or not some bytes are two sorts or an int or dead space? > > That was Luke Leighton's handiwork. Once he worked out it was in > DCE/RPC format most things could be decoded with only a large > amount of head against wall bashing. (-: > > It's interesting to note that the order and size of the arguments > on the wire are pretty much the same as they are in the MSDN. > Running netmon also provides a lot of clues. Are MS Exchange messages DCE/RPC? I tried watching that in netmon once but it didn't decode anything but some kind of security block from the payload. -- signature pending From ulf.bertilsson at adcomdata.no Wed May 2 09:04:41 2001 From: ulf.bertilsson at adcomdata.no (Ulf Bertilsson) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:33 2003 Subject: ZDNet reviews Samba 2.2 Message-ID: > > It's interesting to note that the order and size of the arguments > > on the wire are pretty much the same as they are in the MSDN. > > Running netmon also provides a lot of clues. > > Are MS Exchange messages DCE/RPC? I tried watching that in netmon once > but it didn't decode anything but some kind of security block from > the payload. Exchange is using 'RPC', I had an wired idea once to try and "script" some "outlook" functions using 'rpcclient' calls :) I heard Microsoft took the spech on the RPC, locked it up in a safe and throw away they key. You find some limited RPC tools on the resource kit's. =D Ulf From awilliam at whitemice.org Wed May 2 10:40:05 2001 From: awilliam at whitemice.org (Adam Tauno Williams) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:33 2003 Subject: Unix PW Sync In-Reply-To: <5.0.1.4.2.20010501230544.00b071d0@justindd.mail.iastate.edu> References: <5.0.1.4.2.20010501230544.00b071d0@justindd.mail.iastate.edu> Message-ID: <20010502064005.3ced6071.awilliam@whitemice.org> >It appears the Unix PW sync doesn't work in 2.2.0. When I tried with it >off, things worked okay. When I turned it on, the Unix PW's were changed, >but the windows PW's were not.... I'm using the same passwd sync scripts/settings I used for 2.2.0alphaX and it works. From Daniel.Moeller at de.bosch.com Wed May 2 10:40:35 2001 From: Daniel.Moeller at de.bosch.com (Moeller Daniel (QI/CCE21) *) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:33 2003 Subject: AW: why so many broken pipes? Message-ID: <9015FB0BD980D411BFBC00508BAE6AF74E1310@simail5.server.bosch.com> Hi, I'm running Samba 2.0.7 in serveral installations, mainly on Solaris 2.6 Ultra-Sparcs. I'm getting the same error message very often. It doesn't affect operation, too. But I like to know why this occurs, too. Can someone explain it? Kind regards, Danny -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: iddwb [mailto:David.Bear@asu.edu] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 2. Mai 2001 03:40 An: samba-ntdom@samba.org Betreff: why so many broken pipes? Using samba 2.0.7 on both FreeBSd and Linux. This error is all over the event logs. It doesn't seem catastrophic as samba keeps running. But why do I get it? and can I make it go away? [2001/02/27 17:14:10, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(540) write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Broken pipe [2001/03/02 15:58:57, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(540) write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Broken pipe [2001/03/30 18:13:47, 0] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(540) write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Broken pipe From dave at deakin.edu.au Wed May 2 12:26:49 2001 From: dave at deakin.edu.au (David Schwarz) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:33 2003 Subject: Roaming Profiles, 2.2 and security = user, a small problem Message-ID: <003f01c0d303$2b4ca5e0$a08bb880@addev.deakin.edu.au> Hi guys, What I would like to do is know if it is possible to turn off the generation of the support of ACLs on the NTProfile share / ( Any Share) only? The background: Deakin has a custom setup in that we have two enviroments that use applications from out samba server, One enviroment uses a version of NISGINA, on Win2000. The other enviroment uses an NT4 Server. Samba is running on Sun Hardware We have an in house process that ensures that the encrypted passwords are syncd between the NTserver and the Samba server. We use Security=USER We have roaming profiles being served from the Samba server under 2.0x Everything works fine. The Problem: With the testing of Samba 2.2 we have come across a problem. Samba 2.2 seems to associate SIDs with the ACLs on every file in the NTProfile. This means that once the profile is downloaded from the 2.2 samba server, the permissions are totaly wrong on the desktop machine, and the profile is unreadable. We know can fix the problem by using Security = Domain, and pointing to a Password server. This works fine, it just breaks all the NISGINA machines. (~1000 machines) We guess we can fix it by turning off ACL support when we do the build, although we have not tested this. Any ideas, or have I missed a realy simple configuration method. Dave.... -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed From fortiz at ecogas.com.ar Wed May 2 12:36:39 2001 From: fortiz at ecogas.com.ar (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Facundo_C=E9sar_Ortiz?=) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:33 2003 Subject: Work with NT Message-ID: Since one becomes so that SAMBA validates users and it works as if outside a server NT. Thanks Como se hace para que SAMBA valide usuarios y funcione como si fuera un servidor NT. Gracias. Facundo C?sar Ortiz Distribuidora de Gas Cuyana S.A. Sistemas Cuyo - (261) 4412 558 fortiz@ecogas.com.ar -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed From cantonpa at unive.it Wed May 2 12:54:45 2001 From: cantonpa at unive.it (Patrizia Canton) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:33 2003 Subject: screensaver (fwd) Message-ID: Hi I installed samba 2.2.0 as PDC on a Pc running Debian 2.2rev2, kernel 2.4.3. One of the winnt users reports this error: sometimes it happens to him to leave his PC and after a while the screensaver starts running. when he comes back to work on the PC he is not anymore able to use Pc resources, he had to reset and restart the computer. He told me he did not have this problem before of being part of the domain run by the samba server. Any hint? thanks Patrizia From dbannon at tpg.com.au Wed May 2 13:30:32 2001 From: dbannon at tpg.com.au (David Bannon) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:33 2003 Subject: Unix PW Sync In-Reply-To: <5.0.1.4.2.20010501230544.00b071d0@justindd.mail.iastate.ed u> Message-ID: <3.0.6.32.20010502233032.007c5830@bioserve.latrobe.edu.au> At 11:08 PM 1/5/2001 -0500, Justin D Davis wrote: >It appears the Unix PW sync doesn't work in 2.2.0. When I tried with it >off, things worked okay. When I turned it on, the Unix PW's were changed, >but the windows PW's were not.... The 'windows PW' were not ..! Do you mean the local pw stored on Win95/98 ? If so, samba has no chance to mess with that (nor should it). The two passwds that samba plays with are in: 1. /etc/passwd (/etc/shadow etc) 2. /usr/local/samba/private/smbpasswd The system does work but it involves some 'tuning' on your part. The problems is that samba fails to change /etc/passwd it usually does not know why. So it tells the WinNT (we are talking about WinNT or W2K arn't we ?) that things went wrong, don't know what and WinNT tells the user that its their fault. > > David ------------------------------------------------------------ David Bannon, phone mobile : 0418 525687 Private - Work - Email : dbannon@tpg.com.au D.Bannon@vpac.org http://www.vpac.org Phone : 9337 4210 9925 4733 ------------------------------------------------------------ .... Humpty Dumpty was pushed ! From ejs at delfi.lt Wed May 2 13:38:06 2001 From: ejs at delfi.lt (Eugenijus =?UTF-8?B?SmFudcWha2V2acSNaXVz?=) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:33 2003 Subject: Domain Admin References: <000201c0d288$5d4ebb80$4d01a8c0@id.maidaeng.com> Message-ID: <3AF00DBE.9030301@delfi.lt> Anthony Chris Cocozzo wrote: > Here is the setup: > RH7.0 with all updates applied and samba 2.2 installed and running. > I have several W98 clients and 2 NT4 clients. Browsing and shares all work > like a charm. > > What I can't seem to figure out is how do I give the people with the NT > boxes (me being one of them) sufficient rights to adjust the time, install > programs, etc when we are logged into the domain. I am using the net time > command in a login script and it keeps telling me I don't have sufficient > rights to change the time. Add the user to 'Power Users' local group or change system policy to allow 'Users' or INTERACTIVE group to change system time. IMHO, it will be better to take some shareware tool, that runs as a service on NT. When installing programs you must be able to write to specific places of the disk: 'Program Files' and below, '%WinDir%\System32' and below, also you must be able to change and add values to registry HKLM hive. The best solution, imho, is installing programs as administrator. Or you may adjust permitions for these directories. -- Augis From dbannon at tpg.com.au Wed May 2 13:37:46 2001 From: dbannon at tpg.com.au (David Bannon) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:33 2003 Subject: Domain Admin In-Reply-To: <000301c0d28b$6199cb50$4d01a8c0@id.maidaeng.com> References: <20010501190128.D792D55F0@lists.samba.org> Message-ID: <3.0.6.32.20010502233746.007cfe40@bioserve.latrobe.edu.au> At 04:09 PM 1/5/2001 -0600, Anthony Chris Cocozzo wrote: > >What I can't seem to figure out is how do I give the people with the NT >boxes (me being one of them) sufficient rights to adjust the time, install >programs, etc when we are logged into the domain. I am using the net time >command in a login script and it keeps telling me I don't have sufficient >rights to change the time. There is still an old copy o the pre-release 2.2FAQ on a server that I used to maintain. See http://bioserve.latrobe.edu.au/samba/samba-pdc-faq.html I'll be pulling it down before to long so be quick. A lot of the stuff in it did not make it into the HowTo, maybe we need to work on that... David ------------------------------------------------------------ David Bannon, phone mobile : 0418 525687 Private - Work - Email : dbannon@tpg.com.au D.Bannon@vpac.org http://www.vpac.org Phone : 9337 4210 9925 4733 ------------------------------------------------------------ .... Humpty Dumpty was pushed ! From ctooley at amoa.org Wed May 2 13:59:05 2001 From: ctooley at amoa.org (ctooley@amoa.org) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:33 2003 Subject: screensaver (fwd) Message-ID: <86256A40.004BCC7A.00@amoa.org> You aren't by chance using an Intel EtherExpress Pro 100 or a 3com 3c905C card in the NT box are you? I've seen cases where having those (or I would presume any other NIC with power manangement features that don't work quite right with the NT 4 driver) don't wake up right after going into a PM sleep state. It may be a timing thing with how the card is waking up or the lack thereof. Chris Tooley Patrizia Canton on 05/02/2001 07:54:45 AM To: samba-ntdom@samba.org cc: (bcc: Chris Tooley/AMOA) Subject screensaver (fwd) : Hi I installed samba 2.2.0 as PDC on a Pc running Debian 2.2rev2, kernel 2.4.3. One of the winnt users reports this error: sometimes it happens to him to leave his PC and after a while the screensaver starts running. when he comes back to work on the PC he is not anymore able to use Pc resources, he had to reset and restart the computer. He told me he did not have this problem before of being part of the domain run by the samba server. Any hint? thanks Patrizia From m.brodbelt at acu.ac.uk Wed May 2 14:43:56 2001 From: m.brodbelt at acu.ac.uk (Mike Brodbelt) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:33 2003 Subject: Migration from NT to Samba domain - how Message-ID: <3AF01D2C.98B669C9@acu.ac.uk> Hi all, Quick question for you all :-). I have the following setup NT PDC Samba 2.0.7 member server NT clients All user file are on the Samba machine, and all printing is done via the Samba machine. The NT PDC does authentication only. There is no BDC, and no problems with trust relationships, etc. All users already have accounts in /etc/passwd on the Samba machine. With the release of Samba 2.2, I'd very much like to upgrade my Samba server to 2.2, and, at the same time, make this machine the domain controller, allowing me to retire the NT PDC. I'd like to achieve this as transparently as possible for the end users. Has anyone done this, or is there a FAQ anywhere. I'd like to avoid having to create a new domain and join all the machines to it manually.... Any advice, gotchas, and general info would be much appreciated. Mike. From matteo at iuav.it Wed May 2 17:46:02 2001 From: matteo at iuav.it (Matteo Parpagiola) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:33 2003 Subject: TNG 2.6 does not compile on HP-UX 10.20 Message-ID: <3.0.5.32.20010502184602.009f48f0@brezza.iuav.it> I can't get TNG 2.6 to compile under HP-UX 10.20 using gcc 2.9.2. The error message is from the linker (ld B.10.37). The error message is: # make install ... Linking bin/smbd libtool: link: warning: this platform does not like uninstalled shared libraries libtool: link: `bin/smbd' will be relinked during installation /usr/ccs/bin/ld: Unsatisfied symbols: dlclose (code) collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [bin/smbd] Error 1 The output from configure is: # ./configure --prefix=/opt/samba ... checking for dlopen in -ldl... no checking for dlopen... no checking for dld_link in -ldld... no checking for shl_load... yes creating libtool ... Thanks, Matteo Parpagiola IUAV istituto universitario di architettura di Venezia Tolentini - Santa Croce 191 I-30135 Venezia (Italia) From idra at samba.org Wed May 2 16:55:11 2001 From: idra at samba.org (Simo Sorce) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:33 2003 Subject: TNG 2.6 does not compile on HP-UX 10.20 In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.20010502184602.009f48f0@brezza.iuav.it>; from matteo@iuav.it on Wed, May 02, 2001 at 06:46:02PM +0100 References: <3.0.5.32.20010502184602.009f48f0@brezza.iuav.it> Message-ID: <20010502095511.B18276@va.samba.org> Samba-tng is a separated project now, check http://www.samba-tng.org/mailinglists.html to find support. samba-tng e` un progetto separato ora, su http://www.samba-tng.org/mailinglists.html puoi trovare informazioni sulle liste di supporto per samba-tng. On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 06:46:02PM +0100, Matteo Parpagiola wrote: > I can't get TNG 2.6 to compile under HP-UX 10.20 using gcc 2.9.2. > The error message is from the linker (ld B.10.37). > The error message is: > > # make install > ... > Linking bin/smbd > libtool: link: warning: this platform does not like uninstalled shared > libraries > libtool: link: `bin/smbd' will be relinked during installation > /usr/ccs/bin/ld: Unsatisfied symbols: > dlclose (code) > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > make: *** [bin/smbd] Error 1 > > The output from configure is: > > # ./configure --prefix=/opt/samba > ... > checking for dlopen in -ldl... no > checking for dlopen... no > checking for dld_link in -ldld... no > checking for shl_load... yes > creating libtool > ... > > Thanks, > Matteo Parpagiola > > > IUAV istituto universitario di architettura di Venezia > Tolentini - Santa Croce 191 > I-30135 Venezia (Italia) > > -- Simo Sorce ------------------------------ Unix IS user friendly, it is just selective about who his friends are. From gcarter at valinux.com Wed May 2 17:01:39 2001 From: gcarter at valinux.com (Gerald Carter) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:33 2003 Subject: TNG 2.6 does not compile on HP-UX 10.20 In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.20010502184602.009f48f0@brezza.iuav.it> Message-ID: On Wed, 2 May 2001, Matteo Parpagiola wrote: > I can't get TNG 2.6 to compile under HP-UX 10.20 using gcc 2.9.2. > The error message is from the linker (ld B.10.37). > The error message is: Try asking the TNG folks. http://www.samba-tng.org/ cheers, jerry From Joel.Raper at wahchang.com Wed May 2 17:56:08 2001 From: Joel.Raper at wahchang.com (Joel.Raper@wahchang.com) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:33 2003 Subject: How Do you... Message-ID: <41C0B6AB2A57D3119ED800A0C9EA392001BD8E69@arnold.bedrock.com> I would like to find out if you could setup Samba to give access to multiple domains with out doing the following... - I do not want to setup Trust relationships between all NT domain ( I want to avoid all WINS issues) - I do not want to open it up for all to see unless they are authenticated by any of the approved domains - I do not want to have to have them use another username and password. I have be giving an ideal for a knowledgeable person that suggest we install multiple copies of SAMBA and Virtual ips. Please give me some suggestions. THanks Joel -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed From kenp at mtu.edu Wed May 2 18:17:15 2001 From: kenp at mtu.edu (Ken Palosaari) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:33 2003 Subject: win2k won't join domin Message-ID: hi I'm running samba 2.2 pdc on solaris 8 and am having touble getting a windows 2000 pro workstation to join the domain. I have no problem accessing the domain from a win98 pc. The error I get when I try joing is: "The procedure number is out of range." My smbpasswd entry looks like : testpc$:506:882D8750941D0A28D109DED161091DFE:4D76E00AC502B4F367A64E700A775FE0:[W ]:LCT-3AF04136: it was created using "smbpasswd -a -m testpc$" I noticed in the log file with an error message: [2001/05/02 14:05:57, 10] passdb/smbpass.c:startsmbfilepwent_internal(84) startsmbfilepwent_internal: opening file /samba/private/smbpasswd [2001/05/02 14:05:57, 0] passdb/smbpass.c:startsmbfilepwent_internal(87) startsmbfilepwent_internal: unable to open file /samba/private/smbpasswd. Erro r was Permission denied [2001/05/02 14:05:57, 0] passdb/smbpass.c:iterate_getsmbpwuid(1243) unable to open smb password database. [2001/05/02 14:05:57, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(63) not sure why I'm getting this error when I have the user trying to create the account in both the domain admin group and domain admin users options in the smb.conf thanks for any help you can offer Ken From Rich.West at divatv.com Wed May 2 20:13:17 2001 From: Rich.West at divatv.com (Rich West) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:33 2003 Subject: Win2K client + Samba 2.2 PDC = no netlogon? Message-ID: <3AF06A5D.FCEA5527@divatv.com> I have a Samba 2.2 server running as a PDC for a Win98 and a Win2K machine. The Win98 client logs into the domain and the netlogon script executes happily. The Win2K machine, which has already been successfully added to the domain, doesn't execute the log-on script. Not that this helps (might be a red herring), but, when browsing the network neighborhood, you have to work your way up to clicking "Show entire network", then click on the domain name, in order to see the other hosts in the domain.. Otherwise, Samba 2.2.0 has been working rather well (even during the alpha phases. :).. at least all of the hosts can get into the domain.. -Rich -- Richard West mailto:richard.west@divatv.com Sr. Systems Administrator Diva - Princeton, NJ http://www.divatv.com From vorlon at netexpress.net Wed May 2 20:26:11 2001 From: vorlon at netexpress.net (Steve Langasek) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:33 2003 Subject: Work with NT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Hola Facundo, On Wed, 2 May 2001, Facundo C?sar Ortiz wrote: > Since one becomes so that SAMBA validates users and it works as if outside a > server NT. Thanks > Como se hace para que SAMBA valide usuarios y funcione como si fuera un > servidor NT. > Gracias. ?Has le?do el COMO Samba NT-domain? (http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/Samba-HOWTO-Collection.html#AEN760) Puede que debamos comenzar a traducir esta documentaci?n para mejor servir a los usu?rios no anglohablantes. :) Have you read the Samba NT-domain HOWTO at http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/Samba-HOWTO-Collection.html#AEN760? Perhaps it's time for us to start looking at translating the documentation to better serve the international Samba community... Saludos, Steve Langasek postmodern programmer From khadley at mcselph.com Wed May 2 21:24:50 2001 From: khadley at mcselph.com (Kenneth Hadley) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:33 2003 Subject: Error joing a NT Domain under Samba 2.2.0 Message-ID: <010601c0d34e$56180b20$0901a8c0@mcselph.com> Im having a strange problem joing a NT4 Domain even though ive done this before quite a few times but only on 2.0.7 I'm getting: cli_net_auth2: Error NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED cli_nt_setup_creds: auth2 challenge failed modify_trust_password: unable to setup the PDC credentials to machine NTS_APPL1. Error was : NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED. 2001/05/03 01:09:43 : change_trust_account_password: Failed to change password for domain MSI.NET. Unable to join domain MSI.NET. I did add the Net-BIOS name of my Samba server to the NT Server Manager for Domains before i attempted to run smbpasswd -j msi.net -r nts_appl1 What brainfart mistake did I do? Im using Samba 2.2.0 (samba-2.0.7-20000425.i386.rpm from samba.org) on RedHat 7.0 Does anyone has any ideas? Thanks _______________________________ Kenneth Hadley PC / Network Specialist McCormick Selph Inc. From marco.vittone at infinito.it Tue May 1 23:00:36 2001 From: marco.vittone at infinito.it (Marco Vittone) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:33 2003 Subject: Again on name mapping Message-ID: <000701c0d292$890c0b60$3d941997@vittonelibero.it> I have not used Samba 2.2 as a PDC yet but I'm going to use it very soon. One of the question I have is about username/group mapping between Unix and Nt. Now that the various maps from TNG are gone away (but the code is still in the source) what is the meaning of the "domain groups" option? And what about the "groupname map" option found in the source? Does it works if enabled in the build? Another question. From the W2K point of view how domain users and groups (if mapped) are seen in the security tab from the user? Like in 2.0.7 (so with the Unix name) or with the NT fashion (DOMAIN\Ntname)? Is it possible to assign permissions to global groups and users provided from the Samba PDC in private shares from W2K Professionals box? How Unix ACL are mapped in W2K permissions? Maybe too many questions! Personally I think that the TNG solution (with maps) was maybe the easiest and clear solution but I haven't tried TNG (and I'm not going to use it now that 2.2 is out) so I'm not aware of the problems this solution may cause. It's not a critic, is only an opinion from a user point of view, but the 2.2 approach seems quite a step backward. Sorry for my bad english! Best regards, Marco Vittone From gcarter at valinux.com Wed May 2 13:08:24 2001 From: gcarter at valinux.com (Gerald Carter) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:34 2003 Subject: various small problems with (bugs in?) Samba 2.2 In-Reply-To: ; from pgoetz@math.utexas.edu on Tue, May 01, 2001 at 16:58:35 -0500 References: Message-ID: <20010502080824.I8210@pogo.plainjoe.org> moved to main samna list. On Tue, 01 May 2001 16:58:35 Patrick Goetz wrote: > > Here is a collection of problems I've encountered with > Samba 2.2 > > 1. Log files > > I configured Samba with --prefix=/opt/samba. Consequently, > by default, I get log files /opt/samba/var/log.nmbd > and /opt/samba/var/log.smbd . > > I'd prefer have a single log file in /var/log, however, > adding the line > log file = /var/log/samba.log > > to the [global] section of smb.conf and restarting the daemons > doesn't seem to do anything -- the logs still get written > to /opt/samba/var/*. This works correctly. Thw two log files is by design. No way to override this. As far as the smb.conf parameter, [smbd|nmbd] will write to the compile time default until the config file is parsed. It's a chicken and egg problem. > 2. PID files > > Ideally I'd like to be able to have an init.d > script to start|stop|restart smbd and nmbd. Unfortunately > I can't find any place where a pid file is written, Look in $prefix/var/locks/*pid > I thought smbcontrol was something like apachectl, but > it appears not to be; i.e. the man page gives no > indication of how one would use it to start stop smbcontrol is for sednign messages to smbd and nmbd proceses. > smbd/nmbd. The Debian version of Samba 2.07 does come with > a init.d/samba script (albeit a terribly fubar'ed one) which > must work for 2.07 -- is there any way to get this > functionality in 2.2? See the examples subdirectory of the samba source distribution. > 3. Domain Users > > On a W2K machine (with Samba 2.2 PDC), whenever I try to > add "Domain Users" to the list of users with permissions > on, say, the spool director (although the same thing > happens in any permission granting situation), I > always get the message "Unable to lookup user names > for display" and nothing is added to the list of users > with permissions. Adding individual users from the domain > works fine. Perhaps I'm confused about what "Domain > Users" means -- I just assumed it meant grant > this permission to anyone connecting from this > particular NT domain. Our domain group support is a little incomplete at the moment. cheers, jerry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) From dleffler at alaska.com Thu May 3 01:47:54 2001 From: dleffler at alaska.com (Dave Leffler) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:34 2003 Subject: Unix PW Sync In-Reply-To: <20010502064005.3ced6071.awilliam@whitemice.org> Message-ID: <001201c0d373$125da280$c40aa8c0@anchorageak.net> What might they be? I'd like to get this working on Mandrake 7.2. -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Adam Tauno Williams Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 02:40 To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Re: Unix PW Sync >It appears the Unix PW sync doesn't work in 2.2.0. When I tried with it >off, things worked okay. When I turned it on, the Unix PW's were changed, >but the windows PW's were not.... I'm using the same passwd sync scripts/settings I used for 2.2.0alphaX and it works. From kaab_k at hotmail.com Thu May 3 11:09:47 2001 From: kaab_k at hotmail.com (kaab kaoutar) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:34 2003 Subject: newbie in trouble with saaaaaaaaaaaaaamba :( Message-ID: Hi! I'm an old user of Microsoft, we have two local networks, one of windows95/98 whose workgroup is called win1, and one of NT4 workstations and NT4 Server whose domain is called emagin.I have installed linux mandrake7.2 with my NT workstation, I have installed samba, the workgroup is linux.I have created a user with the same login and passwd's of the administrator of NTserver called server1. I have added the mangled stuff in smb.conf. I have shared adirectpry called test. Now win1 and win2 access the directory! but from linux i access win1, my shared directory abut not win2 :( it asks twice for autentication, first from the linux server then the from nt server(they are the same), but sometime it shows nothing in win2 domain and sometimes it keeps asking for authentication. Do i need to change the NT reg because of the plain text passwords ? i heard i have to enable LM ANNOUNCE in NT how ? i can't find it ? i heard also that i have tmount the NT driver ???????????? Anoter qusetion: is there a way to access my shared directory once logged in my workstation as NT OS and vice versa? Thanks a lot _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. From steve at maths.ed.ac.uk Thu May 3 11:19:15 2001 From: steve at maths.ed.ac.uk (Steven Law) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:34 2003 Subject: Enable/Disable encryption on clients Message-ID: Hello everyone, I'm in the process of moving my clients from a workgroup/no encryption server to a domain/encryption server. Couldn't get my Win2k client to join the domain so I decided to test with a win95 PC to begin with. If I disable (i.e. change the value to 0) the encryption entry in the registry or remove it altogether my PC still seems to be able to authenticate okay to the non-encrypted server and not to the encrypted server. I have disabled password caching (so there are no local pwl files). Is there more to this process ? Regards Steve -- Computing Officer Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Edinburgh University. Phone: 0131 650 5037 , Email: steve@maths.ed.ac.uk Home Page: http://www.maths.ed.ac.uk/~steve From Harald.Junggunst at informatik.uni-erlangen.de Thu May 3 11:54:33 2001 From: Harald.Junggunst at informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Harald Junggunst) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:34 2003 Subject: smbpasswd Message-ID: <3AF146F9.FF3ED6F@informatik.uni-erlangen.de> Hi I`m using Smaba2.2 with Solaris. A group of people should have the right to edit the smbpasswd-file. Therefore I created a new group and changed the file to this group. I set the goup-write-Bit to 1. Now when I modify the smbpasswd-file ( smbpasswd -a; or integrate a new client) the Bit will automatically disapeared. Can help someone? Harald From mthomas at rhrk.uni-kl.de Thu May 3 12:08:39 2001 From: mthomas at rhrk.uni-kl.de (Martin Thomas) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:34 2003 Subject: sharing a serial plotter on samba? References: Message-ID: <00a801c0d3c9$c9fe3020$1332f683@arubi.unikl.de> Hi, I did this some time ago with success (with a suse linux 7.0 intel box and samba 2.0.7), since I do not have access to the print server at the moment I can only give some hints: 1. you have to set up the plotter in the unix system, search the printer-howto from the linux documentation project. you have to do the right entries in the /etc/printcap so tell the system to use a serial port, this seems to depend on the spooling system you use (I used lprng, see www.lprng.org) 2. the BSD spooler requires to set the serial port parameters (baud-rate etc.) before you can use the printer. lprng does this for you - at least it did it for me on a linux box (see www.lprng.org -> howto -> points 12.10 and 11.11) 3. setup the plotter in autocad as a local windows plotter, do a plot and redirect the output to a file, transfer this file to you unix-box (samba or ftp) 4. try to print the file via the spool-system: lpr -Pnameofplotterinprintcap autocadplotfilefrompoint3 this has to work - read the howto/manpages and adjust you settings again if not 5. after you have successfully plotted your file just add the plotter like any other printer to the smb.conf 6. adjust the drivers settings for the plotter on your windows machine(s) so it points to the samba print share on the print-server Hope this helps, Martin ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lista linux" To: "samba NT list" Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 7:01 PM Subject: sharing a serial plotter on samba? > hi all, > > I have a serial plotter (used under AutoCad) and wanted to share it using > samba, does any body knows if this is possible? is it posible to share a > serial port from the server using samba (2.2.0 PDC)? > > thanks in advance. > > romy > > > From tilger at hts-net.de Thu May 3 12:43:02 2001 From: tilger at hts-net.de (Hendrik Tilger) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:34 2003 Subject: samedit question Message-ID: Greetings, I have a question about the samedit command from samba-tng-alpha-2.6. We'd like to use it in a script to add NT-users to a NT-PDC to synchronize with our NIS-server. Everything works fine, we can just add users, change passwords ... But we *can't* add further information to the account, like Full name, Homedir, profile. with: samedit -S MY_PDC -U myname%mypass -c 'samuserset testaccount -p testword -F "Mr. Account"' i'll get: "Set User Info: failed" "User info change failed." Whats wrong with it? Thanks in advance. H. Tilger ____________________________________ HTS Systembetreuung * www.hts-net.de Hendrik Tilger Tel. 03641 686 728 Gesch?ftsf?hrer Fax. 03641 686 710 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Hendrik Tilger.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 471 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-ntdom/attachments/20010503/51174dde/HendrikTilger.vcf From mafoe at munich.sgi.com Thu May 3 13:03:38 2001 From: mafoe at munich.sgi.com (Martin Foerster) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:34 2003 Subject: one server for two domains Message-ID: <001501c0d3d1$77f8e600$0100000a@munich.sgi.com> Hi there, I have a samba server installed with security=domain, password server is PDC. Now a couple of user will join a different NT domain, but they still need the same access on the samba server as before. Is it possible in any way, to access the same samba server with security=domain and two different NT Domains for authentification ? thanks for any input Martin From avant at 2600.org.au Thu May 3 14:24:12 2001 From: avant at 2600.org.au (aVANTGUARD) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:34 2003 Subject: samba 2.2 / Windows 2000 Message-ID: I'm not sure if this problem is published, or 2.2 is not designed for this, but from what I have read I'm sure I should be able to get this working. I have a samba 2.2 server running on my Linux server, and Windows 2000 sp1 (fully patched) running on my client machine. The workgroup for both is 'underground' The machine names are: 'technolust' and 'avant' respectively. Now, the user on the client machine happens to be the same as the machine name. 'avant' A user on the Linux machine exists with the name 'avant' (username) UID = 1000 I've also already added 'avant' to smbpasswd with 'smbpasswd -a avant' and entered the password It is fine up to this point then I try to add the machine name in with 'smbpasswd -a avant -m avant' and I get this --> technolust:/etc# smbpasswd -a avant -m avant User avant$ does not exist in system password file (usually /etc/passwd). Cannot add account without a valid local system user. Failed to modify password entry for user avant$ This is strange, since the avant user *does* exist in the '/etc/passwd' and '/usr/local/samba/private/smbpasswd' If I try to add the Windows 2000 machine to the domain, I get either these two error messages: "The account used is a computer account. Use your global user account or local user account to access this server." "The credentials supplied conflict with an existing set of credentials." There is an account on the windows 2000 machine also of 'avant' They all have the same password. technolust:/usr/local/samba/bin# ./smbd -V Version 2.2.0 Is there something that I am doing incorrectly, or not doing at all? If anyone has similar issues or, knows the solution, let me know please! Thanks, avant. ps attached is my smb.conf file. -------- smb.conf ---------- [global] workgroup = UNDERGROUND netbios name = TECHNOLUST server string = MICROSOFT WINDOWS NT log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 50 socket options = TCP_NODELAY security = USER encrypt passwords = yes local master = yes os level = 64 preferred master = yes domain master = yes domain logons = yes wins support = yes interfaces = 192.168.0.1/16 hosts allow = 192.168. 127.0.0.1 [pub] comment = Users Shared Files path = /share/pub read only = yes guest ok = yes browseable = yes [tmp] comment = Temporary file space path = /tmp read only = No guest ok = Yes [homes] comment = Home Directories browseable = no writable = yes From gcarter at valinux.com Thu May 3 14:36:27 2001 From: gcarter at valinux.com (Gerald Carter) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:34 2003 Subject: win2k won't join domin In-Reply-To: ; from kenp@mtu.edu on Wed, May 02, 2001 at 13:17:15 -0500 References: Message-ID: <20010503093627.E1366@pogo.plainjoe.org> On Wed, 02 May 2001 13:17:15 Ken Palosaari wrote: > [2001/05/02 14:05:57, 10] passdb/smbpass.c:startsmbfilepwent_internal(84) > startsmbfilepwent_internal: opening file /samba/private/smbpasswd > [2001/05/02 14:05:57, 0] passdb/smbpass.c:startsmbfilepwent_internal(87) > startsmbfilepwent_internal: unable to open file > /samba/private/smbpasswd. Erro > r was Permission denied > [2001/05/02 14:05:57, 0] passdb/smbpass.c:iterate_getsmbpwuid(1243) > unable to open smb password database. > [2001/05/02 14:05:57, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(63) > > > not sure why I'm getting this error when I have the user > trying to create the account in both the domain admin > group and domain admin users options in the smb.conf I'm not sure (would have to look into it some more), but you may need to be root. I'm not sure how well the domain admin stuff works right now. There may be some code paths that it doesn't cover. Cheers, jerry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) From avant at 2600.org.au Thu May 3 14:52:35 2001 From: avant at 2600.org.au (aVANTGUARD) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:34 2003 Subject: samba 2.2 / Windows 2000 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: excellent, thank you. it worked :) now, the only problem is, I get a new error message "The procedure number is out of range." Do I need to now set-up a trust relationship for this machine 'avant$'? Any ideas as to what this error message relates to in a samba world? Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: Andreas Steinmetz [mailto:ast@domdv.de] Sent: Friday, 4 May 2001 12:27 AM To: aVANTGUARD Subject: RE: samba 2.2 / Windows 2000 Make sure that not only the user 'avant' is in /etc/passwd but that the machine 'avant$' is in there, too. Shell may be e.g. /bin/false On 03-May-2001 aVANTGUARD wrote: Andreas Steinmetz D.O.M. Datenverarbeitung GmbH From edmundo at shitepie.net Thu May 3 15:39:16 2001 From: edmundo at shitepie.net (Stokes) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:34 2003 Subject: samba 2.2 / Windows 2000 References: Message-ID: <000701c0d3e7$36908180$010aa8c0@shitepie> i have found that this error can be avoided by NOT adding the machine account to the smbpasswd file. Just make sure the machine account (with the $) is in your system passwd file, and try to add the machine to the domain. In my case, anyway, samba took care of adding the account to the smbpasswd file by itself upon joining the machine to the domain. this may not be the case for you, but it's worth a shot. Stokes ----- Original Message ----- From: "aVANTGUARD" To: "Andreas Steinmetz" Cc: Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 7:52 AM Subject: RE: samba 2.2 / Windows 2000 > excellent, thank you. it worked :) > now, the only problem is, I get a new error message > > "The procedure number is out of range." > > Do I need to now set-up a trust relationship for this machine 'avant$'? > Any ideas as to what this error message relates to in a samba world? > > Thanks. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Andreas Steinmetz [mailto:ast@domdv.de] > Sent: Friday, 4 May 2001 12:27 AM > To: aVANTGUARD > Subject: RE: samba 2.2 / Windows 2000 > > > Make sure that not only the user 'avant' is in /etc/passwd but that the > machine > 'avant$' is in there, too. Shell may be e.g. /bin/false > > On 03-May-2001 aVANTGUARD wrote: > > > Andreas Steinmetz > D.O.M. Datenverarbeitung GmbH > > > From ctooley at amoa.org Thu May 3 15:58:04 2001 From: ctooley at amoa.org (ctooley@amoa.org) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:34 2003 Subject: Migration Documentation Message-ID: <86256A41.0056AF0B.00@amoa.org> This may seem like something that's specific enough that I should do it on my own, but I'll ask anyway. Does anyone have any migration documenation for moving data and users from Netware to Samba? I'm running Netware 5.0 and want to replace it with Samba 2.2 on Linux as soon as possible. I've created all the user accounts and all of the groups to basically mirror the Netware NDS entries. I've got the ACL patches installed into the kernel and all of the necessary tools. I can get Samba running just fine, I've got plenty of experience with that part of it. However, what I'm wondering is if there is an easy way to retain the ACL information from Netware and move the data over to a Linux box. I would think that there should be some migration docs distributed with Samba for people wishing to switch platforms, however it's not that unrealistic to believe they aren't there yet. If no one else has anything done, I will start such documentation with my process and basically start all over again in building the Samba box just to be complete. Chris Tooley From ghost at uusikaupunki.net Thu May 3 17:01:16 2001 From: ghost at uusikaupunki.net (Juha Auvinen) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:34 2003 Subject: SAMBA 2.2.0 PDC / account expired In-Reply-To: <86256A41.0056AF0B.00@amoa.org> Message-ID: We are running samba 2.2.0 as pdc in our network (9x and win2k) when some users try to use win2k shares win9x tells that the users account has expired. Has anyone else had these kind of experiences and does anyone know how to fix this problem? -- Juha Auvinen Talinkorventie 11 c 80 20320 TURKU Handle Ghost Puh 0400-976272 http://atsilnx.uusikaupunki.net Carpe Diem Lads! From don_mccall at hp.com Thu May 3 17:23:21 2001 From: don_mccall at hp.com (MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1)) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:34 2003 Subject: one server for two domains Message-ID: <079FD72E42C9D311B854009027650E6F040509EA@xatl02.atl.hp.com> Hi Martin, There are a couple of things you could do; 1. have your nt admins set up a trust between the two NT domains, and have "allow trusted domains = yes" (which is the default) in your smb.conf. Then when domainb/user tries to access a resource on samba, which is authenticating to domaina, the password server in domaina will authenticate the user via the trust between domaina/domainb. 2. If these couple of users are the exception, you could just create a local smbpasswd file and add them and their passwords via smbpasswd program. That way, when the authentication fails on the password server, samba will 'fallback' to checking for the users in it's smbpasswd file, and if it finds them, and the password is correct, it will authenticate them locally. Method ONE is preferred, IMHO... Hope this helps, Don "Reason, not volume, is the primary differentiator between a discussion, and an argument." -----Original Message----- From: Martin Foerster [mailto:mafoe@munich.sgi.com] Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 9:04 AM To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: one server for two domains Hi there, I have a samba server installed with security=domain, password server is PDC. Now a couple of user will join a different NT domain, but they still need the same access on the samba server as before. Is it possible in any way, to access the same samba server with security=domain and two different NT Domains for authentification ? thanks for any input Martin From ghost at uusikaupunki.net Thu May 3 20:02:27 2001 From: ghost at uusikaupunki.net (Juha Auvinen) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:34 2003 Subject: SAMBA 2.2.0 PAM Message-ID: What kind of problems there are in PAM, conserning win2k and NT? Any ideas when will samba 2.2.1 be ready and published? -- Juha Auvinen 20320 TURKU Puh 0400-976272 Carpe Diem Lads! From seymourp at horizondata.com Thu May 3 20:16:37 2001 From: seymourp at horizondata.com (Paul Seymour) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:34 2003 Subject: Printing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: I'm having a problem setting up my win2k machines to print from samba. It seems that I can only get the printers to work if I spool the print jobs from the workstation. I need to have the server spool the printjobs, because I do lot's of printing (obviously). What is the best way to setup a printer in samba and have the win2k machines install and set them up correctly? Paul SysAdmin Horizon Data Corp. From spinler.patrick at mayo.edu Thu May 3 20:48:14 2001 From: spinler.patrick at mayo.edu (Patrick Spinler) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:34 2003 Subject: winbindd References: Message-ID: <3AF1C40E.63DB9DF7@mayo.edu> Hi: Take a look in the source/nsswitch directory. I think you need to issue a "make winbindd" or something similar. There's a README in the nsswitch dir. -- Pat Geok Choo Teo-Chee wrote: > > Hi, > > I had downloaded samba-tng (alpha 2.6) and successfully compiled > it on my Solaris 2.6 . When I looked into the > > winbindd (8) man pages, it stated that I need to copy "libnss_winbind.so.2" > and "pam_winbind.so" to "/lib" and "/lib/security" > > respectively. But I cannot find these two files that I need to copy. > > Any pointers to where I can find these two files while be much > appreciated. > > Thank you. -- This message does not represent the policies or positions of the Mayo Foundation or its subsidiaries. Patrick Spinler email: Spinler.Patrick@Mayo.EDU Mayo Foundation phone: 507/284-9485 From Michael.Ott at erlm.siemens.de Fri May 4 09:33:22 2001 From: Michael.Ott at erlm.siemens.de (Michael Ott) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:34 2003 Subject: confirm 956101 Message-ID: <20010504113322.J16428@erlm.siemens.de> confirm 956101 -- Michael Ott --------------------------------- - Siemens AG - I&S IT PS 51 ERL - - Werner-von-Siemens-Strasse 60 - - 91050 Erlangen - - Tel. +49 91 31 7 42 0 54 - - Michael.Ott@erlm.siemens.de - --------------------------------- From Brecht.Samyn at kulak.ac.be Fri May 4 09:33:17 2001 From: Brecht.Samyn at kulak.ac.be (Brecht Samyn) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:34 2003 Subject: %U and %u functionality change in 2.2?? References: <988210106.20240.7.camel@comp10574.potsdam.edu> <3AE6FB0A.5C27AEA8@valinux.com> <3AE81033.1CF7E9E0@kulak.ac.be> <3AE9A0D0.3B6D26D9@valinux.com> Message-ID: <3AF2775C.9163BE73@kulak.ac.be> Sorry, my fault: %U now seems to work with the patched version. But %u doesn't. Will that work again or is this option abandonned ? thanks, brecht Jeremy Allison wrote: > I just tested this with the latest CVS (with my patch). > > I added a share in the smb.conf, > > [user-%U] > comment = user %U > path = /tmp > > And I see the share name and comment name with my current > logged in user name substituted. > > So I can't reproduce your problem here. > > Jeremy. > > -- > -------------------------------------------------------- > Buying an operating system without source is like buying > a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions. > -------------------------------------------------------- -- Brecht Samyn, Systeemgroep Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Campus Kortrijk (KULAK) E-mail: Brecht.Samyn@kulak.ac.be tel. ++32 56 246 264 From paulan at joycast.com Fri May 4 09:44:58 2001 From: paulan at joycast.com (Paul An) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:35 2003 Subject: domain logon of w2k client to samba 2.2.0 server Message-ID: <3AF27A1A.BE7009F5@joycast.com> There are two domains, one with w2k server named svra (domainA)with active directory and the other with samba 2.2.0 (domainB). I've joined a win2k client to the samba 2.2.0 domain (domain B) by doing the following on the samba server: useradd client$ smbpassed -a -m client and by changing the network setting in the win 2k client. I've got the "welcome to the domain" message on the win2k client. The samba server has the following in the smb.conf: workgroup = domainB password server = svra domain logon = yes local master = yes os level = 33 domain master = yes preferred master = yes When I reboot the win2k client and try logging onto the domain, I get a message saying that the user can not be logged into the system, to check the password and try loggin in again. I have no problem with win98 clients logging into the domain. The same account fails on win2k and succeeds on win98. How can I fix this? From Brecht.Samyn at kulak.ac.be Fri May 4 09:47:03 2001 From: Brecht.Samyn at kulak.ac.be (Brecht Samyn) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:35 2003 Subject: log= with 2.2.0 Message-ID: <3AF27A96.2E0A51EC@kulak.ac.be> After upgrading from 2.0.7 to 2.2.0 (with subst-patch) the log parameter doesn't work as before: I have: == smb.conf == ... include /smb.conf.%L ... and: == smb.conf.odeon == ... log file = /var/log/samba/tlc/odeon/%m.log ... but Samba 2.2.0 logs to /usr/local/samba/var/log.smbd brecht -- Brecht Samyn, Systeemgroep Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Campus Kortrijk (KULAK) E-mail: Brecht.Samyn@kulak.ac.be tel. ++32 56 246 264 From barth at cck.uni-kl.de Fri May 4 11:18:00 2001 From: barth at cck.uni-kl.de (Christian Barth) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:35 2003 Subject: samba 2.2 / Windows 2000 In-Reply-To: <000701c0d3e7$36908180$010aa8c0@shitepie> Message-ID: <3AF2AC08.30795.8D70B4@localhost> If I remembar the first mail about this right: You have am machine and a user "avant" This is a real challange, since user names, machine names, workgroup names and domain names are all managed in the same name space. So it may be be impossible what you are trying. Try it with a over machine name first. Let the machine be in a workgroup not named like the domain bevor joining the domain, .... Christian BTW: A couple of mysterious problems went way when we renamed our domain not having the same name as the PDC Christian > i have found that this error can be avoided by NOT adding the machine > account to the smbpasswd file. Just make sure the machine account (with the > $) is in your system passwd file, and try to add the machine to the domain. > In my case, anyway, samba took care of adding the account to the smbpasswd > file by itself upon joining the machine to the domain. > > this may not be the case for you, but it's worth a shot. > > Stokes > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "aVANTGUARD" > To: "Andreas Steinmetz" > Cc: > Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 7:52 AM > Subject: RE: samba 2.2 / Windows 2000 > > > > excellent, thank you. it worked :) > > now, the only problem is, I get a new error message > > > > "The procedure number is out of range." > > > > Do I need to now set-up a trust relationship for this machine 'avant$'? > > Any ideas as to what this error message relates to in a samba world? > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Andreas Steinmetz [mailto:ast@domdv.de] > > Sent: Friday, 4 May 2001 12:27 AM > > To: aVANTGUARD > > Subject: RE: samba 2.2 / Windows 2000 > > > > > > Make sure that not only the user 'avant' is in /etc/passwd but that the > > machine > > 'avant$' is in there, too. Shell may be e.g. /bin/false > > > > On 03-May-2001 aVANTGUARD wrote: > > > > > > Andreas Steinmetz > > D.O.M. Datenverarbeitung GmbH > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________________________________ In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates? (SUN) From Mike.Wagner at am.wackergroup.com Fri May 4 13:02:23 2001 From: Mike.Wagner at am.wackergroup.com (Wagner, Mike) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:35 2003 Subject: ASCII files have CR's stripped with Win2000 Message-ID: <60FF35B6E36ED311BB2500A0C9A7AD4C0191CA93@wackercorp.com> Hello, I am running SAMBA 1.9.18 p10 on a SUN Ultra-1, SunOS 5.6 and see the following problems: 1. When I use Windows 2000 (SR1) to transfer ASCII files to/from my Samba UNIX file server, the carriage returns often get stripped. This is not a problem when using a Windows NT4 (SR5) PC. 2. My level of Samba uses "plain text" passwords, which must be enabled in the Win2K registry. However, after less than 24 hours the Win2K PC lost access to the Samba UNIX file server and I had to change the Win2K machine registry back to require encrypted passwords. This is wrong. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- May need to enable plain text password in Win2K OS See http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q224/2/87.asp * Regedit: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\LanmanWorkStation\Param eters * Value Name: EnablePlainTextPassword * Data Type: REG_DWORD * Data: 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------- Does anyone else see these problems? Is there an easy fix from the Win2K side? What release of SAMBA addresses these problems? Thanks for the help, I fear that these issues have been addressed here before. Samba list member for ten hours. Sincerely, Mike From aalang at rutgersinsurance.com Fri May 4 13:19:43 2001 From: aalang at rutgersinsurance.com (Adam Lang) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:35 2003 Subject: ASCII files have CR's stripped with Win2000 References: <60FF35B6E36ED311BB2500A0C9A7AD4C0191CA93@wackercorp.com> Message-ID: <000e01c0d49c$e208fb40$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> When you say they are stripped, are you moving the text files to samba and then looking at them in unix or are you moving files to samba and when you open them in windows later, they are messed up? Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Wagner, Mike" To: Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 9:02 AM Subject: ASCII files have CR's stripped with Win2000 > Hello, > > I am running SAMBA 1.9.18 p10 on a SUN Ultra-1, SunOS 5.6 and see the > following problems: > > 1. When I use Windows 2000 (SR1) to transfer ASCII files to/from my Samba > UNIX file server, the carriage returns often get stripped. This is not a > problem when using a Windows NT4 (SR5) PC. From Volker.Rittner at t-online.de Fri May 4 13:17:30 2001 From: Volker.Rittner at t-online.de (Volker Rittner) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:35 2003 Subject: (no subject) Message-ID: <000a01c0d49c$95547220$0200000a@aplux.intra> -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed From Mike.Wagner at am.wackergroup.com Fri May 4 13:57:29 2001 From: Mike.Wagner at am.wackergroup.com (Wagner, Mike) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:35 2003 Subject: ASCII files have CR's stripped with Win2000 Message-ID: <60FF35B6E36ED311BB2500A0C9A7AD4C0191CA94@wackercorp.com> I am moving ASCII text configuration files (less than 10K of text) from other unix machines and from WinNT4 machines to the Samba server and then using the Win2K machine to pick the file off the server. The file once picked up is all on one line. Users are spending time going through the files with a text editor and reinserting the 's. Mike -----Original Message----- From: Adam Lang [SMTP:aalang@rutgersinsurance.com] Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 8:20 AM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: ASCII files have CR's stripped with Win2000 When you say they are stripped, are you moving the text files to samba and then looking at them in unix or are you moving files to samba and when you open them in windows later, they are messed up? Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Wagner, Mike" To: Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 9:02 AM Subject: ASCII files have CR's stripped with Win2000 > Hello, > > I am running SAMBA 1.9.18 p10 on a SUN Ultra-1, SunOS 5.6 and see the > following problems: > > 1. When I use Windows 2000 (SR1) to transfer ASCII files to/from my Samba > UNIX file server, the carriage returns often get stripped. This is not a > problem when using a Windows NT4 (SR5) PC. From aalang at rutgersinsurance.com Fri May 4 14:13:03 2001 From: aalang at rutgersinsurance.com (Adam Lang) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:35 2003 Subject: ASCII files have CR's stripped with Win2000 References: <60FF35B6E36ED311BB2500A0C9A7AD4C0191CA94@wackercorp.com> Message-ID: <002401c0d4a4$556ce9a0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> If I recall, it isn't a Samba issue. It is a Unix-Windows issue. Unix uses one marker to signal a end of line, whereas windows typically uses two markers. Notepad usually gets fooled, but whenever I have opened a unix text file in MS Word, it usually interprets it correctly. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Wagner, Mike" To: Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 9:57 AM Subject: RE: ASCII files have CR's stripped with Win2000 > I am moving ASCII text configuration files (less than 10K of text) from > other unix machines and from WinNT4 machines to the Samba server and then > using the Win2K machine to pick the file off the server. The file once > picked up is all on one line. Users are spending time going through the > files with a text editor and reinserting the 's. > > Mike > > -----Original Message----- > From: Adam Lang [SMTP:aalang@rutgersinsurance.com] > Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 8:20 AM > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: Re: ASCII files have CR's stripped with Win2000 > > When you say they are stripped, are you moving the text files to > samba and > then looking at them in unix or are you moving files to samba and > when you > open them in windows later, they are messed up? > > Adam Lang > Systems Engineer > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company > http://www.rutgersinsurance.com > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Wagner, Mike" > To: > Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 9:02 AM > Subject: ASCII files have CR's stripped with Win2000 > > > > Hello, > > > > I am running SAMBA 1.9.18 p10 on a SUN Ultra-1, SunOS 5.6 and see > the > > following problems: > > > > 1. When I use Windows 2000 (SR1) to transfer ASCII files to/from > my Samba > > UNIX file server, the carriage returns often get stripped. This > is not a > > problem when using a Windows NT4 (SR5) PC. > > From Heering at edo.uni-dortmund.de Fri May 4 14:23:38 2001 From: Heering at edo.uni-dortmund.de (Oliver Heering) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:35 2003 Subject: Samba 2.2 and Win2K Domain Admins In-Reply-To: <20010502014709.31228.qmail@web11606.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20010502014709.31228.qmail@web11606.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <2221107038.20010504162338@edo.uni-dortmund.de> Hi Suraj, On Wednesday, May 02, 2001 you wrote: > I think there has been a number of posts regarding domain admin support with > Win2k on this list but so far I have not seen any of these concerns been > addressed. Has anybody been able to login to a Win2K machine using admin > privelges. I tried putting the userid in the "domain users" parameter but it > did not work. I did the following: - create a unix group dedicated to those users who shall have admin privileges - change the primary group of the unix-user you want to become a domain-admin to that group - set "domain admin group = @" in smb.conf when i now log in to my domain using samba 2.2.0 as DC, i am granted full administrative privileges. cya, sLoP - http://www.ocrana.de From schapiro at clerk.pi.huji.ac.il Fri May 4 15:00:23 2001 From: schapiro at clerk.pi.huji.ac.il (Schlomo Schapiro) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:35 2003 Subject: Migration Documentation In-Reply-To: <86256A41.0056AF0B.00@amoa.org> Message-ID: Hi, you could mount the netware server under linux and read out the trustees (with nwtrustee2 from ncpfs) and set them on the linux box. But why would you want to make such a switch ? Netware is much better as fileserver and has a much better Windows integration and also a Linux client now. Schlomo On Thu, 3 May 2001 ctooley@amoa.org wrote: > > > This may seem like something that's specific enough that I should do it on my > own, but I'll ask anyway. > > Does anyone have any migration documenation for moving data and users from > Netware to Samba?I'm running Netware 5.0 and want to replace it with Samba 2.2 > on Linux as soon as possible.I've created all the user accounts and all of the > groups to basically mirror the Netware NDS entries.I've got the ACL patches > installed into the kernel and all of the necessary tools.I can get Samba > running just fine, I've got plenty of experience with that part of it.However, > what I'm wondering is if there is an easy way to retain the ACL information from > Netware and move the data over to a Linux box.I would think that there should > be some migration docs distributed with Samba for people wishing to switch > platforms, however it's not that unrealistic to believe they aren't there yet. > > If no one else has anything done, I will start such documentation with my > process and basically start all over again in building the Samba box just to be > complete. > > Chris Tooley > > > -- Schlomo Schapiro Computation Authority Hebrew University of Jerusalem Tel: ++972 / 2 / 65-84404 Fax: 65-27349 email: schapiro@clerk.pi.huji.ac.il WWW: http://shum.cc.huji.ac.il/~schapiro From gcarter at valinux.com Fri May 4 16:37:00 2001 From: gcarter at valinux.com (Gerald Carter) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:35 2003 Subject: example [add|delete] share command Message-ID: FYI... I just checked in a perl script that is a rought example of an 'add|delete share command'. See examples/misc/modify_smb_conf.pl. Hint: it parses smb.conf into a hash of hashes and so could easily be made into a 'add|delete printer command' :-) Enjoy. Cheers, jerry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) From jbenedet at unm.edu Fri May 4 21:45:41 2001 From: jbenedet at unm.edu (John Benedetto) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:35 2003 Subject: ASCII files have CR's stripped with Win2000 In-Reply-To: <60FF35B6E36ED311BB2500A0C9A7AD4C0191CA94@wackercorp.com> Message-ID: <1145063150.988987541@dhcp-200-0052.unm.edu> Okay... "moving" how? FTP? or as a shared drive? And, the files from the Unix side, that they are editing on the PC side, that is a normal occurance, isn't it? If the file originated on the Unix side, the LF/CR problem will be there regardless, and is normal behavior, isn't it? --On Friday, May 04, 2001 8:57 AM -0500 "Wagner, Mike" wrote: > I am moving ASCII text configuration files (less than 10K of text) from > other unix machines and from WinNT4 machines to the Samba server and then > using the Win2K machine to pick the file off the server. The file once > picked up is all on one line. Users are spending time going through the > files with a text editor and reinserting the 's. > > Mike > > -----Original Message----- > From: Adam Lang [SMTP:aalang@rutgersinsurance.com] > Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 8:20 AM > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: Re: ASCII files have CR's stripped with Win2000 > > When you say they are stripped, are you moving the text files to > samba and > then looking at them in unix or are you moving files to samba and > when you > open them in windows later, they are messed up? > > Adam Lang > Systems Engineer > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company > http://www.rutgersinsurance.com > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Wagner, Mike" > To: > Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 9:02 AM > Subject: ASCII files have CR's stripped with Win2000 > > > > Hello, > > > > I am running SAMBA 1.9.18 p10 on a SUN Ultra-1, SunOS 5.6 and see > the > > following problems: > > > > 1. When I use Windows 2000 (SR1) to transfer ASCII files to/from > my Samba > > UNIX file server, the carriage returns often get stripped. This > is not a > > problem when using a Windows NT4 (SR5) PC. > > > From lbrons at euronet.nl Fri May 4 21:50:29 2001 From: lbrons at euronet.nl (Louis Brons) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:35 2003 Subject: Change behaviour with printer properties. HP LaserJet 2100 Message-ID: hi, after setting up Samba 2.2.0 everything went really smooth, there is only one small problem which i can resolve. Current situation, shares and printer driver install work great. The only thing i can't seem to solve is getting al printer properties available. From ben at doeskin.com Sat May 5 09:30:37 2001 From: ben at doeskin.com (Ben Roberts) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:35 2003 Subject: win2k won't join domin References: Message-ID: <000b01c0d546$1af5d780$0a01a8c0@doeskin.com> Try loging in as root, when you 'change to domain' in network properties (win2k). Make sure. of course, that there is an entry for root in smbpasswd. After I logged in using the root account, it accepted me into the domain (welcome to the yourdomain domain). My problem is now that when i reboot and choose the domain, it wont let me log in, whatever account i use. It gives this error: "The system cannot log you on to this domain because the systems computer account in its primary domain is missing or the password on that account is incorrect " So none of my accounts on either machine will log into the domain. ;( Anyone come accross this? Ben ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ken Palosaari" To: Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 7:17 PM Subject: win2k won't join domin > hi > > I'm running samba 2.2 pdc on solaris 8 and am having touble getting a > windows 2000 pro workstation to join the domain. I have no problem > accessing the domain from a win98 pc. > > The error I get when I try joing is: > > "The procedure number is out of range." > > > My smbpasswd entry looks like : > > testpc$:506:882D8750941D0A28D109DED161091DFE:4D76E00AC502B4F367A64E700A775FE 0:[W ]:LCT-3AF04136: > > it was created using "smbpasswd -a -m testpc$" > > I noticed in the log file with an error message: > > [2001/05/02 14:05:57, 10] passdb/smbpass.c:startsmbfilepwent_internal(84) > startsmbfilepwent_internal: opening file /samba/private/smbpasswd > [2001/05/02 14:05:57, 0] passdb/smbpass.c:startsmbfilepwent_internal(87) > startsmbfilepwent_internal: unable to open file /samba/private/smbpasswd. Erro > r was Permission denied > [2001/05/02 14:05:57, 0] passdb/smbpass.c:iterate_getsmbpwuid(1243) > unable to open smb password database. > [2001/05/02 14:05:57, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(63) > > > not sure why I'm getting this error when I have the user trying to create > the account in both the domain admin group and domain admin users > options in the smb.conf > > > thanks for any help you can offer > Ken > > > > > From nick at brealey.org Sat May 5 12:01:26 2001 From: nick at brealey.org (Nicholas Brealey) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:36 2003 Subject: Migration Documentation References: Message-ID: <3AF3EB96.5CA12AC@brealey.org> Schlomo Schapiro wrote: > > Hi, > > you could mount the netware server under linux and read out the trustees > (with nwtrustee2 from ncpfs) and set them on the linux box. > > But why would you want to make such a switch ? Netware is much better as > fileserver and has a much better Windows integration and also a Linux > client now. > > Schlomo > Hello This is probably off-topic but I am intrested in discussing Samba vs Netware. I don't really know what Netware is capable of. I have a Netware server which was setup (not by me) for Windows 95/98 clients and we have added Windows NT/2000 clients. We also have a Sun server running Samba 2.2 as a PDC and an number of workstations running Solaris, IRIX and Linux. This is the list of things I don't like about Netware in my set up. They really all relate to Windows NT/2000 and are perhaps to do with out setup. I would love to be corrected if I am wrong (which I probably am). 1) Logging in is complicated and anoying. I have the Netware client installed. The user is presented with a window where they type their user name and password. This window has a check box for 'workstation only' which is misnamed - it actually means 'don't login to Netware'. There is also an Advanced button and a Windows NT/2000 tab where the user can set their Microsoft user name and choose to login in to the Microsoft domain or the local workstation. A very annoying feature of this dialogue is that the Microsoft user name does not default to the Netware user name. If more than one user uses a machine at least one of them has to type in their username twice even if their Netware and Microsoft user names are the same. If the Microsoft and Netware usernames and password are the same and the Micrsoft user name has been left at the correct name after the last use, then things go smoothly, if this is not the case a second login dialogue is displayed for Microsoft Networking. 2) Installing the Netware client correctly is extra work. If you use Microsoft Networking you need to install the Netware client with IP only and make sure that Microsoft Networking is higher priority than Netware. If you don't do a custom install of the client then you get slow performance, see http://www.ithowto.com/novell/clientspeed.htm for details. 3) Users can only share directories on their drives using CIFS so they have to have Microsoft Networking installed - having Netware as well just makes life more complicated. 4) Users can change ACLs on files on Samba shares in (almost) the same way as they change ACLs on files on local disks. I don't know how to restrict permissions on single file on a Netware share. The only time I tried it I restricted access to all files. The help button on my NT workstation gave no helpful information. 5) Windows NT/2000 roaming profiles don't work with Netware (or perhaps we don't have them enabled). 6) It seems that you need a Windows NT/2000 server to act as a gateway to integrate Netware well with Windows NT/2000 clients. If you have a Windows NT/2000 server why bother with Netware server? 7) I have to have Windows NT/2000 and Unix either for the applications our users run on them or to develop software for customers to run. Why do I a want another OS, Netware, when the ones I have to have can do everything I need. Regards Nick From grobe at gmx.de Sat May 5 17:07:25 2001 From: grobe at gmx.de (Lars Grobe) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:36 2003 Subject: hint: one possible reason for w2k not joining samba-controlled domain Message-ID: <3AF4334D.E8F4C6AD@gmx.de> Hi! I had problems with win2k-workstations not being able to join my samba-controlled domain. I don't know if there are others who made the same error, but I think I should just report it, maybe it will help someone. If not, just laugh about it ;-) I had my samba configuration in 3 files: one "general" and two for two servers. One of those was supposed to become the PDC. Anybody who is familiar with samba will see the error, but I didn't find it first and spent many hours there. It is necessary to define everything that is necessary for domain-controlling in the default smb.conf, not in any .smb.conf-files, which are a common way to make multiple servers show up. With my configuration, the PDC worked fine, but I couldn't get workstations become members of the domain. So I put everything together into one smb.conf, voila! (The extra .smb.conf is used when a client demands access to - but the pdc is accessed with another name, so the settings in .smb.conf are not read. CU, Lars O. Grobe. From rpeterso at mtholyoke.edu Sun May 6 03:59:08 2001 From: rpeterso at mtholyoke.edu (Ron Peterson) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:36 2003 Subject: homes share and logon path Message-ID: The Smamba 2.2 PDC FAQ says it is bad to set "logon path = \\%N\%U\profile" in smb.conf, because sometimes Windows clients will maintain a connection the \\homes\ share after the user has logged out. I'm just trying to understand this. When /does/ Windows drop a share? Setting up a [profiles] share as /home/%U/ would suffer the same problem I take it? And the trick, then, is appending %U to a shared share (so to speak), not making %U part of the share itself. Correct? I would really like to keep /home/ a one stop shop for a person's stuff, including roaming profile data. Is there a good way to do this? A [myhomes] share pointing to /home, and "logon path = \\%N\myhomes\%U" perhaps? Yes/No/Maybe So? -- Ron Peterson Network & Systems Manager Mount Holyoke College GPG and other info at http://www.mtholyoke.edu/~rpeterso From schapiro at clerk.pi.huji.ac.il Sun May 6 08:02:08 2001 From: schapiro at clerk.pi.huji.ac.il (Schlomo Schapiro) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:36 2003 Subject: Migration Documentation In-Reply-To: <3AF3EB96.5CA12AC@brealey.org> Message-ID: Hi, I hope the samba guys are not upset about this topic ... Anyway, don't do things you don't KNOW ! E.g. if you know Windows, then do Windows. If you know Novell, then don't. Besides that, if you don't have any enterprise level management needs (e.g. only few people in one department) or don't want strong management of the desktop, then you really don't need Novell. OTOH, if you need a directory-based authentication backbone with excellent Windows Client integration and proven high security, then there are not so many alternatives to Novell, especially when it comes to stability and support and performance. And, NW6 will support CIFS and to do roaming profiles you might need Zenworks (for Novell). And, don't try to save money at the wrong place ! Schlomo PS: Does anybody from the samba side know anything about CIFS on NetWare ? On Sat, 5 May 2001, Nicholas Brealey wrote: > Schlomo Schapiro wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > you could mount the netware server under linux and read out the trustees > > (with nwtrustee2 from ncpfs) and set them on the linux box. > > > > But why would you want to make such a switch ? Netware is much betteras > > fileserver and has a much better Windows integration and also a Linux > > client now. > > > > Schlomo > > > > Hello > > This is probably off-topic but I am intrested in discussing Samba vs > Netware. > > I don't really know what Netware is capable of. I have a Netware server > which > was setup (not by me) for Windows 95/98 clients and we have added > Windows > NT/2000 clients. We also have a Sun server running Samba 2.2 as a PDC > and > an number of workstations running Solaris, IRIX and Linux. > > This is the list of things I don't like about Netware in my set up. They > really > all relate to Windows NT/2000 and are perhaps to do with out setup. I > would > love to be corrected if I am wrong (which I probably am). > > 1) Logging in is complicated and anoying. Ihave the Netware client > installed. > The user is presented with a window where they type their user name and > password. > This window has a check box for 'workstation only' which is misnamed - > it actually > means 'don't login to Netware'. There is also an Advanced button and a > Windows NT/2000 > tab where the user can set their Microsoft user name and choose to login > in to the > Microsoft domain or the local workstation. A very annoying feature of > this dialogue > is that the Microsoft user name does not default to the Netware user > name. If more than > one user uses a machine at least one of them has to type in their > username twice > even if their Netware and Microsoft user names are the same. If the > Microsoft and Netware > usernames and password are the same and the Micrsoft user name has been > left at the > correct name after the last use, then things go smoothly, if this is not > the case a > second login dialogue is displayed for Microsoft Networking. > > 2) Installing the Netware client correctly is extrawork. If you use > Microsoft > Networking you need to install the Netware client with IP only and make > sure > that Microsoft Networking is higher priority than Netware. If you don't > do a custom > install of the client then you get slow performance, see > http://www.ithowto.com/novell/clientspeed.htm for details. > > 3) Users can only share directories on their drives using CIFS so > they have to have Microsoft Networking installed - having Netware as > well just > makes life more complicated. > > 4) Users can change ACLs on files on Samba shares in (almost) the same > way as > they change ACLs on files on local disks. I don't know how to restrict > permissions > on single file on a Netware share. The only time I tried it I restricted > access > to all files. The help button on my NT workstation gave no helpful > information. > > 5) Windows NT/2000 roaming profiles don't work with Netware (or perhaps > we don't > have them enabled). > > 6) It seems that you need a Windows NT/2000 server to act as a gateway > to integrate > Netware well with Windows NT/2000 clients. If you have a Windows NT/2000 > server > why bother with Netware server? > > 7) I have to have Windows NT/2000 and Unix either for the applications > our users run > on them or to develop software for customers to run. Why do I a want > another OS, > Netware, when the ones I have to have can do everything I need. > > > Regards > > Nick > -- Schlomo Schapiro Computation Authority Hebrew University of Jerusalem Tel: ++972 / 2 / 65-84404 Fax: 65-27349 email: schapiro@clerk.pi.huji.ac.il WWW: http://shum.cc.huji.ac.il/~schapiro From chris at spener.net Sun May 6 09:58:44 2001 From: chris at spener.net (Christian SPENER) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:36 2003 Subject: can't login on samba 2.2 Message-ID: <01050611584401.00700@dukeshome> so i can connect to an domain (winNT4.0sp6german), but when i restart the workstation to login with a user, i get an error, that the user is disabled. the log.smbd tells me: (log level 3) [2001/06/06 11:44:44, 3] smbd/ipc.c:named_pipe(334) named pipe command on <> name [2001/06/06 11:44:44, 3] smbd/ipc.c:api_fd_reply(296) Got API command 0x26 on pipe "NETLOGON" (pnum 701b)free_pipe_context: destroying talloc pool of size 0 [2001/06/06 11:44:44, 3] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_pipe_request(1163) Doing \PIPE\NETLOGON [2001/06/06 11:44:44, 3] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1195) api_rpcTNP: rpc command: NET_SAMLOGON [2001/06/06 11:44:44, 3] rpc_server/srv_netlog_nt.c:_net_sam_logon(495) SAM Logon (Interactive). Domain:[MARS]. User:[test] [2001/06/06 11:44:44, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:push_sec_ctx(279) push_sec_ctx(65534, 65534) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2001/06/06 11:44:44, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(310) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2001/06/06 11:44:44, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:pop_sec_ctx(416) pop_sec_ctx (65534, 65534) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2001/06/06 11:44:44, 0] passdb/pampass.c:pam_account(268) PAM: UNKNOWN ERROR for User: test [2001/06/06 11:44:44, 2] passdb/pampass.c:pam_error_handler(66) PAM: Account Check Failed : Authentication service cannot retrieve authentication info. [2001/06/06 11:44:44, 0] passdb/pampass.c:pam_accountcheck(381) PAM: Account Validation Failed - Rejecting User! [2001/06/06 11:44:44, 3] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:free_pipe_context(417) free_pipe_context: destroying talloc pool of size 8192 when i log in as local user then i can browse the network and connect to the samba server with the user name. someone got help thx chris -- Christian SPENER email: chris@spener.net From schapiro at clerk.pi.huji.ac.il Sun May 6 10:51:45 2001 From: schapiro at clerk.pi.huji.ac.il (Schlomo Schapiro) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:36 2003 Subject: Migration Documentation In-Reply-To: <001101c0d60c$d1316200$8000a8c0@ibm23ar813> Message-ID: Well, I didn't spell it out, but Novell 5.1 with NDS 8.5 (now called 85.0) is a very fine LDAP server which outperforms OpenLDAP in many aspects and has scalability features only dreamt about in OpenLDAP (plus the commercial support ...). Samba is great and the simple reason that the documentation is lacking is that with the scarce manpower the samba team has they prefer to develop samba and write the absolute minimum of docs (and actually also the mailing lists are part of the docs). I support this attitude and maybe you can give resources to the samba team to write docs, after all it's an open source community project ... But we are now really off-topic and I don't see what there is left to discuss about (Novell/Samba/Windows/Linux) ? Sincerely, Schlomo On Sun, 6 May 2001, Tim Robison wrote: > What it really comes down to is this: > If you have SAMBA running, with NOVELL, you dont need NT/2000.You can use > open office(or its equivalent) to read and write Office files, Xwindows on > the desktop or GNOME or KDE...what ever, and you really dont need a windows > based server product.You can use NFS accross the network along with SAMBA > based shares.Lets face it, Windows NT/2000 server product is expensive to > install, unreliable, expensive to scale, and unstable. In general, 2000 is > bettern than NT, and Whistler, or what ever it being beta tested under now > is better than 2000.Then only real issue I have with any LINUX based > anything is the documentation.While the LDP is making a dent in this > problem, there are still vast improvemnts needed.I believe the SAMBA > documentation has also vastly improved, but it still needs a better cookbook > type approach.It should have a step by step guide to accomplish the > general setup, then a step by step guide to set it up as a PDC, then one for > the BDC, then one for integrating into a Windows Network, then one for > Integrating into a Novell Network.While I have not checked the site in the > last 30 days, I do not beleive it has these items in it. > > The SAMBA team has done marvelous work, and I hope they keep it up. If you > really want to make a real splash, create hooks into samba for OPEN LDAP.I > see a day coming soon when most businesses will question the need for the MS > platform other than at the desktop. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Schlomo Schapiro" > To: "Nicholas Brealey" > Cc: > Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2001 3:02 AM > Subject: Re: Migration Documentation > > > > Hi, > > > > I hope the samba guys are not upset about this topic ... > > > > Anyway, don't do things you don't KNOW ! E.g. if you know Windows, then do > > Windows. If you know Novell, then don't. > > > > Besides that, if you don't have any enterprise level management needs > > (e.g. only few people in one department) or don't want strong management > > of the desktop, then you really don't need Novell. > > > > OTOH, if you need a directory-based authentication backbone with > > excellent Windows Client integration and proven high security, then there > > arenot so many alternatives to Novell, especially when it comes to > > stability and support and performance. > > > > And, NW6 will support CIFS and to do roaming profiles you might need > > Zenworks (for Novell). > > > > And, don't try to save money at the wrongplace ! > > > > Schlomo > > > > PS: Does anybody from the samba side know anything about CIFS on NetWare ? > > > > > > On Sat, 5 May 2001, Nicholas Brealey wrote: > > > > > Schlomo Schapiro wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > you could mount the netware serverunder linux and read out the > trustees > > > > (with nwtrustee2 from ncpfs) and set them on the linux box. > > > > > > > > But why would you want to make such a switch ? Netware is much > betteras > > > > fileserver and has a much better Windows integration and also a Linux > > > > client now. > > > > > > > > Schlomo > > > > > > > > > > Hello > > > > > > This is probably off-topic but I am intrested in discussing Samba vs > > > Netware. > > > > > > I don't really know what Netware is capable of. I have a Netware server > > > which > > > was setup (not by me) for Windows 95/98 clients and we have added > > > Windows > > > NT/2000 clients. We also have a Sun server running Samba 2.2 as a PDC > > > and > > > an number of workstations running Solaris, IRIX and Linux. > > > > > > This is the list of things I don't like about Netware in my set up. They > > > really > > > all relate to Windows NT/2000 and are perhaps to do with out setup. I > > > would > > > love to be corrected if I am wrong (which I probably am). > > > > > > 1) Logging inis complicated and anoying. Ihave the Netware client > > > installed. > > > The user is presented with a window where they type their user name and > > > password. > > > This window has a check box for 'workstation only' which is misnamed - > > > it actually > > > means 'don't login to Netware'. There is also an Advanced button and a > > > Windows NT/2000 > > > tab where the user can set their Microsoft user name and choose to login > > > in to the > > > Microsoft domain or the local workstation. A very annoying feature of > > > this dialogue > > > is that the Microsoft user name does not default to the Netware user > > > name. If more than > > > one user uses a machine at least one of them has to type in their > > > username twice > > > even if their Netware and Microsoft user names are the same. If the > > > Microsoft and Netware > > > usernames and password are the same and the Micrsoft user name has been > > > left at the > > > correct name after the last use, then things go smoothly, if this is not > > > the case a > > >second login dialogue is displayed for Microsoft Networking. > > > > > > 2) Installing the Netware client correctly is extrawork. If you use > > > Microsoft > > > Networking you need to install the Netware client with IP only and make > > > sure > > > that Microsoft Networking is higher priority than Netware. If you don't > > > do a custom > > > install of the client then you get slow performance, see > > > http://www.ithowto.com/novell/clientspeed.htm for details. > > > > > > 3) Users can only share directories ontheir drives using CIFS so > > > they have to have Microsoft Networking installed - having Netware as > > > well just > > > makes life more complicated. > > > > > > 4) Users can change ACLs on files on Samba shares in (almost) the same > > > way as > > > they change ACLs on files on local disks. I don't know how to restrict > > > permissions > > > on single file on a Netware share. The only time I tried it I restricted > > > access > > > to all files. The help button on my NT workstation gave no helpful > > > information. > > > > > > 5) Windows NT/2000 roaming profiles don't work with Netware (or perhaps > > > we don't > > > have them enabled). > > > > > > 6) It seems that you need a Windows NT/2000 server to act as a gateway > > > to integrate > > > Netware well with Windows NT/2000 clients. If you have a Windows NT/2000 > > > server > > > why bother with Netware server? > > > > > > 7) I have to have Windows NT/2000 and Unix either for the applications > > > our users run > > > on them or to develop software for customers to run. Why do I a want > > > another OS, > > > Netware, when the ones I have to have can do everything I need. > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > Nick > > > > > > > -- > > Schlomo Schapiro > > Computation Authority > > Hebrew University of Jerusalem > > > > Tel: ++972 / 2/ 65-84404 > > Fax: 65-27349 > > email: schapiro@clerk.pi.huji.ac.il > > WWW: http://shum.cc.huji.ac.il/~schapiro > > > > > > > -- Schlomo Schapiro Computation Authority Hebrew University of Jerusalem Tel: ++972 / 2 / 65-84404 Fax: 65-27349 email: schapiro@clerk.pi.huji.ac.il WWW: http://shum.cc.huji.ac.il/~schapiro From kaab_k at hotmail.com Sun May 6 12:17:35 2001 From: kaab_k at hotmail.com (kaab kaoutar) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:36 2003 Subject: (no subject) Message-ID: Hi ! I have a domain called EMAGIN, composed of NT workstations and an NT server called SERVER1.In one of the NT workstations, i have also installed linux mandrake7.2 in a partition. This machine is called kaoutar. I've installed Samba in it, and tried to join the EMAGIN domain, letting SERVER1 the domain contoller. I have shared a directory called KTI. Here is my smb.conf: " [global] netbios name=kaoutar workgroup = EMAGIN server string = Samba %v on (%h) security = domain password server=SERVER1 encrypt passwords = Yes local master = no domain controller=SERVER1 name resolve order =lmhosts wins hosts bcast mangled names = yes [KTI] comment = KI path = /var/www/html/site_kti writeable = no guest ok = Yes read only =yes " I have created a user account in linux and samba with the same authentication parameters of the NT server administrator. when i type : smbclient -U% -L LOCALHOST I first got : unkonwn parameter encountered "domain controller" then it gives the right results... but i realized that it does not make the right resolution for server1, so i added the ip address of server1 to the /etc/host file then it updated the error to: "NT-STATUS-ACCESS-DENIED" and that's also what it gives when i tried to make samba server join the EMAGIN domain, so obviously samba have not yet joined the domain. By the way the "/etc/lmhost" is composed of only one line: 127.0.0.1 localhost ! is it normal ? Well, the NT workstations and server easily access the shared directory! However, when i try to browse the network via konquekor, it fails, it keeps asking for server1 and kaoutar authentication. THANKS _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. From kaab_k at hotmail.com Sun May 6 12:25:38 2001 From: kaab_k at hotmail.com (kaab kaoutar) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:36 2003 Subject: Konqueror network browser! Message-ID: Hi! Is konqueror network browser the easiest way to browse NT SHARED DIRECTORY? I know only one other wy wich is the using the command line "smbclient ..."! can i mount a directory using mount ? Thanks _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. From kaab_k at hotmail.com Sun May 6 12:28:59 2001 From: kaab_k at hotmail.com (kaab kaoutar) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:36 2003 Subject: smbwrapper in samba 2.0.7! Message-ID: Hi! How can i get smbwrapper? i'm using samba 2.0.7 RPM! Thanks _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. From kaab_k at hotmail.com Sun May 6 12:30:46 2001 From: kaab_k at hotmail.com (kaab kaoutar) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:36 2003 Subject: resolution && lmhots ! Message-ID: Hi! is it normal to have lomhosts and hosts filled only with 127.0.0.1 localhost? Thanks _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. From abartlet at pcug.org.au Sun May 6 12:44:44 2001 From: abartlet at pcug.org.au (Andrew Bartlett) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:36 2003 Subject: smbwrapper in samba 2.0.7! References: Message-ID: <3AF5473C.33A5A225@bartlett.house> kaab kaoutar wrote: > > Hi! > How can i get smbwrapper? i'm using samba 2.0.7 RPM! > Thanks My understanding is that it does not function under linux, due to changes in glibc. -- Andrew Bartlett abartlet@pcug.org.au From r_huelsmann at ish.de Sun May 6 13:13:08 2001 From: r_huelsmann at ish.de (Ralf Huelsmann) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:36 2003 Subject: listmanager ? Message-ID: <000b01c0d62e$4b0d33d0$3401a8c0@ish.de> hi ! could someone give me a hint how to unsubscribe ? going in holliday for two 16 days... :-) thanx greetings, ralf --- Ralf Huelsmann Kempen Germany Office: http://www.ish.de/ r_huelsmann@ish.de phone +49 2152 962010 fax +49 2152 962009 Mobile: r_huelsmann@bigfoot.com phone +49 171 2170401 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ralf_H=FClsmann.vcf?= Type: text/x-vcard Size: 609 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-ntdom/attachments/20010506/a7cbe851/iso-8859-1QRalf_HFClsmann.vcf From barth at cck.uni-kl.de Sun May 6 14:19:45 2001 From: barth at cck.uni-kl.de (Christian Barth) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:36 2003 Subject: can't login on samba 2.2 Message-ID: <200105061419.QAA29305@fbk.mv.uni-kl.de> From saamer at gmx.ch Sun May 6 17:10:40 2001 From: saamer at gmx.ch (Samuel Suter) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:36 2003 Subject: joining a samba 2.2.0 domain with windowsXP Message-ID: <000501c0d64f$81fee520$0200a8c0@jupiter> hi all I am running samba 2.2.0 alpha3 ond my linux-server. I set it up as NT-Domain controller. On win98, everything is working fine, but if I want to join the domain with my windowsXP client I get an error message. "The procedure number is out of range." I made the machine account before. Does anyone know the problem behind this? These are the entries in my log.smbd: [2001/05/06 18:58:44, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(672) api_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to unmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO. [2001/05/06 18:58:44, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1199) api_rpcTNP: api_samr_rpc: SAMR_SET_USERINFO failed. thx Sam --- Samuel Suter saamer@gmx.ch From don_paul at earthlink.net Sun May 6 18:11:14 2001 From: don_paul at earthlink.net (Don Paul) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:37 2003 Subject: Can't gain access to the NT In-Reply-To: <200105061419.QAA29305@fbk.mv.uni-kl.de> Message-ID: I am able to see the Amiga on the NT Network Neighborhood however, Socket access from NT denied! I can't see the NT on the Amiga side.... From a CLI (control line interface) I type, smbclient -L Laptop1 (laptop1 is the name of the NT4.0 laptop) added interface ip=192.168.0.2 bcast=192.168.0.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 added interface ip=216.244.24.137 bcast=216.244.24.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 Password: (I simply type return as I don't know a password for the NT or the Amiga as I never set one??) Anonymous login successful Domain=[WORKGROUP] OS=[Windows NT 4.0] Server=[NT LAN Manager 4.0] Sharename Type Comment -------- ----- ------- Error returning browse list: ERRDOS - ERRnoaccess (Access Denied.) Server Comment ----- ------- DAVID Samba Server LAPTOP1 Workgroup Master -------- ------ WORKGROUP LAPTOP1 I am able to ping both ways using names and numbers... NT4.0 = 192.168.0.1 Laptop1 Amiga = 192.168.0.2 DAVID My question is, Why is the NT (Laptop1) denying me access? Because of a password? Or something else?? Where is that set on both machines... and why would there be a password if I never gave either machine one? Thanks.. From mark at axeon.screaming.net Sun May 6 18:49:25 2001 From: mark at axeon.screaming.net (mark@axeon.screaming.net) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:37 2003 Subject: joining a samba 2.2.0 domain with windowsXP References: <000501c0d64f$81fee520$0200a8c0@jupiter> Message-ID: <000701c0d65d$468d1e90$6201a8c0@markw2000> I had the same problem - and failed to solve it :) moved back to 2k presumably XP doesnt act in exactly the same way as 2K mark ----- Original Message ----- From: "Samuel Suter" To: "Samba ntdom" Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2001 6:10 PM Subject: joining a samba 2.2.0 domain with windowsXP > hi all > > I am running samba 2.2.0 alpha3 ond my linux-server. I set it up as > NT-Domain controller. On win98, everything is working fine, but if I want to > join the domain with my windowsXP client I get an error message. "The > procedure number is out of range." > > I made the machine account before. Does anyone know the problem behind this? > > These are the entries in my log.smbd: > [2001/05/06 18:58:44, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(672) > api_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to unmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO. > [2001/05/06 18:58:44, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1199) > api_rpcTNP: api_samr_rpc: SAMR_SET_USERINFO failed. > > thx > Sam > > --- > Samuel Suter > saamer@gmx.ch > > From jeremy at valinux.com Sun May 6 19:48:55 2001 From: jeremy at valinux.com (Jeremy Allison) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:37 2003 Subject: joining a samba 2.2.0 domain with windowsXP In-Reply-To: <000701c0d65d$468d1e90$6201a8c0@markw2000>; from mark@axeon.screaming.net on Sun, May 06, 2001 at 07:49:25PM +0100 References: <000501c0d64f$81fee520$0200a8c0@jupiter> <000701c0d65d$468d1e90$6201a8c0@markw2000> Message-ID: <20010506124855.A18289@valinux.com> On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 07:49:25PM +0100, mark@axeon.screaming.net wrote: > I had the same problem - and failed to solve it :) > moved back to 2k > > presumably XP doesnt act in exactly the same way as 2K > XP isn't released yet is it ? If someone can give us access to the beta version we can probably fix this. I think this is an RPC we have implemented in HEAD but not 2.2 yet. Thanks, Jeremy Allison, Samba Team. -- -------------------------------------------------------- Buying an operating system without source is like buying a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions. -------------------------------------------------------- From mark at axeon.screaming.net Sun May 6 21:03:36 2001 From: mark at axeon.screaming.net (mark@axeon.screaming.net) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:37 2003 Subject: joining a samba 2.2.0 domain with windowsXP References: <000501c0d64f$81fee520$0200a8c0@jupiter> <000701c0d65d$468d1e90$6201a8c0@markw2000> <20010506124855.A18289@valinux.com> Message-ID: <002301c0d670$04faa430$6201a8c0@markw2000> No, you are right, its not. At Beta 2 Stage atm. I'm afraid that you wont be able to legally access it, however i've heard #winxp on efnet could show you some ftp servers that have it for download :) If not, I'd be willing to carry out any instructions of yours (netmon or whatever), and I'll try it against head Mark ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeremy Allison" To: Cc: "Samuel Suter" ; "SAMBA - NTDOM" Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2001 8:48 PM Subject: Re: joining a samba 2.2.0 domain with windowsXP > On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 07:49:25PM +0100, mark@axeon.screaming.net wrote: > > I had the same problem - and failed to solve it :) > > moved back to 2k > > > > presumably XP doesnt act in exactly the same way as 2K > > > > XP isn't released yet is it ? If someone can give us access > to the beta version we can probably fix this. I think this > is an RPC we have implemented in HEAD but not 2.2 yet. > > Thanks, > > Jeremy Allison, > Samba Team. > > -- > -------------------------------------------------------- > Buying an operating system without source is like buying > a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions. > -------------------------------------------------------- > From saamer at gmx.ch Sun May 6 21:46:00 2001 From: saamer at gmx.ch (Samuel Suter) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:37 2003 Subject: joining a samba 2.2.0 domain with windowsXP References: <000501c0d64f$81fee520$0200a8c0@jupiter> <000701c0d65d$468d1e90$6201a8c0@markw2000> <20010506124855.A18289@valinux.com> Message-ID: <008e01c0d675$f150dca0$0200a8c0@jupiter> hi There is a way. You can register at www.microsoft.com/whistler and wait for one or two moths, to download it, or you go to one of these warez-sites and get it from there. On these sites, you'll mostly find cracked versions, but I think, they are legally, if you don't use them longer as 180 days. Go to http://www.navnetwork.net/ddl/search.cgi and search for "windows". I'm sure, you'll find something. greetings Sam --- Samuel Suter saamer@gmx.ch ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeremy Allison" To: Cc: "Samuel Suter" ; "SAMBA - NTDOM" Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2001 9:48 PM Subject: Re: joining a samba 2.2.0 domain with windowsXP > On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 07:49:25PM +0100, mark@axeon.screaming.net wrote: > > I had the same problem - and failed to solve it :) > > moved back to 2k > > > > presumably XP doesnt act in exactly the same way as 2K > > > > XP isn't released yet is it ? If someone can give us access > to the beta version we can probably fix this. I think this > is an RPC we have implemented in HEAD but not 2.2 yet. > > Thanks, > > Jeremy Allison, > Samba Team. > > -- > -------------------------------------------------------- > Buying an operating system without source is like buying > a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions. > -------------------------------------------------------- > From jeremy at valinux.com Sun May 6 22:48:15 2001 From: jeremy at valinux.com (Jeremy Allison) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:37 2003 Subject: joining a samba 2.2.0 domain with windowsXP In-Reply-To: <008e01c0d675$f150dca0$0200a8c0@jupiter>; from saamer@gmx.ch on Sun, May 06, 2001 at 11:46:00PM +0200 References: <000501c0d64f$81fee520$0200a8c0@jupiter> <000701c0d65d$468d1e90$6201a8c0@markw2000> <20010506124855.A18289@valinux.com> <008e01c0d675$f150dca0$0200a8c0@jupiter> Message-ID: <20010506154815.A22048@valinux.com> On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 11:46:00PM +0200, Samuel Suter wrote: > hi > > There is a way. You can register at www.microsoft.com/whistler and wait for > one or two moths, to download it, or you go to one of these warez-sites and > get it from there. On these sites, you'll mostly find cracked versions, but > I think, they are legally, if you don't use them longer as 180 days. I don't think so. We don't use "warez" *anything* :-). BTW: JF just mailed and told me he has a legal beta copy so we'll take a look using that. Jeremy. -- -------------------------------------------------------- Buying an operating system without source is like buying a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions. -------------------------------------------------------- From ulf at twc.de Mon May 7 07:30:44 2001 From: ulf at twc.de (Ulf Bartelt) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:37 2003 Subject: example [add|delete] share command References: Message-ID: <3AF64F24.6209B51A@twc.de> Gerald Carter wrote: > > FYI... :-) > I just checked in a perl script that is a rought example of an > 'add|delete share command'. See examples/misc/modify_smb_conf.pl. > > Hint: it parses smb.conf into a hash of hashes and so could easily be made > into a 'add|delete printer command' :-) > > Enjoy. I kicked all but some global settings out of smb.conf and put each share definition in an own file in /etc/smb.conf.d. The last line of my smb.conf is to include /etc/smb.conf.d/INCLUDES. This file is a list of include statements for each file matching *.smb in /etc/smb.conf.d and there is a command "update-samba-shares" to (re)generate INCLUDES. So whenever I install a package defining an own share, it contains only the small *.smb file and it will call update-samba-shares afterwards in some postinstall functionality... Why??? I... ... needed it someday and I had too less time to think about complicated conf file parsing. Especially adding/killing a share upon package installation/removal had be solved... ... do not use webmin, swat or other tools that might get confused by include statements because I'm kinda prehistoric and prefer simple things... From royt at subexgroup.com Mon May 7 14:26:21 2001 From: royt at subexgroup.com (Roy Thomas) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:37 2003 Subject: SAMBA 2.2.0 PDC / account expired Message-ID: <01C0D701.B0894860.royt@subexgroup.com> we have experienced this problem and as per my understanding its a bug in samba 2.2 which will be fixed in later version will be glad if someone got a solution to this.. Gerald is working on this.................... cheers roy -----Original Message----- From: Juha Auvinen [SMTP:ghost@uusikaupunki.net] Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 10:31 PM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: SAMBA 2.2.0 PDC / account expired We are running samba 2.2.0 as pdc in our network (9x and win2k) when some users try to use win2k shares win9x tells that the users account has expired. Has anyone else had these kind of experiences and does anyone know how to fix this problem? -- Juha Auvinen Talinkorventie 11 c 80 20320 TURKU Handle Ghost Puh 0400-976272 http://atsilnx.uusikaupunki.net Carpe Diem Lads! From opjose at ex-pressnet.com Mon May 7 09:14:08 2001 From: opjose at ex-pressnet.com (Jose M. Sanchez) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:37 2003 Subject: [newbie] resolution && lmhots ! In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Yes it's normal. If you do not have your own DNS you can use entries in /etc/hosts instead. -JMS -----Original Message----- From: newbie-owner@linux-mandrake.com [mailto:newbie-owner@linux-mandrake.com]On Behalf Of kaab kaoutar Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2001 8:31 AM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; samba@lists.samba.org Cc: newbie@linux-mandrake.com Subject: [newbie] resolution && lmhots ! Hi! is it normal to have lomhosts and hosts filled only with 127.0.0.1 localhost? Thanks _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. From royt at subexgroup.com Mon May 7 16:13:25 2001 From: royt at subexgroup.com (Roy Thomas) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:37 2003 Subject: happy holidaying.......... Message-ID: <01C0D710.A5DA7560.royt@subexgroup.com> http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom Go to this link samba-ntdom Subscribers give your mail ID and then click EDIT options and then below you have DISABLE mail delivery - Turn this option ON enjoy your holiday................. roy From etharp at earthlink.net Mon May 7 11:31:52 2001 From: etharp at earthlink.net (Ed Tharp) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:38 2003 Subject: [newbie] resolution && lmhots ! References: Message-ID: <00e601c0d6e9$51d4d2c0$8f721b3f@mshome.net> I stand corrected... Jose is much more correct than I was in this. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jose M. Sanchez" To: "kaab kaoutar" ; ; Cc: Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 5:14 AM Subject: RE: [newbie] resolution && lmhots ! > Yes it's normal. > > If you do not have your own DNS you can use entries in /etc/hosts instead. > > -JMS > > > -----Original Message----- > From: newbie-owner@linux-mandrake.com > [mailto:newbie-owner@linux-mandrake.com]On Behalf Of kaab kaoutar > Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2001 8:31 AM > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; samba@lists.samba.org > Cc: newbie@linux-mandrake.com > Subject: [newbie] resolution && lmhots ! > > > Hi! > is it normal to have lomhosts and hosts filled only > with 127.0.0.1 localhost? > > Thanks > _________________________________________________________________________ > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > > > From Heering at edo.uni-dortmund.de Mon May 7 11:52:23 2001 From: Heering at edo.uni-dortmund.de (Oliver Heering) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:38 2003 Subject: problem saving roaming profile In-Reply-To: <20010430100423.O1518@pogo.eng.auburn.edu> References: <3AE6F79D.8F02A48B@mtholyoke.edu> <2115407209.20010430162911@edo.uni-dortmund.de> <20010430100423.O1518@pogo.eng.auburn.edu> Message-ID: <1966042009.20010507135223@edo.uni-dortmund.de> Hi Gerald, On Monday, April 30, 2001 you wrote: [problem with improper permissions when saving a roaming profile] > This is fixed in 2.2 cvs tree. I tried it out with the latest CVS-version, but it didn't fix the problem :/ Any idea? (for now only disabling the NT ACL SUPPORT seems to work) mfg, Oliver Heering Medienzentrum - Universit?t Dortmund http://www.medienzentrum.uni-dortmund.de From Heering at edo.uni-dortmund.de Mon May 7 12:12:00 2001 From: Heering at edo.uni-dortmund.de (Oliver Heering) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:38 2003 Subject: problem saving roaming profile In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1507219019.20010507141200@edo.uni-dortmund.de> Hi Hitesh, On Monday, April 30, 2001 you wrote: > It looks as if it's a WIN2K problem. Because it even happens in a total > windows environment. i.e when a user with a roaming profile tries to log off > from any win2k machine in a windows environment, he gets a similar error. > But when the same user logs off from an NT4.0, the roaming profile is > updated properly. That's interesting... I wonder why i don't read much more complaints about that. It seems to me like a major bug. Anyways, do you have any workaround for it? Or do you live with the problem and "prepare" every single user-account with NT4.0 before the users may use it? Some guy in the samba-ntdom mailinglist said, this bug has been fixed in the CVS tree, but it actually hasn't. :( (i tried it out) mfg, Oliver Heering Medienzentrum - Universit?t Dortmund http://www.medienzentrum.uni-dortmund.de From aalang at rutgersinsurance.com Tue May 8 01:06:38 2001 From: aalang at rutgersinsurance.com (Adam Lang) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:38 2003 Subject: ASCII files have CR's stripped with Win2000 References: <1145063150.988987541@dhcp-200-0052.unm.edu> Message-ID: <009801c0d75b$22959cc0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> Correct. Unix just uses LF whereas Windows uses CRLF. MS Word picks it up fine... just Notepad (and I think Wordpad) drop the ball. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Benedetto" To: Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 5:45 PM Subject: RE: ASCII files have CR's stripped with Win2000 > Okay... "moving" how? FTP? or as a shared drive? > > And, the files from the Unix side, that they are editing on the PC side, > that is a normal occurance, isn't it? If the file originated on the Unix > side, the LF/CR problem will be there regardless, and is normal behavior, > isn't it? > > --On Friday, May 04, 2001 8:57 AM -0500 "Wagner, Mike" > wrote: > > > I am moving ASCII text configuration files (less than 10K of text) from > > other unix machines and from WinNT4 machines to the Samba server and then > > using the Win2K machine to pick the file off the server. The file once > > picked up is all on one line. Users are spending time going through the > > files with a text editor and reinserting the 's. > > > > Mike > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Adam Lang [SMTP:aalang@rutgersinsurance.com] > > Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 8:20 AM > > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > > Subject: Re: ASCII files have CR's stripped with Win2000 > > > > When you say they are stripped, are you moving the text files to > > samba and > > then looking at them in unix or are you moving files to samba and > > when you > > open them in windows later, they are messed up? > > > > Adam Lang > > Systems Engineer > > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company > > http://www.rutgersinsurance.com > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Wagner, Mike" > > To: > > Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 9:02 AM > > Subject: ASCII files have CR's stripped with Win2000 > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I am running SAMBA 1.9.18 p10 on a SUN Ultra-1, SunOS 5.6 and see > > the > > > following problems: > > > > > > 1. When I use Windows 2000 (SR1) to transfer ASCII files to/from > > my Samba > > > UNIX file server, the carriage returns often get stripped. This > > is not a > > > problem when using a Windows NT4 (SR5) PC. > > > > > > > From gcarter at valinux.com Mon May 7 13:12:41 2001 From: gcarter at valinux.com (Gerald Carter) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:38 2003 Subject: problem saving roaming profile In-Reply-To: <1966042009.20010507135223@edo.uni-dortmund.de> Message-ID: On Mon, 7 May 2001, Oliver Heering wrote: > Hi Gerald, > > On Monday, April 30, 2001 you wrote: > > [problem with improper permissions when saving a roaming profile] > > > This is fixed in 2.2 cvs tree. > > I tried it out with the latest CVS-version, but it didn't fix the > problem :/ > > Any idea? > (for now only disabling the NT ACL SUPPORT seems to work) Can you remind me of the specifics of your environment? What server OS, relavant patches, etc... If you could send Jeremy and myself (offline) a level 10 debug (with 'debug timestamps = no'), we can probably get this straightened out. Cheers, jerry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) From gcarter at valinux.com Mon May 7 13:15:26 2001 From: gcarter at valinux.com (Gerald Carter) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:38 2003 Subject: problem saving roaming profile In-Reply-To: <1507219019.20010507141200@edo.uni-dortmund.de> Message-ID: On Mon, 7 May 2001, Oliver Heering wrote: > Some guy in the samba-ntdom mailinglist said, this bug has been fixed > in the CVS tree, but it actually hasn't. :( (i tried it out) Well technically, I can no longer reproduce it here. :-) If those who are having problems will provide some extra details of their environment (apologies if you have alreayd done this, but this is the last message in this thread i can find in my inbox), we get it corrected. Cheers, jerry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) From goshel at goshsoft.de Mon May 7 13:19:42 2001 From: goshel at goshsoft.de (Philipp Mohrenweiser) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:38 2003 Subject: (no subject) Message-ID: Mit freundlichen Gr??en goshsoft Gesch?ftsf?hrer Philipp A. Mohrenweiser ___________________ www.goshsoft.de Contact: Mail: goshel@goshsoft.de Phone: 0711 9977467 Cell : 0173 7369860 Fax: 0711 7970328 From Errol.Fouquet at mms.gov Mon May 7 13:49:44 2001 From: Errol.Fouquet at mms.gov (Fouquet, Errol) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:38 2003 Subject: Samba 2.2.0 printing problem (not driver upload related) Message-ID: <379313C94B76D2119AB60008C7A402E401E1FCD0@imsnolaa.nola.omm.mms.gov> OK ... this is kind of lengthy: I've got a real "show stopper" of a problem with my Samba 2.2.0 print server. I'm currently in the process of a proof of concept project here at work. I'm lobbying very strongly for a Samba solution for our heterogeneous environment of both Windows clients (W2K) and UNIX workstations (Solaris 2.6, 2.8). I began doing testing in conjunction with the PC team in comparing their W2K print server with my Samba box (RedHat 7.0 on a Power Edge 2400). Just when it looked as though Samba was eating the W2K box's lunch ... a problem. Driver download to W2K clients works fine, printing works fine, but any attempt by a W2K client to access printing preferences causes a problem. Here's what we're seeing: If a W2K client machine attempt to access "Printing Preferences..." from any of the Samba printer's properties, they get a Windows fatal message: Function address 0x23d5bf9 caused a protection fault. (exception code 0xc0000005) The application property sheet page(s) may not function properly. If a W2K client machine attempts to access "Properties" from a File->Print dialog, they get the same error. This never happens when they are dealing with a W2K printer (shared printer from the W2K server)! The W2K clients can print just fine through Samba ... but are not able to access additional properties. I've saved a debug level 10 log file ... if anyone (Jerry?) wants to look at it. Unfortunately, unless I can remedy this soon, we'll be doomed to use W2K as our print server solution :-P Errol Fouquet - UNIX SysAdmin Minerals Management Service, DOI 1201 Elmwood Park Blvd. New Orleans, LA 70123 Phone: (504) 736-3255 email: errol.fouquet@mms.gov From mthomas at rhrk.uni-kl.de Mon May 7 14:33:42 2001 From: mthomas at rhrk.uni-kl.de (Martin Thomas) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:38 2003 Subject: problem saving roaming profile References: Message-ID: <007f01c0d702$b6b78200$1332f683@arubi.unikl.de> This may be a small hint to find a solution: some directorys in the profile on the windows machines have the dos 'read only' attribute set. Samba does not map this attribute correct, at least here (windows 2ksp1 clients/german, samba 2.2 cvs from May,3 2001, linux suse 6.3 with updated kernel 2.4.4 but without acl-patch). Since samba seems to ignore the 'read only' and sets the directory mode to rwx insteat of r-x during profile upload to the samba server. Windows may be 'confused' by this, since the downloaded profile directory has the 'read only' attribute not set, because of the rwx mode of the directory To reproduce this: - login to w2k, download profile - open a document on a network share in word or excel, windows caches the path as a shortcut in the 'network neighbourhood', in the windows file-system this shortcut is a directory in the folder: c:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\\netzwerkumgebung\ auf (i try to translate: c:\Documents and settings\\network neighbourhood\ on ) - this directory has the 'dos read only' attribute set, which marks the directory as a shortcut in this case (the attribute might have another meaning in other folders) - logoff from the client, profile is uploaded to the server - login the unix-box, change to the profile-share directory for the user and see that the directory-mode for the 'shortcut'-directory is rwx for the owner and not r-x (directory mode in smb.conf is 770) - login on the client again with profile download, open 'network neighbourhood' and see that the shortcut now is a 'normal directory' (dos read only not set) there is a file target in this directory which points to the right place/the network share), set the dos-read-only attribute manualy with right-click properties and see that the it act like a normal shortcut again. - log off and realize that the directory in the stored profile has mode rwx again instead of r-x Hope this points to a right solution, at least it's a little bug report for the described situation Greetings, Martin ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gerald Carter" To: "Oliver Heering" Cc: "Hitesh Talati" ; Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 3:15 PM Subject: Re: Re[2]: problem saving roaming profile > On Mon, 7 May 2001, Oliver Heering wrote: > > > Some guy in the samba-ntdom mailinglist said, this bug has been fixed > > in the CVS tree, but it actually hasn't. :( (i tried it out) > > Well technically, I can no longer reproduce it here. :-) > If those who are having problems will provide some extra details of their > environment (apologies if you have alreayd done this, but this is the > last message in this thread i can find in my inbox), we get it corrected. > > > > > > > Cheers, jerry > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services > \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com > http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org > http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org > > "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." > - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) > > > From nik39 at gmx.net Mon May 7 15:08:08 2001 From: nik39 at gmx.net (Nik Thirty-Nine) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:38 2003 Subject: (no subject) Message-ID: <23510.989248088@www42.gmx.net> Hi, I am using Samba 2.2.0 and I am experiencing problems with roaming user profiles. The Samba server is acting as a PDC in a Windows NT domain. With w2k clients, profile updates are no problem at all, but when using NT4.0 it seems that the profile is not properly downloaded from the server. Also it looks like the _whole_ User Part of the registry is not copied properly or not immigrated properly into the running system. Therefore settings like desktop background etc. (which are stored in this part of the registry) don't get updated or dont get immigrated when I relog on the clients machine. Still things like links and files which are stored as files in "Desktop" in every users /home/profiles get updated properly. The only workaround I have found is adding the domain-users to the local administrators, this works and this time also registry is copied properly, and any user settings gets restored. Does anybody knows what the problem is? Is this a bug? Any help is appreciated. Regards Nik Here is my smb.conf: workgroup = DOM netbios name = DOM_PDC interfaces = 192.168.100.1 127.0.0.1/32 bind interfaces only = Yes encrypt passwords = Yes min passwd length = 6 keepalive = 30 socket options = TCP_NODELAY character set = ISO8859-1 logon script = scripts\%g.bat logon drive = H: domain logons = Yes os level = 2 preferred master = Yes domain master = Yes wins support = Yes unix realname = Yes domain admin group = @adm add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -n -g -c users -c Machine -d /dev/null ; Uncomment the following, if you want to use an existing ; NT-Server to authenticate users, but don't forget that ; you also have to create them locally!!! ; security = server ; password server = 192.168.1.10 ; encrypt passwords = yes printing = bsd printcap name = /etc/printcap load printers = yes socket options = TCP_NODELAY map to guest = Bad User ; Uncomment this, if you want to integrate your server ; into an existing net e.g. with NT-WS to prevent nettraffic ; local master = no ; Please uncomment the following entry and replace the ; ip number and netmask with the correct numbers for ; your ethernet interface. ; If you want Samba to act as a wins server, please set ; 'wins support = yes' wins support = yes ; If you want Samba to use an existing wins server, ; please uncomment the following line and replace ; the dummy with the wins server's ip number. ; wins server = 192.168.1.1 ; Do you wan't samba to act as a logon-server for ; your windows 95/98 clients, so uncomment the ; following: domain logons = yes domain master = yes [netlogon] path = /usr/local/samba/netlogon browseable = no [homes] comment = Homedir browseable = no read only = no create mode = 0750 ---------------------------------- nik39@gmx.net ---------------------------------- -- GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet. http://www.gmx.net From htalati at torrentnet.com Mon May 7 15:26:12 2001 From: htalati at torrentnet.com (Hitesh Talati) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:39 2003 Subject: problem saving roaming profile In-Reply-To: <007f01c0d702$b6b78200$1332f683@arubi.unikl.de> Message-ID: I think, I have resolved the problem and it sure is a WIN2K problem. Just as I has said earlier, although we do run several samba servers in our domain, the PDC still is NT4. The major difference in NT and WIN2K in terms of storing profiles is that in NT its under WINNT\Profiles\%username% and under WIN2K it is under "Documents and Settings/%username%". So, when a user with a roaming profile logs onto an NT machine, everything works fine but when he logs on WIN2K terminal server, it creates his default profile under "D & S" folder and I think it tries to copy the profile with this new path back on to the shared profile path which is actually \\servername\profiles\%username%. This gives a msg of access denied. (This is strange as the message shuold say path not found or something like that). I can reproduce this as many times as you want. Because this only happens if its a fresh install of WIN2K. This does not happen if an NT4 is upgraded to WIN2K as the profiles are preserved in the original location during an upgrade. The solution which has worked here for me is that instead of sharing the profiles folder, I went ahead and shared the user's actual folder which contains his profile. i.e let's say if the user's name is john, I shared the folder 'john' instead of \profiles which contains a folder john. So that the roaming profile path for john is now \\servername\john instead of \\servername\profiles\john. This works perfectly fine for me whether a user uses an NT, samba or WIN2K. I have tested this very well and the profiles are uploaded and downloaded with all the changes made during a session without giving any error messages. Pls let me know if any of you has a different opinion or has found anything else. rgds Hitesh -----Original Message----- From: Martin Thomas [mailto:mthomas@rhrk.uni-kl.de] Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 10:34 AM To: Gerald Carter; Oliver Heering Cc: Hitesh Talati; samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Re[2]: problem saving roaming profile This may be a small hint to find a solution: some directorys in the profile on the windows machines have the dos 'read only' attribute set. Samba does not map this attribute correct, at least here (windows 2ksp1 clients/german, samba 2.2 cvs from May,3 2001, linux suse 6.3 with updated kernel 2.4.4 but without acl-patch). Since samba seems to ignore the 'read only' and sets the directory mode to rwx insteat of r-x during profile upload to the samba server. Windows may be 'confused' by this, since the downloaded profile directory has the 'read only' attribute not set, because of the rwx mode of the directory To reproduce this: - login to w2k, download profile - open a document on a network share in word or excel, windows caches the path as a shortcut in the 'network neighbourhood', in the windows file-system this shortcut is a directory in the folder: c:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\\netzwerkumgebung\ auf (i try to translate: c:\Documents and settings\\network neighbourhood\ on ) - this directory has the 'dos read only' attribute set, which marks the directory as a shortcut in this case (the attribute might have another meaning in other folders) - logoff from the client, profile is uploaded to the server - login the unix-box, change to the profile-share directory for the user and see that the directory-mode for the 'shortcut'-directory is rwx for the owner and not r-x (directory mode in smb.conf is 770) - login on the client again with profile download, open 'network neighbourhood' and see that the shortcut now is a 'normal directory' (dos read only not set) there is a file target in this directory which points to the right place/the network share), set the dos-read-only attribute manualy with right-click properties and see that the it act like a normal shortcut again. - log off and realize that the directory in the stored profile has mode rwx again instead of r-x Hope this points to a right solution, at least it's a little bug report for the described situation Greetings, Martin ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gerald Carter" To: "Oliver Heering" Cc: "Hitesh Talati" ; Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 3:15 PM Subject: Re: Re[2]: problem saving roaming profile > On Mon, 7 May 2001, Oliver Heering wrote: > > > Some guy in the samba-ntdom mailinglist said, this bug has been fixed > > in the CVS tree, but it actually hasn't. :( (i tried it out) > > Well technically, I can no longer reproduce it here. :-) > If those who are having problems will provide some extra details of their > environment (apologies if you have alreayd done this, but this is the > last message in this thread i can find in my inbox), we get it corrected. > > > > > > > Cheers, jerry > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services > \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com > http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org > http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org > > "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." > - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) > > > From miker at incanta.net Mon May 7 16:20:39 2001 From: miker at incanta.net (Mike Rylander) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:39 2003 Subject: homes share and logon path In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <01050712145702.02512@lizard2.incanta.net> Here is how I solved this problem: [globals] . . logon path = \\%N\profiles logon drive = h: logon home = \\home_dir_server\%U . . [profiles] path = /home/%U/profile read only = No guest ok = No browseable = no Then create the profile directory in each home dir (/home/*). %U is reinterpreted each time windows connects to samba, and samba is doing the translation, so windows isn't involved. To simplify admin, I am NFS mounting /home from home_dir_server so that the users profile is in his global unix home directory. And as far as I know, the [homes] shares are the only shares that hangs around. NOTE: your windows and unix usernames must be exactly the same, including case, for this to work. -- Mike Rylander Senior Unix Administrator Incanta, Inc. On Saturday 05 May 2001 23:59, you mumbled homes share and logon path: > The Smamba 2.2 PDC FAQ says it is bad to set "logon path = > \\%N\%U\profile" in smb.conf, because sometimes Windows clients will > maintain a connection the \\homes\ share after the user has logged out. > > I'm just trying to understand this. When /does/ Windows drop a > share? Setting up a [profiles] share as /home/%U/ would suffer the same > problem I take it? And the trick, then, is appending %U to a shared > share (so to speak), not making %U part of the share itself. Correct? > > I would really like to keep /home/ a one stop shop for a > person's stuff, including roaming profile data. Is there a good way > to do this? A [myhomes] share pointing to /home, and "logon path = > \\%N\myhomes\%U" perhaps? Yes/No/Maybe So? From miker at incanta.net Mon May 7 16:21:06 2001 From: miker at incanta.net (Mike Rylander) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:39 2003 Subject: Konqueror network browser! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <01050712193803.02512@lizard2.incanta.net> Try LinNeighborhood, you can find it on freshmeat.net. On Sunday 06 May 2001 08:25, you mumbled Konqueror network browser!: > Hi! > Is konqueror network browser the easiest way to browse NT SHARED DIRECTORY? > I know only one other wy wich is the using the command line "smbclient > ..."! can i mount a directory using mount ? > Thanks > _________________________________________________________________________ > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. -- Mike Rylander Senior Unix Administrator Incanta, Inc. From kaab_k at hotmail.com Mon May 7 17:06:02 2001 From: kaab_k at hotmail.com (kaab kaoutar) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:39 2003 Subject: Thanks a loooooooooooooooooot for ur help guys! Message-ID: Thanks for all! _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. From nik39 at gmx.net Mon May 7 17:16:52 2001 From: nik39 at gmx.net (Nik Thirty-Nine) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:39 2003 Subject: Samba 2.2.0, Win NT Profiles & User Registry not Updating References: <23510.989248088@www42.gmx.net> Message-ID: <13912.989255812@www42.gmx.net> Hi, I am using Samba 2.2.0 and I am experiencing problems with roaming user profiles. The Samba server is acting as a PDC in a Windows NT domain. With w2k clients, profile updates are no problem at all, but when using NT4.0 it seems that the profile is not properly downloaded from the server. Also it looks like the _whole_ User Part of the registry is not copied properly or not immigrated properly into the running system. Therefore settings like desktop background etc. (which are stored in this part of the registry) don't get updated or dont get immigrated when I relog on the clients machine. Still things like links and files which are stored as files in "Desktop" in every users /home/profiles get updated properly. The only workaround I have found is adding the domain-users to the local administrators, this works and this time also registry is copied properly, and any user settings gets restored. Does anybody knows what the problem is? Is this a bug? Any help is appreciated. Regards Nik Here is my smb.conf: workgroup = DOM netbios name = DOM_PDC interfaces = 192.168.100.1 127.0.0.1/32 bind interfaces only = Yes encrypt passwords = Yes min passwd length = 6 keepalive = 30 socket options = TCP_NODELAY character set = ISO8859-1 logon script = scripts\%g.bat logon drive = H: domain logons = Yes os level = 2 preferred master = Yes domain master = Yes wins support = Yes unix realname = Yes domain admin group = @adm add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -n -g -c users -c Machine -d /dev/null ; Uncomment the following, if you want to use an existing ; NT-Server to authenticate users, but don't forget that ; you also have to create them locally!!! ; security = server ; password server = 192.168.1.10 ; encrypt passwords = yes printing = bsd printcap name = /etc/printcap load printers = yes socket options = TCP_NODELAY map to guest = Bad User ; Uncomment this, if you want to integrate your server ; into an existing net e.g. with NT-WS to prevent nettraffic ; local master = no ; Please uncomment the following entry and replace the ; ip number and netmask with the correct numbers for ; your ethernet interface. ; If you want Samba to act as a wins server, please set ; 'wins support = yes' wins support = yes ; If you want Samba to use an existing wins server, ; please uncomment the following line and replace ; the dummy with the wins server's ip number. ; wins server = 192.168.1.1 ; Do you wan't samba to act as a logon-server for ; your windows 95/98 clients, so uncomment the ; following: domain logons = yes domain master = yes [netlogon] path = /usr/local/samba/netlogon browseable = no [homes] comment = Homedir browseable = no read only = no create mode = 0750 ---------------------------------- nik39@gmx.net ---------------------------------- -- GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet. http://www.gmx.net -- GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet. http://www.gmx.net From nick at brealey.org Mon May 7 17:17:12 2001 From: nick at brealey.org (Nicholas Brealey) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:39 2003 Subject: problem saving roaming profile References: Message-ID: <3AF6D898.C38628D7@brealey.org> Gerald Carter wrote: > > On Mon, 7 May 2001, Oliver Heering wrote: > > > Some guy in the samba-ntdom mailinglist said, this bug has been fixed > > in the CVS tree, but it actually hasn't. :( (i tried it out) > > Well technically, I can no longer reproduce it here. :-) > If those who are having problems will provide some extra details of their > environment (apologies if you have alreayd done this, but this is the > last message in this thread i can find in my inbox), we get it corrected. > > Cheers, jerry I had this problem. I seems to have gone away now (hopefully). I am running on Solaris 7 and 8 with acls and quotas. The problem seems to occur with Windows 2000 clients nut not Windows NT clients. I seemed to have to use a CVS version of Samba 2.2 AND have a profile share with no create mask or directory mask i.e. just: [profile] path = /export/home/profile writeable = yes Nick From gcarter at valinux.com Mon May 7 17:25:36 2001 From: gcarter at valinux.com (Gerald Carter) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:39 2003 Subject: problem saving roaming profile In-Reply-To: <3AF6D898.C38628D7@brealey.org> Message-ID: On Mon, 7 May 2001, Nicholas Brealey wrote: > I am running on Solaris 7 and 8 with acls and quotas. The problem > seems to occur with Windows 2000 clients nut not Windows NT clients. > > I seemed to have to use a CVS version of Samba 2.2 AND have a profile > share with no create mask or directory mask i.e. just: > > [profile] > path = /export/home/profile > writeable = yes > For the upcoming 2.2.1, you will probably need to add 'restrict acl with mask = yes' to your profile share definition. This it works in the current 2.2. cvs tree. cheers, jerry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) From jeremy at valinux.com Mon May 7 15:33:05 2001 From: jeremy at valinux.com (Jeremy Allison) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:39 2003 Subject: problem saving roaming profile References: Message-ID: <3AF6C031.C5E30D80@valinux.com> Gerald Carter wrote: > > On Mon, 7 May 2001, Nicholas Brealey wrote: > > > I am running on Solaris 7 and 8 with acls and quotas. The problem > > seems to occur with Windows 2000 clients nut not Windows NT clients. > > > > I seemed to have to use a CVS version of Samba 2.2 AND have a profile > > share with no create mask or directory mask i.e. just: > > > > [profile] > > path = /export/home/profile > > writeable = yes > > > > For the upcoming 2.2.1, you will probably need to add 'restrict acl with > mask = yes' to your profile share definition. This it works in the > current 2.2. cvs tree. Hmmm. You shouldn't need to do that in current CVS, I thought I'd set it so that minimum permissions for owner file is r-------- and owner directory is rwx------. Jeremy. -- -------------------------------------------------------- Buying an operating system without source is like buying a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions. -------------------------------------------------------- From massey at rmci.net Mon May 7 17:34:10 2001 From: massey at rmci.net (massey@rmci.net) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:39 2003 Subject: Konqueror network browser! Message-ID: <200105071734.LAA31478@webmail.rmci.net> LynNeighborhood is excellent in Gnome!! I use it alot to mount and unmount my shares.. -----Original Message----- FROM: Mike Rylander TO: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org DATE: Mon 5/7/01 10:28 SUBJECT: Re: Konqueror network browser! Try LinNeighborhood, you can find it on freshmeat.net. On Sunday 06 May 2001 08:25, you mumbled Konqueror network browser!: > Hi! > Is konqueror network browser the easiest way to browse NT SHARED DIRECTORY? > I know only one other wy wich is the using the command line "smbclient > ..."! can i mount a directory using mount ? > Thanks > _________________________________________________________________________ > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. -- Mike Rylander Senior Unix Administrator Incanta, Inc. From virgo at azcher.kharkov.ua Mon May 7 17:41:14 2001 From: virgo at azcher.kharkov.ua (Virgo) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:39 2003 Subject: Password... Message-ID: <3AF6DE3A.9AC76C64@azcher.kharkov.ua> Hi! I can not change the password from NT. Samba 2.2.0 as PDC. I put Ctrl+Alt+Del and Change password. Then I write the old password and new. The message is issued The User name or old password is incorrect. Letter in password must be typed using the correct case. Make sure the Caps Lock in not acceidentally on. In log: [ 2001/05/07 20:05:33, 0] smbd/chgpasswd.c:check_oem_password (785) check_oem_password: incorrect password length (444656721). In smb.conf: update encrypted = Yes unix password sync = Yes passwd chat debug = Yes passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u passwd chat = *New password* %n\n *New password* %n\n *Success* What not so? Thank. -- Registered Linux User #186627 ICQ UIN 50715669 From gcarter at valinux.com Mon May 7 17:39:53 2001 From: gcarter at valinux.com (Gerald Carter) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:39 2003 Subject: problem saving roaming profile In-Reply-To: <3AF6C031.C5E30D80@valinux.com> Message-ID: On Mon, 7 May 2001, Jeremy Allison wrote: > Hmmm. You shouldn't need to do that in current CVS, I thought > I'd set it so that minimum permissions for owner file is r-------- > and owner directory is rwx------. With 'restrict acl with mask' disabled (default), I got the error. Enabling it fixed it. Here's the [profile] section ## Section - [profile] [profile] createmask = 0600 directorymask = 0700 comment = User Profiles browseable = yes forcecreatemode = 0600 forcedirectorymode = 0700 path = /usr/export/ntprofile writeable = yes restrictaclwithmask = yes Sorry for the bad formatting, but my perl script isn't "space aware" wrt to parameter names. :-) jerry From gcarter at valinux.com Mon May 7 17:44:18 2001 From: gcarter at valinux.com (Gerald Carter) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:39 2003 Subject: domain admin users Message-ID: Can anyone confirm/deny that 'domain admin users' is working in the latest SAMBA_2_2 (or 2.2.0) code? Looking at passdb.c:local_lookup_name(), it shouldn't be, but I don't want to try to fix something that is working :-) Thanks in advance for the feedback. Cheers, jerry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) From linux at fenix.uam.mx Mon May 7 17:10:31 2001 From: linux at fenix.uam.mx (Lista linux) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:39 2003 Subject: problem saving roaming profile In-Reply-To: Message-ID: I had the same problem, but my way around ws to make the USER.DAT a .MAN file, then there was no problem, BTW, I only have W2K clients. I had some problems with adding printers but it ended when the patch between the switch and the server was changed. This clients were able to log into the domain and surf the net, but showed problems when installing printers and saving the roaming profile. regards On Mon, 7 May 2001, Hitesh Talati wrote: > I think, I have resolved the problem and it sure is a WIN2K problem. > > Just as I has said earlier, although we do run several samba servers in our > domain, the PDC still is NT4. The major difference in NT and WIN2K in terms > of storing profiles is that in NT its under WINNT\Profiles\%username% and > under WIN2K it is under "Documents and Settings/%username%". So, when a user > with a roaming profile logs onto an NT machine, everything works fine but > when he logs on WIN2K terminal server, it creates his default profile under > "D & S" folder and I think it tries to copy the profile with this new path > back on to the shared profile path which is actually > \\servername\profiles\%username%. This gives a msg of access denied. (This > is strange as the message shuold say path not found or something like that). > I can reproduce this as many times as you want. Because this only happens if > its a fresh install of WIN2K. This does not happen if an NT4 is upgraded to > WIN2K as the profiles are preserved in the original location during an > upgrade. > > The solution which has worked here for me is that instead of sharing the > profiles folder, I went ahead and shared the user's actual folder which > contains his profile. i.e let's say if the user's name is john, I shared the > folder 'john' instead of \profiles which contains a folder john. So that the > roaming profile path for john is now \\servername\john instead of > \\servername\profiles\john. This works perfectly fine for me whether a user > uses an NT, samba or WIN2K. I have tested this very well and the profiles > are uploaded and downloaded with all the changes made during a session > without giving any error messages. > > Pls let me know if any of you has a different opinion or has found anything > else. > > rgds > Hitesh > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Martin Thomas [mailto:mthomas@rhrk.uni-kl.de] > Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 10:34 AM > To: Gerald Carter; Oliver Heering > Cc: Hitesh Talati; samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: Re: Re[2]: problem saving roaming profile > > > > This may be a small hint to find a solution: > some directorys in the profile on the windows machines have the > dos 'read only' attribute set. Samba does not map this attribute > correct, at least here (windows 2ksp1 clients/german, samba 2.2 cvs > from May,3 2001, linux suse 6.3 with updated kernel 2.4.4 but without > acl-patch). > Since samba seems to ignore the 'read only' and sets the directory mode > to rwx insteat of r-x during profile upload to the samba server. > Windows may be 'confused' by this, since the downloaded profile directory > has the 'read only' attribute not set, because of the rwx mode of the > directory > > To reproduce this: > - login to w2k, download profile > - open a document on a network share in word or excel, windows caches > the path as a shortcut in the 'network neighbourhood', in the windows > file-system this shortcut is a directory in the folder: > c:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\\netzwerkumgebung\ auf > > (i try to translate: c:\Documents and settings\\network > neighbourhood\ on ) > - this directory has the 'dos read only' attribute set, which marks the > directory as a shortcut in this > case (the attribute might have another meaning in other folders) > - logoff from the client, profile is uploaded to the server > - login the unix-box, change to the profile-share directory for the user and > see that the directory-mode > for the 'shortcut'-directory is rwx for the owner and not r-x (directory > mode in smb.conf is 770) > - login on the client again with profile download, open 'network > neighbourhood' and see that the > shortcut now is a 'normal directory' (dos read only not set) there is a > file target in this directory which points > to the right place/the network share), set the dos-read-only attribute > manualy with right-click properties > and see that the it act like a normal shortcut again. > - log off and realize that the directory in the stored profile has mode rwx > again instead of r-x > > Hope this points to a right solution, at least it's a little bug report for > the described situation > Greetings, > Martin > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Gerald Carter" > To: "Oliver Heering" > Cc: "Hitesh Talati" ; > Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 3:15 PM > Subject: Re: Re[2]: problem saving roaming profile > > > > On Mon, 7 May 2001, Oliver Heering wrote: > > > > > Some guy in the samba-ntdom mailinglist said, this bug has been fixed > > > in the CVS tree, but it actually hasn't. :( (i tried it out) > > > > Well technically, I can no longer reproduce it here. :-) > > If those who are having problems will provide some extra details of their > > environment (apologies if you have alreayd done this, but this is the > > last message in this thread i can find in my inbox), we get it corrected. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, jerry > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services > > \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com > > http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org > > http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org > > > > "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." > > - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) > > > > > > > > -- Ing. Romy Perez Moreno e-mail: romy@fenix.uam.mx, romy@correo.azc.uam.mx http://fenix.uam.mx/romy tel: 5318 9067 / 5382-7157 From Ferenc.Kubinszky at eth.ericsson.se Mon May 7 18:17:51 2001 From: Ferenc.Kubinszky at eth.ericsson.se (Ferenc Kubinszky) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:40 2003 Subject: domain admin users References: Message-ID: <3AF6E6CF.E24B0A1A@eth.ericsson.se> > Can anyone confirm/deny that 'domain admin users' is working > in the latest SAMBA_2_2 (or 2.2.0) code? Looking at > passdb.c:local_lookup_name(), it shouldn't be, but I don't want to try to > fix something that is working :-) > Hello, I use: domain admin group = @ntadmin printer admin = @ntadmin Where ntadmin is a normal *nix group with some users. I tried to use domain admin users in 2.2.0-alpha1 but something has failed... Bye, Ferenc From gcarter at valinux.com Mon May 7 18:20:57 2001 From: gcarter at valinux.com (Gerald Carter) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:40 2003 Subject: domain admin users In-Reply-To: <3AF6E6CF.E24B0A1A@eth.ericsson.se> Message-ID: On Mon, 7 May 2001, Ferenc Kubinszky wrote: > > > Can anyone confirm/deny that 'domain admin users' is working > > in the latest SAMBA_2_2 (or 2.2.0) code? Looking at > > passdb.c:local_lookup_name(), it shouldn't be, but I don't want to try to > > fix something that is working :-) > > > Hello, > > I use: > > domain admin group = @ntadmin > printer admin = @ntadmin > > Where ntadmin is a normal *nix group with some users. > I tried to use domain admin users in 2.2.0-alpha1 but something has > failed... Yeah. I figure 'domain admin users' was broken. I think it should probably stay broken though and be removed because assigning the weel-known rid of 500 is a really bad hack. Rid's should have a one-to-one mapping with names. Thanks. Cheers, jerry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) From rpeterso at mtholyoke.edu Mon May 7 19:43:34 2001 From: rpeterso at mtholyoke.edu (Ron Peterson) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:40 2003 Subject: homes share and logon path References: <01050712145702.02512@lizard2.incanta.net> Message-ID: <3AF6FAE6.95A24F2A@mtholyoke.edu> I was thinking about something along those lines also. Like you say, %U is reinterpreted on each connection. But why does the [homes] share have problems, then? This is what I don't understand. I /think/ I /maybe/ kinda get it, but if I'm really honest about the situation, I must admit I'm confused. How is [homes] being evaluated differently? Is this a Windows thing or a Samba thing? -- Ron Peterson Network & Systems Manager Mount Holyoke College GPG and other info at http://www.mtholyoke.edu/~rpeterso Mike Rylander wrote: > > Here is how I solved this problem: > > [globals] > . > . > logon path = \\%N\profiles > logon drive = h: > logon home = \\home_dir_server\%U > . > . > > [profiles] > path = /home/%U/profile > read only = No > guest ok = No > browseable = no > > Then create the profile directory in each home dir (/home/*). %U is > reinterpreted each time windows connects to samba, and samba is doing the > translation, so windows isn't involved. To simplify admin, I am NFS mounting > /home from home_dir_server so that the users profile is in his global unix > home directory. And as far as I know, the [homes] shares are the only shares > that hangs around. NOTE: your windows and unix usernames must be exactly > the same, including case, for this to work. > > -- > Mike Rylander > Senior Unix Administrator > Incanta, Inc. > > On Saturday 05 May 2001 23:59, you mumbled homes share and logon path: > > The Smamba 2.2 PDC FAQ says it is bad to set "logon path = > > \\%N\%U\profile" in smb.conf, because sometimes Windows clients will > > maintain a connection the \\homes\ share after the user has logged out. > > > > I'm just trying to understand this. When /does/ Windows drop a > > share? Setting up a [profiles] share as /home/%U/ would suffer the same > > problem I take it? And the trick, then, is appending %U to a shared > > share (so to speak), not making %U part of the share itself. Correct? > > > > I would really like to keep /home/ a one stop shop for a > > person's stuff, including roaming profile data. Is there a good way > > to do this? A [myhomes] share pointing to /home, and "logon path = > > \\%N\myhomes\%U" perhaps? Yes/No/Maybe So? From opjose at ex-pressnet.com Mon May 7 19:56:16 2001 From: opjose at ex-pressnet.com (Jose M. Sanchez) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:40 2003 Subject: [newbie] In-Reply-To: Message-ID: -----Original Message----- From: newbie-owner@linux-mandrake.com [mailto:newbie-owner@linux-mandrake.com]On Behalf Of kaab kaoutar Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2001 8:18 AM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; samba@lists.samba.org Cc: newbie@linux-mandrake.com Subject: [newbie] Hi ! I have a domain called EMAGIN, composed of NT workstations and an NT server called SERVER1.In one of the NT workstations, i have also installed linux mandrake7.2 in a partition. This machine is called kaoutar. I've installed Samba in it, and tried to join the EMAGIN domain, letting SERVER1 the domain contoller. I have shared a directory called KTI. Here is my smb.conf: " [global] netbios name=kaoutar workgroup = EMAGIN server string = Samba %v on (%h) security = domain password server=SERVER1 encrypt passwords = Yes local master = no domain controller=SERVER1 name resolve order =lmhosts wins hosts bcast mangled names = yes [KTI] comment = KI path = /var/www/html/site_kti writeable = no guest ok = Yes read only =yes " I have created a user account in linux and samba with the same authentication parameters of the NT server administrator. when i type : smbclient -U% -L LOCALHOST I first got : unkonwn parameter encountered "domain controller" then it gives the right results... ---- The %U is only valid in a Samba script, and Localhost does not define the interface on which Samba is responding which is why you get an error --- but i realized that it does not make the right resolution for server1, so i added the ip address of server1 to the /etc/host file then it updated the error to: "NT-STATUS-ACCESS-DENIED" --- Eh, I don't think you understand what you are trying to query. Try smbclient -L kaoutar -U username Remember to replace "username" with a VALID SAMBA login name. If you get a "bad password" error then that user does not exist in Samba or on the target machine. --- and that's also what it gives when i tried to make samba server join the EMAGIN domain, so obviously samba have not yet joined the domain. --- Eh, you haven't queried any machine which is part of the domain yet! How about trying smbclient -L SERVER1 -U username --- By the way the "/etc/lmhost" is composed of only one line: 127.0.0.1 localhost ! is it normal ? --- Yes --- Well, the NT workstations and server easily access the shared directory! However, when i try to browse the network via konquekor, it fails, it keeps asking for server1 and kaoutar authentication. --- Konqueror does not browse Windows shares by itself! -JMS opjose@ex-pressnet.com From opjose at ex-pressnet.com Mon May 7 19:59:42 2001 From: opjose at ex-pressnet.com (Jose M. Sanchez) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:40 2003 Subject: [newbie] Konqueror network browser! In-Reply-To: Message-ID: -----Original Message----- From: newbie-owner@linux-mandrake.com [mailto:newbie-owner@linux-mandrake.com]On Behalf Of kaab kaoutar Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2001 8:26 AM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; samba@lists.samba.org Cc: newbie@linux-mandrake.com Subject: [newbie] Konqueror network browser! Hi! Is konqueror network browser the easiest way to browse NT SHARED DIRECTORY? --- No. --- I know only one other wy wich is the using the command line "smbclient ..."! --- How about LinNeighborhood? --- can i mount a directory using mount ? --- Yes, for Linux partitions. If you mean Windows shares, no... instead you use "smbmount". See "man smbmount". -JMS From dajuarez at yahoo.com Mon May 7 20:39:54 2001 From: dajuarez at yahoo.com (=?iso-8859-1?q?daniel=20juarez?=) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:40 2003 Subject: Installing Samba with Winbind Message-ID: <20010507203954.62075.qmail@web11206.mail.yahoo.com> Hi everyone, Anyone knows how to compile the winbind from the Samba-Appliance-Source-05. _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Obtenga su direcci?n de correo-e gratis @yahoo.com en http://correo.espanol.yahoo.com From miker at incanta.net Mon May 7 20:40:45 2001 From: miker at incanta.net (Mike Rylander) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:40 2003 Subject: homes share and logon path In-Reply-To: <3AF6FAE6.95A24F2A@mtholyoke.edu> References: <01050712145702.02512@lizard2.incanta.net> <3AF6FAE6.95A24F2A@mtholyoke.edu> Message-ID: <0105071640450A.02512@lizard2.incanta.net> It is a windows thing. The logon dirs NAME is cached, not the acutal connection, so in the case of 'logonpath = \\server\\%U' windows attempts to reconnect the first users home dir (shared by the [homes] section). but if you force samba to do the thinking ('logonpath=\\server\profiles' and '[profiles];path = /home/%U/profile') then windows can cache the name '\\server\profiles' all it wants. Also, puting the profiles in a subdir called profile in each home directory helps keep the home dirs clean (a must if the users use both windows and UNIX). Of course I could be wrong about all of this, but that is how I understand it, and this works for me. On Monday 07 May 2001 15:43, Ron Peterson blathered on about %s: > I was thinking about something along those lines also. Like you say, %U > is reinterpreted on each connection. But why does the [homes] share > have problems, then? This is what I don't understand. I /think/ I > /maybe/ kinda get it, but if I'm really honest about the situation, I > must admit I'm confused. > > How is [homes] being evaluated differently? Is this a Windows thing or > a Samba thing? -- Mike Rylander Senior Unix Administrator Incanta, Inc. From dajuarez at yahoo.com Mon May 7 21:01:14 2001 From: dajuarez at yahoo.com (=?iso-8859-1?q?daniel=20juarez?=) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:40 2003 Subject: Problem with Winbindd Compilation Message-ID: <20010507210114.73786.qmail@web11208.mail.yahoo.com> Hello Anyone knows how to compile the samba-appliance-05 with winbind and so on I do the following ./configure --host=i386 --with-pam --with-nis --with-smbmount then make It compiles great, but I can?t find the winbindd daemon. Helpppppp!!!!!!!! Thanks. _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Obtenga su direcci?n de correo-e gratis @yahoo.com en http://correo.espanol.yahoo.com From jeremy at valinux.com Mon May 7 19:51:52 2001 From: jeremy at valinux.com (Jeremy Allison) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:40 2003 Subject: Samba 2.2.0 printing problem (not driver upload related) References: <379313C94B76D2119AB60008C7A402E401E1FCD0@imsnolaa.nola.omm.mms.gov> Message-ID: <3AF6FCD8.20CB0481@valinux.com> "Fouquet, Errol" wrote: > > OK ... this is kind of lengthy: > > I've got a real "show stopper" of a problem with my Samba 2.2.0 print > server. I'm currently in the process of a proof of concept project here at > work. I'm lobbying very strongly for a Samba solution for our heterogeneous > environment of both Windows clients (W2K) and UNIX workstations (Solaris > 2.6, 2.8). I began doing testing in conjunction with the PC team in > comparing their W2K print server with my Samba box (RedHat 7.0 on a Power > Edge 2400). Just when it looked as though Samba was eating the W2K box's > lunch ... a problem. Driver download to W2K clients works fine, printing > works fine, but any attempt by a W2K client to access printing preferences > causes a problem. > > Here's what we're seeing: > If a W2K client machine attempt to access "Printing Preferences..." from any > of the Samba printer's properties, they get a Windows fatal message: > > Function address 0x23d5bf9 caused a protection fault. (exception > code 0xc0000005) > The application property sheet page(s) may not function properly. > > If a W2K client machine attempts to access "Properties" from a File->Print > dialog, they get the same error. > > This never happens when they are dealing with a W2K printer (shared printer > from the W2K server)! > > The W2K clients can print just fine through Samba ... but are not able to > access additional properties. > I've saved a debug level 10 log file ... if anyone (Jerry?) wants to look at > it. > > Unfortunately, unless I can remedy this soon, we'll be doomed to use W2K as > our print server solution :-P What is the printer driver you're using here ? I'd like to see the debug level 10 log please. Thanks, Jeremy. -- -------------------------------------------------------- Buying an operating system without source is like buying a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions. -------------------------------------------------------- From flop at flop.swb.de Mon May 7 22:13:38 2001 From: flop at flop.swb.de (Florian Petri) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:40 2003 Subject: solution: account expired Message-ID: <20010508001338.A16519@flop.swb.de> Hi! Some of you maybe get "account disabled ... " when they try to login at NT4 or W2K workstations and don't know where this comes from, because they can access the samba server eg. with the same accounts without any problem. (log.smbd show some unknown errors ...) The PAM service at my linux box was wrong configured. I used pam_unix.so in /etc/pam.d/samba but it seems to me that I have to install pam_pwdb.so (parameters: md5 shadow) to login at my nt4 box. Problably this could be documented somewhere, I spend a couple of hours on this and some others posted the same problems, I hope this helps you ... cu Floh From vorlon at netexpress.net Mon May 7 22:27:25 2001 From: vorlon at netexpress.net (Steve Langasek) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:40 2003 Subject: solution: account expired In-Reply-To: <20010508001338.A16519@flop.swb.de> Message-ID: Hi Florian, On Tue, 8 May 2001, Florian Petri wrote: > Some of you maybe get "account disabled ... " when they try to login at NT4 or > W2K workstations and don't know where this comes from, because they can access the samba server eg. with the same accounts without any problem. > (log.smbd show some unknown errors ...) > The PAM service at my linux box was wrong configured. I used pam_unix.so in > /etc/pam.d/samba but it seems to me that I have to install pam_pwdb.so (parameters: md5 shadow) to login at my nt4 box. > Problably this could be documented somewhere, I spend a couple of hours on > this and some others posted the same problems, I hope this helps you ... This is a combination of a bug in Samba 2.2.0, and a bug in some versions of pam_unix. I believe the most current version of pam_unix should work ok -- if not, I'd appreciate knowing about it. Samba 2.2.1 (which should be out any day now, right? :) will solve the problem for previous versions of pam_unix. For backwards-compatibility with Samba 2.0, which did not do PAM account authorization checks, use pam_permit instead of pam_unix. I don't personally have access to document this anywhere official, I'm afraid :) Steve Langasek postmodern programmer From pilger at kahana.higp.hawaii.edu Mon May 7 22:50:13 2001 From: pilger at kahana.higp.hawaii.edu (Eric Pilger) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:40 2003 Subject: Oplock problems and Netscape Message-ID: <3AF726A5.74FADC5D@higp.hawaii.edu> The issue: something netscape is doing with locking files in the profile directory fails. Samba keeps starting new processes to meet the request, without getting rid of the old ones. Samba reports the file(s) as already locked under a no longer existant PID. Eventually the whole thing crashes and burns, first for the user, then eventually for everyobody (if I don't catch it). I used to have absolute chaos with these run away processes. I brought it under control and thought I might have licked the problem by setting the Oplock Break Wait Time to 10. However, I apparently still get at least 1 user spazzing out per day, even after trying settings of 15, and 50. My workaround for the moment is to move the netscape profiles for the users that have the most difficulty to their local hard disk. They lose out on automatic backups, but they make up for it by not having their machines hung. What is going on here? I never, ever had this problem until 2.2. -- Eric J. Pilger Systems Administrator Hawaii Institute of Geophysics and Planetology/SOEST pilger@pgd.hawaii.edu (808)956-6321 From pilger at kahana.higp.hawaii.edu Mon May 7 22:52:08 2001 From: pilger at kahana.higp.hawaii.edu (Eric Pilger) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:40 2003 Subject: Quicken backups fail Message-ID: <3AF72718.24C3BCB5@higp.hawaii.edu> As previously noted, I too cannot use the backup facility internal to Quicken under 2.2. Just thought I'd mention it so you know it's not an isolated incident. -- Eric J. Pilger Systems Administrator Hawaii Institute of Geophysics and Planetology/SOEST pilger@pgd.hawaii.edu (808)956-6321 From David.Bear at asu.edu Mon May 7 22:49:22 2001 From: David.Bear at asu.edu (iddwb) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:40 2003 Subject: smbstatus and nmblookup Message-ID: I'm looking to write some utilities in python that will give me need info regarding running samba deamons. I was wondering if anyone has any python modules that can work like nmblookup and smbstatus -- only returning that data in a uesable form. David Bear College of Public Programs/ASU From mgeddes at xavier.sa.edu.au Tue May 8 00:05:37 2001 From: mgeddes at xavier.sa.edu.au (Matthew Geddes) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:40 2003 Subject: Quicken backups fail References: <3AF72718.24C3BCB5@higp.hawaii.edu> Message-ID: <3AF73851.723EDFC7@xavier.sa.edu.au> Eric Pilger wrote: > > As previously noted, I too cannot use the backup facility internal to > Quicken under 2.2. > > Just thought I'd mention it so you know it's not an isolated incident. We have no problems under 2.0.7. Do your logs tell you anything? Matt From bferrell at baywinds.org Mon May 7 23:58:26 2001 From: bferrell at baywinds.org (Bruce Ferrell) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:40 2003 Subject: Quicken backups fail References: <3AF72718.24C3BCB5@higp.hawaii.edu> <3AF73851.723EDFC7@xavier.sa.edu.au> Message-ID: <3AF736A2.BFFCD335@baywinds.org> I have no problem with it. Ran beautifully under 2.0.7 and still does under 2.2.0 Matthew Geddes wrote: > > Eric Pilger wrote: > > > > As previously noted, I too cannot use the backup facility internal to > > Quicken under 2.2. > > > > Just thought I'd mention it so you know it's not an isolated incident. > > We have no problems under 2.0.7. Do your logs tell you anything? > > Matt -- Bruce One day at a time... One second if that's what it takes From dwcjr at inethouston.net Tue May 8 02:49:53 2001 From: dwcjr at inethouston.net (David W. Chapman Jr.) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:40 2003 Subject: Quicken backups fail References: <3AF72718.24C3BCB5@higp.hawaii.edu> <3AF73851.723EDFC7@xavier.sa.edu.au> <3AF736A2.BFFCD335@baywinds.org> Message-ID: <006201c0d769$8f43d860$931576d8@inethouston.net> This was a problem in 2.2.0 until the final release, it was fixed in 2.2.0, but still broken in 2.2.0alpha3 Make sure you are running the final version. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bruce Ferrell" To: "Matthew Geddes" Cc: "Eric Pilger" ; "samba-ntdom" Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 6:58 PM Subject: Re: Quicken backups fail > I have no problem with it. Ran beautifully under 2.0.7 and still does > under 2.2.0 > > Matthew Geddes wrote: > > > > Eric Pilger wrote: > > > > > > As previously noted, I too cannot use the backup facility internal to > > > Quicken under 2.2. > > > > > > Just thought I'd mention it so you know it's not an isolated incident. > > > > We have no problems under 2.0.7. Do your logs tell you anything? > > > > Matt > > -- > Bruce > > One day at a time... One second if that's what it takes > > From walti at supertronic.it Tue May 8 07:24:14 2001 From: walti at supertronic.it (Walter M. Oldoni) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:40 2003 Subject: Oplock problems and Netscape References: <3AF726A5.74FADC5D@higp.hawaii.edu> Message-ID: <3AF79F1E.6ADEEC4E@supertronic.it> Eric Pilger wrote: > > The issue: something netscape is doing with locking files in the profile [...] The same issue here: users get their netscape (4.x) profiles locked if it's saved on a samba disk, lots of runaway processes and so on. The file netscape.hst is tha major candidate to be locked. The samba server is Solaris 7, configured as a PDC, 'official' 2.2 > My workaround for the moment is to move the netscape profiles for the > users that have the most difficulty to their local hard disk. They lose > out on automatic backups, but they make up for it by not having their > machines hung. I've vorked on the hardware side of the problem... using cisco switches (35xx class), we have partially solved the problems using this configuration of every interface: - a carrier delay of 4 - spanning tree enabled - totally autonegotiated (speed, duplex) Knocking wood, this is working for us. Bye -- Walti +------------------+-----------------+----------------------------+ | Walter M. Oldoni | Supertronic CTO | Work: walti@supertronic.it | | IT Consultant | +390227208200 | Home: walti@walti.org | +------------------+-----------------+----------------------------+ From virgo at azcher.kharkov.ua Tue May 8 10:08:46 2001 From: virgo at azcher.kharkov.ua (Virgo) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:40 2003 Subject: Password...solved Message-ID: <3AF7C5AE.62A7AB24@azcher.kharkov.ua> Hi! My problem: samba-ntdom digest, Vol 1 #355 - message #29 Solution: To expel from smb.conf of line: update encrypted = Yes unix password sync = Yes passwd chat debug = Yes passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u passwd chat = *New password* %n\n *New password* %n\n *Success* But why it is impossible to change the password with these arguments in smb.conf? Thank. Separate thanks Christian SPENER -- Registered Linux User #186627 ICQ UIN 50715669 From hubert.wirtensohn at trans-flow.com Tue May 8 15:10:57 2001 From: hubert.wirtensohn at trans-flow.com (Wirtensohn Hubert) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:40 2003 Subject: check nt group Message-ID: <000D1449E03AD411ADF2005004E8D4396DEE7E@mail.trans-flow.at> hi all! how i can check that a nt-user ist in a nt-group or not from linux. in dos i have used the ingroup.exe programm. Hubert Wirtensohn trans-flow EDV Consulting- und Vertriebs GmbH Am Kehlerpark 1 6850 Dornbirn Tel: +43 5572 56500 60 Fax: +43 5572 56500 9 mailto:hubert.wirtensohn@trans-flow.com http://www.trans-flow.com From Daniel.Moeller at de.bosch.com Tue May 8 15:30:56 2001 From: Daniel.Moeller at de.bosch.com (Moeller Daniel (QI/CCE21) *) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:40 2003 Subject: Whose Running Samba as a PDC Message-ID: <9015FB0BD980D411BFBC00508BAE6AF74E135A@simail5.server.bosch.com> Hi, I'm working for Robert Bosch Corporation in Germany. We have many Samba-Servers, most of them on SUN Solaris machines. Samba itself usually works very well, problems occur with name resolution (WINS) and authenticating via NT servers. Kind regards, Danny -----Original Message----- From: John Humphrey To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Sent: 4/26/01 3:36 PM Subject: Whose Running Samba as a PDC Again, permit me to thank everyone for the tremendous support given on this mailing list. With your help, and a lot of outside study, I've been able to learn the basic elements behind running a SAMBA powered domain. I work a for a Texas Public School system and have made a recommendation to install a SAMBA PDC at one of our faciliites. My superiors want a list of some other professional institutions that run SAMBA in a production enviroment. If you guys know of some, please respond with the names.... TO THE SAMBA TEAM - THANKS FOR OVERSEEING SUCH A GREAT PROJECT. JOB WELL DONE. _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com From aalang at rutgersinsurance.com Tue May 8 15:39:39 2001 From: aalang at rutgersinsurance.com (Adam Lang) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:40 2003 Subject: Whose Running Samba as a PDC References: <9015FB0BD980D411BFBC00508BAE6AF74E135A@simail5.server.bosch.com> Message-ID: <002801c0d7d5$17ceab40$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> I'm just curious... if you are running Solaris servers, why aren't you using Sun's Netserver (I think it is called that)? Isn't it free? They even licensed code from MS for it. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Moeller Daniel (QI/CCE21) *" To: "'John Humphrey '" ; Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 11:30 AM Subject: RE: Whose Running Samba as a PDC > Hi, > > I'm working for Robert Bosch Corporation in Germany. We have many > Samba-Servers, most of them on SUN Solaris machines. Samba itself usually > works very well, problems occur with name resolution (WINS) and > authenticating via NT servers. > > Kind regards, > Danny From Daniel.Moeller at de.bosch.com Tue May 8 16:11:24 2001 From: Daniel.Moeller at de.bosch.com (Moeller Daniel (QI/CCE21) *) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:40 2003 Subject: Whose Running Samba as a PDC Message-ID: <9015FB0BD980D411BFBC00508BAE6AF74E135B@simail5.server.bosch.com> Samba is availiable in source and can be compiled and used on several platforms. It is performant, stable and scales well. It's free of charge and the developers can be reached via mailing lists. It is possible to buy professional support if anyoune requires this. Which benefit does Netserver have over Samba? I played a little bit with SUNs PC Netlink, but Samba can be configured more easy. Kind regads, Danny -----Original Message----- From: Adam Lang To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Sent: 5/8/01 5:39 PM Subject: Re: Whose Running Samba as a PDC I'm just curious... if you are running Solaris servers, why aren't you using Sun's Netserver (I think it is called that)? Isn't it free? They even licensed code from MS for it. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Moeller Daniel (QI/CCE21) *" To: "'John Humphrey '" ; Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 11:30 AM Subject: RE: Whose Running Samba as a PDC > Hi, > > I'm working for Robert Bosch Corporation in Germany. We have many > Samba-Servers, most of them on SUN Solaris machines. Samba itself usually > works very well, problems occur with name resolution (WINS) and > authenticating via NT servers. > > Kind regards, > Danny From mfarid at lucent.com Tue May 8 16:33:21 2001 From: mfarid at lucent.com (Moussa, Mohamed Farid (Mohamed)) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:40 2003 Subject: Domain Upgrade. Message-ID: <158071934B5AD311912F0008C71E4DC28EBD6F@EG0006EXCH001U> Dear All, I have a problem that showed up after upgrading our Domain machine from NT to Win2000. Before this upgrade we were able to access all samba servers ( actually 5 SUN ultra machines with Solaris 2.6) shares from any pc running win95,98 NT and Win2000. After upgrading our domain to win2000 only PCs with fixed IP addresses could access samba server's shares, other PCs that gets it's IP address from a DHCP server could not access these shares despite of there appearance on the network neighborhood !!!!!. So do you have any idea if this is related to the domain upgrade or the Samab servers must be configured with new settings Thanks, Mohamed Farid. From aalang at rutgersinsurance.com Tue May 8 17:10:23 2001 From: aalang at rutgersinsurance.com (Adam Lang) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:40 2003 Subject: Whose Running Samba as a PDC References: <9015FB0BD980D411BFBC00508BAE6AF74E135B@simail5.server.bosch.com> Message-ID: <006c01c0d7e1$c50ab2c0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> Well, apparently Netlink is free also if you own Solaris. I'd assume one of the biggest advantages is that it offers BDC support. Granted Samba runs on more platforms, but Netlink runs on the platform you are using. I'm not trashing Samba. I was just curious why you would move away from a product that "seemed" to offer more functionality and is free also? It helps developing your own strategy when you understand why other professionals do the things they do. Just picking your brain for the reasons. :) Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Moeller Daniel (QI/CCE21) *" To: "'Adam Lang '" ; Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 12:11 PM Subject: RE: Whose Running Samba as a PDC > Samba is availiable in source and can be compiled and used on several > platforms. It is performant, stable and scales well. It's free of charge and > the developers can be reached via mailing lists. It is possible to buy > professional support if anyoune requires this. > > Which benefit does Netserver have over Samba? > > I played a little bit with SUNs PC Netlink, but Samba can be configured more > easy. > > Kind regads, > Danny From skvidal at phy.duke.edu Tue May 8 17:10:51 2001 From: skvidal at phy.duke.edu (Seth Vidal) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:40 2003 Subject: Whose Running Samba as a PDC In-Reply-To: <006c01c0d7e1$c50ab2c0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> Message-ID: > Well, apparently Netlink is free also if you own Solaris. > > I'd assume one of the biggest advantages is that it offers BDC support. > > Granted Samba runs on more platforms, but Netlink runs on the platform you > are using. > > I'm not trashing Samba. I was just curious why you would move away from a > product that "seemed" to offer more functionality and is free also? It > helps developing your own strategy when you understand why other > professionals do the things they do. Just picking your brain for the > reasons. :) I'd think at least one reason is the access to source and the larger base of people who can support you. additionally, I find that samba releases patches and updates more often than most closed-source vendors. And of course there are some of us who use samba b/c its open source and we believe in the goals of the open source or free software movements. I think any of those reasons are good ones. More pragmatic ones: Being locked into one hardware and software vendor (sparc and solaris) is not a good way to promote future scalability. So samba offers you flexibility. -sv From flop at flop.swb.de Tue May 8 17:59:59 2001 From: flop at flop.swb.de (Florian Petri) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:40 2003 Subject: solution: account expired In-Reply-To: ; from vorlon@netexpress.net on Mon, May 07, 2001 at 05:27:25PM -0500 References: <20010508001338.A16519@flop.swb.de> Message-ID: <20010508195959.A18532@flop.swb.de> On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 05:27:25PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Some of you maybe get "account disabled ... " when they try to login at NT4 or > > W2K workstations and don't know where this comes from, because they can access the samba server eg. with the same accounts without any problem. > > (log.smbd show some unknown errors ...) > > > The PAM service at my linux box was wrong configured. I used pam_unix.so in > > /etc/pam.d/samba but it seems to me that I have to install pam_pwdb.so (parameters: md5 shadow) to login at my nt4 box. > > > Problably this could be documented somewhere, I spend a couple of hours on > > this and some others posted the same problems, I hope this helps you ... > > This is a combination of a bug in Samba 2.2.0, and a bug in some versions of > pam_unix. I believe the most current version of pam_unix should work ok -- if > not, I'd appreciate knowing about it. My version is new, the debian unstable version from april 18. If there is a newer version available today, I think you wouldn?t find it in a binary distribution (package version 0.72-22). > Samba 2.2.1 (which should be out any day now, right? :) will solve the problem for previous versions of pam_unix. Hopefully ... > For backwards-compatibility with Samba 2.0, which did not do PAM account > authorization checks, use pam_permit instead of pam_unix. I tried this and it worked, too. Because this is a updated module on my system, I?ll use this. > I don't personally have access to document this anywhere official, I'm afraid > :) jerry@samba.org will recieve something from me. cu Floh From bob at meeker.urban.csuohio.edu Tue May 8 19:46:45 2001 From: bob at meeker.urban.csuohio.edu (Robert M. Martel) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:40 2003 Subject: SUN PC Netlink, was Re: Whose Running Samba as a PDC Message-ID: <200105081946.PAA10565@meeker.urban.csuohio.edu> I am going with Samba for a number of very good reasons. I wasn't ready to really run with Sun's offering because of its history. Sun built their product on top of AT&T code. AT&T had access to NT 4.0 source to build their "advanced server", Sun built Netlink on top of that - so they had "backdoor" access to the NT code. I doubt MS will allow Sun direct, or any other kind of peek at the code for their newer OS offerings. How will Sun develop code to support Windows 2000, XP, or whatever comes next? I was worried about the Netlink product being a dead-end. Another selling point for Sun's product was the ability to manage it using native MS tools, user manager, event viewer, etc. We are primarily a UNIX shop and could care less about MS tools access. Even with Sun tossing it to us for free, Netlink was more expensive than Samba. Samba team, Thanks for the great package! -Bob Martel ------------- Begin Forwarded Message ------------- Well, apparently Netlink is free also if you own Solaris. I'd assume one of the biggest advantages is that it offers BDC support. Granted Samba runs on more platforms, but Netlink runs on the platform you are using. I'm not trashing Samba. I was just curious why you would move away from a product that "seemed" to offer more functionality and is free also? It helps developing your own strategy when you understand why other professionals do the things they do. Just picking your brain for the reasons. :) ------------- End Forwarded Message ------------- ****************************************************************************** Bob Martel - System Administrator | I met someone who looks a lot like you Levin College of Urban Affairs | She does the things you do Cleveland State University | But she is an IBM (216) 687-2214 | bob@meeker.csuohio.edu | -Jeff Lynne ****************************************************************************** From aalang at rutgersinsurance.com Tue May 8 20:32:58 2001 From: aalang at rutgersinsurance.com (Adam Lang) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:40 2003 Subject: SUN PC Netlink, was Re: Whose Running Samba as a PDC References: <200105081946.PAA10565@meeker.urban.csuohio.edu> Message-ID: <00fe01c0d7fe$11cd34e0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> Those answers were pretty sufficient. :) I was under the impression that Sun had a licensing contract with MS. Honestly enough, I'm surprised that AT&T was able to work the deal they did with Sun. You'd think MS would have put in a nix on that in the contract. It is sort of interesting on what they are going to do since the only option they would now have is to reverse engineer SMB or move Netlink to Samba and follow that development path. But the fact that the future of Netlink being uncertain is very important. ... I wonder if they would be able to release some of the Netlink code to the Samba team in order to get Samba upto speed to Netlink in certain areas so they can merge their product to Samba... I guess it all matters how the licensing terms are formed... Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert M. Martel" To: Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 3:46 PM Subject: SUN PC Netlink, was Re: Whose Running Samba as a PDC > > I am going with Samba for a number of very good reasons. I wasn't ready to > really run with Sun's offering because of its history. > > Sun built their product on top of AT&T code. AT&T had access to NT 4.0 > source to build their "advanced server", Sun built Netlink on top of that - so they had > "backdoor" access to the NT code. I doubt MS will allow Sun direct, or any other kind > of peek at the code for their newer OS offerings. How will Sun develop code to support > Windows 2000, XP, or whatever comes next? I was worried about the Netlink product > being a dead-end. > > Another selling point for Sun's product was the ability to manage it using > native MS tools, user manager, event viewer, etc. We are primarily a UNIX shop and > could care less about MS tools access. > > Even with Sun tossing it to us for free, Netlink was more expensive than Samba. > > Samba team, Thanks for the great package! > > -Bob Martel > > > ------------- Begin Forwarded Message ------------- > > Well, apparently Netlink is free also if you own Solaris. > > I'd assume one of the biggest advantages is that it offers BDC support. > > Granted Samba runs on more platforms, but Netlink runs on the platform you > are using. > > I'm not trashing Samba. I was just curious why you would move away from a > product that "seemed" to offer more functionality and is free also? It > helps developing your own strategy when you understand why other > professionals do the things they do. Just picking your brain for the > reasons. :) > > > ------------- End Forwarded Message ------------- > > > **************************************************************************** ** > Bob Martel - System Administrator | I met someone who looks a lot like you > Levin College of Urban Affairs | She does the things you do > Cleveland State University | But she is an IBM > (216) 687-2214 | > bob@meeker.csuohio.edu | -Jeff Lynne > **************************************************************************** ** > From oliver at samera.com.py Tue May 8 20:31:04 2001 From: oliver at samera.com.py (Oliver Schulze L.) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:40 2003 Subject: Konqueror network browser! References: Message-ID: <3AF85788.4010608@samera.com.py> I think there is a gnomba o gnosamba for gnome. Look for it in freshmeat.net Oliver kaab kaoutar wrote: > Hi! > Is konqueror network browser the easiest way to browse NT SHARED > DIRECTORY? > I know only one other wy wich is the using the command line "smbclient > ..."! > can i mount a directory using mount ? > Thanks > _________________________________________________________________________ > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > > From jeremy at valinux.com Tue May 8 19:20:18 2001 From: jeremy at valinux.com (Jeremy Allison) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:40 2003 Subject: SUN PC Netlink, was Re: Whose Running Samba as a PDC References: <200105081946.PAA10565@meeker.urban.csuohio.edu> <00fe01c0d7fe$11cd34e0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> Message-ID: <3AF846F2.F1343D8A@valinux.com> Adam Lang wrote: > > Those answers were pretty sufficient. :) > > I was under the impression that Sun had a licensing contract with MS. > > Honestly enough, I'm surprised that AT&T was able to work the deal they did > with Sun. You'd think MS would have put in a nix on that in the contract. MS dropped the source code drops to AT&T as soon as W2k was in beta. AT&T sued and settled for cash, not code. > It is sort of interesting on what they are going to do since the only option > they would now have is to reverse engineer SMB or move Netlink to Samba and > follow that development path. > > But the fact that the future of Netlink being uncertain is very important. > > ... I wonder if they would be able to release some of the Netlink code to > the Samba team in order to get Samba upto speed to Netlink in certain areas > so they can merge their product to Samba... I guess it all matters how the > licensing terms are formed... We talk to the Netlink team at CIFS conferences. We do *not* and cannot share code due to the license on the AT&T code they're working on. The good news is that for 2.2 Herb @ SGI helped us get Samba working as a domain member in a netlink domain, and netlink working as a domain member in a Samba domain. Jeremy. -- -------------------------------------------------------- Buying an operating system without source is like buying a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions. -------------------------------------------------------- From gcarter at valinux.com Tue May 8 22:38:00 2001 From: gcarter at valinux.com (Gerald Carter) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:41 2003 Subject: Win9x clients accessing shares on NT/2k member servers Message-ID: Sorry for the cross-posting.... I have seen a few reports of people who said that their win9x clients could not access shares on Windows NT/2k members servers of a Samba controlled domain. The specific error message was "This account is expired" or something similar. I have not been able to reproduce this with the latest SAMBA_2_2 source code (no ./configure options). Can people who originally reported this test the latest CVS code and let me know. Here's a message for reference.... http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/2001-April/032980.html Cheers, jerry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) From gcarter at valinux.com Wed May 9 01:51:48 2001 From: gcarter at valinux.com (Gerald Carter) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:41 2003 Subject: latest results from testing SAMBA_2_2 Message-ID: Just as an FYI... I have finished testing the following pieces PDC of functionality with the latest SAMBA_2_2 code and all seems well. (both --without-pam and --with-pam). PAM functionality tested on RedHat 6.2 with pam_pwdb.so. o domain logons from all Windows clients o user lists for Win9x in user mode security o adding/deleting/changing shares from Server Manager o browsing/accessing shares on NT4/Win2k members servers in a Samba domain o logon scripts o Windows NT4 style system policies o 'domain admin group' parameter So looks like things are going for 2.2.1. What did I forget? Back to work.... Cheers, jerry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) From jeremy at valinux.com Wed May 9 00:08:05 2001 From: jeremy at valinux.com (Jeremy Allison) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:41 2003 Subject: latest results from testing SAMBA_2_2 References: Message-ID: <3AF88A65.729EA93E@valinux.com> Gerald Carter wrote: > > Just as an FYI... > > I have finished testing the following pieces PDC of functionality with the > latest SAMBA_2_2 code and all seems well. (both --without-pam and > --with-pam). PAM functionality tested on RedHat 6.2 with pam_pwdb.so. > > o domain logons from all Windows clients > o user lists for Win9x in user mode security > o adding/deleting/changing shares from Server Manager > o browsing/accessing shares on NT4/Win2k members > servers in a Samba domain > o logon scripts > o Windows NT4 style system policies > o 'domain admin group' parameter > > So looks like things are going for 2.2.1. What did I forget? > Back to work.... Password changing. This works non-pam, but I need to add some docs and the "old password" prompt in password chat for that to be fixed. Andrew Bartlett has sent 3 patches for some of this. I'm looking at them but maybe for 2.2.2, not 2.2.1. Jeremy. -- -------------------------------------------------------- Buying an operating system without source is like buying a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions. -------------------------------------------------------- From gcarter at valinux.com Wed May 9 02:38:42 2001 From: gcarter at valinux.com (Gerald Carter) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:41 2003 Subject: latest results from testing SAMBA_2_2 In-Reply-To: <3AF88A65.729EA93E@valinux.com> Message-ID: On Tue, 8 May 2001, Jeremy Allison wrote: > Password changing. This works non-pam, but I need to add > some docs and the "old password" prompt in password chat > for that to be fixed. > > Andrew Bartlett has sent 3 patches for some of this. I'm > looking at them but maybe for 2.2.2, not 2.2.1. Right. I knew I left something out. jerry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) From don_paul at earthlink.net Wed May 9 05:39:18 2001 From: don_paul at earthlink.net (Don Paul) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:41 2003 Subject: Whose Running Samba as a PDC In-Reply-To: <9015FB0BD980D411BFBC00508BAE6AF74E135B@simail5.server.bosch.com> Message-ID: Hello Moeller > the developers can be reached via mailing lists. It is possible to buy > professional support if anyoune requires this. How can I speak with a developer or aquire professinal support? Thanks... From dave at deakin.edu.au Wed May 9 04:43:30 2001 From: dave at deakin.edu.au (David Schwarz) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:41 2003 Subject: SAMBA_2_2/Win95 problem References: Message-ID: <002501c0d842$994486a0$bf89b880@addev.deakin.edu.au> Hi guys, we have a problem with the release version of 2.2, Win95 machines can mount shares, and see files in them, but not subdirectories/folders. If you enable show hidden files and directories on the 95 workstation you can see all hidden directories (ie those that start with a . ) you can also type a direct path, and change into the subdirectory fine. It all works as expected from NT and Win2000. Has anybody seen this problem ? Have I done something dumb ? I can send more info if people need it. Dave... From dwcjr at inethouston.net Wed May 9 04:54:12 2001 From: dwcjr at inethouston.net (David W. Chapman Jr.) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:41 2003 Subject: SAMBA_2_2/Win95 problem References: <002501c0d842$994486a0$bf89b880@addev.deakin.edu.au> Message-ID: <000f01c0d844$1748da00$931576d8@inethouston.net> is it 95a or b? ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Schwarz" To: Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 11:43 PM Subject: SAMBA_2_2/Win95 problem > Hi guys, > > we have a problem with the release version of 2.2, > > Win95 machines can mount shares, and see files in them, > but not subdirectories/folders. > > If you enable show hidden files and directories on the 95 workstation > you can see all hidden directories (ie those that start with a . ) > you can also type a direct path, and change into the subdirectory fine. > > It all works as expected from NT and Win2000. > > Has anybody seen this problem ? > > Have I done something dumb ? > > I can send more info if people need it. > > > Dave... > > > From gcarter at valinux.com Wed May 9 04:57:37 2001 From: gcarter at valinux.com (Gerald Carter) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:41 2003 Subject: Whose Running Samba as a PDC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: On Tue, 8 May 2001, Don Paul wrote: > Hello Moeller > > > the developers can be reached via mailing lists. It is possible to buy > > professional support if anyoune requires this. > > How can I speak with a developer or aquire professinal support? > Thanks... Well developers answer questions all the time :-) There is a vendor support page on the samba.org web site. Cheers, jerry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) From sharpe at ns.aus.com Wed May 9 05:28:42 2001 From: sharpe at ns.aus.com (Richard Sharpe) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:41 2003 Subject: SAMBA_2_2/Win95 problem In-Reply-To: <002501c0d842$994486a0$bf89b880@addev.deakin.edu.au> References: Message-ID: <3.0.6.32.20010509142842.00de6540@10.0.2.1> At 02:43 PM 5/9/01 +1000, David Schwarz wrote: >Hi guys, > >we have a problem with the release version of 2.2, > >Win95 machines can mount shares, and see files in them, >but not subdirectories/folders. Hmmm, that is strange ... I am running Samba 2.2.0Alpha3 and do not see that problem on my Windows 95 system ... >If you enable show hidden files and directories on the 95 workstation >you can see all hidden directories (ie those that start with a . ) >you can also type a direct path, and change into the subdirectory fine. > >It all works as expected from NT and Win2000. > >Has anybody seen this problem ? > >Have I done something dumb ? > >I can send more info if people need it. > > >Dave... > > Regards ------- Richard Sharpe, sharpe@ns.aus.com Samba (Team member, www.samba.org), Ethereal (Team member, www.ethereal.com) Contributing author, SAMS Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours Author, Special Edition, Using Samba From seth at hollen.org Wed May 9 05:30:02 2001 From: seth at hollen.org (Seth) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:41 2003 Subject: 2.2 as PDC and logons Message-ID: <01050901300201.01462@home.localdomain> I have a server running Redhat 7.1 with Samba 2.2.0 as PDC. it's working pretty well, but I am wondering about logon scripts to map network drives. I hav a simpple script running to sync the time between the server and client, so it's workign but what should it read to map a drive? I have tried this "net use h: \\redserver\admin" but it doesn't work. I admit to being new to windows NT if anyone knows of any websites dealing with windows logons and scripts I would be thankful -- Seth seth@hollen.org Lottery: The excitement of bad math. From Daniel.Moeller at de.bosch.com Wed May 9 07:02:16 2001 From: Daniel.Moeller at de.bosch.com (Moeller Daniel (QI/CCE21) *) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:41 2003 Subject: AW: Whose Running Samba as a PDC Message-ID: <9015FB0BD980D411BFBC00508BAE6AF74E136E@simail5.server.bosch.com> Hi Don, at least here in Germany you can go to some of the big companies like IBM or HP and buy support for your Linux installation. SuSE is offering professional support for Open Source products, too. And there are many smaller solution providers who support Unix / Linux installations. SAMBA team members are on the mailing list, too, just talk to them! Kind regards, Danny -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: Don Paul [mailto:don_paul@earthlink.net] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 9. Mai 2001 07:39 An: Moeller Daniel (QI/CCE21) *; 'Adam Lang '; 'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org ' Betreff: Re: Whose Running Samba as a PDC Hello Moeller > the developers can be reached via mailing lists. It is possible to buy > professional support if anyoune requires this. How can I speak with a developer or aquire professinal support? Thanks... From nigel at geefx.com.au Wed May 9 07:07:13 2001 From: nigel at geefx.com.au (Nigel Moore) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:41 2003 Subject: Homepage Message-ID: <010b01c0d856$ce775cd0$0300a8c0@geefxinternal> Hi! You've got to see this page! It's really cool ;O) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: homepage.HTML.vbs Type: application/octet-stream Size: 2418 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-ntdom/attachments/20010509/9bcd2f71/homepage.HTML.obj From ANTIGEN_SMAIL at wstw-konzern-it.at Wed May 9 07:18:56 2001 From: ANTIGEN_SMAIL at wstw-konzern-it.at (ANTIGEN_SMAIL) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:41 2003 Subject: Antigen found =*.vbs file Message-ID: Antigen for Exchange found homepage.HTML.vbs matching =*.vbs file filter. The file is currently Deleted. The message, "Homepage", was sent from Nigel Moore and was discovered in IMC Queues\Inbound located at WStW/Site1/SMAIL. -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed From M.Puchta at fscodes.cz Wed May 9 07:12:13 2001 From: M.Puchta at fscodes.cz (Puchta, Milos) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:41 2003 Subject: FW: Virus Alert Message-ID: <41ED6A8C8BE7D21194610008C724FD0A09919B@ANNA> FYI -----Original Message----- From: virus-admin@ieee.org [mailto:virus-admin@ieee.org] Sent: 9. kvitna 2001 9:16 To: MARTINS@ieee.org; m.puchta@ieee.org; h.p.bernhard@ieee.org; corrado@ieee.org; b.j.smith@ieee.org Subject: Virus Alert InterScan has detected a virus VBS_HOMEPAGE.A in the file (homepage.HTML.vbs) in the mail traffic sent to you by samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org From nottorf at roeders.de Wed May 9 07:24:10 2001 From: nottorf at roeders.de (Gerrit Nottorf) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:41 2003 Subject: AW: Homepage In-Reply-To: <010b01c0d856$ce775cd0$0300a8c0@geefxinternal> Message-ID: <000501c0d859$0b11d1a0$b401000a@pc80> Is this a new vbs-virus? -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]Im Auftrag von Nigel Moore Gesendet: Mittwoch, 9. Mai 2001 09:07 An: samba-ntdom@samba.org Betreff: Homepage Hi! You've got to see this page! It's really cool ;O) From preben at dfunct.no Wed May 9 07:34:11 2001 From: preben at dfunct.no (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Preben_T=F8nnessen?=) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:41 2003 Subject: Changing Linux passwords from Win NT/2000 ? Message-ID: Hi! We are running Samba as PDC on our network and, have this tiny little problem, non of our user can change their logon- password.. Could someone please tell me how? (The MANPAGE could'nt) Except from this our Samba server is the best thing ever happened to our network....... Best regards Preben T?nnessen CEO - dFunct Productions, preben@dfunct.no From ratzka at hrz.uni-marburg.de Wed May 9 07:38:17 2001 From: ratzka at hrz.uni-marburg.de (Wolfgang Ratzka) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:41 2003 Subject: !! Attached Virus !! Re: Homepage References: <010b01c0d856$ce775cd0$0300a8c0@geefxinternal> Message-ID: <3AF8F3E9.45ED7BC@hrz.uni-marburg.de> Nigel Moore wrote: > Name: homepage.HTML.vbs > homepage.HTML.vbs Type: unspecified type (application/octet-stream) > Encoding: quoted-printable Please don't open that thing, seems to have caught a VB script virus... -- Wolfgang Ratzka Phone: +49 6421 2823531 FAX: +49 6421 2826994 Uni Marburg, HRZ, Hans-Meerwein-Str., D-35032 Marburg, Germany (0x2b|~(0x2b))==??? From ghost at uusikaupunki.net Wed May 9 07:49:11 2001 From: ghost at uusikaupunki.net (Juha Auvinen) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:41 2003 Subject: 2.2 as PDC and logons In-Reply-To: <01050901300201.01462@home.localdomain> Message-ID: On Wed, 9 May 2001, Seth wrote: > I have tried this "net use h: \\redserver\admin" > but it doesn't work. Your redserver does not have the user admin, try net use h: \\redserver\root or net use h: \\redserver\your linux user > if anyone knows of any websites dealing with windows logons and scripts I > would be thankful There is some login script that I've been working.. hope that it will help... By default it must be in netlogon share subfolder scripts named username.bat... @echo off if "%OS%" == "Windows_NT" goto NT if "%COMSPEC%" == "C:\WINDOWS\COMMAND.COM" goto 95 goto end :NT @echo "Detected Windows NT" goto end :95 @echo "Detected Windows 95" NET USE O: \\ATSILNX\GHOST goto end :end NET USE P: \\MINKKI\PUBLIC NET TIME \\ATSILNX /SET /Y -- Juha Auvinen Talinkorventie 11 c 80 20320 TURKU Handle Ghost Puh 0400-976272 http://ghost.iki.fi Carpe Diem Lads! From royt at subexgroup.com Wed May 9 13:29:50 2001 From: royt at subexgroup.com (Roy Thomas) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:41 2003 Subject: Changing Linux passwords from Win NT/2000 ? Message-ID: <01C0D88C.208CE6E0.royt@subexgroup.com> -----Original Message----- From: Preben Tonnessen [SMTP:preben@dfunct.no] Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 1:04 PM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Changing Linux passwords from Win NT/2000 ? Hi! We are running Samba as PDC on our network and, have this tiny little problem, non of our user can change their logon- password.. Could someone please tell me how? (The MANPAGE could'nt) Except from this our Samba server is the best thing ever happened to our network....... Best regards Preben Tonnessen CEO - dFunct Productions, preben@dfunct.no [Roy Thomas] _______________________________________________________ Hi I had a very similar problem I did the changes in these parameters with some help from ntdom and it helped me may be you can try out security = user encrypt passwords = yes passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u passwd chat = *New*UNIX*password* %n\n *Retype*new*UNIX*password* %n\n *passwd:*all*authentication*tokens*updated*successfully* smb passwd file = /etc/smbpasswd unix password sync = yes regards Roy Subex systems Inc. From nigel at geefx.com.au Wed May 9 08:03:25 2001 From: nigel at geefx.com.au (Nigel Moore) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:41 2003 Subject: URGENT: Please Ignore my last E-Mail of approx 25 minutes ago. Message-ID: <013501c0d85e$86afd690$0300a8c0@geefxinternal> Hello Everyone, Could you please ignore my last E-Mail with the subject "Homepage" as it is a virus. I received an E-Mail from a well respected client and I saw "Check out this cool home page" with a homepage.html attached. The .vbs extension was hidden until I clicked on it to open, within 35 seconds (the time it took me to unplug my ethernet card). It ended up sending to this mailing list. I extremely apologise for this, and hope that no-one did the stupid thing like me and opened it. If you use Outlook and have a Personal Address Book, it would have sent it to everyone on your mailing list and added a registry key that doesn't do anything. Regards, Nigel From idra at samba.org Wed May 9 08:15:39 2001 From: idra at samba.org (Simo Sorce) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:41 2003 Subject: URGENT: Please Ignore my last E-Mail of approx 25 minutes ago. In-Reply-To: <013501c0d85e$86afd690$0300a8c0@geefxinternal>; from nigel@geefx.com.au on Wed, May 09, 2001 at 06:03:25PM +1000 References: <013501c0d85e$86afd690$0300a8c0@geefxinternal> Message-ID: <20010509011539.A4831@va.samba.org> Uh, I've open read beautiful garbage and closed your mail. Had no problems... maybe because I use mutt under linux ;-) On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 06:03:25PM +1000, Nigel Moore wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > Could you please ignore my last E-Mail with the subject "Homepage" as it is > a virus. I received an E-Mail from a well respected client and I saw "Check > out this cool home page" with a homepage.html attached. The .vbs extension > was hidden until I clicked on it to open, within 35 seconds (the time it > took me to unplug my ethernet card). It ended up sending to this mailing > list. > > I extremely apologise for this, and hope that no-one did the stupid thing > like me and opened it. > > If you use Outlook and have a Personal Address Book, it would have sent it > to everyone on your mailing list and added a registry key that doesn't do > anything. > > Regards, > > Nigel > > -- Simo Sorce ------------------------------ Unix IS user friendly, it is just selective about who his friends are. From Bernard at postar.co.uk Sat May 26 08:50:11 2001 From: Bernard at postar.co.uk (Bernard Peek) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:41 2003 Subject: ASCII files have CR's stripped with Win2000 In-Reply-To: <009801c0d75b$22959cc0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> References: <1145063150.988987541@dhcp-200-0052.unm.edu> <009801c0d75b$22959cc0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> Message-ID: In article <009801c0d75b$22959cc0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com>, Adam Lang writes >Correct. Unix just uses LF whereas Windows uses CRLF. > >MS Word picks it up fine... just Notepad (and I think Wordpad) drop the >ball. Wordpad is OK. If you have a UNIX text file on a PC you can open it with Wordpad then save it again. That will add DOS style end-of-line markers. -- Bernard Peek IT Manager, POSTAR Ltd. 27 Sale Place, London, W2 1YR. (020 7479 9702) Bernard@postar.co.uk From R.J.Mckeating at lboro.ac.uk Wed May 9 09:30:38 2001 From: R.J.Mckeating at lboro.ac.uk (R.J.Mckeating@lboro.ac.uk) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:41 2003 Subject: URGENT: Please Ignore my last E-Mail of approx 25 minutes ago. In-Reply-To: <013501c0d85e$86afd690$0300a8c0@geefxinternal> References: <013501c0d85e$86afd690$0300a8c0@geefxinternal> Message-ID: <989400638.3af90e3e0c095@staff-webmail.lboro.ac.uk> No problem, as a university we use Exim for our mail server and it does stop and search on any email with vb stuff atached, so it would not get through. Even if it did, like a lot of people nowadays my desk top is linux so it would not affect it anyhow. RonMac Quoting Nigel Moore : > Hello Everyone, > > Could you please ignore my last E-Mail with the subject "Homepage" as it > is > a virus. I received an E-Mail from a well respected client and I saw > "Check > out this cool home page" with a homepage.html attached. The .vbs > extension > was hidden until I clicked on it to open, within 35 seconds (the time it > took me to unplug my ethernet card). It ended up sending to this mailing > list. > > I extremely apologise for this, and hope that no-one did the stupid > thing > like me and opened it. > > If you use Outlook and have a Personal Address Book, it would have sent > it > to everyone on your mailing list and added a registry key that doesn't > do > anything. > > Regards, > > Nigel > > > > Ron McKeating Computing Services Loughborough University 01509 222329 From T.Zwinge at Alexius.de Wed May 9 09:45:00 2001 From: T.Zwinge at Alexius.de (T.Zwinge@Alexius.de) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:41 2003 Subject: UNIX password snyc doesn't work Message-ID: I can't get the UNIX password sync to work. The UNIX password simply isn't changed when I change the SMB password. I'm using the following settings: security = DOMAIN password server = NT-PDC NT-BDC smb passwd file = /etc/smbpasswd passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u passwd chat = *new*password* %n\n *new*password* %n\n *changed* passwd chat debug = No unix password sync = Yes I'm using Samba 2.07 on a SuSE Linux 7.0 PC. Thanks, Tamo From royt at subexgroup.com Wed May 9 17:19:10 2001 From: royt at subexgroup.com (Roy Thomas) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:41 2003 Subject: Win9x clients accessing shares on NT/2k member servers Message-ID: <01C0D8AC.2A0D40A0.royt@subexgroup.com> Hi Jerry I tried with the CVS version and tried connecting from a win95 PC to a winNT share and it didn't give me any error.so hopefully this solves my account expired problem. ....further testing is onn...and will keep you updated I don't know why it didn't work with the rpm version (samba-2.2.0-20010417.i386) which i used earlier on my redhat 6.2 thanks roy -----Original Message----- From: Gerald Carter [SMTP:gcarter@valinux.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 4:08 AM To: samba@samba.org; samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Win9x clients accessing shares on NT/2k member servers Sorry for the cross-posting.... I have seen a few reports of people who said that their win9x clients could not access shares on Windows NT/2k members servers of a Samba controlled domain. The specific error message was "This account is expired" or something similar. I have not been able to reproduce this with the latest SAMBA_2_2 source code (no ./configure options). Can people who originally reported this test the latest CVS code and let me know. Here's a message for reference.... http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/2001-April/032980.html Cheers, jerry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) From gary at edisoninfo.com Wed May 9 12:34:09 2001 From: gary at edisoninfo.com (gary@edisoninfo.com) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:41 2003 Subject: 2.2 as PDC and logons In-Reply-To: <01050901300201.01462@home.localdomain> References: <01050901300201.01462@home.localdomain> Message-ID: <1228.192.168.0.5.989411649.squirrel@smtp.edisoninfo.com> First guess is that you created the file using Vi or something on the linux side? Remember, Windows files have to have a carrage return (cr) and a line feed (lf) at the end of each line. *nix's do not. Create the file using a windows editor of some sort, then copy it into the 'netlogon' directory. - Gary > I have a server running Redhat 7.1 with Samba 2.2.0 as PDC. it's > working pretty well, but I am wondering about logon scripts to map > network drives. I hav a simpple script running to sync the time > between the server and client, so it's workign but what should it read > to map a drive? > > I have tried this "net use h: \\redserver\admin" > but it doesn't work. > I admit to being new to windows NT > if anyone knows of any websites dealing with windows logons and scripts > I would be thankful > -- > > Seth > seth@hollen.org > > Lottery: The excitement of bad math. From shanu at exocore.com Wed May 9 13:32:56 2001 From: shanu at exocore.com (Shanker Balan) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:41 2003 Subject: ./configure --with-pam_smbpass fails Message-ID: <20010509190256.A4185@monster.exocore.com> Hello: $ ./configure --with-smbmount --with-pam --with-syslog --with-pam_smbpass $ make all [..] Using LIBS = -ldl -lnsl -lpam make: *** No rule to make target `lib/slprintf.po', needed by `bin/pam_smbpass.so'. Stop. Any clues? -- Shanu - - - - - - - - - - - ( Shanu ) - - Shanker Balan shanu@exocore.com From Heering at edo.uni-dortmund.de Wed May 9 14:33:46 2001 From: Heering at edo.uni-dortmund.de (Oliver Heering) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:41 2003 Subject: bug-report: permission-problems saving roaming profile In-Reply-To: <3AF6FA01.AD0657DD@valinux.com> References: <5320210813.20010507174830@edo.uni-dortmund.de> <3AF6FA01.AD0657DD@valinux.com> Message-ID: <19721418763.20010509163346@edo.uni-dortmund.de> Hi Jeremy, On Monday, May 07, 2001 you wrote: > Please re-checkout the 2.2 CVS and try again. I think I > have now fixed this. Yeah! I re-checked the CVS tree out again and the bug was gone! Thank you a lot. btw: is the nt acl support of any real use? I can only see the security-bits, but i cannot modify them even when i own the respective file or directory. mfg, Oliver Heering Medienzentrum - Universit?t Dortmund http://www.medienzentrum.uni-dortmund.de From gcarter at valinux.com Wed May 9 14:37:49 2001 From: gcarter at valinux.com (Gerald Carter) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:41 2003 Subject: bug-report: permission-problems saving roaming profile In-Reply-To: <19721418763.20010509163346@edo.uni-dortmund.de> Message-ID: On Wed, 9 May 2001, Oliver Heering wrote: > > Please re-checkout the 2.2 CVS and try again. I think I > > have now fixed this. > > Yeah! I re-checked the CVS tree out again and the bug was gone! Thank > you a lot. Wonderful. :-) > btw: is the nt acl support of any real use? I can only see the > security-bits, but i cannot modify them even when i own the respective > file or directory. Yes. You should be able to manipulate security bits or file systems ACLs using the security tab. Works fine here (both ways). cheers, jerry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) From vorlon at netexpress.net Wed May 9 16:03:44 2001 From: vorlon at netexpress.net (Steve Langasek) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:41 2003 Subject: latest results from testing SAMBA_2_2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Hi Jerry, On Tue, 8 May 2001, Gerald Carter wrote: > I have finished testing the following pieces PDC of functionality with the > latest SAMBA_2_2 code and all seems well. (both --without-pam and > --with-pam). PAM functionality tested on RedHat 6.2 with pam_pwdb.so. > o domain logons from all Windows clients > o user lists for Win9x in user mode security > o adding/deleting/changing shares from Server Manager > o browsing/accessing shares on NT4/Win2k members > servers in a Samba domain > o logon scripts > o Windows NT4 style system policies > o 'domain admin group' parameter > So looks like things are going for 2.2.1. What did I forget? > Back to work.... I may be misremembering, but didn't most of the PAM problems show up when using pam_unix rather than pam_pwdb? Does all of the above work with pam_unix as well? Regards, Steve Langasek postmodern programmer From gcarter at valinux.com Wed May 9 16:07:39 2001 From: gcarter at valinux.com (Gerald Carter) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:41 2003 Subject: latest results from testing SAMBA_2_2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: On Wed, 9 May 2001, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Tue, 8 May 2001, Gerald Carter wrote: > > > I have finished testing the following pieces PDC of functionality with the > > latest SAMBA_2_2 code and all seems well. (both --without-pam and > > --with-pam). PAM functionality tested on RedHat 6.2 with pam_pwdb.so. > > I may be misremembering, but didn't most of the PAM problems show up when > using pam_unix rather than pam_pwdb? Does all of the above work with pam_unix > as well? Excellent point. I'll check again. Cheers, jerry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) From thudak at sistina.com Wed May 9 16:23:04 2001 From: thudak at sistina.com (Tom Hudak) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:41 2003 Subject: Stray process? Message-ID: <20010509112304.B12373@localhost> I keep seeing a "sistina-f24JL4K" server out there on my network. It seems to go away when I bring down my PDC, but I don't know what it is, and it's inaccessible. It's simply a "machine" called sistina-F24JL4K, any idea what that is? I'm looking forward to adding users/shares via server/user manager. Great work guys! -- Thomas J. Hudak Systems Administrator Sistina Software Inc. - www.sistina.com Phone: 612.638.0500 x.513 Fax: 612.379.3952 Page: 612.318.1967 Key fingerprint = BEC6 3181 4C9B A7BB AF11 4717 6F85 B346 380D 523E sleep: Command not found - The story of my life... -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-ntdom/attachments/20010509/68f72984/attachment.bin From greg at kwikfind.com Wed May 9 16:40:38 2001 From: greg at kwikfind.com (Greg J. Zartman) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:42 2003 Subject: Email Virus Message-ID: <012a01c0d8a6$c8751160$6f00a8c0@logeng.net> To all members of the mailing list: Please stop sending me email messages like this: Not nice. Not nice at all. I received this email virus from someone on this group. I have never and would never intentionally send out malicious code. Sorry for the inconvenience that this may have caused anyone. Regards, Greg J. Zartman, P.E. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Greg J. Zartman.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 477 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-ntdom/attachments/20010509/5b800aa4/GregJ.Zartman.vcf From MMcEldowney at deltaregional.com Wed May 9 16:48:15 2001 From: MMcEldowney at deltaregional.com (McEldowney, Michael) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:42 2003 Subject: Email Virus Message-ID: Greg, This wasn't a malicious attempt. Look thru the posts for today. The virus sent itself by way of an unwary lister, and that lister publicly announced and apologized for what happened. Nothing about this was intentional. --Mike > -----Original Message----- > From: Greg J. Zartman [mailto:greg@kwikfind.com] > Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 11:41 AM > To: Samba Mailing List > Subject: Email Virus > > > To all members of the mailing list: > > Please stop sending me email messages like this: > Not nice. Not nice at all. > > I received this email virus from someone on this group. I > have never and > would never intentionally send out malicious code. > > Sorry for the inconvenience that this may have caused anyone. > > Regards, > > Greg J. Zartman, P.E. > > From greg at leiinc.com Wed May 9 17:04:39 2001 From: greg at leiinc.com (Greg J. Zartman, P.E.) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:42 2003 Subject: Homepage Message-ID: <04ec01c0d8aa$223d5a60$6f00a8c0@logeng.net> Hi! You've got to see this page! It's really cool ;O) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: homepage.HTML.vbs Type: application/octet-stream Size: 2418 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-ntdom/attachments/20010509/4f807d26/homepage.HTML.obj From greg at leiinc.com Wed May 9 17:04:42 2001 From: greg at leiinc.com (Greg J. Zartman, P.E.) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:42 2003 Subject: Homepage Message-ID: <04f001c0d8aa$23cc37c0$6f00a8c0@logeng.net> Hi! You've got to see this page! It's really cool ;O) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: homepage.HTML.vbs Type: application/octet-stream Size: 2418 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-ntdom/attachments/20010509/189d600d/homepage.HTML.obj From NMXEXSPP0_CATNHAT at DMHA.org Wed May 9 17:02:53 2001 From: NMXEXSPP0_CATNHAT at DMHA.org (Nemx Power Tools for MS Exchange Server_CATNHAT_0) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:42 2003 Subject: Virus Notification: A virus has been detected in a message in whi ch you where a recipient Message-ID: <4FA96CDCBB8CD41182ED00902740666E2B1E73@CATNHAT> From: Greg J. Zartman, P.E. [SMTP:greg@leiinc.com] To: Date: Wed, May 09 2001, 1:04:39 PM Subject: Homepage The message contained 1 virus(es): homepage.html.vbs infected with the VBS/VBSWG.X@mm.Worm virus - - - -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed From NMXEXSPP0_CATNHAT at DMHA.org Wed May 9 17:04:35 2001 From: NMXEXSPP0_CATNHAT at DMHA.org (Nemx Power Tools for MS Exchange Server_CATNHAT_0) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:42 2003 Subject: Virus Notification: A virus has been detected in a message in whi ch you where a recipient Message-ID: <4FA96CDCBB8CD41182ED00902740666E2B1E7D@CATNHAT> From: Greg J. Zartman, P.E. [SMTP:greg@leiinc.com] To: Date: Wed, May 09 2001, 1:04:42 PM Subject: Homepage The message contained 1 virus(es): homepage.html.vbs infected with the VBS/VBSWG.X@mm.Worm virus - - - -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed From root at s4hdfwww.eurocontrol.de Wed May 9 17:04:43 2001 From: root at s4hdfwww.eurocontrol.de (root@s4hdfwww.eurocontrol.de) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:42 2003 Subject: Virus Alert Message-ID: <200105091704.f49H4hT12625@s4hdfwww.eurocontrol.de> Have detected a virus (VBS_HOMEPAGE.A) in your mail traffic on 05/09/2001 19:04:37 with an action quarantined. From ANTIGEN_SMAIL at wstw-konzern-it.at Wed May 9 17:08:46 2001 From: ANTIGEN_SMAIL at wstw-konzern-it.at (ANTIGEN_SMAIL) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:42 2003 Subject: Antigen found =*.vbs file Message-ID: Antigen for Exchange found homepage.HTML.vbs matching =*.vbs file filter. The file is currently Deleted. The message, "Homepage", was sent from Greg J. Zartman, P.E. and was discovered in IMC Queues\Inbound located at WStW/Site1/SMAIL. -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed From ANTIGEN_SMAIL at wstw-konzern-it.at Wed May 9 17:10:40 2001 From: ANTIGEN_SMAIL at wstw-konzern-it.at (ANTIGEN_SMAIL) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:42 2003 Subject: Antigen found =*.vbs file Message-ID: Antigen for Exchange found homepage.HTML.vbs matching =*.vbs file filter. The file is currently Deleted. The message, "Homepage", was sent from Greg J. Zartman, P.E. and was discovered in IMC Queues\Inbound located at WStW/Site1/SMAIL. -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed From jeremy at valinux.com Wed May 9 15:46:03 2001 From: jeremy at valinux.com (Jeremy Allison) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:42 2003 Subject: bug-report: permission-problems saving roaming profile References: <5320210813.20010507174830@edo.uni-dortmund.de> <3AF6FA01.AD0657DD@valinux.com> <19721418763.20010509163346@edo.uni-dortmund.de> Message-ID: <3AF9663B.E3F02468@valinux.com> Oliver Heering wrote: > > Hi Jeremy, > > On Monday, May 07, 2001 you wrote: > > > Please re-checkout the 2.2 CVS and try again. I think I > > have now fixed this. > > Yeah! I re-checked the CVS tree out again and the bug was gone! Thank > you a lot. > > btw: is the nt acl support of any real use? I can only see the > security-bits, but i cannot modify them even when i own the respective > file or directory. This works fine here (both compiled with --with-acl-support and without). Jeremy. -- -------------------------------------------------------- Buying an operating system without source is like buying a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions. -------------------------------------------------------- From barroca at coltec.ufmg.br Wed May 9 19:07:43 2001 From: barroca at coltec.ufmg.br (Leonardo Luiz Padovani da Mata) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:42 2003 Subject: lot's of problems.. Message-ID: <20010509190743.2596.qmail@zabumba.coltec.ufmg.br> i'm using a linux PDC server with samba 2.0.8. My server was a NT 4.0 machine but i have changed it for linux. Everyone could log in and see the linux file server. Here is the problems 1- Whem i try to install a new machine it won't acept to enter in the new NT domain, i have to put that machine in the older domain. after that i could change it into the new nt domain, but i whant to uninstall the older SERVER 2- I whant to shutdown every 40 machines over the network, i have tryed lots of windows programs and nothing works, there is a way to do this with the linux server? 3- I whant to delete the local profile created in the NT workstations over the network, is that possible? 4- Why when i'm using roaming profiles my network "gains a lot of collisions" ? That's it.... Sorry about the terrible english, this is because i'm not english, canadian,australian or american. :-) Leonardo From justindd at iastate.edu Wed May 9 14:19:13 2001 From: justindd at iastate.edu (Justin D Davis) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:42 2003 Subject: umask, directory mask in 2.2.0 Message-ID: <200105091919.OAA15364@mailhub.iastate.edu> Is anyone besides me having problems getting the masks to do what they want it to? I want permissions to be: file: r--rw---- dir: r-xrwx--- I have tried the file as 317 and the directory as 207, but this is not what I end up with. I am using the force group command. JD From vorlon at netexpress.net Wed May 9 19:19:22 2001 From: vorlon at netexpress.net (Steve Langasek) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:42 2003 Subject: ./configure --with-pam_smbpass fails In-Reply-To: <20010509190256.A4185@monster.exocore.com> Message-ID: Hi Shanker, On Wed, 9 May 2001, Shanker Balan wrote: > Hello: > $ ./configure --with-smbmount --with-pam --with-syslog --with-pam_smbpass > $ make all > [..] > Using LIBS = -ldl -lnsl -lpam > make: *** No rule to make target `lib/slprintf.po', needed by > `bin/pam_smbpass.so'. Stop. > Any clues? Attached is a patch against Samba 2.2 CVS that lets pam_smbpass build. Tridge removed the slprintf function from the source, and because I had referenced lib/slprintf.c directly instead of using LIB_OBJ, the build breaks. This is a bad practice on my part that should probably be corrected now that pam_smbpass is part of the Samba source tree. In the meantime, applying the above patch and running ./config.status (or rerunning ./configure) does the trick. Regards, Steve Langasek postmodern programmer -------------- next part -------------- Index: Makefile.in =================================================================== RCS file: /cvsroot/samba/source/Makefile.in,v retrieving revision 1.227.2.43 diff -u -w -r1.227.2.43 Makefile.in --- Makefile.in 2 May 2001 01:42:03 -0000 1.227.2.43 +++ Makefile.in 9 May 2001 18:56:30 -0000 @@ -330,12 +330,11 @@ pam_smbpass/pam_smb_acct.o pam_smbpass/support.o \ lib/debug.o lib/util_sid.o lib/messages.o lib/util_str.o \ lib/wins_srv.o lib/substitute.o lib/select.o lib/util.o \ - lib/slprintf.o nsswitch/wb_client.o nsswitch/wb_common.o \ - lib/system.o lib/charset.o lib/util_file.o lib/kanji.o \ - lib/genrand.o lib/username.o lib/charcnv.o lib/time.o \ - lib/md4.o lib/util_unistr.o lib/signal.o lib/talloc.o \ - lib/ms_fnmatch.o lib/util_sock.o lib/doscalls.o lib/smbrun.o \ - lib/util_sec.o \ + nsswitch/wb_client.o nsswitch/wb_common.o lib/system.o \ + lib/charset.o lib/util_file.o lib/kanji.o lib/genrand.o \ + lib/username.o lib/charcnv.o lib/time.o lib/md4.o \ + lib/util_unistr.o lib/signal.o lib/talloc.o lib/ms_fnmatch.o \ + lib/util_sock.o lib/doscalls.o lib/smbrun.o lib/util_sec.o \ ubiqx/ubi_sLinkList.o libsmb/smbencrypt.o libsmb/smbdes.o \ $(PARAM_OBJ) $(TDB_OBJ) $(PASSDB_OBJ) From gcarter at valinux.com Wed May 9 19:41:36 2001 From: gcarter at valinux.com (Gerald Carter) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:42 2003 Subject: ./configure --with-pam_smbpass fails In-Reply-To: Message-ID: On Wed, 9 May 2001, Steve Langasek wrote: > Attached is a patch against Samba 2.2 CVS that lets pam_smbpass build. > Tridge removed the slprintf function from the source, and because I > had referenced lib/slprintf.c directly instead of using LIB_OBJ, the > build breaks. This is a bad practice on my part that should probably > be corrected now that pam_smbpass is part of the Samba source tree. > In the meantime, applying the above patch and running ./config.status > (or rerunning ./configure) does the trick. applied to 2.2 tree. jerry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) From Jon.Wright at InfoTechFL.Com Wed May 9 19:51:03 2001 From: Jon.Wright at InfoTechFL.Com (Jon Wright) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:42 2003 Subject: Samba as PDC In-Reply-To: <20010509190226.624CA51CE@lists.samba.org>; from samba-ntdom-request@lists.samba.org on Wed, May 09, 2001 at 12:02:26PM -0700 References: <20010509190226.624CA51CE@lists.samba.org> Message-ID: <20010509155103.E25157@Osprey.InfotechFL.com> I have a Redhat Linux 6.0 running Samba 2.2 acting as a PDC for a domain. We have two(2) additional Redhat bxoes running 2.2 as member servers, both running Redhat 6.2. We are experiencing wierdness when users attempt to connect to the servers. One machine will authenticate using the password server listed, and the other seems to require a local smbpasswd file. I can attach smb.conf files, if desired, but was wondering if there were any know issues that I should look at first? Everything that seems significant, i.e. encrypted passwords, allow trusted domains, password server are identical. Thanks, Jon -- Jon Wright, Network Administrator | 5700 SW 34th St. Suite 1235 Info Tech, Inc. | Gainesville, FL 32608 jon.wright@infotechfl.com | (352)381-4400 Voice jon.wright@cloverleaf.net | (352)381-4444 Fax From horde at promax.com.mx Wed May 9 21:18:17 2001 From: horde at promax.com.mx (Francisco Villagrana) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:42 2003 Subject: unsuscribe Message-ID: <000c01c0d8cd$90e73260$32bdf494@promax.com.mx> unsuscribe -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed From vorlon at netexpress.net Wed May 9 21:23:02 2001 From: vorlon at netexpress.net (Steve Langasek) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:42 2003 Subject: solution: account expired In-Reply-To: <20010508195959.A18532@flop.swb.de> Message-ID: On Tue, 8 May 2001, Florian Petri wrote: > On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 05:27:25PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > Some of you maybe get "account disabled ... " when they try to login at NT4 or > > > W2K workstations and don't know where this comes from, because they can access the samba server eg. with the same accounts without any problem. > > > (log.smbd show some unknown errors ...) > > > The PAM service at my linux box was wrong configured. I used pam_unix.so in > > > /etc/pam.d/samba but it seems to me that I have to install pam_pwdb.so (parameters: md5 shadow) to login at my nt4 box. > > > Problably this could be documented somewhere, I spend a couple of hours on > > > this and some others posted the same problems, I hope this helps you ... > > This is a combination of a bug in Samba 2.2.0, and a bug in some versions of > > pam_unix. I believe the most current version of pam_unix should work ok -- if > > not, I'd appreciate knowing about it. > My version is new, the debian unstable version from april 18. > If there is a newer version available today, I think you wouldn?t find it > in a binary distribution (package version 0.72-22). Ah.. I've just looked at the PAM CVS code more closely, and it seems that I misremembered how this was being done in pam_unix; there's uid-handling code in place to handle the pathological case of a program running as non-root which needs to get access to an /NIS+/ database, but there's nothing for the case where the calling app invokes PAM as non-root and needs to get access to the shadow file. Samba appears to be the first app to try this particular maneuver, for better or for worse. I'll add code to pam_unix to handle this for the next Linux-PAM release; on the Samba side, the sane thing to do is still to call become_root() before each PAM call. Unfortunately, this is currently not that easy to achieve without breaking other parts of the code (e.g., rpcclient, smbclient). Regards, Steve Langasek psotmodern programmer From dwcjr at inethouston.net Wed May 9 21:48:03 2001 From: dwcjr at inethouston.net (David W. Chapman Jr.) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:42 2003 Subject: !! Attached Virus !! Re: Homepage References: <010b01c0d856$ce775cd0$0300a8c0@geefxinternal> <3AF8F3E9.45ED7BC@hrz.uni-marburg.de> Message-ID: <01a101c0d8d1$b92d6ba0$931576d8@inethouston.net> but, "It's really cool ;O)"!!!! ----- Original Message ----- From: "Wolfgang Ratzka" To: Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 2:38 AM Subject: !! Attached Virus !! Re: Homepage > Nigel Moore wrote: > > > Name: homepage.HTML.vbs > > homepage.HTML.vbs Type: unspecified type (application/octet-stream) > > Encoding: quoted-printable > > Please don't open that thing, seems to have caught a VB script > virus... > > -- > Wolfgang Ratzka Phone: +49 6421 2823531 FAX: +49 6421 2826994 > Uni Marburg, HRZ, Hans-Meerwein-Str., D-35032 Marburg, Germany > (0x2b|~(0x2b))==??? > > From jbeauchamp at gesinc.com Thu May 10 00:58:28 2001 From: jbeauchamp at gesinc.com (James W. Beauchamp) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:42 2003 Subject: Windows 2000 browse issue Message-ID: <012a01c0d8ec$5687dd80$1d01a8c0@gesinc.com> Hi all. Can anyone tell me where I might look to see why a new win2k workstation does not show up in a Samba controlled workgroup? (2.0.7) I have another box running win2k server and it shows up in the workgroup browse list fine (network neighborhood) but the new win2k workstation does not. However, the win2k workstation can browse the samba server fine to edit files and run applications it is just not visible in Network neighborhood. TIA James Beauchamp Global Environmental Solutions, Inc. 2621 Sandy Plains Road - Suite 102 Marietta, GA 30066 www.gesinc.com 770-579-6097 - ext. 227 770-579-6099 (fax) From ajay.raghuraj at blr.hpsglobal.com Thu May 10 04:57:19 2001 From: ajay.raghuraj at blr.hpsglobal.com (Raghuraj, Ajay) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:42 2003 Subject: Linux as a PDC Message-ID: Hi all, I have a seperate LAN in my netwrok for a project purpose.However the number of hosts in the LAN is around 40. I have Linux ( RedHat7.0) on a Dell 2400.I want to configure this as a Domain Controller for NT/2000 machines.Please guide me step by step. Thanks & Regards, Ajay WARNING: The information in this message is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this message by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution of the message, or any action or omission taken by you in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please immediately contact the sender if you have received this message in error. Thank you.----------------- HCL Perot Systems From royt at subexgroup.com Thu May 10 10:55:34 2001 From: royt at subexgroup.com (Roy Thomas) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:42 2003 Subject: Linux as a PDC Message-ID: <01C0D93F.BDB7CBC0.royt@subexgroup.com> [Roy Thomas] http://us1.samba.org/samba/docs/ http://samba.cadcamlab.org/using/work/html_cygnus/DBTOHTML-CHA-2.html#CHAPTER-2 hi ajay here's some hints on how i went about setting up...... if this could help........ The above 3 site will give you a brief of samba PDC You can get the source/binaries from www.samba.org you can install samba-alpha 2.2 or the cvs version on the RD 7.0 steps are download->configure->make->make install Now samba needs to be configured. Some highlights of what needs to be done Groups have to be created to which different classes of users will belong. Add Users/workstations(manually or thru scripts) on linux/samba The '/etc/smb.conf' contains all of the samba configuration Define the home share Define the profile share Define the netlogon share you can start off with minimum setup and then try to configure scripts to logon and to add workstations,printer conf etc Its working fine for me.. try out ...........this is not everything but something to start offf...... SAMPLE SMB.CONF FILE global] workgroup = "your domainname" server string = samba PDC hosts allow = 10.10. 10.20. 127. log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m log level = 3 max log size = 50 security = user encrypt passwords = yes smb passwd file = /etc/smbpasswd unix password sync = yes passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u passwd chat = *New*UNIX*password* %n\n *Retype*new*UNIX*password* %n\n *passwd:*all*authentication*tokens*updated*successfully* domain admin group = @admins domain admin users = root socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_SNDBUF=8192 SO_RCVBUF=8192 local master = yes os level = 65 domain master = yes preferred master = yes domain logons = yes logon script = login.bat logon home = \\%G\%U\.profile name resolve order = wins lmhosts bcast wins support = yes wins proxy = yes dns proxy = yes preserve case = yes short preserve case = yes status = yes share modes = no Share Definitions [homes] comment = Home Directories browseable = no writable = yes hide dot files = yes [netlogon] comment = Network Logon Service path = /home/netlogon guest ok = no writable = no [Profiles] path = /%G/%U/.profile browseable = no guest ok = yes [apps] comment = User Applications path = /apps public = no writable = no printable = no create mask = 0666 directory mask = 0775 [data] comment = User Data path = /data public = no writable = yes printable = no create mask = 0666 directory mask = 0775 force group = users -----Original Message----- From: Raghuraj, Ajay [SMTP:ajay.raghuraj@blr.hpsglobal.com] Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 10:27 AM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Linux as a PDC Hi all, I have a seperate LAN in my netwrok for a project purpose.However the number of hosts in the LAN is around 40. I have Linux ( RedHat7.0) on a Dell 2400.I want to configure this as a Domain Controller for NT/2000 machines.Please guide me step by step. Thanks & Regards, Ajay WARNING: The information in this message is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this message by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution of the message, or any action or omission taken by you in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please immediately contact the sender if you have received this message in error. Thank you.----------------- HCL Perot Systems From siva at aquila.soft.net Wed May 9 18:25:23 2001 From: siva at aquila.soft.net (siva) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:42 2003 Subject: nis + samba Message-ID: <3AF98B93.E9F457AE@aquila.soft.net> I want to setup a samba with nis . I having a problem in configuring single password for NIS + samba. Any body had done this. Please suggest the way to do this. Raz From Daniel.Moeller at de.bosch.com Thu May 10 06:44:46 2001 From: Daniel.Moeller at de.bosch.com (Moeller Daniel (QI/CCE21) *) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:42 2003 Subject: AW: Stray process? Message-ID: <9015FB0BD980D411BFBC00508BAE6AF74E137F@simail5.server.bosch.com> Hi Tom, looks like an automatically bye W2K generated Name. I've seen something similar after installing NIC-drivers on a W2K workstation which had none before. Kind regards, Danny -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: Tom Hudak [mailto:thudak@sistina.com] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 9. Mai 2001 18:23 An: Samba NT Domain list Betreff: Stray process? I keep seeing a "sistina-f24JL4K" server out there on my network. It seems to go away when I bring down my PDC, but I don't know what it is, and it's inaccessible. It's simply a "machine" called sistina-F24JL4K, any idea what that is? I'm looking forward to adding users/shares via server/user manager. Great work guys! -- Thomas J. Hudak Systems Administrator Sistina Software Inc. - www.sistina.com Phone: 612.638.0500 x.513 Fax: 612.379.3952 Page: 612.318.1967 Key fingerprint = BEC6 3181 4C9B A7BB AF11 4717 6F85 B346 380D 523E sleep: Command not found - The story of my life... From Michael.Homsey at tip.csiro.au Thu May 10 09:22:00 2001 From: Michael.Homsey at tip.csiro.au (Homsey, Michael (TIP, Epping)) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:42 2003 Subject: Stray process? Message-ID: <75059BDB0B80E347AD421963658D43760149B2@wing-ep.tip.csiro.au> Yes, indeed the default name a win2k box has is along those lines. Can you ping it from an NT/cmd box? it will use netbios name resolution (ie broadcast) and a positive response will return an IP address and with that ... regards, Michael Homsey -----Original Message----- From: Moeller Daniel (QI/CCE21) * [mailto:Daniel.Moeller@de.bosch.com] Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 4:45 PM To: 'Tom Hudak'; Samba NT Domain list Subject: AW: Stray process? Hi Tom, looks like an automatically bye W2K generated Name. I've seen something similar after installing NIC-drivers on a W2K workstation which had none before. Kind regards, Danny -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: Tom Hudak [mailto:thudak@sistina.com] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 9. Mai 2001 18:23 An: Samba NT Domain list Betreff: Stray process? I keep seeing a "sistina-f24JL4K" server out there on my network. It seems to go away when I bring down my PDC, but I don't know what it is, and it's inaccessible. It's simply a "machine" called sistina-F24JL4K, any idea what that is? I'm looking forward to adding users/shares via server/user manager. Great work guys! -- Thomas J. Hudak Systems Administrator Sistina Software Inc. - www.sistina.com Phone: 612.638.0500 x.513 Fax: 612.379.3952 Page: 612.318.1967 Key fingerprint = BEC6 3181 4C9B A7BB AF11 4717 6F85 B346 380D 523E sleep: Command not found - The story of my life... From kautron at eudoramail.com Thu May 10 08:19:28 2001 From: kautron at eudoramail.com (Prakash Bissoondial) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:42 2003 Subject: smbmount Message-ID: <004a01c0d92a$7d2e1600$85400180@nt2001> Hi! Is there smbmount for HP-UX samba? rgds, -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed From dm at hejoe.de Thu May 10 10:42:51 2001 From: dm at hejoe.de (Dirk =?iso-8859-1?Q?Maa=DF?=) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:42 2003 Subject: nis + samba References: <3AF98B93.E9F457AE@aquila.soft.net> Message-ID: <3AFA70AB.D3FF2258@hejoe.de> siva wrote: > > I want to setup a samba with nis . I having a problem in configuring > single password for NIS + samba. Any body had done this. Please suggest > the way to do this. > > Raz Hi, I'am not an expert but I managed it somehow (solaris 8, samba-2.2.0). If yppasswd works without asking for an existing password the following lines in smb.conf should work encrypt passwords = yes unix password sync = yes passwd program = /bin/yppasswd %u passwd chat = *password* %n\n *password* %n\n *attributes*changed* As I understood, the 'passwd program' is running as root when called from samba, so 'yppasswd ' should not ask for an password if it is invoked on the NIS-master. Somebody has told me about another solution using 'passwd' instead of 'yppasswd' and doing a NIS-Update (through 'cd /var/yp; make') from time to time by a cron job. Again, samba has to run on the nis-master. Unix users have to use 'smbpasswd' to change their passwords (or 'smbpasswd -r ' to do it remotely). The above is just written on my experience. You should look in the samba-faqs for the 'official' way. Dirk Maass From shanu at exocore.com Thu May 10 10:56:25 2001 From: shanu at exocore.com (Shanker Balan) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:42 2003 Subject: ./configure --with-pam_smbpass fails In-Reply-To: ; from gcarter@valinux.com on Wed, May 09, 2001 at 12:41:36PM -0700 References: Message-ID: <20010510162625.A1639@monster.exocore.com> Hello: CVS now compiles --with-pam_smbpass. ;) I am however not able to sync UNIX passwords after adding the following to smb.conf. I have removed the older chat based lines from smb.conf pam password change = yes UNIX password sync = yes I am using openldap-1.2.11-15 with pam-0.74-22 on a RHL 7.1 system. Snips from the samba logs: smb_pam_passchange_conv: Could not find reply for PAM prompt: Enter login(LDAP) password: PAM: unable to obtain the new authentication token - is password to weak? smb_pam_error_handler: PAM: Password Change Failed : Authentication token manipulation error smb_pam_passchange: PAM: Password Change Failed for user xxx! I can successfully change passwords using LDAP passwords using "passwd" as normal user. $ passwd Enter login(LDAP) password: New UNIX password: Retype new UNIX password: LDAP password information changed for foo passwd: all authentication tokens updated successfully -- Shanu Gerald Carter wrote, > applied to 2.2 tree. -- - - - - - - - - - - - ( Shanu ) - - Shanker Balan shanu@exocore.com From dm at hejoe.de Thu May 10 11:31:22 2001 From: dm at hejoe.de (Dirk =?iso-8859-1?Q?Maa=DF?=) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:42 2003 Subject: Windows 2000 browse issue References: <012a01c0d8ec$5687dd80$1d01a8c0@gesinc.com> Message-ID: <3AFA7C0A.6818C8A1@hejoe.de> "James W. Beauchamp" wrote: > > Hi all. > > Can anyone tell me where I might look to see why a new win2k workstation > does not show up in a Samba controlled workgroup? (2.0.7) I have another > box running win2k server and it shows up in the workgroup browse list fine > (network neighborhood) but the new win2k workstation does not. However, the > win2k workstation can browse the samba server fine to edit files and run > applications it is just not visible in Network neighborhood. > Is file and printer sharing correctly installed and enabled on that workstation? (can you share directories?) Dirk Maass From justindd at iastate.edu Thu May 10 07:43:24 2001 From: justindd at iastate.edu (Justin D Davis) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:42 2003 Subject: umask, directory mask in 2.2.0 Message-ID: <200105101243.HAA04683@mailhub.iastate.edu> I thought that the leading number was for control of suid, sgid, and sticky? > Maybe you want 0317 and 0207 ?? The leading zero makes them octal. > > ________________________________________ > Michael D. Black Principal Engineer > mblack@csihq.com 321-676-2923,x203 > http://www.csihq.com Computer Science Innovations > http://www.csihq.com/~mike My home page > FAX 321-676-2355 > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Justin D Davis" > To: > Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 10:19 AM > Subject: umask, directory mask in 2.2.0 > > > Is anyone besides me having problems getting the masks to do what they want > it > to? > > I want permissions to be: > file: r--rw---- > dir: r-xrwx--- > > I have tried the file as 317 > and the directory as 207, but this is not what I end up with. > I am using the force group command. > > JD > > From netbopp at hotmail.com Thu May 10 13:09:36 2001 From: netbopp at hotmail.com (BO PP) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:42 2003 Subject: Collecting shares on server Message-ID: Hello. First of all, I'm very impressed by the performance samba 2.2.0 is giving to our LAN. I have configured samba to act as PDC for w2k-workstations and w9x-machines. My question is: We have one shared folder on each computer named mp3. We also have a shared service named mp3 on the samba-server. What I want to do (if possible) is to mount the shared mp3-folder on each machine to the mp3-folder on the server on logon. This way we can save our mp3-files locally and browse on the server, hopefully... Can I make a kind of "Log-off"-script? The case mentioned above can created some unneccary halts when different computers are turned off. One last question, does there excist any spefications for system-requerements using samba as pdc? Bjørn Ove Johnsen Department for Informatics University of Bergen _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. From bartkus at nosc.mil Thu May 10 14:17:34 2001 From: bartkus at nosc.mil (Dave Bartkus) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:42 2003 Subject: NT box will not logon SAMBA Message-ID: <003401c0d95b$f5e0dde0$eeaefdc6@nosc.mil> Hi, I am totally new to UNIX and to SAMBA so don't be too hard on me. I have been looking at the possibility of using Solaris 8 for Intel as the server OS with clients running NT or Windows 2000 for an upcoming project. Initially SAMBA, from the reviews, looked to be the PERFECT solution. However, been working for the past several days and have not been able to get my NT box to logon to SAMBA. I can ping the Solaris 8 (SAMBA) box..but can't logon...can't even mount/map a disk. I have followed Step # 2...many times..drank lots of coffee. Keep looking over my smb.conf file and making changes but felt that it was time to ask for some help from people who may have been there already. Any suggestions would be appreciated, I have attached a copy of my smb.conf file for all to laugh at... Also, reading through the documentation I came across section 6.7 - DOMAIN_CONTROL.txt. It was very disappointing to find that SAMBA really can not act as an NT Domain Controller? This was a KEY reason why we were looking at SAMBA...some rumors that I have heard say there are plans in SAMBA version 3.0 for this? Is this a true statement? If so..anybody have an ETA on version 3.0? Thanks, Dave B. David A. Bartkus Senior Systems Engineer Gnostech Inc. 650 Louis Drive Suite 190 Warminster, PA 18974 Phone: 215-443-8660 FAX: 215-443-9192 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smb.conf Type: application/octet-stream Size: 1053 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-ntdom/attachments/20010510/b60274a4/smb.obj From s354199 at student.uq.edu.au Thu May 10 13:46:46 2001 From: s354199 at student.uq.edu.au (Elliot Mackenzie) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:43 2003 Subject: NT box will not logon SAMBA In-Reply-To: <003401c0d95b$f5e0dde0$eeaefdc6@nosc.mil> Message-ID: The fact that Samba 2.2.0 CAN run as a PDC for the W2KSP1 machines I am running is the main reason I chose it over the ridiculously expensive clogware that is Windows Server. Seriously, it runs fine, some things are not totally implemented yet, but as far as login scripts, logins, logouts etc go - it's all there. Check the samba website, everything you need is there (even example smb.conf's for running samba as a pdc). I don't really have time to look at your smb.conf tonight (two exams tomorrow) so you will have to ask someone else for assistance with that. :) Oh, and see if your Windows machine is still running as smoothly as it was when you booted it up two months earlier :-) Samba only got shut down on our machines here to upgrade to new 2.2.0 (of course without rebooting ). Prior to that the samba service had an uptime close to three months (moved buildings three months ago). M. -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Dave Bartkus Sent: Friday, 11 May 2001 12:18 AM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Cc: Joseph Mountain Mill Subject: NT box will not logon SAMBA Hi, I am totally new to UNIX and to SAMBA so don't be too hard on me. I have been looking at the possibility of using Solaris 8 for Intel as the server OS with clients running NT or Windows 2000 for an upcoming project. Initially SAMBA, from the reviews, looked to be the PERFECT solution. However, been working for the past several days and have not been able to get my NT box to logon to SAMBA. I can ping the Solaris 8 (SAMBA) box..but can't logon...can't even mount/map a disk. I have followed Step # 2...many times..drank lots of coffee. Keep looking over my smb.conf file and making changes but felt that it was time to ask for some help from people who may have been there already. Any suggestions would be appreciated, I have attached a copy of my smb.conf file for all to laugh at... Also, reading through the documentation I came across section 6.7 - DOMAIN_CONTROL.txt. It was very disappointing to find that SAMBA really can not act as an NT Domain Controller? This was a KEY reason why we were looking at SAMBA...some rumors that I have heard say there are plans in SAMBA version 3.0 for this? Is this a true statement? If so..anybody have an ETA on version 3.0? Thanks, Dave B. David A. Bartkus Senior Systems Engineer Gnostech Inc. 650 Louis Drive Suite 190 Warminster, PA 18974 Phone: 215-443-8660 FAX: 215-443-9192 From barth at cck.uni-kl.de Thu May 10 13:48:50 2001 From: barth at cck.uni-kl.de (Christian Barth) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:43 2003 Subject: NT box will not logon SAMBA In-Reply-To: <003401c0d95b$f5e0dde0$eeaefdc6@nosc.mil> Message-ID: <3AFAB862.15588.1B7CB8E@localhost> > [global] > printing = bsd > load printers = no > guest account = guest > log file = /usr/local/samba/var/log.%m > log level = 8 > password level = 8 > lock directory = /var/spool/locks > server string = "Test Server" > workgroup = Happy > os level = 64 > preferred master = yes > domain master = yes > local master = yes > security = user > ; encrypt passwords = yes For the PDC stuff to work you must set up encrypted passwords. If you only want to share files to a win2k box, you may use plain text passwd, but that means that you have to apply a regitsty key to the win2k box to enabel them. Christian > domain logons = yes > > domain admin users = yes > domain admin group = yes > > logon path = \\%n\usr\bin\profiles\%u > logon drive = X: > logon home = \\testserver\%u > > [netlogon] > path = /usr/local/samba/lib/netlogon > writeable = yes > write list = ntadmin > > [profiles] > path = /export/smb/ntprofile > writeable = yes > create mask = 0600 > directory mask = 0700 > > [homes] > comment = Home Directories > browseable = yes > read only = no > create mode = 0750 > > [printers] > path = /usr/spool/public > guest ok = yes > printable = yes > > [tmp] > path = /tmp > valid users = root > public = yes > writable = yes > printable = no > _______________________________________________________________________ In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates? (SUN) From gcarter at valinux.com Thu May 10 14:00:48 2001 From: gcarter at valinux.com (Gerald Carter) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:43 2003 Subject: NT box will not logon SAMBA References: <003401c0d95b$f5e0dde0$eeaefdc6@nosc.mil> Message-ID: <3AFA9F10.D4C388CE@valinux.com> Dave Bartkus wrote: > > Also, reading through the documentation I came across > section 6.7 - DOMAIN_CONTROL.txt. It was very > disappointing to find that SAMBA really can > not act as an NT Domain Controller? This was > a KEY reason why we were looking at SAMBA...some > rumors that I have heard say there are plans in > SAMBA version 3.0 for this? Is this a true > statement? If so..anybody have an ETA on version 3.0? The docs are wrong. Ignore that section (old DOMAIN_CONTROL.txt) I'll update it. btw...looking at your smb.conf, just like the HOWTO says, you must use password encryption (i.e. encrypt passwords = yes). Make sure you are using 2.2 as well. jerry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) From justindd at iastate.edu Thu May 10 09:08:07 2001 From: justindd at iastate.edu (Justin D Davis) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:43 2003 Subject: NT box will not logon SAMBA Message-ID: <200105101408.JAA22212@mailhub.iastate.edu> For one thing, you should have the encrypt passwords set to yes. Then make sure you have users set up for samba. Do a `smbpasswd -a user` to add them, and it will ask you for that user's password. Things generally look decent, although I would comment out all of the domain master = yes local master = yes etc. for now. I would put in a line such as `remote announce = 192.168.1.255` to make the server appear to other systems. The first step is to get things configured so that you can mount a drive/open a share from the server, then afterwards you can setup the machine accounts and attempt to turn on the PDC features. > Hi, > > I am totally new to UNIX and to SAMBA so don't be too hard on me. > > I have been looking at the possibility of using Solaris 8 for Intel as the > server OS with clients running NT or Windows 2000 for an upcoming project. > Initially SAMBA, from the reviews, looked to be the PERFECT solution. > However, been working for the past several days and have not been able to > get my NT box to logon to SAMBA. I can ping the Solaris 8 (SAMBA) box..but > can't logon...can't even mount/map a disk. > > I have followed Step # 2...many times..drank lots of coffee. Keep looking > over my smb.conf file and making changes but felt that it was time to ask > for some help from people who may have been there already. Any suggestions > would be appreciated, I have attached a copy of my smb.conf file for all to > laugh at... > > Also, reading through the documentation I came across section 6.7 - > DOMAIN_CONTROL.txt. It was very disappointing to find that SAMBA really can > not act as an NT Domain Controller? This was a KEY reason why we were > looking at SAMBA...some rumors that I have heard say there are plans in > SAMBA version 3.0 for this? Is this a true statement? If so..anybody have an > ETA on version 3.0? > > Thanks, > > Dave B. > > David A. Bartkus > Senior Systems Engineer > Gnostech Inc. > 650 Louis Drive > Suite 190 > Warminster, PA 18974 > Phone: 215-443-8660 > FAX: 215-443-9192 > From nicku at vtc.edu.hk Thu May 10 14:11:01 2001 From: nicku at vtc.edu.hk (Nick Urbanik) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:43 2003 Subject: Group policies not working with win2k, samba 2.2 Message-ID: <3AFAA175.E427C033@vtc.edu.hk> Dear team, I have had no luck with group policies in Samba 2.2. User policies work fine. I have read and re-read Microsoft's documentation, the Samba HOWTO Collection from CVS, and chapter 6 of the O'Reilly book: "Managing the WIndows NT Registry". I also find that I need to delete NTUSER.DAT from a user's profile if they accidentally get the Default User's profile. I am running Samba on Red Hat 7.1, as well as RH 7.0. The user has no specific user profile. I also tried deleting the Default User's profile. Still the group profile does not get applied. Please, can anyone suggest anything? Other aspects of Samba as an PDC for WIN2k clients work really well, although the security tab for a Samba share shared to a group appears confusing to my friend, a Windows administrator. -- Nick Urbanik, Dept. of Information Technology and Communications Hong Kong Institute of Vocational Education (Tsing Yi) email: nicku@vtc.edu.hk Tel: (852) 2436 8576, (852) 2436 8579 Fax: (852) 2435 1406 pgp ID: 7529555D fingerprint: 53 B6 6D 73 52 EE 1F EE EC F8 21 98 45 1C 23 7B From don_mccall at hp.com Thu May 10 14:13:19 2001 From: don_mccall at hp.com (MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1)) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:43 2003 Subject: smbmount Message-ID: <079FD72E42C9D311B854009027650E6F04050A2B@xatl02.atl.hp.com> Hello Prakash, No, there is not. However, HP-UX 11.0 ships with both Samba (CIFS/9000 SERVER) and a product called CIFS/9000 CLIENT for free. The CIFS/9000 CLIENT gives you smbmount capability, ie you can use it to mount a windows share to a HP-UX mountpoint. You can also download it from http://software.hp.com under the networking and system management link. But it is only for HP-UX 11.0 and greater versions of the OS. There is a product called Sharity from Objective Development that also provides this functionality - see http://www.obdev.at for more info on this... Hope this helps, Don -----Original Message----- From: Prakash Bissoondial [mailto:kautron@eudoramail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 4:19 AM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: smbmount Hi! Is there smbmount for HP-UX samba? rgds, From jloo at acm.org Thu May 10 14:18:16 2001 From: jloo at acm.org (Joseph Loo) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:43 2003 Subject: Windows 2000 Network Directory Message-ID: <3AFAA328.D955735A@acm.org> Our company is going to windows 2000 active directory. Is there any way to interface samba with the active directory to allow automatic authentication of users from windows machines? -- Joseph Loo jloo@acm.org From uschmidt at mpi-halle.mpg.de Thu May 10 14:24:48 2001 From: uschmidt at mpi-halle.mpg.de (Udo Schmidt) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:43 2003 Subject: logon profile and architecture Message-ID: <3AFAA4B0.7EC7CE7E@mpi-halle.mpg.de> Dear all, (Samba 2.2.0) I tried to create profiles depending on architecture of the client: ... [global] logon drive = H: logon home = \\%N\%U logon path = \\%N\profiles\%a\%U ... [profiles] comment = user profiles path = /home/samba/profiles writeable = yes browsable = yes create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0750 ... Unfortunately the clients regret to create user profile in /home/samba/profiles/Win2K and /home/samba/profiles/WinNT What is my fault ? Udo -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed From vorlon at netexpress.net Thu May 10 15:42:33 2001 From: vorlon at netexpress.net (Steve Langasek) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:43 2003 Subject: ./configure --with-pam_smbpass fails In-Reply-To: <20010510162625.A1639@monster.exocore.com> Message-ID: On Thu, 10 May 2001, Shanker Balan wrote: > CVS now compiles --with-pam_smbpass. ;) > I am however not able to sync UNIX passwords after adding the following > to smb.conf. I have removed the older chat based lines from smb.conf > pam password change = yes > UNIX password sync = yes Side note: you'll want to turn off 'unix password sync'. > I am using openldap-1.2.11-15 with pam-0.74-22 on a RHL 7.1 system. > Snips from the samba logs: > smb_pam_passchange_conv: Could not find reply for PAM prompt: Enter > login(LDAP) password: > PAM: unable to obtain the new authentication token - is password to > weak? > smb_pam_error_handler: PAM: Password Change Failed : Authentication > token manipulation error > smb_pam_passchange: PAM: Password Change Failed for user xxx! > I can successfully change passwords using LDAP passwords using "passwd" > as normal user. > $ passwd > Enter login(LDAP) password: > New UNIX password: > Retype new UNIX password: > LDAP password information changed for foo > passwd: all authentication tokens updated successfully I see two problems here. First, according to the current source, you need to use the 'passwd chat' option in your smb.conf file to tell Samba how to handle the prompts it gets from PAM modules. The default value is *new*password* %n\n *new*password* %n\n *changed* , which I think would need to be changed to something like New*password*\n*new*password*\n*changed* . However, the second problem is going to be the show-stopper here: the current Samba password changing code is written expecting to only have to provide PAM with the new password. Since you're using pam_ldap, root has no special privileges and must also provide the user's /old/ password during a password change. We may or may not have access to the old password at this point, but at the very least the PAM code doesn't know how to supply it. So the pam password changing code is not very usable yet, at least not for PAM modules like pam_ldap. Steve Langasek postmodern programmer From aalang at rutgersinsurance.com Thu May 10 15:54:23 2001 From: aalang at rutgersinsurance.com (Adam Lang) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:43 2003 Subject: Workaround for "trusts" Message-ID: <00bd01c0d969$7be9fea0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> I have two offices connected over a WAN link. How do you manage to get users in both groups able to user resources in each office but still only have to worry about one log on? Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com From linux at thepopenet.com Thu May 10 18:09:20 2001 From: linux at thepopenet.com (linux) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:43 2003 Subject: Configuring Samba for Windows Domains Logons Message-ID: I need help on my Red Hat 7.1 - configurating my Linux Server to be a Domain Controller. My workstations are Windows 2000 professional and 98. I used the work setup in the SMB.CONF and it works fine. But when I set it up as the book said - I can't get through the password. It comes up with this error " The procedure is out of range". So what is the trick and setup procedures. Please help me. I have the Samba Book, O'Reilly by Robert Eckstein. Thanks! Linux all the way. From jbeauchamp at gesinc.com Thu May 10 21:39:59 2001 From: jbeauchamp at gesinc.com (James W. Beauchamp) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:43 2003 Subject: Windows 2000 browse issue References: <012a01c0d8ec$5687dd80$1d01a8c0@gesinc.com> <3AFA7C0A.6818C8A1@hejoe.de> Message-ID: <004c01c0d999$c6f45960$1d01a8c0@gesinc.com> Dirk: Thanks for the response. I'll check and see if sharing is enabled on the box. I didn't know that you had to enable sharing for a machine to show up in the browse list? Is this really true for win2k because I have winnt machines with no shares and they show in the browse list (unless there is something I am missing). James ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dirk Maa?" To: "James W. Beauchamp" Cc: Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 4:31 AM Subject: Re: Windows 2000 browse issue > "James W. Beauchamp" wrote: > > > > Hi all. > > > > Can anyone tell me where I might look to see why a new win2k workstation > > does not show up in a Samba controlled workgroup? (2.0.7) I have another > > box running win2k server and it shows up in the workgroup browse list fine > > (network neighborhood) but the new win2k workstation does not. However, the > > win2k workstation can browse the samba server fine to edit files and run > > applications it is just not visible in Network neighborhood. > > > > Is file and printer sharing correctly installed and enabled on that > workstation? > (can you share directories?) > > Dirk Maass > > From MMcEldowney at deltaregional.com Thu May 10 19:24:19 2001 From: MMcEldowney at deltaregional.com (McEldowney, Michael) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:43 2003 Subject: Workaround for "trusts" Message-ID: Haven't tried this yet but will need to soon. I was thinking about using one samba box as the password server for the other. If you try it before I do, let me know if it works ;) -- Mike > -----Original Message----- > From: Adam Lang [mailto:aalang@rutgersinsurance.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 10:54 AM > To: Samba > Subject: Workaround for "trusts" > > > I have two offices connected over a WAN link. > > How do you manage to get users in both groups able to user > resources in each > office but still only have to worry about one log on? > > Adam Lang > Systems Engineer > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company > http://www.rutgersinsurance.com > > From barroca at coltec.ufmg.br Thu May 10 19:34:51 2001 From: barroca at coltec.ufmg.br (Leonardo Luiz Padovani da Mata) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:43 2003 Subject: lot's of problems.. -why there is no answer? Message-ID: <20010510193451.10771.qmail@zabumba.coltec.ufmg.br> i'm using a linux PDC server with samba 2.0.8. My server was a NT 4.0 machine but i have changed it for linux. Everyone could log in and see the linux file server. Here is the problems 1- Whem i try to install a new machine it won't acept to enter in the new NT domain, i have to put that machine in the older domain. after that i could change it into the new nt domain, but i whant to uninstall the older SERVER 2- I whant to shutdown every 40 machines over the network, i have tryed lots of windows programs and nothing works, there is a way to do this with the linux server? 3- I whant to delete the local profile created in the NT workstations over the network, is that possible? 4- Why when i'm using roaming profiles my network "gains a lot of collisions" ? That's it.... Sorry about the terrible english, this is because i'm not english, canadian,australian or american. :-) Leonardo From gcarter at valinux.com Thu May 10 19:41:47 2001 From: gcarter at valinux.com (Gerald Carter) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:43 2003 Subject: Workaround for "trusts" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: On Thu, 10 May 2001, McEldowney, Michael wrote: > Haven't tried this yet but will need to soon. I was thinking about > using one samba box as the password server for the other. If you try > it before I do, let me know if it works ;) Why not just replicate the smbpasswd file using rsync over ssh? jerry SAMBA Team From h.p.bernhard at ieee.org Thu May 10 20:01:00 2001 From: h.p.bernhard at ieee.org (Hans-Peter Bernhard) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:43 2003 Subject: Configuring Samba for Windows Domains Logons References: Message-ID: <3AFAF37C.DB0BE82A@ieee.org> Well I had the same problem. I am not quite sure that it really helps, but: I was looking for the problem and so I turned on the debug messages by compiling samba with --enable-debug I never got this error message again. I don't know if it helps in your case, just try it. hpb linux wrote: > > I need help on my Red Hat 7.1 - configurating my Linux Server to be a Domain > Controller. My workstations are Windows 2000 professional and 98. I used > the work setup in the SMB.CONF and it works fine. > > But when I set it up as the book said - I can't get through the password. > It comes up with this error " The procedure is out of range". > > So what is the trick and setup procedures. Please help me. I have the > Samba Book, O'Reilly by Robert Eckstein. > > Thanks! Linux all the way. -- +-------------------------------------------------------------+ | Dr. Hans-Peter BERNHARD | | Email: h.p.bernhard@ieee.org | +-------------------------------------------------------------+ | @ | @ | | Inst. for Communications | HTBLA-Steyr | | and Information Engineering | Schluesselhofgasse 63 | | Johannes Kepler University | A-4430 Steyr | | Linz, AUSTRIA | AUSTRIA | | Phone: +43-732-2468-9711 | Phone: +43-7252-72914-42 | | Fax : +43-732-2468-9712 | Fax : +43-7252-72914-25 | +-------------------------------------------------------------+ From kevin.currie at wmich.edu Thu May 10 20:27:11 2001 From: kevin.currie at wmich.edu (Kevin G. Currie) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:43 2003 Subject: Req root to join domain w/ W2K Message-ID: Why exactly does joining a domain from a Windows 2K box require the root password for the Samba server (or the root account at all for that matter)? I understand that you're trying to automate creation of accounts with samba on a unix machine, but frankly, I'm not going to touch that with a 20 foot poll. If I have setup the machine accounts in /etc/passwd and smbpasswd ahead of time by hand, why can't a domain admin add machines to the domain? Giving out the root password (even if it is different in smbpasswd) is _NOT_ an option at our sight. What needs to be done to get around this if the account entries are pre-made? How can I help (IOW, where should I start looking and what should I know ahead of time about the code)? Kevin Currie -- phew, for a minute there i lost myself. From jeremy at valinux.com Thu May 10 21:12:05 2001 From: jeremy at valinux.com (Jeremy Allison) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:43 2003 Subject: Req root to join domain w/ W2K References: Message-ID: <3AFB0425.493AADB3@valinux.com> "Kevin G. Currie" wrote: > If I have setup the machine accounts in /etc/passwd and smbpasswd ahead of > time by hand, why can't a domain admin add machines to the domain? Because currently this involves changing a password in smbpasswd, and this is a root read only file. Once JF's group mapping goes into the main code we can revisit this. Jeremy. -- -------------------------------------------------------- Buying an operating system without source is like buying a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions. -------------------------------------------------------- From chris_allen at aurema.com Thu May 10 04:52:41 2001 From: chris_allen at aurema.com (Chris Allen) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:43 2003 Subject: latest results from testing SAMBA_2_2 References: Message-ID: <989470357.321817@cousin.sw.oz.au> > o domain logons from all Windows clients Will 2.2.1 allow Whistler/XP to join the domain? Thanks Chris From jeremy at valinux.com Thu May 10 22:17:23 2001 From: jeremy at valinux.com (Jeremy Allison) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:43 2003 Subject: latest results from testing SAMBA_2_2 References: <989470357.321817@cousin.sw.oz.au> Message-ID: <3AFB1373.AD100277@valinux.com> Chris Allen wrote: > > > o domain logons from all Windows clients > > Will 2.2.1 allow Whistler/XP to join the domain? I haven't recieved any info from JF on this, so there'll probably be no change from the current CVS state on this for 2.2.1. Is this a problem as XP won't even be launched until october (at the earliest) ? Jeremy. -- -------------------------------------------------------- Buying an operating system without source is like buying a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions. -------------------------------------------------------- From seth at hollen.org Fri May 11 00:23:58 2001 From: seth at hollen.org (Seth) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:43 2003 Subject: need help- samba 2.2.0 died on me!! Message-ID: <01051020235800.02394@home.localdomain> I could use some help. at work today I had to uninstall 2.2.0 and go back to 2.0.7. for some reason when the sammba server was on the network noone could browse in network neighborhood or connect to the sever. if I unplugged the network cable everything ran fine. trying to logon from any NT box I would get the error message that no domain controller was available. and other times it would say a slow network connection was detected and did I want to use my local or roaming profile? (roaming profile wouldn't work then however) yes i restarted saamba several times. I even went to a bare minium on a smb.conf file and it still wouldn't work. I could really use help, I had to go into work after being up for 24hrs and was a zombie. redhat 7.1 samba 2.2.0 here is the smb.conf file I was using thanks all! # Global parameters [global] workgroup = XXXXX netbios name = sambaserver server string = SAMBA %v on %L encrypt passwords = Yes update encrypted = Yes min password length = 3 debug level = 3 log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log max log size = 2000 name resolve order = wins lmhosts host bcast socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 logon path =\\%L\admin\profiles\%u os level = 65 preferred master = Yes domain master = Yes local master = Yes wins support = Yes security = user status = Yes logon script =admin\scripts\default.bat domain admin group = @managers domain logons = Yes create mask = 0775 hosts allow = 127.0.0.1 print command = /usr/bin/lp -d%p -oraw %s; rm %s lpq command = /usr/bin/lpstat -o%p lprm command = /usr/bin/cancel %p-%j queuepause command = /usr/bin/disable %p queueresume command = /usr/bin/enable %p [netlogon] path = /usr/local/samba/lib/netlogon writable = no write list = ntadmin [profiles] path = /export/smb/ntprofile writable = yes create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 [printers] comment = All Printers path = /var/spool/samba printable = Yes [jim$] comment = jim& path = /careflight-data/ writeable = Yes [lp] comment = marsha's printer path = /var/spool/samba writeable = Yes printable = Yes printer = lp oplocks = No share modes = No [accounting] comment = accounting data path = /careflight-data/accounting/ valid users = @accounting,@managers,tiny write list = @accounting,@managers writeable = Yes create mask = 0770 force create mode = 0770 directory mask = 0770 inherit permissions = Yes fstype = FAT [managers] comment = managers path = /careflight-data/managers/ valid users = @managers writeable = Yes create mask = 0770 force create mode = 0770 inherit permissions = Yes browseable = No fstype = FAT [flight] comment = flight data path = /careflight-data/flight/ valid users = @flight,@managers write list = @flight writeable = Yes create mask = 0777 force create mode = 0777 inherit permissions = Yes guest ok = Yes fstype = FAT [maint] comment = Maintenance path = /careflight-data/maint/ valid users = @maint,@managers,noreen,tiny write list = @maint,@managers,tiny writeable = Yes force create mode = 0775 inherit permissions = Yes fstype = FAT [pilots] comment = pilot data path = /careflight-data/pilots/ valid users = @pilots,@managers,noreen write list = @pilots,@managers,noreen writeable = Yes force create mode = 0775 inherit permissions = Yes guest ok = Yes fstype = FAT [admin] comment = Administration data path = /careflight-data/admin/ valid users = @admin,@managers,@flight,@pilots,@maint writeable = Yes force create mode = 0775 inherit permissions = Yes guest ok = Yes fstype = FAT -- Seth seth@hollen.org Lottery: The excitement of bad math. From shanu at exocore.com Fri May 11 05:11:58 2001 From: shanu at exocore.com (Shanker Balan) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:43 2003 Subject: ./configure --with-pam_smbpass fails In-Reply-To: ; from vorlon@netexpress.net on Thu, May 10, 2001 at 10:42:33AM -0500 References: <20010510162625.A1639@monster.exocore.com> Message-ID: <20010511104158.B1267@monster.exocore.com> Hello: Steve Langasek wrote, > > UNIX password sync = yes > > Side note: you'll want to turn off 'unix password sync'. Wokay! > > I am using openldap-1.2.11-15 with pam-0.74-22 on a RHL 7.1 system. > So the pam password changing code is not very usable yet, at least not > for PAM modules like pam_ldap. Sucks. Anyways, thanx a lot for your time Steve. -- Shanu - - - - - - - - - - - ( Shanu ) - - Shanker Balan shanu@exocore.com From chris_allen at aurema.com Fri May 11 07:19:46 2001 From: chris_allen at aurema.com (Chris Allen) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:43 2003 Subject: latest results from testing SAMBA_2_2 In-Reply-To: <3AFB1373.AD100277@valinux.com> Message-ID: Hi Jeremy, >-----Original Message----- >From: jeremy@valinux.com [mailto:jeremy@valinux.com] >Sent: Friday, 11 May 2001 08:17 >To: Chris Allen >Cc: samba-ntdom@samba.org >Subject: Re: latest results from testing SAMBA_2_2 > > >Chris Allen wrote: >> >> > o domain logons from all Windows clients >> >> Will 2.2.1 allow Whistler/XP to join the domain? > >I haven't recieved any info from JF on this, so there'll >probably be no change from the current CVS state on this >for 2.2.1. OK. > >Is this a problem as XP won't even be launched until >october (at the earliest) ? Unfortunately we use Whistler in our development so it makes it difficult not having both the desktops (win2k) and development servers in the same domain. Regards, Chris From A.Vilain at elsto.nl Fri May 11 08:14:11 2001 From: A.Vilain at elsto.nl (Armand Vilain) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:43 2003 Subject: need help- samba 2.2.0 died on me!! Message-ID: <91E7061859A3D411A83A00805FC70D44038A13@MAIL> Seth, Your 'host allow' option shows only your localhost, could this be your problem? Greets, Armand Vilain -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: Seth [mailto:seth@hollen.org] Verzonden: vrijdag 11 mei 2001 2:24 Aan: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Onderwerp: need help- samba 2.2.0 died on me!! I could use some help. at work today I had to uninstall 2.2.0 and go back to 2.0.7. for some reason when the sammba server was on the network noone could browse in network neighborhood or connect to the sever. if I unplugged the network cable everything ran fine. trying to logon from any NT box I would get the error message that no domain controller was available. and other times it would say a slow network connection was detected and did I want to use my local or roaming profile? (roaming profile wouldn't work then however) yes i restarted saamba several times. I even went to a bare minium on a smb.conf file and it still wouldn't work. I could really use help, I had to go into work after being up for 24hrs and was a zombie. redhat 7.1 samba 2.2.0 here is the smb.conf file I was using thanks all! # Global parameters [global] workgroup = XXXXX netbios name = sambaserver server string = SAMBA %v on %L encrypt passwords = Yes update encrypted = Yes min password length = 3 debug level = 3 log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log max log size = 2000 name resolve order = wins lmhosts host bcast socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 logon path =\\%L\admin\profiles\%u os level = 65 preferred master = Yes domain master = Yes local master = Yes wins support = Yes security = user status = Yes logon script =admin\scripts\default.bat domain admin group = @managers domain logons = Yes create mask = 0775 hosts allow = 127.0.0.1 print command = /usr/bin/lp -d%p -oraw %s; rm %s lpq command = /usr/bin/lpstat -o%p lprm command = /usr/bin/cancel %p-%j queuepause command = /usr/bin/disable %p queueresume command = /usr/bin/enable %p [netlogon] path = /usr/local/samba/lib/netlogon writable = no write list = ntadmin [profiles] path = /export/smb/ntprofile writable = yes create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 [printers] comment = All Printers path = /var/spool/samba printable = Yes [jim$] comment = jim& path = /careflight-data/ writeable = Yes [lp] comment = marsha's printer path = /var/spool/samba writeable = Yes printable = Yes printer = lp oplocks = No share modes = No [accounting] comment = accounting data path = /careflight-data/accounting/ valid users = @accounting,@managers,tiny write list = @accounting,@managers writeable = Yes create mask = 0770 force create mode = 0770 directory mask = 0770 inherit permissions = Yes fstype = FAT [managers] comment = managers path = /careflight-data/managers/ valid users = @managers writeable = Yes create mask = 0770 force create mode = 0770 inherit permissions = Yes browseable = No fstype = FAT [flight] comment = flight data path = /careflight-data/flight/ valid users = @flight,@managers write list = @flight writeable = Yes create mask = 0777 force create mode = 0777 inherit permissions = Yes guest ok = Yes fstype = FAT [maint] comment = Maintenance path = /careflight-data/maint/ valid users = @maint,@managers,noreen,tiny write list = @maint,@managers,tiny writeable = Yes force create mode = 0775 inherit permissions = Yes fstype = FAT [pilots] comment = pilot data path = /careflight-data/pilots/ valid users = @pilots,@managers,noreen write list = @pilots,@managers,noreen writeable = Yes force create mode = 0775 inherit permissions = Yes guest ok = Yes fstype = FAT [admin] comment = Administration data path = /careflight-data/admin/ valid users = @admin,@managers,@flight,@pilots,@maint writeable = Yes force create mode = 0775 inherit permissions = Yes guest ok = Yes fstype = FAT -- Seth seth@hollen.org Lottery: The excitement of bad math. From MMcEldowney at deltaregional.com Fri May 11 13:08:53 2001 From: MMcEldowney at deltaregional.com (McEldowney, Michael) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:43 2003 Subject: Workaround for "trusts" Message-ID: Yep, that would work too... > -----Original Message----- > From: Gerald Carter [mailto:gcarter@valinux.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 2:42 PM > To: McEldowney, Michael > Cc: 'Adam Lang'; Samba > Subject: RE: Workaround for "trusts" > > > On Thu, 10 May 2001, McEldowney, Michael wrote: > > > Haven't tried this yet but will need to soon. I was thinking about > > using one samba box as the password server for the other. > If you try > > it before I do, let me know if it works ;) > > Why not just replicate the smbpasswd file using rsync over ssh? > > > > > > > > > jerry > SAMBA Team > > From cantonpa at unive.it Fri May 11 13:26:51 2001 From: cantonpa at unive.it (Patrizia Canton) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:43 2003 Subject: problems with hp2000c and kodak 8670PS printers Message-ID: Hi I installed successfully on my samba server (Linux Debian 2.2rev2, kernel2.4.3), acting as PDC, the printer drivers for HP2100 and HP2100TN. I can use these printers from win98 and WINNT clients with no problems. Now I am trying to install a printer driver for a HP2000c and a Kodak8670PS printers. I am, as usual, connecting from a winnt client as root, go to the server printer folder, select the printer properties and use the new driver button to install the drivers. I select the HP2000c printer , then the program starts copying the files from the cd to the samba server everything seems to be ok, but then it stops saying "unable to copy the NTx86 driver". If I look on the samba server in the W32X86 directory I can see the files *dll, *exe, etc. for my HP200c printers. But the printer does not work. I set-up the printer for the win98 clients with no problem. If I try the same procedure for the kodak printer I cannot find the correct *inf file on the cd of the printer, so I cannot change the driver from "NO PRINTER DRIVER AVAILABLE..." to the correct one. If I try to install the kodal printer from a win98 client, the program complains it need the win98cd, I put the win98 cd, and then I was able to configure this printer for a win98 client. Any idea? Patrizia From ad at ordix.de Fri May 11 13:55:31 2001 From: ad at ordix.de (Andre Dirr) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:43 2003 Subject: samba2.2 with acl and quota Message-ID: <3AFBEF53.1558A0B3@ordix.de> hi all, i don?t know whether i am a little bit offtopic, but i habe the following question: i use red hat 7.1 with kernel 2.4.4, samba 2.2.0 with acl, and it works fine! now i try to enable quotas (they are turned on in the kernel and in samba), but i can?t match it, cos there is the new quota-format in redhat with kernel 2.4.... my question: does anybody know whether this combination is possible yet or does know a site where i can read more about setting up the new quota (i know the man-pages). thank you for help, andy dirr From kathee at mindiq.com Fri May 11 15:16:54 2001 From: kathee at mindiq.com (kat) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:43 2003 Subject: to lock or not to lock, that is the ? Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.2.20010511111528.02814e68@mail.mindiq.com> What is the best settings when trying top emulate NT file server for apps, for the LOCK configurations? Default? I am having strange errors/problems with a couple of apps, and it may be lock related, but I don't want to just turn things on/off without knowing a bit more. thanks Kathee From greg at leiinc.com Fri May 11 16:29:05 2001 From: greg at leiinc.com (Greg J. Zartman, P.E.) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:43 2003 Subject: Homepage Virus Message-ID: <018301c0da37$805bf320$6f00a8c0@logeng.net> I realize that it's not the smartest thing in the world to blindly open email attachments. Generally, I'm pretty good about it, but in this case (for some reason), I didn't think twice about opening an attachment sent by someone else from this mailing list. I think of everyone here pretty much like any of my peers here in my office. It's disappointing to get email messages, like the following, from people (from this group) in response to email messages sent out by the homepage virus: Message: Some reason you're sending us viruses...?? you'll have to do better than that if you want to get us and you better hire a good computer tech in the next few days. We are going to nuke you and you mail server off the net!!!!! I've received about a dozen message very similar to this one and all from people on this mailing list. What gives? Greg J. Zartman, P.E. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Greg J. Zartman.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 477 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-ntdom/attachments/20010511/11c4cf37/GregJ.Zartman.vcf From aalang at rutgersinsurance.com Fri May 11 16:39:43 2001 From: aalang at rutgersinsurance.com (Adam Lang) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:43 2003 Subject: Homepage Virus References: <018301c0da37$805bf320$6f00a8c0@logeng.net> Message-ID: <01ab01c0da38$fb3a4e60$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> Sometimes people don't realize s*** happens. Other times people have email virus filters and they have automatic responses programmed. I try my best to handle it professionally and just inform the person that they have an email virus. People have to realize that they aren't sent out intentional. but you have to realize also that you can't rely on the fact if you trust the sender or not, because if they are infected, it isn't really them sending it. Overall, ask the person if they meant to send the file. In the case of a vbs file, if you are really impatient, save it to disk and open it in a text editor. I don't open attachments from my own mother. :) But I also agree, people don't need to be rude either. They also have to realize that with threatening messages like that, if you experience any network problems in the very near future, it is enough to give to federal authorities to have them investigated. People have to act civil. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Greg J. Zartman, P.E." To: "Samba News" Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 12:29 PM Subject: Homepage Virus > I realize that it's not the smartest thing in the world to blindly open > email attachments. Generally, I'm pretty good about it, but in this case > (for some reason), I didn't think twice about opening an attachment sent by > someone else from this mailing list. I think of everyone here pretty much > like any of my peers here in my office. > > It's disappointing to get email messages, like the following, from people > (from this group) in response to email messages sent out by the homepage > virus: > Message: > Some reason you're sending us viruses...?? you'll have to do better than > that if you want to get us and you better hire a good computer tech in the > next few days. We are going to nuke you and you mail server off the net!!!!! > > > I've received about a dozen message very similar to this one and all from > people on this mailing list. What gives? > > > Greg J. Zartman, P.E. > > From evoltech at sfsu.edu Fri May 11 16:58:21 2001 From: evoltech at sfsu.edu (Stolen Skulls) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:43 2003 Subject: joining w2K machines ; incorrect network passwd error Message-ID: <20010511095821.A3759@cslab.sfsu.edu> Hello all I am having the following error when trying to add my w2k machines to a the samba PDC here. have root account set up in smbpasswd for adding w2k machines, also have machine account added, wkstation has correct netmask(found that this is a problem sometimes). Adding Nt boxes to the PDC works fine and I couldn't be happier, but I keep getting the following error "The following error occurred attemting to join the domain"HH302": The specified network password is not correct." If anyone has any help with this it would be greatly apreciated as I have been racking my brains on this for the past week. Thanks in advance below is all the info on the setup. -Dennis os: debian kernel: 2.2 samba version: 2.2 smb.conf [global] netbios name = gentoo workgroup = HH302 ;this is master browser specific fields os level = 65 preferred master = Yes domain master = Yes local master = yes domain logons = Yes ;security securityi = user encrypt passwords = Yes ;location for profiles and home logon script = scripts/%U.bat logon path = \\%N\profile\%U logon drive = Z: server string = %h server (Samba %v) passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u passwd chat = *Enter\snew\sUNIX\spassword:* %n\n *Retype\snew\sUNIX\spassword:* %n\n . syslog = 0 max log size = 1000 log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m socket options = IPTOS_LOWDELAY TCP_NODELAY SO_SNDBUF=4096 SO_RCVBUF=4096 printcap name = /etc/printcap domain admin group = @adm dns proxy = No guest account = ftp invalid users = root printing = lprng print command = /usr/bin/lpr -r -P%p %s lpq command = /usr/bin/lpq -P%p lprm command = /usr/bin/lprm -P%p %j load printers = yes [homes] comment = Home Directories writeable = Yes create mask = 0700 directory mask = 0700 browseable = No [printers] comment = All Printers path = /var/smbspool guest account = ftp create mask = 0777 guest ok = Yes printable = Yes print command = /usr/bin/lpr -r -P%p %s printer = /etc/printcap public = yes writeable = yes status = yes browseable = yes [ftp] comment = ftp files path = /home/u2/ftp guest ok = Yes [netlogon] path = /home/u2/netlogon writeable = no write list = @adm [profile] path = /home/u1/profile/ writeable = Yes create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 From Patrick_Jeanson at adc.com Fri May 11 18:17:17 2001 From: Patrick_Jeanson at adc.com (Jeanson, Patrick) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:43 2003 Subject: Samba in a NT network. Message-ID: Hi ! I have managed to configure my linux box to share FS with a NT machines in a nt network. Unfortunately the net admin came to me and told me that our Linux machines(~10) are taking the master browser role in the network. Is there a way to configure SAMBA in order to avoid this problem? Thanks! ------------smb.conf-------------------------------------------------------- -- # Global parameters [global] workgroup = CORP security = DOMAIN encrypt passwords = Yes null passwords = Yes log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 50 load printers = No os level = 65 local master = No wins support = Yes strict locking = Yes [jeansop] comment = Patrick_Jeanson path = /home/jeansop writeable = Yes create mask = 0777 [tftp] comment = tftp jeansop path = /home/tftp/pub guest account = guest writeable = Yes create mask = 0777 guest ok = Yes strict locking = No ------------smb.conf-------------------------------------------------------- -- Patrick Jeanson Patrick Jeanson Software Designer ADC Broadband Transport & Access Group Tel: 514.215.2500 x2743 Fax: 514.215.2528 patrick_jeanson@adc.com Learn about ADC - The Broadband Company at www.adc.com Mailing Address: 6505, Trans-Canada Highway, 5th Floor, Ville St-Laurent, Quebec, Canada H4T 1S3 From ejs at delfi.lt Fri May 11 16:47:50 2001 From: ejs at delfi.lt (Eugenijus =?UTF-8?B?SmFudcWha2V2acSNaXVz?=) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:43 2003 Subject: problems with hp2000c and kodak 8670PS printers References: Message-ID: <3AFC17B6.9020101@delfi.lt> Patrizia Canton wrote: > If I try the same procedure for the kodak printer > I cannot find the correct *inf file on the cd of the printer, so I cannot > change the driver from "NO PRINTER DRIVER AVAILABLE..." to the correct > one. If you have driver files copied, you can use `rpcclient -c "setdriver ...."` on Samba side to set the driver for Win clients. This is the only solution for me now (RH Linux 7.0 + Samba 2.2.0; WinNT as clients) -- Augis From barroca at coltec.ufmg.br Fri May 11 18:23:05 2001 From: barroca at coltec.ufmg.br (Leonardo Luiz Padovani da Mata) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:43 2003 Subject: samba patch Message-ID: <20010511182305.19268.qmail@zabumba.coltec.ufmg.br> i whant to instal the samba 2.09 patch.... how i do that?daLeoanrdo From mhaney at info4cars.com Fri May 11 18:28:08 2001 From: mhaney at info4cars.com (Mark Haney) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:43 2003 Subject: Samba in a NT network. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Yes set the OS Level = 0 that will make sure Samba never wins the browser election. -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Jeanson, Patrick Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 2:17 PM To: 'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org' Subject: Samba in a NT network. Hi ! I have managed to configure my linux box to share FS with a NT machines in a nt network. Unfortunately the net admin came to me and told me that our Linux machines(~10) are taking the master browser role in the network. Is there a way to configure SAMBA in order to avoid this problem? Thanks! ------------smb.conf-------------------------------------------------------- -- # Global parameters [global] workgroup = CORP security = DOMAIN encrypt passwords = Yes null passwords = Yes log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 50 load printers = No os level = 65 local master = No wins support = Yes strict locking = Yes [jeansop] comment = Patrick_Jeanson path = /home/jeansop writeable = Yes create mask = 0777 [tftp] comment = tftp jeansop path = /home/tftp/pub guest account = guest writeable = Yes create mask = 0777 guest ok = Yes strict locking = No ------------smb.conf-------------------------------------------------------- -- Patrick Jeanson Patrick Jeanson Software Designer ADC Broadband Transport & Access Group Tel: 514.215.2500 x2743 Fax: 514.215.2528 patrick_jeanson@adc.com Learn about ADC - The Broadband Company at www.adc.com Mailing Address: 6505, Trans-Canada Highway, 5th Floor, Ville St-Laurent, Quebec, Canada H4T 1S3 From jtrostel at connex.com Fri May 11 18:33:21 2001 From: jtrostel at connex.com (John Trostel) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:43 2003 Subject: Samba in a NT network. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Reduce your OS level to a smaller number. If it is set to '65' the Samba server will _always_ win browser elections. Set it lower like 'os level = 20' or 'os level = 0' or delete it from your smb.conf file (mine doesn't have a 'os level' definition and functions politely in an NT environment. You might _add_ 'domain master = False' just to be sure. On 11-May-2001 Jeanson, Patrick wrote: > Hi ! > > > > I have managed to configure my linux box to share FS with a NT machines in a > > nt network. > > Unfortunately the net admin came to me and told me that our Linux > > machines(~10) are taking the master browser role in the network. > > > > Is there a way to configure SAMBA in order to > > avoid this problem? > > > > Thanks! > > > > ------------smb.conf-------------------------------------------------------- > > -- > ># Global parameters > > [global] > > workgroup = CORP > > security = DOMAIN > > encrypt passwords = Yes > > null passwords = Yes > > log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m > > max log size = 50 > > load printers = No > > os level = 65 > > local master = No > > wins support = Yes > > strict locking = Yes > > > > [jeansop] > > comment = Patrick_Jeanson > > path = /home/jeansop > > writeable = Yes > > create mask = 0777 > > > > [tftp] > > comment = tftp jeansop > > path = /home/tftp/pub > > guest account = guest > > writeable = Yes > > create mask = 0777 > > guest ok = Yes > > strict locking = No > > ------------smb.conf-------------------------------------------------------- > > -- > > > > Patrick Jeanson > > > > > > > > Patrick Jeanson > > Software Designer > > ADC Broadband Transport & Access Group > > Tel: 514.215.2500 x2743 > > Fax: 514.215.2528 > > patrick_jeanson@adc.com > > > > Learn about ADC - The Broadband Company at www.adc.com > > > > Mailing Address: 6505, Trans-Canada Highway, 5th Floor, Ville St-Laurent, > Quebec, Canada H4T 1S3 -- John M. Trostel Linux OS Engineer Connex jtrostel@connex.com From jeremy at valinux.com Fri May 11 16:46:16 2001 From: jeremy at valinux.com (Jeremy Allison) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:44 2003 Subject: to lock or not to lock, that is the ? References: <5.1.0.14.2.20010511111528.02814e68@mail.mindiq.com> Message-ID: <3AFC1758.FB08F1EE@valinux.com> kat wrote: > > What is the best settings when trying top emulate NT file server for apps, > for the LOCK configurations? Default? > > I am having strange errors/problems with a couple of apps, and it may be > lock related, but I don't want to just turn things on/off without knowing a > bit more. What version of Samba ? We have complete NT locking semantics with 2.2.0 (auto-tested against NT and Samba). Jeremy. -- -------------------------------------------------------- Buying an operating system without source is like buying a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions. -------------------------------------------------------- From njr at crms.uky.edu Fri May 11 20:01:55 2001 From: njr at crms.uky.edu (Nick J Ritter) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:44 2003 Subject: invalid pipe handle Message-ID: hey- I;m sure this has been covered before, but I didn't hear about it so forgive me. I have samba 2.0.7 running on a Solaris 8 box... I want NT/2000 users to be able to map their home drives on the Solaris machine. When I am on my 2000 machine and try to map my home drive on the Solaris machine, I get an invalid username or password error. (I know they were entered in correctly.) the log.mymachine says there was a INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 703d ...smbd/ipc.c:api_fd_reply Any help would be appreciated, -NJR *************************************************************************** Nicholas J. Ritter Application Developer, Computer Aided Engineering Group Center for Robotics and Manufacturing Systems College of Engineering, University of Kentucky (606) 257-6262 x409 (606) 257-1071 - Fax njr@crms.uky.edu http://www.crms.engr.uky.edu *************************************************************************** From rpeterso at mtholyoke.edu Fri May 11 20:45:13 2001 From: rpeterso at mtholyoke.edu (Ron Peterson) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:44 2003 Subject: Configuring Samba for Windows Domains Logons References: Message-ID: <3AFC4F59.B07040F6@mtholyoke.edu> linux wrote: > > I need help on my Red Hat 7.1 - configurating my Linux Server to be a Domain > Controller. My workstations are Windows 2000 professional and 98. I used > the work setup in the SMB.CONF and it works fine. > > But when I set it up as the book said - I can't get through the password. > It comes up with this error " The procedure is out of range". Have you tried to log on as 'root'? -- Ron Peterson Network & Systems Manager Mount Holyoke College GPG and other info at http://www.mtholyoke.edu/~rpeterso From chris at spener.net Fri May 11 21:26:25 2001 From: chris at spener.net (Christian SPENER) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:44 2003 Subject: some permission questions In-Reply-To: <3AFC4F59.B07040F6@mtholyoke.edu> References: <3AFC4F59.B07040F6@mtholyoke.edu> Message-ID: <01051123262503.00746@dukeshome> what permission (chmod), owner and group should the following dirs have? [netlogon] path = /samba/netlogon [profiles] path = /samba/ntprofile thx chris -- Christian SPENER email: chris@spener.net From justindd at iastate.edu Sat May 12 03:56:04 2001 From: justindd at iastate.edu (Justin D Davis) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:44 2003 Subject: RH7.1 vs RH7.0 with Samba 2.2 Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.2.20010511224325.00a54220@justindd.mail.iastate.edu> I found myself with an interesting problem. My audiotron Networked MP3 player refuses to give up on attempting to search a share that is browseable which it does not have access to. This is the reason why I had to create a "read list" for the music share, note that it has one fewer entries than does the valid users list. If we could fix whatever bug is causing this.....that would likely solve my problem below.....anyway Here is the problem...one of the directories inside the music share is called mp3 (relevant only to the explanation, the specific name is insignificant). On RH7.0 things work as one would expect. The "computer" users work as they should and the audiotron finds the music share but gives up looking when the share is empty. On RH 7.1 however, the audiotron finds something it thinks has a title of "mp3" but when it tries to play it, it gives an error. If I comment out the music share, the "mp3" title which has appeared when it should not have, will disappear. I guess maybe I shouldn't have put 2.2 on RH7.1....probably should have stuck with 2.0.9 Thanks for any suggestions to this one (Other than debug level 10, I don't know my way around the source to interpret that, but if someone requests my log file I'd be more than happy to send a level 10 to help you diagnose the problem) Thanks for any help! JD smb.conf file: [global] workgroup = davis netbios name = efarmer domain admin users = root, justindd logon drive = u: logon home = \\%L\%U\homedrv hosts allow = 192.186.1. 127.0.0.1 server string = Samba Server printing = lprng log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log max log size = 0 security = user encrypt passwords = yes smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 interfaces = 192.168.1.100/24 remote announce = 192.168.1.255 domain logons = yes dns proxy = no [homes] comment = Home Directories browseable = no writable = yes [netlogon] comment = Network Logon Service path = /home/netlogon guest ok = yes writable = no browseable = no share modes = no #note -- the is a userid in my file #I replaced it here for obvious reasons [audiotron] path =/audiotron valid users = @audiotron, public = no writable = yes write list = @audiotron force group = audiotron [music] path=/music hosts deny = 192.168.1.103 valid users = @mp3write, @audiotron, public = no browseable = yes writable = yes write list = @mp3write read list = @mp3write, @audiotron force group = mp3write From whn at topelo.lopi.com Sat May 12 19:30:13 2001 From: whn at topelo.lopi.com (Bill Nugent) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:47 2003 Subject: NTDOM branch 2.1-preAlpha (20-Feb-1999) upgrade to 2.2.0 - profile woes Message-ID: <20010512193013.19850.qmail@topelo.lopi.com> Howdy, Back in February 1999 my site _had_ to use the now defunct NTDOM CVS branch because it was highly desirable to have a single password database for our multiple NT 4 workstations (now at SP6a). Our current configuration is having authentication (netlogin) being handled by the 2.1-preAlpha running under i386 RedHat 5.2 on a Pentium 90. Samba 2.2.0 is running on i386 RedHat 6.2 on a Pentium Pro and is providing all the file & print serving including the roaming profiles. I would like to retire the old server and use only the server running Samba 2.2.0 but the roaming profiles are being ignored when I turn off the old server and enable authentication on the 2.2.0 box. After the initial loss, the profiles work normally but needless to say my user community does not want to loose everything they've customized. The netlogin share appears to be working correctly because the logon script is being executed and people can log in. The way I have been trying to make the switch is: 1. Switch the NT box(es) from the domain to a dummy workgroup & reboot 2. Kill old samba 2.1 preAlpha server 3. Turn on domain mastering, etc. on 2.2.0 server and restart 4. Add the NT box(es) using "smbpasswd -a -m HOSTNAME$" 5. Have NT box(es) rejoin the domain and reboot 6. Login in as a user, the logon script is executed and the big Welcome to Windows box appears with the arrow pointing at the start button. 7. Bang my head against the wall. I've tried reading the documentation twice, reviewing the list archives, set the file protection to 0700 for directories and 0600 for files, "tried "map hidden = yes" & "map system = yes" for the profiles share, restored the old NTUSER.DAT file on top of the new one, moved the old smbpasswd file to the new server, sacrificed pizza at midnight (yum!) and a few other things I don't wish to admit to. The loss of the existing roaming profiles is not desirable. I get the feeling I am being stupid but I'm not finding it. Is there any way for me make the switch to Samba 2.2.0 while not loosing the profiles? I'll be glad to supply the various .conf files or make debug runs if helpful. Hope this makes sense. TIA, Bill Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from relay1.wplus.net (smtp.wplus.net [195.131.52.143]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 118C745EE for ; Sun, 13 May 2001 11:34:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Real-To: Received: from dimetra (ip94-243.dialup.wplus.net [195.131.94.243]) by relay1.wplus.net (8.9.1/8.9.1/wplus.2) with SMTP id WAA35958 for ; Sun, 13 May 2001 22:35:48 +0400 (MSD) From: "Andrey Nepomnyaschih" To: Subject: Performance Monitor Date: Sun, 13 May 2001 22:35:50 +0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, I have found that when transferring a file from Samba-2.2.0 to a Win2k machine performance monitor displays quite interesting information. NBT Connection Bytes Received/sec 2119806.974 Network Interface Bytes Received/sec 6392267.252 I believe the host doesn't have any other connection that can eat 4 Mbytes/s. And when calculating speed by dividing file size by time I'm getting that actual speed is around 6 Mbytes/s. This is strange because at the other facility we have a WinNT machine serving as file and print server and some Win2k client there, and I remember that when I was measuring speed there was such big margin between NBT Connection and Network Interface (about few hundreds kilobytes). Does anyone has a good explanation? I've got another big margin (about 38%) between ftp and samba transfers. Ftp scores about at 10 Mbytes/s. Samba 6 Mbytes/s. Playing with Socket options didn't gave any performance gain. The OS is FreeBSD. And again comparing to WinNT Server, I was able to get about 8,4 Mbytes/s. So is there something that can help me figure out what's wrong with it? Andrey Nepomnyaschih nas@chartpilot.ru Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp1.pandora.be (hercules.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.33]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 90BBA4615 for ; Sun, 13 May 2001 12:00:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 10916 invoked from network); 13 May 2001 19:01:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO pctom) ([213.224.128.28]) (envelope-sender ) by hercules.telenet-ops.be (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 13 May 2001 19:01:28 -0000 Message-ID: <001901c0dbf9$13f9c6d0$0200a8c0@pctom> From: "Tom Myny" To: References: Subject: time problem at domain Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 00:07:16 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, Al my computers on the domain have the wrong time but the server has still the right time. My domain (myny): on server: [root@killhead samba]# date Sun May 13 21:05:25 GMT+1 2001 on win2k client: (also GMT+1 (brussels)) the time 0:06:25 Anybody a solution ? P.s i'm running on redhat 7.1 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from impact.firerun.net (impact.firerun.net [216.222.9.100]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 077C44843 for ; Sun, 13 May 2001 13:24:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from firerun.net (rommie.firerun.net [216.222.9.102]) by impact.firerun.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f4DKPQP03685; Sun, 13 May 2001 14:25:26 -0600 Message-ID: <3AFEEDB7.3CF58097@firerun.net> Date: Sun, 13 May 2001 14:25:27 -0600 From: Patrick Reply-To: critter@rmci.net X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Myny Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: time problem at domain References: <001901c0dbf9$13f9c6d0$0200a8c0@pctom> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Are you running a command, say on login or at specific intervals with the job scheduler that sets the time? For example on my setup I set the time on the workstations during login, using the login script for the user, then every few hours it will run a batch file to set the time agian using the windows scheduler. The command is pretty simple "net time /set /yes" although that assumes that "time server = yes" is set in your smb.conf. Other wise you will need this command "net time \\ /set /yes". Hope that helps. Patrick Tom Myny wrote: > Hi, > > Al my computers on the domain have the wrong time but the server has still > the right time. > > My domain (myny): > > on server: > > [root@killhead samba]# date > Sun May 13 21:05:25 GMT+1 2001 > > on win2k client: > > (also GMT+1 (brussels)) the time 0:06:25 > > Anybody a solution ? > > P.s i'm running on redhat 7.1 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.net [194.221.183.20]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3747049B1 for ; Sun, 13 May 2001 13:40:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 1689 invoked by uid 0); 13 May 2001 20:42:17 -0000 Received: from pop-mu-15-1-dialup-238.freesurf.ch (HELO apollo) (194.230.112.238) by mail.gmx.net (mp004-rz3) with SMTP; 13 May 2001 20:42:17 -0000 Message-ID: <00b801c0dbed$32bf3de0$0200a8c0@jupiter> From: "Samuel Suter" To: Cc: "Samba ntdom" References: <01050901300201.01462@home.localdomain> Subject: Re: 2.2 as PDC and logons Date: Sun, 13 May 2001 22:42:15 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Seth" To: Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 7:30 AM Subject: 2.2 as PDC and logons > I have a server running Redhat 7.1 with Samba 2.2.0 as PDC. it's working > pretty well, but I am wondering about logon scripts to map network drives. I > hav a simpple script running to sync the time between the server and client, > so it's workign but what should it read to map a drive? > > I have tried this "net use h: \\redserver\admin" > but it doesn't work. > I admit to being new to windows NT > if anyone knows of any websites dealing with windows logons and scripts I > would be thankful > -- > > Seth > seth@hollen.org > > Lottery: The excitement of bad math. > hi seth I don't know a website that's dealing with logon scripts. But I have one hint for you. First, you have to create at least one user in you smbpasswd file. Then you can map this share on NT with the following command in your logon script. net use h: \\redserver\admin /user:username password Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp-server2.tampabay.rr.com (smtp-server2.cfl.rr.com [65.32.2.69]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D07E48FD for ; Sun, 13 May 2001 13:46:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from home.localdomain (242836hfc177.tampabay.rr.com [24.28.36.177]) by smtp-server2.tampabay.rr.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with SMTP id f4DKlfv23272 for ; Sun, 13 May 2001 16:47:41 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Seth Reply-To: seth@hollen.org To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: time problem at domain Date: Sun, 13 May 2001 16:49:03 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: <001901c0dbf9$13f9c6d0$0200a8c0@pctom> <3AFEEDB7.3CF58097@firerun.net> In-Reply-To: <3AFEEDB7.3CF58097@firerun.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01051316441400.11574@home.localdomain> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I have a similar problem, I have time server = yes in my smb.conf file and my logon script has that exact line you have also. But when it tries to execute it says I don't have permission to change the time. it gets the new time but won't set it. any ideas? seth On Sunday 13 May 2001 16:25, you wrote: > Are you running a command, say on login or at specific intervals with the > job scheduler that sets the time? For example on my setup I set the time > on the workstations during login, using the login script for the user, then > every few hours it will run a batch file to set the time agian using the > windows scheduler. The command is pretty simple "net time /set /yes" > although that assumes that "time server = yes" is set in your smb.conf. > Other wise you will need this command "net time \\ /set /yes". > > Hope that helps. > > Patrick > > Tom Myny wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Al my computers on the domain have the wrong time but the server has > > still the right time. > > > > My domain (myny): > > > > on server: > > > > [root@killhead samba]# date > > Sun May 13 21:05:25 GMT+1 2001 > > > > on win2k client: > > > > (also GMT+1 (brussels)) the time 0:06:25 > > > > Anybody a solution ? > > > > P.s i'm running on redhat 7.1 -- Seth seth@hollen.org Lottery: The excitement of bad math. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from slittle.com (co3007848-a.rivrw1.nsw.optushome.com.au [203.164.52.43]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 295D0465C for ; Sun, 13 May 2001 14:03:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 23068 invoked from network); 13 May 2001 21:04:46 -0000 Received: from max.intranet (HELO max) (192.168.0.2) by chloe.intranet with SMTP; 13 May 2001 21:04:46 -0000 Message-ID: <006401c0dbf0$56e64760$0200a8c0@max> From: "scott" To: References: <001901c0dbf9$13f9c6d0$0200a8c0@pctom> <3AFEEDB7.3CF58097@firerun.net> <01051316441400.11574@home.localdomain> Subject: Re: time problem at domain Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 07:04:46 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2462.0000 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > I have a similar problem, I have time server = yes in my smb.conf file and my > logon script has that exact line you have also. But when it tries to execute > it says I don't have permission to change the time. it gets the new time but > won't set it. Try giving Everyone permission to set the time.. under W2K, this is in Administrative Tools -> Local Security Settings -> Local Policies -> User Rights Assignment. By default only Administrators/Power Users can do it. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from smtp6.mindspring.com (smtp6.mindspring.com [207.69.200.110]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 800494636 for ; Sun, 13 May 2001 17:55:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kitchen (user-vcaug4q.dsl.mindspring.com [216.175.64.154]) by smtp6.mindspring.com (8.9.3/8.8.5) with SMTP id UAA24166; Sun, 13 May 2001 20:56:31 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <002a01c0dc12$13f02080$1501a8c0@easypea.com> From: "James W. Beauchamp" To: , References: <001901c0dbf9$13f9c6d0$0200a8c0@pctom> <3AFEEDB7.3CF58097@firerun.net> <01051316441400.11574@home.localdomain> Subject: Re: time problem at domain Date: Sun, 13 May 2001 21:05:37 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ If you are trying to set the time on the NT workstation, you need to make sure that the user has that permission set. You can also do it with system policies. The setting is under permissions. HTH James ----- Original Message ----- From: "Seth" To: Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 4:49 PM Subject: Re: time problem at domain > I have a similar problem, I have time server = yes in my smb.conf file and my > logon script has that exact line you have also. But when it tries to execute > it says I don't have permission to change the time. it gets the new time but > won't set it. > > any ideas? > > seth > > On Sunday 13 May 2001 16:25, you wrote: > > Are you running a command, say on login or at specific intervals with the > > job scheduler that sets the time? For example on my setup I set the time > > on the workstations during login, using the login script for the user, then > > every few hours it will run a batch file to set the time agian using the > > windows scheduler. The command is pretty simple "net time /set /yes" > > although that assumes that "time server = yes" is set in your smb.conf. > > Other wise you will need this command "net time \\ /set /yes". > > > > Hope that helps. > > > > Patrick > > > > Tom Myny wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Al my computers on the domain have the wrong time but the server has > > > still the right time. > > > > > > My domain (myny): > > > > > > on server: > > > > > > [root@killhead samba]# date > > > Sun May 13 21:05:25 GMT+1 2001 > > > > > > on win2k client: > > > > > > (also GMT+1 (brussels)) the time 0:06:25 > > > > > > Anybody a solution ? > > > > > > P.s i'm running on redhat 7.1 > > -- > > Seth > seth@hollen.org > > Lottery: The excitement of bad math. > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from subexgroup.com (unknown [164.164.82.20]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 458114301 for ; Sun, 13 May 2001 23:06:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ROY by subexgroup.com with SMTP (MDaemon.v3.5.0.R) for ; Mon, 14 May 2001 11:34:50 +0530 Received: by localhost with Microsoft MAPI; Mon, 14 May 2001 11:34:08 -0000 Message-ID: <01C0DC69.C9DEC2F0.royt@subexgroup.com> From: Roy Thomas Reply-To: "royt@subexgroup.com" To: 'Jeremy Allison' , Gerald Carter Cc: "samba-ntdom@samba.org" Subject: RE: latest results from testing SAMBA_2_2 Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 11:34:07 -0000 Organization: ssl X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet E-mail/MAPI - 8.0.0.4211 X-Return-Path: royt@subexgroup.com X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ HI all It was updated recently that Samba latest testing has been done on o user lists for Win9x in user mode security (this one patch update i need very badly) And a few other things....... could someone help me on where i could download this samba version(which has all these updates) from should i use the CVS or the alpha version.................. Thanks Roy -----Original Message----- From: Jeremy Allison [SMTP:jeremy@valinux.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 5:38 AM To: Gerald Carter Cc: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Re: latest results from testing SAMBA_2_2 Gerald Carter wrote: > > Just as an FYI... > > I have finished testing the following pieces PDC of functionality with the > latest SAMBA_2_2 code and all seems well. (both --without-pam and > --with-pam). PAM functionality tested on RedHat 6.2 with pam_pwdb.so. > > o domain logons from all Windows clients > o user lists for Win9x in user mode security > o adding/deleting/changing shares from Server Manager > o browsing/accessing shares on NT4/Win2k members > servers in a Samba domain > o logon scripts > o Windows NT4 style system policies > o 'domain admin group' parameter > > So looks like things are going for 2.2.1. What did I forget? > Back to work.... Password changing. This works non-pam, but I need to add some docs and the "old password" prompt in password chat for that to be fixed. Andrew Bartlett has sent 3 patches for some of this. I'm looking at them but maybe for 2.2.2, not 2.2.1. Jeremy. -- -------------------------------------------------------- Buying an operating system without source is like buying a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions. -------------------------------------------------------- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from www2.living-systems.de (unknown [195.226.125.130]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2C0D48BE for ; Mon, 14 May 2001 00:40:43 -0700 (PDT) To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: unix_clean_name ???? MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.6a January 17, 2001 Message-ID: From: Lars.Roesch@living-systems.de Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 09:42:00 +0200 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on www2/living systems AG/DE(Release 5.0.1 (Intl)|16 July 1999) at 14.05.2001 09:42:04, Serialize complete at 14.05.2001 09:42:04 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello. I'm running samba 2.0.7 on Redhat 6.2. Now my question: How can I see in the log file, what files were deleted? I have some entrees in the log file like lroesch closed file Lotus/Notes/Data/~notes.lck (numopen=5) unix_clean_name [/Lotus/Notes/Data/~notes.lck] reduce_name [Lotus/Notes/Data/~notes.lck] [/home/lroesch] reduced to Lotus/Notes/Data/~notes.lck call_trans2qfilepathinfo Lotus/Notes/Data/~notes.lck level=257 call=5 total_data=0 . . reply_unlink : \Lotus\Notes\Data\~notes.lck unix_clean_name [/Lotus/Notes/Data/~notes.lck] from a file that definitiv was deleted. At which loglevel can I see, that a file was deleted (the log above is at debug level 2 ). Regards Lars Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from neptune.dalalu.fr (neptune.dalalu.fr [195.101.66.61]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 888384646 for ; Mon, 14 May 2001 01:04:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from orion.hq.dalalu.fr (IDENT:root@orion.hq.dalalu.fr [192.168.24.53]) by neptune.dalalu.fr (8.9.3/jtpda-5.3.1) with ESMTP id KAA01475 ; Mon, 14 May 2001 10:05:19 +0200 Received: from orion.hq.dalalu.fr (IDENT:micoulea@orion.hq.dalalu.fr [192.168.24.53]) by orion.hq.dalalu.fr (8.9.2/jtpda-5.3.1) with SMTP id KAA09364 ; Mon, 14 May 2001 10:05:17 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 10:05:17 +0200 (CEST) From: Jean Francois Micouleau X-Sender: micoulea@orion.hq.dalalu.fr To: Chris Allen Cc: jeremy@valinux.com, samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: RE: latest results from testing SAMBA_2_2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Fri, 11 May 2001, Chris Allen wrote: > >-----Original Message----- > >From: jeremy@valinux.com [mailto:jeremy@valinux.com] > >Sent: Friday, 11 May 2001 08:17 > >To: Chris Allen > >Cc: samba-ntdom@samba.org > >Subject: Re: latest results from testing SAMBA_2_2 > >> > >> Will 2.2.1 allow Whistler/XP to join the domain? > > > >I haven't recieved any info from JF on this, so there'll > >probably be no change from the current CVS state on this > >for 2.2.1. > > OK. > > > > >Is this a problem as XP won't even be launched until > >october (at the earliest) ? > > Unfortunately we use Whistler in our development so it makes it difficult > not having both the desktops (win2k) and development servers in the same > domain. To join a domain Whistler beta2 is using a (currently) unsupported level in samr_set_user_info. I'm wondering if it's simply using MD5 instead of MD4. Could be. Anybody has an idea ? J.F. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp01do.de.uu.net (smtp01do.de.uu.net [192.76.144.61]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9E1347C2 for ; Mon, 14 May 2001 01:57:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.seidelservodrives ([193.155.21.2]) by smtp01do.de.uu.net (5.5.5/5.5.5) with ESMTP id KAA12064 for ; Mon, 14 May 2001 10:58:59 +0200 (MET DST) Received: by EXCHANGE with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id ; Mon, 14 May 2001 10:56:55 +0200 Message-ID: <2144B36A1914D311A4B100105AD9330226E13E@EXCHANGE> From: "Alders, Dirk" To: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: PDC Samba2.2.0 Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 10:56:51 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, I tried to install a samba-pdc and when I try connect to the domain I get a fault like "number of procedures out of range" (I use a win 2k (german) version and the message is: "Die Anzahl der Prozeduren ist ausserhalb des erlaubten Bereichs."). I hope someone could help me with this Problem... Thanks Dirk Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mailer2.lut.ac.uk (mailer2.lut.ac.uk [158.125.1.206]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC73C4B02 for ; Mon, 14 May 2001 02:06:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [158.125.1.116] (helo=staffpop1.lboro.ac.uk ident=root) by mailer2.lut.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.10 #1) id 14zEKG-0002Na-00; Mon, 14 May 2001 10:07:36 +0100 Received: from nobody by staffpop1.lboro.ac.uk with local (Exim 3.13 #1) id 14zEKG-0003XE-00; Mon, 14 May 2001 10:07:36 +0100 To: "Greg J. Zartman, P.E." Subject: Re: Homepage Virus Message-ID: <989831256.3affa05824a4f@staff-webmail.lboro.ac.uk> Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 10:07:36 +0100 (BST) From: R.J.Mckeating@lboro.ac.uk Cc: Samba News References: <018301c0da37$805bf320$6f00a8c0@logeng.net> In-Reply-To: <018301c0da37$805bf320$6f00a8c0@logeng.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.1 X-Originating-IP: 131.231.80.5 X-Lboro-Filtered: mailer2.lut.ac.uk, Mon, 14 May 2001 10:07:36 +0100 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I for one cannot see the point in being so rude. This is the Samba list, think aboute what Open Source software stands for. It is suposed to be about equality and selflessness. Lots of people on this list give up time and effort to help others. Being rude and offensive towards people who made a mistake is not what we should be about. RonMac Quoting "Greg J. Zartman, P.E." : > I realize that it's not the smartest thing in the world to blindly open > email attachments. Generally, I'm pretty good about it, but in this > case > (for some reason), I didn't think twice about opening an attachment sent > by > someone else from this mailing list. I think of everyone here pretty > much > like any of my peers here in my office. > > It's disappointing to get email messages, like the following, from > people > (from this group) in response to email messages sent out by the homepage > virus: > Message: > Some reason you're sending us viruses...?? you'll have to do better than > that if you want to get us and you better hire a good computer tech in > the > next few days. We are going to nuke you and you mail server off the > net!!!!! > > > I've received about a dozen message very similar to this one and all > from > people on this mailing list. What gives? > > > Greg J. Zartman, P.E. > > Ron McKeating Computing Services Loughborough University 01509 222329 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from beamer.mchh.siemens.de (beamer.mchh.siemens.de [194.138.158.163]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C31946EE for ; Mon, 14 May 2001 02:37:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from moody.mchh.siemens.de (mail2.mchh.siemens.de [194.138.158.226]) by beamer.mchh.siemens.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA29430 for ; Mon, 14 May 2001 11:38:56 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from warpn008 ([139.21.37.4]) by moody.mchh.siemens.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id LAA09978 for ; Mon, 14 May 2001 11:38:55 +0200 (MET DST) From: "Thomas Widmann" To: Subject: samba 2.2 and kerberos 5 support Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 11:38:55 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ hi i try to compile samba 2.2 with kerberos 5 support: ./configure --with-krb5 after i do a make i get this error compiling pass_check.c: Compiling passdb/pass_check.c In file included from passdb/pass_check.c:375: /usr/local/include/krb5.h:1841: parse error before `profile_t' make: *** [passdb/pass_check.o] Error 1 packages installed: samba-2.2.0 krb5-1.2.2 what's wrong there ? thanks in advance regards thomas Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from subexgroup.com (unknown [164.164.82.20]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0413C4857 for ; Mon, 14 May 2001 02:49:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ROY by subexgroup.com with SMTP (MDaemon.v3.5.0.R) for ; Mon, 14 May 2001 15:17:55 +0530 Received: by localhost with Microsoft MAPI; Mon, 14 May 2001 15:17:12 -0000 Message-ID: <01C0DC88.F341E9A0.royt@subexgroup.com> From: Roy Thomas Reply-To: "royt@subexgroup.com" To: "'Alders, Dirk'" , "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: RE: PDC Samba2.2.0 Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 15:17:11 -0000 Organization: ssl X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet E-mail/MAPI - 8.0.0.4211 X-Return-Path: royt@subexgroup.com X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi The below options could help ..this were posted earlier try it out..... 1 ) Have you tried logging in as 'root' when it asks for an authorized username/password? is root in smbpasswd 2) This error occurs when the machine account entry exists in the smbpasswd file, but the 'add user script' fails to add the entry into /etc/passwd. check for any conflict or verify if its already there Regards roy -----Original Message----- From: Alders, Dirk [SMTP:DAlders@seidelservodrives.de] Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 2:27 PM To: 'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org' Subject: PDC Samba2.2.0 Hi, I tried to install a samba-pdc and when I try connect to the domain I get a fault like "number of procedures out of range" (I use a win 2k (german) version and the message is: "Die Anzahl der Prozeduren ist ausserhalb des erlaubten Bereichs."). I hope someone could help me with this Problem... Thanks Dirk Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ariel.unive.it (ariel.unive.it [157.138.1.34]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33AE245DC; Mon, 14 May 2001 02:56:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from velios.unive.it (IDENT:root@velios.unive.it [157.138.1.83]) by ariel.unive.it (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f4E9vT502308; Mon, 14 May 2001 11:57:29 +0200 Received: from localhost (cantonpa@localhost) by velios.unive.it (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA12293; Mon, 14 May 2001 11:57:28 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: velios.unive.it: cantonpa owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 11:57:28 +0200 (CEST) From: Patrizia Canton To: Eugenijus =?UTF-8?B?SmFudcWha2V2acSNaXVz?= Cc: samba@lists.samba.org, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: problems with hp2000c and kodak 8670PS printers In-Reply-To: <3AFC17B6.9020101@delfi.lt> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ If I do a 'rpclient ... -c "enumdrivers"' I cannot see the HP200c driver, doing 'rpcclient ... -c enumprinters" I can see the HP2000C printer with , of course "NO PRINTER DRIVER..." so I do no know which driver to assign using the setdriver command. The thing that I do not understand is that: if I check the files I have downloaded to the server (using the "new driver" button) with the files necessary for this kind of printer obtained from the printer test page , all the necessary files are present on the server! I really do not know what to do. cheers On Fri, 11 May 2001, Eugenijus [UTF-8] JanuE!keviD ius wrote: > > > Patrizia Canton wrote: > > > > If I try the same procedure for the kodak printer > > I cannot find the correct *inf file on the cd of the printer, so I cannot > > change the driver from "NO PRINTER DRIVER AVAILABLE..." to the correct > > one. > > If you have driver files copied, you can use `rpcclient -c "setdriver > ...."` on Samba side to set the driver for Win clients. This is the only > solution for me now (RH Linux 7.0 + Samba 2.2.0; WinNT as clients) > > -- > Augis > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from exchgnr.blr.hpsglobal.com (unknown [164.164.95.146]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69E294409 for ; Mon, 14 May 2001 03:27:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by EXCHGNR with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 14 May 2001 15:36:13 +0500 Message-ID: From: "Raghuraj, Ajay" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: samba on RedHat 7.0 Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 15:57:34 +0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, Although I am able to see my Linux machine in the network neighbourhood, when i click on the machine it says " network path not found ".Any help would be appreciated.Here is a snap shot of my configuration. # Samba config file created using SWAT # from aaa.bbb.ccc.199 (aaa.bbb.ccc.199) # Date: 2001/05/14 02:31:23 # Global parameters [global] workgroup = HPSBLR1 netbios name = RSNLINUX server string = Samba #encrypt password = yes update encrypted = no security = user # smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log max log size = 0 socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 dns proxy = No printing = lprng [printers] comment = All Printers path = /var/spool/samba printable = Yes browseable = No [myhome] comment = Home Directory path = /home/ajaybr browsable = yes available = yes writable = no write list = ajaybr WARNING: The information in this message is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this message by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution of the message, or any action or omission taken by you in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please immediately contact the sender if you have received this message in error. Thank you.----------------- HCL Perot Systems Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from cessna1.garf.co.uk (unknown [212.42.0.131]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3728747DA for ; Mon, 14 May 2001 03:29:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lynx (lynx.garf.co.uk [212.42.0.138]) by cessna1.garf.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA12751; Mon, 14 May 2001 11:29:43 +0100 Message-ID: <00b801c0dc60$ca9be780$0120a8c0@garf.co.uk> Reply-To: "Rob Lyle" From: "Rob Lyle" To: "Greg J. Zartman, P.E." , Cc: "Samba News" References: <018301c0da37$805bf320$6f00a8c0@logeng.net> <989831256.3affa05824a4f@staff-webmail.lboro.ac.uk> Subject: Re: Homepage Virus Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 11:29:43 +0100 Organization: Consus Ltd MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Drop topic. Everyone makes mistakes. End of lesson ... Bandwidth returned ... NEXT. Rgds, --Rob. ----- Original Message ----- From: To: "Greg J. Zartman, P.E." Cc: "Samba News" Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 10:07 AM Subject: Re: Homepage Virus > I for one cannot see the point in being so rude. This is the Samba list, think > aboute what Open Source software stands for. It is suposed to be about equality > and selflessness. Lots of people on this list give up time and effort to help > others. Being rude and offensive towards people who made a mistake is not what > we should be about. > > RonMac > Quoting "Greg J. Zartman, P.E." : > > > I realize that it's not the smartest thing in the world to blindly open > > email attachments. Generally, I'm pretty good about it, but in this > > case > > (for some reason), I didn't think twice about opening an attachment sent > > by > > someone else from this mailing list. I think of everyone here pretty > > much > > like any of my peers here in my office. > > > > It's disappointing to get email messages, like the following, from > > people > > (from this group) in response to email messages sent out by the homepage > > virus: > > Message: > > Some reason you're sending us viruses...?? you'll have to do better than > > that if you want to get us and you better hire a good computer tech in > > the > > next few days. We are going to nuke you and you mail server off the > > net!!!!! > > > > > > I've received about a dozen message very similar to this one and all > > from > > people on this mailing list. What gives? > > > > > > Greg J. Zartman, P.E. > > > > > > > > Ron McKeating > Computing Services > Loughborough University > 01509 222329 > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from fyserv1.fy.chalmers.se (fyserv1.fy.chalmers.se [129.16.110.66]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 513264408 for ; Mon, 14 May 2001 04:15:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fy.chalmers.se (unimon [129.16.114.105]) by fyserv1.fy.chalmers.se (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA07422; Mon, 14 May 2001 13:16:53 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <3AFFBE9F.2B1F93CB@fy.chalmers.se> Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 13:16:47 +0200 From: Andy Polyakov X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.08C-SGI [en] (X11; U; IRIX 6.5 IP32) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrey Nepomnyaschih Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Performance Monitor References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > I have found that when transferring a file from Samba-2.2.0 to a Win2k > machine performance monitor displays quite interesting information. > > NBT Connection > Bytes Received/sec 2119806.974 > > Network Interface > Bytes Received/sec 6392267.252 > > I believe the host doesn't have any other connection that can eat 4 > Mbytes/s. > And when calculating speed by dividing file size by time I'm getting > that actual speed is around 6 Mbytes/s. If the actual speed is 6MBps, then nobody eats anything (you do get your 6MBps in the NI counter, don't you). What must have happened is that NBT counter failed to account those "missing" 4MBps as NBT traffic. In order to answer the question what's wrong with it (the NBT counter) one has to know how the accounting works (which we don't). Might it be as simple as that it failed to distinguish 2/3 or network packets as NBT because of fragmentation at IP layer? I used to believe that this should never happen as the hosts negotiate MTU and therefore avoid the fragmentation, but what if they fail? Andy. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from iris.dns-solutions.net (iris.dns-solutions.net [209.66.124.15]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 06BE64C91 for ; Mon, 14 May 2001 06:05:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 11510 invoked from network); 14 May 2001 13:06:20 -0000 Received: from ppph3-69.citynet.net.ar (HELO infor001) (@200.32.23.69) by websat.com.ar - 200.32.23.69 with SMTP; 14 May 2001 13:06:20 -0000 Reply-To: From: "Maximiliano Petersen" To: Subject: not work profiles Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 10:05:46 -0300 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Excuse well not to be written in ingles, and uses a translator. The "logon path" load neither and my "log files" nor This is my configuration file: ************************************************************************* # Global parameters [global] ;Basic Server Setting netbios name = NAME workgroup = GROUP ;Soporta Logos domain logons = Yes logon path = \\%N\profiles\%U logon drive = L: logon home = \\%N\%U logon script = %G.bat ;We should act as the domain and local master browser os level = 64 preferred master = yes domain master = yes local master = yes ;Secuity settings security = user ;encrypty password are a requirement for a PDC encrypt passwords = yes update encrypted = yes passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u passwd chat = *New*UNIX*password* %n\n *ReType*new*UNIX*password* %n\n * passwd:*all*authentication*tokens*updated*successfully* ;Mapa de Usuasrios username map = /etc/samba/smbusers smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd domain admin group = @adm max log size = 50 log file = /var/log/samba/log.samba.%M message command = csh -c 'xedit %s;rm %s' & default = homes dns proxy = No protocol = NT1 domain admin users = maxi socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 ;Mensajes a Mandar postexec = echo "%u se desconecto de %S from %m (%I) %T" >> /tmp/log.sam ba preexec = echo "%u se a conectado de %S from %m (%I) %T" >> /tmp/log.sam ba server string = Corre en %h la version %v del Samba Server [homes] comment = Home Directories read only = No create mask = 0775 force create mode = 0777 directory mask = 0775 force directory mode = 0777 browseable = No [profiles] path = /home/usuarios/Profiles writeable = yes create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 ************************************************************************* Please Help me thanks Maximiliano Petersen Administrador de Redes ************************** Websat Cordoba 2777 - 2000 - Rosario Santa Fe - Argentina TE:4498982 mpetersen@websat.com.ar Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from linux05.unm.edu (linux05.unm.edu [129.24.15.37]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 42EFF45E9 for ; Mon, 14 May 2001 07:12:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 30101 invoked by uid 124); 14 May 2001 14:11:45 -0000 Received: from jbenedet@unm.edu by linux05.unm.edu with qmail-scanner-0.96 (. Clean. Processed in 0.426464 secs); 14 May 2001 14:11:45 -0000 Received: from bldg87-0053.unm.edu (129.24.204.111) by linux05.unm.edu with SMTP; 14 May 2001 14:11:45 -0000 Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 08:10:46 -0600 From: John Benedetto To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: samba on RedHat 7.0 Message-ID: <1985368790.989827846@bldg87-0053.unm.edu> In-Reply-To: Originator-Info: login-token=Mulberry:01NXqlo5/cChG13g8iTC0RFXjMFx6+qO3M qg== X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.0.5 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Have you run through all the tests in the DIAGNOSIS.TXT file (it's in the /docs directoy of your Samba install)? What client? Is it set to NOT encrypt passwords? Do you have guest access set up on the server? - john --On Monday, May 14, 2001 3:57 PM +0500 "Raghuraj, Ajay" wrote: > Hi, > > Although I am able to see my Linux machine in the network neighbourhood, > when i click on the machine it says " network path not found ".Any help > would be appreciated.Here is a snap shot of my configuration. > > # Samba config file created using SWAT > # from aaa.bbb.ccc.199 (aaa.bbb.ccc.199) > # Date: 2001/05/14 02:31:23 > > # Global parameters > [global] > workgroup = HPSBLR1 > netbios name = RSNLINUX > server string = Samba > #encrypt password = yes > update encrypted = no > security = user > # smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd > log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log > max log size = 0 > socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 > dns proxy = No > printing = lprng > > [printers] > comment = All Printers > path = /var/spool/samba > printable = Yes > browseable = No > > [myhome] > comment = Home Directory > path = /home/ajaybr > browsable = yes > available = yes > writable = no > write list = ajaybr > WARNING: The information in this message is confidential and may be > legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to > this message by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended > recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution of the message, or > any action or omission taken by you in reliance on it, is prohibited and > may be unlawful. Please immediately contact the sender if you have > received this message in error. Thank you.----------------- HCL Perot > Systems =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- John Thomas Benedetto, Analyst/Programmer II jbenedet@unm.edu Parish Memorial Business Library (505)277-8945 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131-1496 http://www.unm.edu/~jbenedet/ http://eLibrary.unm.edu/pmleref Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from tennyson.netexpress.net (tennyson.netexpress.net [64.22.192.12]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7B3F4234 for ; Mon, 14 May 2001 08:18:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (vorlon@localhost) by tennyson.netexpress.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA29556; Mon, 14 May 2001 10:19:50 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: tennyson.netexpress.net: vorlon owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 10:19:45 -0500 (CDT) From: Steve Langasek To: Maximiliano Petersen Cc: Subject: Re: not work profiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hola Maximiliano, Mejor si se pregunta en la lista de usuarios, samba@lists.samba.org. ?Existe ya el directorio /var/log/samba? El Samba no lo creara. You're better off asking this on the samba@lists.samba.org mailing list. Does the directory /var/log/samba exist on your system? Samba won't create it for you. Saludos, Steve Langasek postmodern programmer On Mon, 14 May 2001, Maximiliano Petersen wrote: > Excuse well not to be written in ingles, and uses a translator. The "logon > path" load neither and my "log files" nor This is my configuration file: > > ************************************************************************* > # Global parameters > [global] > ;Basic Server Setting > netbios name = NAME > workgroup = GROUP > > ;Soporta Logos > domain logons = Yes > > logon path = \\%N\profiles\%U > > logon drive = L: > logon home = \\%N\%U > logon script = %G.bat > > > ;We should act as the domain and local master browser > os level = 64 > preferred master = yes > > domain master = yes > local master = yes > > ;Secuity settings > security = user > > ;encrypty password are a requirement for a PDC > encrypt passwords = yes > update encrypted = yes > passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u > passwd chat = *New*UNIX*password* %n\n *ReType*new*UNIX*password* > %n\n * > passwd:*all*authentication*tokens*updated*successfully* > > ;Mapa de Usuasrios > username map = /etc/samba/smbusers > smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd > domain admin group = @adm > > > max log size = 50 > log file = /var/log/samba/log.samba.%M > message command = csh -c 'xedit %s;rm %s' & > default = homes > > > dns proxy = No > protocol = NT1 > domain admin users = maxi > socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 > > ;Mensajes a Mandar > postexec = echo "%u se desconecto de %S from %m (%I) %T" >> > /tmp/log.sam > ba > preexec = echo "%u se a conectado de %S from %m (%I) %T" >> > /tmp/log.sam > ba > server string = Corre en %h la version %v del Samba Server > > [homes] > comment = Home Directories > read only = No > create mask = 0775 > force create mode = 0777 > directory mask = 0775 > force directory mode = 0777 > browseable = No > [profiles] > path = /home/usuarios/Profiles > writeable = yes > create mask = 0600 > directory mask = 0700 > ************************************************************************* > Please Help me > thanks > Maximiliano Petersen > Administrador de Redes > ************************** > Websat > Cordoba 2777 - 2000 - Rosario > Santa Fe - Argentina > TE:4498982 > mpetersen@websat.com.ar Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from sistina.com (hermes.sistina.com [208.210.145.141]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CBFF14494 for ; Mon, 14 May 2001 08:46:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 32721 invoked from network); 14 May 2001 15:45:51 -0000 Received: from fry.sistina.com (HELO icarus) (208.210.145.138) by hermes.sistina.com with SMTP; 14 May 2001 15:45:51 -0000 Received: by icarus (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 14 May 2001 10:46:54 -0500 Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 10:46:54 -0500 From: Tom Hudak To: Samba NT Domain list Subject: Anti-Virus? Message-ID: <20010514104654.H27313@localhost> Mail-Followup-To: Tom Hudak , Samba NT Domain list Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i X-Mailer: "GUI? I don't need no stinkin' GUI!" X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/signed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ The following is way off topic: I have a number of 9x/w2k machines on my network and with the rampage of crappy M$ virii floating about, I feel it's time to invest in some quality AV software for the M$ machines. I've been looking at the McAfee suites which are available for a variety of *nix enviroments but I'm mostly interested in something I can distribute to each of these machines and will run on my PDC. I'm not sure exactly how the Norton stuff works, but it looks like you need to install it on the machine acting as your domain controller, anyone have any information on this? Could I get it running in a wine enviroment? Could I set it up on another machine that would install it to the PDC? Thanks, -- Thomas J. Hudak Systems Administrator Sistina Software Inc. - www.sistina.com Phone: 612.638.0500 x.513 Fax: 612.379.3952 Page: 612.318.1967 Key fingerprint = BEC6 3181 4C9B A7BB AF11 4717 6F85 B346 380D 523E sleep: Command not found - The story of my life... [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp.edisoninfo.com (dhcp024-166-123-229.neo.rr.com [24.166.123.229]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 99BEB4D19 for ; Mon, 14 May 2001 09:07:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 30444 invoked from network); 14 May 2001 16:08:35 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO edisoninfo.com) (apache@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 14 May 2001 16:08:35 -0000 Received: from 192.168.0.5 (SquirrelMail authenticated user gary) by smtp.edisoninfo.com with HTTP; Mon, 14 May 2001 12:08:35 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3190.192.168.0.5.989856515.squirrel@smtp.edisoninfo.com> Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 12:08:35 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: Anti-Virus? From: "Gary S MacKay" To: In-Reply-To: <20010514104654.H27313@localhost> References: <20010514104654.H27313@localhost> Cc: X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.1.2 [cvs]) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I use Sophos Anti-Virus on all of my servers. They support linux, Novell, NT, and Macintosh. It can be installed and maintained on every machine on your network without leaving your chair! Daily downloads to the server keep all machines updated together. I have yet to see it miss a virus. One of the best demo's I do for my clients is install the 30day demo version on their network (the one they claim is clean since they use McAfee, Norton, whatever) and show them a bunch of viri that they missed. It's an easy sell after that. Email me off-loop if you want more info. - Gary > The following is way off topic: > I have a number of 9x/w2k machines on my network and with the rampage > of crappy M$ virii floating about, I feel it's time to invest in some > quality AV software for the M$ machines. I've been looking at the > McAfee suites which are > available for a variety of *nix enviroments but I'm mostly interested > in something I can distribute to each of these machines and will run on > my PDC. I'm not sure exactly how the Norton stuff works, but it looks > like you need to > install it on the machine acting as your domain controller, anyone have > any information on this? Could I get it running in a wine enviroment? > Could I set it up on another machine that would install it to the PDC? > Thanks, > -- > Thomas J. Hudak > Systems Administrator > Sistina Software Inc. - www.sistina.com > Phone: 612.638.0500 x.513 > Fax: 612.379.3952 > Page: 612.318.1967 > Key fingerprint = BEC6 3181 4C9B A7BB AF11 4717 6F85 B346 380D 523E > > sleep: Command not found - The story of my life... Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from lande06.landam.com (lct.landam.com [206.211.96.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E387343E9 for ; Mon, 14 May 2001 09:34:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by lande06.landam.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 14 May 2001 12:35:03 -0400 Message-ID: <6768A16CA846D3119104009027998CC30D13D89B@lande04.landam.com > From: SRuth@LANDAM.com To: thudak@sistina.com, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Anti-Virus? Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 12:37:20 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ The company I work for uses the Norton Antivirus 7.5 Enterprise solution. I like it particularly because the admin console for the software will tell me, at a glance, which version of the definitions are installed on the clients and when the last full scan took place. It's not necessary to install it on a Domain controller, at least not that I'm aware of. Also, all installations can be performed from one PC to all other machines via the LAN. I don't know how much it costs, but it's worth checking out. Sven -----Original Message----- From: Tom Hudak [mailto:thudak@sistina.com] Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 10:47 AM To: Samba NT Domain list Subject: Anti-Virus? The following is way off topic: I have a number of 9x/w2k machines on my network and with the rampage of crappy M$ virii floating about, I feel it's time to invest in some quality AV software for the M$ machines. I've been looking at the McAfee suites which are available for a variety of *nix enviroments but I'm mostly interested in something I can distribute to each of these machines and will run on my PDC. I'm not sure exactly how the Norton stuff works, but it looks like you need to install it on the machine acting as your domain controller, anyone have any information on this? Could I get it running in a wine enviroment? Could I set it up on another machine that would install it to the PDC? Thanks, -- Thomas J. Hudak Systems Administrator Sistina Software Inc. - www.sistina.com Phone: 612.638.0500 x.513 Fax: 612.379.3952 Page: 612.318.1967 Key fingerprint = BEC6 3181 4C9B A7BB AF11 4717 6F85 B346 380D 523E sleep: Command not found - The story of my life... [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailout05.sul.t-online.com (mailout05.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.82]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B33674458 for ; Mon, 14 May 2001 09:39:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fwd02.sul.t-online.de by mailout05.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 14zLP5-0004p7-02; Mon, 14 May 2001 18:41:03 +0200 Received: from molkerei-ammerland.de (520003202015-0001@[62.224.225.211]) by fmrl02.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 14zLP4-1YUW1oC; Mon, 14 May 2001 18:41:02 +0200 Message-ID: <3B000BBF.E514E599@molkerei-ammerland.de> Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 18:45:51 +0200 From: Uwe Laverenz Organization: Molkerei Ammerland eG X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [de] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Samba NT Domain list Subject: Re: Anti-Virus? References: <20010514104654.H27313@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Sender: 520003202015-0001@t-dialin.net Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi Tom, > install it on the machine acting as your domain controller, anyone have any > information on this? Could I get it running in a wine enviroment? Could I set > it up on another machine that would install it to the PDC? Not sure, but maybe Sophos-Antivirus is what you are looking for: http://www.sophos.com cu, Uwe Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.mcselph.com (unknown [207.217.237.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F20164564 for ; Mon, 14 May 2001 09:56:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kennethhadley (207.217.237.2) by mail.mcselph.com (Worldmail 1.3.167); 14 May 2001 09:57:02 -0700 Message-ID: <031301c0dc96$e70455c0$0901a8c0@mcselph.com> From: "Kenneth Hadley" To: "Tom Hudak" Cc: References: <20010514104654.H27313@localhost> Subject: Re: Anti-Virus? Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 09:57:01 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ We use Trend Micro's NeatSuite for our Windows based machines, and it works very well for us. It includes Officescan which is basically a Enterprise version of PC-Cillin for the clients, ServerProtect which protects NT/W2k servers, VirusWall (which they defaultly give you a NT license for but will for free convert the License to their Linux version) which is a proxy firewall to kill email/active-x/java viruses , and various other programs. Only prob is (so far) they dont have a linux client. http://www.trend.com/products/neatsuite/exchange.htm _______________________________ Kenneth Hadley PC / Network Specialist McCormick Selph Inc. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Hudak" To: "Samba NT Domain list" Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 8:46 AM Subject: Anti-Virus? > The following is way off topic: > I have a number of 9x/w2k machines on my network and with the rampage of > crappy M$ virii floating about, I feel it's time to invest in some quality AV > software for the M$ machines. I've been looking at the McAfee suites which > are > available for a variety of *nix enviroments but I'm mostly interested in > something I can distribute to each of these machines and will run on my PDC. > I'm not sure exactly how the Norton stuff works, but it looks like you need > to > install it on the machine acting as your domain controller, anyone have any > information on this? Could I get it running in a wine enviroment? Could I set > it up on another machine that would install it to the PDC? > Thanks, > -- > Thomas J. Hudak > Systems Administrator > Sistina Software Inc. - www.sistina.com > Phone: 612.638.0500 x.513 > Fax: 612.379.3952 > Page: 612.318.1967 > Key fingerprint = BEC6 3181 4C9B A7BB AF11 4717 6F85 B346 380D 523E > > sleep: Command not found - The story of my life... > > [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.valinux.com (mail.valinux.com [198.186.202.175]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9C7B4DAF for ; Mon, 14 May 2001 10:42:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from legion.hdqt.valinux.com ([10.6.11.17] helo=valinux.com ident=jeremy) by mail.valinux.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 14zMNI-0004Pb-00; Mon, 14 May 2001 10:43:16 -0700 Message-ID: <3AFFFD2E.95647600@valinux.com> Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 11:43:42 -0400 From: Jeremy Allison Organization: VA Linux Systems X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.13-0.7 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Alders, Dirk" Cc: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: Re: PDC Samba2.2.0 References: <2144B36A1914D311A4B100105AD9330226E13E@EXCHANGE> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ "Alders, Dirk" wrote: > > Hi, > > I tried to install a samba-pdc and when I try connect to the domain I get a > fault like "number of procedures out of range" (I use a win 2k (german) > version and the message is: "Die Anzahl der Prozeduren ist ausserhalb des > erlaubten Bereichs."). I hope someone could help me with this Problem... This is fixed in CVS and will be fixed in Samba 2.2.1. Cheers, Jeremy Allison, Samba Team. -- -------------------------------------------------------- Buying an operating system without source is like buying a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions. -------------------------------------------------------- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mail.valinux.com (mail.valinux.com [198.186.202.175]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 204C24DBA for ; Mon, 14 May 2001 10:43:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from legion.hdqt.valinux.com ([10.6.11.17] helo=valinux.com ident=jeremy) by mail.valinux.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 14zMOB-0004T5-00; Mon, 14 May 2001 10:44:11 -0700 Message-ID: <3AFFFD64.90E4AB8A@valinux.com> Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 11:44:36 -0400 From: Jeremy Allison Organization: VA Linux Systems X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.13-0.7 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jean Francois Micouleau Cc: Chris Allen , samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Re: latest results from testing SAMBA_2_2 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Jean Francois Micouleau wrote: > > To join a domain Whistler beta2 is using a (currently) unsupported level > in samr_set_user_info. What's the info level it uses. Any chance I could look at the traces ? Jeremy. -- -------------------------------------------------------- Buying an operating system without source is like buying a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions. -------------------------------------------------------- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mail.confluencewatersports.com (mail.confluencewatersports.com [216.237.221.241]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 904B54D9C for ; Mon, 14 May 2001 10:57:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from TAZER (mdmontazer.mail.confluencewatersports.com [192.168.0.54]) (authenticated) by mail.confluencewatersports.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f4EHwk619093 for ; Mon, 14 May 2001 13:58:46 -0400 From: "Mark Montazer" To: "SAMBA-NTDOM (E-mail)" Subject: FW: latest results from testing SAMBA_2_2 Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 13:58:35 -0400 Message-ID: <005201c0dc9f$7fc4d250$3600a8c0@confluencewatersports.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Just a side note. I have a PC that was running WIN2K, I configured it for domain logons using Samba 2.2.0(final). Recently a co-worker upgraded(?) it to the beta of WINXP and he hasn't had a problem logging onto the domain. I haven't tried to remove and readd him though. Let me know if I can do anything to help. Mark -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Jeremy Allison Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 11:45 AM To: Jean Francois Micouleau Cc: Chris Allen; samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Re: latest results from testing SAMBA_2_2 Jean Francois Micouleau wrote: > > To join a domain Whistler beta2 is using a (currently) unsupported level > in samr_set_user_info. What's the info level it uses. Any chance I could look at the traces ? Jeremy. -- -------------------------------------------------------- Buying an operating system without source is like buying a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions. -------------------------------------------------------- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from zabumba.coltec.ufmg.br (zabumba.coltec.ufmg.br [150.164.102.68]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C45304DA0 for ; Mon, 14 May 2001 11:11:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 9784 invoked by uid 5004); 14 May 2001 18:12:20 -0000 Message-ID: <20010514181220.9783.qmail@zabumba.coltec.ufmg.br> From: "Leonardo Luiz Padovani da Mata" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: lot's of problems.. -why there is no answer? Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 18:12:20 GMT Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ i'm using a linux PDC server with samba 2.0.8. My server was a NT 4.0 machine but i have changed it for linux. Everyone could log in and see the linux file server. Here is the problems 1- Whem i try to install a new machine it won't acept to enter in the new NT domain, i have to put that machine in the older domain. after that i could change it into the new nt domain, but i whant to uninstall the older SERVER 2- I whant to shutdown every 40 machines over the network, i have tryed lots of windows programs and nothing works, there is a way to do this with the linux server? 3- I whant to delete the local profile created in the NT workstations over the network, is that possible? 4- Why when i'm using roaming profiles my network "gains a lot of collisions" ? That's it.... Sorry about the terrible english, this is because i'm not english, canadian,australian or american. :-) this is my smb.conf [global] workgroup = n2m netbios name = zabumba server string = SAMBA PDC hosts allow = 150.164.102. security = user status = yes encrypt passwords = yes domain admin group = @staff # username map = /etc/smbusers socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 os level = 65 domain logons = yes logon script = scripts\%U.bat logon home = \\%L\%U\.profiles # logon path = \\%L\%U\Profiles # utilizado para roaming profiles #logon path = # eh utilizado para perfil local logon path = share modes = no unix password sync = true passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u passwd chat = *password* %n\n *password* %n\n *successful* time server = yes guest account = nobody logon drive = z: [homes] # comment = Home Directories browseable = yes writable = yes [staff] #comment = root directory path = /home valid users = helena, lilica, fantini, humberto, alfredo, barroca admin users = helena, lilica, fantini, humberto, alfredo, barroca browseable = yes writeable = yes [web_coltec] path = /home/httpd/html valid users = root, humberto, barroca, alfredo admin users = root, humberto, barroca, alfredo browseable = yes writeable = yes [web_n2m] path = /home/httpd/html/n2m valid users = root, humberto, helena, lilica, barroca, alfredo admin users = root, humberto, helena, lilica, barroca, alfredo browseable = yes writeable = yes [biomas] path= /home/setores/biomas valid users = crono, blackpig, alfredo admin users = alfredo browseable = yes writable = yes [trabalho] #comment = root directory path = /home/alunos/trabalho browseable = yes writeable = no [pemja] #comment = root directory path = /home/pemja valid users = ccvieira admin users = ccvieira browseable = yes writeable = yes [netlogon] comment = Network Logon Service path = /home/samba/netlogon # guest ok = yes locking = no public = no browseable = yes writable = no share modes = no [zabuprn] # coment = zabuprn valid users = root,alfredo,helena,lilica,barroca,macarrao,humberto,mchiaretto,fantini,lucia,ccvieira ; printing command = /usr/bin/lpr -r %s printer = zabuprn public = no writable = no printable = yes printing = BSD Leonardo Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from eskimo.dhnw.net (unknown [63.120.42.226]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6516C4403 for ; Mon, 14 May 2001 11:46:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jason ([10.1.1.100]) by eskimo.dhnw.net (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id f4EIktN28185; Mon, 14 May 2001 14:46:55 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jason Coene" To: "Leonardo Luiz Padovani da Mata" , Subject: RE: lot's of problems.. -why there is no answer? Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 14:46:19 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <20010514181220.9783.qmail@zabumba.coltec.ufmg.br> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Leonardo, I will try to clear up some of the issues for you. ### [ ... ] ### ### ### i'm using a linux PDC server with samba 2.0.8. My server was a NT 4.0 ### machine but i have changed it for linux. Everyone could log in ### and see the ### linux file server. ### Here is the problems ### 1- Whem i try to install a new machine it won't acept to enter ### in the new ### NT domain, i have to put that machine in the older domain. after that i ### could change it into the new nt domain, but i whant to ### uninstall the older ### SERVER 1) you need to be more clear about the names. nt 4 has trouble when joining a domain that it is "already in". this is a quirky issue that many suffer from. theres no real way to get around this (if i understand your issue correctly). ### 2- I whant to shutdown every 40 machines over the network, i have tryed ### lots of windows programs and nothing works, there is a way to ### do this with ### the linux server? 2) this isnt a samba issue.. ive never used such a program, but this could be taken care of by a simple win32 client installed on each pc which listens to a socket that denies all connections that arent from the linux server. then validates by username/pw, then proceeds to call the ShutDownEx() function (i believe thats it, its been a while). have a linux server that at a specified time (or by user intervention) sends the proper data to the clients (if they are all on the subnet, or on a network where broadcast packets are routed, may i suggest using udp and SO_BROADCAST). ### 3- I whant to delete the local profile created in the NT ### workstations over ### the network, is that possible? logoff all user's whoms profiles need to be deleted and delete the user's profile directory. if you want to delete it over the smb network i would suggest placing the profiles on a seperate service (such as \\server\profiles\%u), where everyone can see the user's profile dir, however be diligent with permissions. at this point you can login as root and modify as you like. another solution is to add another share (if the user's home directories are /home/, share /home, allowing only @staff (or only root if you dont want all staff to have access). [homedirs] path=/home writeable=yes valid users=@staff force user=root force group=wheel ### 4- Why when i'm using roaming profiles my network "gains a lot of ### collisions" ? there are a lot of files being transferred. use a switch instead of a hub :) i hope that helped. and your english isnt too bad at all :) regards, jason Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.mcselph.com (unknown [207.217.237.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 818D64702 for ; Mon, 14 May 2001 11:51:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kennethhadley (207.217.237.2) by mail.mcselph.com (Worldmail 1.3.167); 14 May 2001 11:52:52 -0700 Message-ID: <03c701c0dca7$164a6f80$0901a8c0@mcselph.com> From: "Kenneth Hadley" To: "Roger Dehus" Cc: References: <002b01c0dca2$dad24580$0262b0cc@saturn2> Subject: Re: Anti-Virus? Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 11:51:11 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ <<>> Unfortunately I haven't had time to setup the Viruswall (nevermind that Ive had it for over a year) program but the client programs did catch the homepage virus...as a matter of fact we had zero infections, and only a dozen or so kills _______________________________ Kenneth Hadley PC / Network Specialist McCormick Selph Inc. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Roger Dehus" To: "Kenneth Hadley" Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 11:21 AM Subject: Re: Anti-Virus? > I have a client that uses this on their Linux POP 3 server, however it seems > that the last vbs "homepage" virus got through..did you have the same > problem? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Kenneth Hadley > To: Tom Hudak > Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Date: Monday, May 14, 2001 11:55 AM > Subject: Re: Anti-Virus? > > > >We use Trend Micro's NeatSuite for our Windows based machines, and it works > >very well for us. > >It includes Officescan which is basically a Enterprise version of PC-Cillin > >for the clients, ServerProtect which protects NT/W2k servers, VirusWall > >(which they defaultly give you a NT license for but will for free convert > >the License to their Linux version) which is a proxy firewall to kill > >email/active-x/java viruses , and various other programs. > >Only prob is (so far) they dont have a linux client. > >http://www.trend.com/products/neatsuite/exchange.htm > > > > > > > >_______________________________ > >Kenneth Hadley > >PC / Network Specialist > >McCormick Selph Inc. > > > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Tom Hudak" > >To: "Samba NT Domain list" > >Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 8:46 AM > >Subject: Anti-Virus? > > > > > >> The following is way off topic: > >> I have a number of 9x/w2k machines on my network and with the rampage of > >> crappy M$ virii floating about, I feel it's time to invest in some > quality > >AV > >> software for the M$ machines. I've been looking at the McAfee suites > which > >> are > >> available for a variety of *nix enviroments but I'm mostly interested in > >> something I can distribute to each of these machines and will run on my > >PDC. > >> I'm not sure exactly how the Norton stuff works, but it looks like you > >need > >> to > >> install it on the machine acting as your domain controller, anyone have > >any > >> information on this? Could I get it running in a wine enviroment? Could I > >set > >> it up on another machine that would install it to the PDC? > >> Thanks, > >> -- > >> Thomas J. Hudak > >> Systems Administrator > >> Sistina Software Inc. - www.sistina.com > >> Phone: 612.638.0500 x.513 > >> Fax: 612.379.3952 > >> Page: 612.318.1967 > >> Key fingerprint = BEC6 3181 4C9B A7BB AF11 4717 6F85 B346 380D 523E > >> > >> sleep: Command not found - The story of my life... > >> > >> [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature] > > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from relay1.wplus.net (smtp.wplus.net [195.131.52.143]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0E3D4403 for ; Mon, 14 May 2001 12:00:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Real-To: Received: from dimetra (ip94-243.dialup.wplus.net [195.131.94.243]) by relay1.wplus.net (8.9.1/8.9.1/wplus.2) with SMTP id XAA19523 for ; Mon, 14 May 2001 23:01:13 +0400 (MSD) From: "Andrey Nepomnyaschih" To: Subject: RE: lot's of problems.. -why there is no answer? Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 23:01:08 +0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20010514181220.9783.qmail@zabumba.coltec.ufmg.br> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, I'll do my best to answer these questions. But they are usefull only if you use WinNT. > 1- Whem i try to install a new machine it won't acept to > enter in the new > NT domain, i have to put that machine in the older domain. > after that i > could change it into the new nt domain, but i whant to > uninstall the older > SERVER 1. Actually, haven't seen anything similar to this, maybe you can try to describe it in details. And I skip it. > 2- I whant to shutdown every 40 machines over the network, > i have tryed > lots of windows programs and nothing works, there is a way > to do this with > the linux server? 2. Depends on what Windows are you using, WinNT will accept remote shutdown request. Win9x and WinMe will not. So if you are using NT/2k then try to search for resource kits. There is a utility called shutdown. But this one will work only from another WinNT/Win2k machine. > 3- I whant to delete the local profile created in the NT > workstations over > the network, is that possible? 3. Use registry editor and set HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\WindowsNT\CurrentVersion\Winlogon\DeleteRoamin gCache to 1 (DWORD). !! IMPORTANT !! Play with before enabling it at all machine. If you are using Outlook (without Exchange) or some other programs that stores files along with user profile. It can become deleted if Windows will assume that it has nothing to do on the profile server. > 4- Why when i'm using roaming profiles my network "gains a lot of > collisions" ? 4. Well you are using hub to connect your network. And there some times when at least two of your NICs start sending at the same time (that is when collision occur). It is not bat not good, you should take it as it is (this is a main concept of Ethernet). You can make a change to switched network if you really don't like that light flashing. At last you should start worrying about it you get a really slow transfers. Or you get a lot of collisions when there are only two computers who talk to each other. This may indicate the presence of faulty NIC. I hope this helps someone, Andrey Nepomnyaschih nas@chartpilot.ru > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Leonardo Luiz > Padovani da Mata > Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 10:12 PM > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: lot's of problems.. -why there is no answer? > > > i'm using a linux PDC server with samba 2.0.8. My server > was a NT 4.0 > machine but i have changed it for linux. Everyone could log > in and see the > linux file server. > Here is the problems > That's it.... > Sorry about the terrible english, this is because i'm not english, > canadian,australian or american. :-) > this is my smb.conf > [global] > > workgroup = n2m > netbios name = zabumba > server string = SAMBA PDC > hosts allow = 150.164.102. > security = user > status = yes > encrypt passwords = yes > domain admin group = @staff > # username map = /etc/smbusers > socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 > os level = 65 > domain logons = yes > logon script = scripts\%U.bat > logon home = \\%L\%U\.profiles > # logon path = \\%L\%U\Profiles # utilizado para roaming profiles > #logon path = # eh utilizado para perfil local > logon path = > share modes = no > unix password sync = true > passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u > passwd chat = *password* %n\n *password* %n\n *successful* > time server = yes > guest account = nobody > logon drive = z: > > [homes] > # comment = Home Directories > browseable = yes > writable = yes > > [staff] > > #comment = root directory > path = /home > valid users = helena, lilica, fantini, humberto, alfredo, barroca > admin users = helena, lilica, fantini, humberto, alfredo, barroca > browseable = yes > writeable = yes > > [web_coltec] > > path = /home/httpd/html > valid users = root, humberto, barroca, alfredo > admin users = root, humberto, barroca, alfredo > browseable = yes > writeable = yes > > [web_n2m] > > path = /home/httpd/html/n2m > valid users = root, humberto, helena, lilica, barroca, alfredo > admin users = root, humberto, helena, lilica, barroca, alfredo > browseable = yes > writeable = yes > > [biomas] > path= /home/setores/biomas > valid users = crono, blackpig, alfredo > admin users = alfredo > browseable = yes > writable = yes > > [trabalho] > #comment = root directory > path = /home/alunos/trabalho > browseable = yes > writeable = no > > [pemja] > > #comment = root directory > path = /home/pemja > valid users = ccvieira > admin users = ccvieira > browseable = yes > writeable = yes > > [netlogon] > comment = Network Logon Service > path = /home/samba/netlogon > # guest ok = yes > locking = no > public = no > browseable = yes > writable = no > share modes = no > > > [zabuprn] > > # coment = zabuprn > valid users = > root,alfredo,helena,lilica,barroca,macarrao,humberto,mchiare > tto,fantini,lucia,ccvieira > ; printing command = /usr/bin/lpr -r %s > printer = zabuprn > public = no > writable = no > printable = yes > printing = BSD > > > Leonardo > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from neptune.dalalu.fr (neptune.dalalu.fr [195.101.66.61]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03C1A440C for ; Mon, 14 May 2001 14:41:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from orion.hq.dalalu.fr (IDENT:root@orion.hq.dalalu.fr [192.168.24.53]) by neptune.dalalu.fr (8.9.3/jtpda-5.3.1) with ESMTP id XAA02666 ; Mon, 14 May 2001 23:42:41 +0200 Received: from orion.hq.dalalu.fr (IDENT:micoulea@orion.hq.dalalu.fr [192.168.24.53]) by orion.hq.dalalu.fr (8.9.2/jtpda-5.3.1) with SMTP id XAA12357 ; Mon, 14 May 2001 23:42:40 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 23:42:40 +0200 (CEST) From: Jean Francois Micouleau X-Sender: micoulea@orion.hq.dalalu.fr To: Jeremy Allison Cc: Chris Allen , samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Re: latest results from testing SAMBA_2_2 In-Reply-To: <3AFFFD64.90E4AB8A@valinux.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Mon, 14 May 2001, Jeremy Allison wrote: > > To join a domain Whistler beta2 is using a (currently) unsupported level > > in samr_set_user_info. > > What's the info level it uses. 0x19. pretty much like a info level 21. > Any chance I could look at the traces ? yes maybe ;-) ;-) I wanted to do some more hacking before. J.F. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smto-mail-02.epiphany.com (unknown [208.49.174.40]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 278704422 for ; Mon, 14 May 2001 15:47:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by smto-mail-02.epiphany.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 14 May 2001 15:45:35 -0700 Message-ID: <38A6C7D1B5A8D4118D5B00508B5E08E3145D80@goofy.epiphany.com> From: murali@epiphany.com To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, samba@samba.org Subject: Samba 2.0.7 on Solaris 2.7 (open files) Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 15:45:31 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Greetings! Down loaded, compiled with gcc & installed Samba 2.0.7 on Solaris 7(Sparc). It appears that the log.smb has this error regarding open files. 1. Does this mean, The NT/Win2K clients are requesting 10K open files? Because, the samba configuration file does not have any entry for this parameter. 2. If the Clients are requesting this many open files, Can I able to detect which NT/Win2K system is requesting this? 3. When ever, I start Samba, only nmbd is running (not smbd) Any help/pointers would be very much appreciated. Thanks, Murali Here is the out put of log.smb [2001/05/14 15:41:51, 1] smbd/server.c:main(641) smbd version 2.0.7 started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell 1992-1998 [2001/05/14 15:41:51, 1] smbd/files.c:file_init(216) file_init: Information only: requested 10000 open files, 4086 are available. [2001/05/14 15:41:51, 1] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(988) Username nobody is invalid on this system [2001/05/14 15:41:51, 1] smbd/server.c:main(641) smbd version 2.0.7 started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell 1992-1998 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from yowie.cc.uq.edu.au (yowie.cc.uq.edu.au [130.102.2.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A75C4420D; Mon, 14 May 2001 19:22:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from student.uq.edu.au (s354199@student.uq.edu.au [130.102.87.136]) by yowie.cc.uq.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA10186; Tue, 15 May 2001 12:23:46 +1000 (GMT+1000) Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 12:23:45 +1000 (GMT+1000) From: Elliot Mackenzie To: Cc: , Subject: Re: Samba 2.0.7 on Solaris 2.7 (open files) In-Reply-To: <38A6C7D1B5A8D4118D5B00508B5E08E3145D80@goofy.epiphany.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ AFAIK, requesting 10000 files is like saying "list all". I get the same message in my logs, and it hasn't caused any problems. I'm pretty sure it is normal. You might want to check that samba doesn't allow user nobody, because it appears as though it does in your setup, and you don't have an system account for it. It's probably just filling up your logs with errors like the one below. be aware also that 2.0.7 had an unrelated security bug and you might want to consider getting it patched up. - M. On Mon, 14 May 2001 murali@epiphany.com wrote: > Greetings! > > Down loaded, compiled with gcc & installed Samba 2.0.7 on Solaris 7(Sparc). > It > appears that the log.smb has this error regarding open files. > > 1. Does this mean, The NT/Win2K clients are requesting 10K open files? > Because, > the samba configuration file does not have any entry for this > parameter. > > 2. If the Clients are requesting this many open files, Can I able to > detect > which NT/Win2K system is requesting this? > > 3. When ever, I start Samba, only nmbd is running (not smbd) > > Any help/pointers would be very much appreciated. > > Thanks, > Murali > > > Here is the out put of log.smb > > [2001/05/14 15:41:51, 1] smbd/server.c:main(641) > smbd version 2.0.7 started. > Copyright Andrew Tridgell 1992-1998 > [2001/05/14 15:41:51, 1] smbd/files.c:file_init(216) > file_init: Information only: requested 10000 open files, 4086 are > available. > [2001/05/14 15:41:51, 1] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(988) > Username nobody is invalid on this system > [2001/05/14 15:41:51, 1] smbd/server.c:main(641) > smbd version 2.0.7 started. > Copyright Andrew Tridgell 1992-1998 > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from akira.rsp.com.au (akira.rsp.com.au [203.32.218.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AAE44446 for ; Mon, 14 May 2001 20:10:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rsp.com.au (wylie.rsp.com.au [10.5.0.8]) by akira.rsp.com.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA25420 for ; Tue, 15 May 2001 12:41:34 +0930 (CST) Message-ID: <3B009E65.1751ECB9@rsp.com.au> Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 12:41:33 +0930 From: Ben Roberts X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; U; IRIX64 6.5 IP30) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: PDC with Samba 2.2.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, I just noticed the thread regarding 'procedure is out of range' error messg. I remember getting this error when I was setting up samba a few weeks ago. Now I can't seem to get that far at all. After rebulding my server, I now get the error message 'credentials conflict' ...blah, blah, blah... When joining the domain using the root account. I remember fixing this, but I can't seem to now. Im using samba 2.2.0 and have machine$ and username in passwd and smbpasswd. Can anyone refresh my memory and help me get to the next problem? ('procedure is out of range') :) Thanks, Ben -- Ben Roberts Rising Sun Pictures [www.rsp.com.au] 44 High Street, Kensington, 5068 South Australia, Australia P +61 8 8364 6074 F +61 8 8364 6075 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mlode.mlode.com (mlode.mlode.com [208.12.100.233]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7440643FB for ; Mon, 14 May 2001 20:18:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fred (son-ts11-23.mlode.com [208.31.172.230]) by mlode.mlode.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-70564U7000L700S0V35) with SMTP id com; Mon, 14 May 2001 20:19:51 -0700 Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.20010514202432.00aab4d0@mail.mlode.com> X-Sender: lamasney@mail.mlode.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 20:24:32 -0700 To: Tom Hudak , Samba NT Domain list From: Mike Lamasney Subject: Re: Anti-Virus? In-Reply-To: <20010514104654.H27313@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Tom, I've had excellent experiences with Command Software. You can look at their stuff at commandcom.com. I have it running on every win9x workstation in our school district, and have a script download the latest virus definition files weekly to each of 5 Linux servers. Then each workstation daily contacts the nearest server for any recent updates. And the cost is lots less than brand x and brand y. And, no, I have no financial relationship with the company. Am just a happy customer. At 10:46 AM 5/14/01 -0500, Tom Hudak wrote: >The following is way off topic: >I have a number of 9x/w2k machines on my network and with the rampage of >crappy M$ virii floating about, I feel it's time to invest in some quality AV >software for the M$ machines. I've been looking at the McAfee suites which >are >available for a variety of *nix enviroments but I'm mostly interested in >something I can distribute to each of these machines and will run on my PDC. >I'm not sure exactly how the Norton stuff works, but it looks like you need >to >install it on the machine acting as your domain controller, anyone have any >information on this? Could I get it running in a wine enviroment? Could I set >it up on another machine that would install it to the PDC? >Thanks, >-- >Thomas J. Hudak >Systems Administrator >Sistina Software Inc. - www.sistina.com >Phone: 612.638.0500 x.513 >Fax: 612.379.3952 >Page: 612.318.1967 >Key fingerprint = BEC6 3181 4C9B A7BB AF11 4717 6F85 B346 380D 523E > >sleep: Command not found - The story of my life... > >[demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature] > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from leviathan.inethouston.net (216-118-21-146.pdq.net [216.118.21.146]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE44D4443 for ; Mon, 14 May 2001 20:34:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dwcjr (DWCJR.inethouston.net [216.118.21.147]) by leviathan.inethouston.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4341F10F40F; Mon, 14 May 2001 22:35:32 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <012e01c0dcf0$175ce6c0$931576d8@inethouston.net> From: "David W. Chapman Jr." To: "Tom Hudak" , "Samba NT Domain list" , "Mike Lamasney" References: <3.0.5.32.20010514202432.00aab4d0@mail.mlode.com> Subject: Re: Anti-Virus? Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 22:35:30 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I've had problems with mcafee. Particularly in its ability to detect viruses. I've had it pass over plenty that Norton would detect. But the good side to mcafee is the multitude of platforms it supports. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Lamasney" To: "Tom Hudak" ; "Samba NT Domain list" Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 10:24 PM Subject: Re: Anti-Virus? > Tom, I've had excellent experiences with Command Software. You can > look at their stuff at commandcom.com. I have it running on every > win9x workstation in our school district, and have a script download the > latest virus definition files weekly to each of 5 Linux servers. > Then each workstation daily contacts the nearest server for any recent > updates. And the cost is lots less than brand x and brand y. And, no, > I have no financial relationship with the company. Am just a happy > customer. > > At 10:46 AM 5/14/01 -0500, Tom Hudak wrote: > >The following is way off topic: > >I have a number of 9x/w2k machines on my network and with the rampage of > >crappy M$ virii floating about, I feel it's time to invest in some quality AV > >software for the M$ machines. I've been looking at the McAfee suites which > >are > >available for a variety of *nix enviroments but I'm mostly interested in > >something I can distribute to each of these machines and will run on my PDC. > >I'm not sure exactly how the Norton stuff works, but it looks like you need > >to > >install it on the machine acting as your domain controller, anyone have any > >information on this? Could I get it running in a wine enviroment? Could I set > >it up on another machine that would install it to the PDC? > >Thanks, > >-- > >Thomas J. Hudak > >Systems Administrator > >Sistina Software Inc. - www.sistina.com > >Phone: 612.638.0500 x.513 > >Fax: 612.379.3952 > >Page: 612.318.1967 > >Key fingerprint = BEC6 3181 4C9B A7BB AF11 4717 6F85 B346 380D 523E > > > >sleep: Command not found - The story of my life... > > > >[demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature] > > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailhub.iastate.edu (mailhub.iastate.edu [129.186.1.102]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3337B4589 for ; Mon, 14 May 2001 20:52:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from justindd.iastate.edu (207-191-201-250.cpe.ats.mcleodusa.net [207.191.201.250]) by mailhub.iastate.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA20039 for ; Mon, 14 May 2001 22:54:12 -0500 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20010514225101.00a52200@justindd.mail.iastate.ed u> X-Sender: justindd@justindd.mail.iastate.edu (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 22:54:27 -0500 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org From: Justin D Davis Subject: Re: Anti-Virus? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Actually, I have had McAffee and Norton for a long time and I have found that Norton often cannot find a virus when McAffee does. I know McAffee has a lot more Domain type support for enterprises than most others (Several major Aerospace corporations, who must have security at all cost run McAffee including the one I work for as a Co-Op right now). I have however found that more often than not, when McAffee reports having found a virus, it is actually just a string in some program which happens to match a virus string, but there really is no virus. Despite this, if you want something that wins tons of awards and seems to be almost an industry standard, than McAffee is probably what you want. JD Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.uni-kl.de (mail.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.52]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAF3D4264 for ; Mon, 14 May 2001 23:49:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de [131.246.239.10]) by mail.uni-kl.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f4F6p9816352; Tue, 15 May 2001 08:51:09 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (fbk.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.62]) by enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.2) with ESMTP id IAA28840; Tue, 15 May 2001 08:51:09 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk42-7 (fbk42-7.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.77]) by fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id IAA04659; Tue, 15 May 2001 08:51:09 +0200 From: "Christian Barth" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, Ben Roberts Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 08:51:08 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: PDC with Samba 2.2.0 Message-ID: <3B00EDFC.25688.187653@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <3B009E65.1751ECB9@rsp.com.au> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > Hi, > > I just noticed the thread regarding 'procedure is out of range' error > messg. I remember getting this error when I was setting up samba a few > weeks ago. Now I can't seem to get that far at all. After rebulding my > server, I now get the error message 'credentials conflict' ...blah, > blah, blah... Disconnect all network connections (drives, printers, ..) befor trying to join the domain. Christian > When joining the domain using the root account. I remember > fixing this, but I can't seem to now. Im using samba 2.2.0 and have > machine$ and username in passwd and smbpasswd. Can anyone refresh my > memory and help me get to the next problem? ('procedure is out of > range') :) > > Thanks, > > Ben > > -- > Ben Roberts > > Rising Sun Pictures [www.rsp.com.au] > 44 High Street, Kensington, 5068 > South Australia, Australia > P +61 8 8364 6074 > F +61 8 8364 6075 > _______________________________________________________________________ In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates? (SUN) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailout1-1.nyroc.rr.com (mailout1-1.nyroc.rr.com [24.92.226.146]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA190465B for ; Mon, 14 May 2001 23:51:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from qwerty (roc-204-210-158-163.rochester.rr.com [204.210.158.163]) by mailout1-1.nyroc.rr.com (8.11.2/RoadRunner 1.03) with SMTP id f4F6ol027836; Tue, 15 May 2001 02:50:48 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jason Coene" To: "Ben Roberts" , Subject: RE: PDC with Samba 2.2.0 Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 02:51:27 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <3B009E65.1751ECB9@rsp.com.au> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Ben, The Cridentials conflict error occurs when you already have a connection to the server (in one way or another). You may already have a connection to the server. Just Disconnect all mapped drives. (net use /DELETE * /YES) Make sure you are not in the same domain as the server. (ie if the domain is MYDOM, change the computer into the SOMEWG workgroup) you should never go from WORKGROUP "MYNET" to DOMAIN "MYNET". Reboot the pc and try joining again with the root / pw combination. make sure the root / pw combo is in smbpasswd. Regards, Jason >RE: >I just noticed the thread regarding 'procedure is out of range' error >messg. I remember getting this error when I was setting up samba a few >weeks ago. Now I can't seem to get that far at all. After rebulding my >server, I now get the error message 'credentials conflict' ...blah, >blah, blah... When joining the domain using the root account. I remember >fixing this, but I can't seem to now. Im using samba 2.2.0 and have >machine$ and username in passwd and smbpasswd. Can anyone refresh my >memory and help me get to the next problem? ('procedure is out of >range') :) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from akira.rsp.com.au (akira.rsp.com.au [203.32.218.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDA2546C1 for ; Mon, 14 May 2001 23:53:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dogmatix (dogmatix.rsp.com.au [10.5.0.18]) by akira.rsp.com.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA27321; Tue, 15 May 2001 16:24:23 +0930 (CST) Message-ID: <008701c0dd0b$afd5d860$1200050a@dogmatix> From: "Ben Roberts" To: "Jason Coene" , References: Subject: Re: PDC with Samba 2.2.0 Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 16:23:02 +0930 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Yeah, thats right. Thanks for your help guys... onto the next hurdle :) cheers. Ben ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jason Coene" To: "Ben Roberts" ; Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 4:21 PM Subject: RE: PDC with Samba 2.2.0 > Ben, > > The Cridentials conflict error occurs when you already have a connection to > the server (in one way or another). > > You may already have a connection to the server. Just Disconnect > all mapped drives. (net use /DELETE * /YES) > > Make sure you are not in the same domain as the server. (ie if > the domain is MYDOM, change the computer into the SOMEWG workgroup) > > you should never go from WORKGROUP "MYNET" to DOMAIN "MYNET". > > Reboot the pc and try joining again with the root / pw combination. > make sure the root / pw combo is in smbpasswd. > > Regards, > > Jason > > > >RE: > >I just noticed the thread regarding 'procedure is out of range' error > >messg. I remember getting this error when I was setting up samba a few > >weeks ago. Now I can't seem to get that far at all. After rebulding my > >server, I now get the error message 'credentials conflict' ...blah, > >blah, blah... When joining the domain using the root account. I remember > >fixing this, but I can't seem to now. Im using samba 2.2.0 and have > >machine$ and username in passwd and smbpasswd. Can anyone refresh my > >memory and help me get to the next problem? ('procedure is out of > >range') :) > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from obelix.lci.at (obelix.lci.at [195.70.245.111]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B13C847D9 for ; Tue, 15 May 2001 00:48:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 2anecon01 ([195.70.245.213]) by obelix.lci.at with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.1600); Tue, 15 May 2001 09:49:29 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Paul Ivancsics Organization: Anecon To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: smbmount - 1st steps Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 09:50:05 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01051509500500.05589@2anecon01> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 May 2001 07:49:29.0497 (UTC) FILETIME=[924C6090:01C0DD13] Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I am about to introduce a linux workstation into an NT network. 1) I can mount a share on an NT server as root, but not as a user: # smbount //server/share /mnt -ousername=username/workgroup%passwd load_client_codepage: filename /usr/lib/samba/codepages/codepage.850 does not exist. load_unicode_map: filename /usr/lib/samba/codepages/unicode_map.850 does not exist. cannot mount on /mnt: Die Operation ist nicht erlaubt (Means "no permission") smbmnt failed: 1 mount.smbfs: ioctl failed, res=-1 Could not umount /mnt: Das Argument ist ung?ltig 2) When i mount as root, all users but root only have rx permission, although the share allows for write access. This is Suse 7.1, smbclnt 2.0.7 Any help would be appreciated Paul Ivancsics Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ns3.tstt.net.tt (ns3.tstt.net.tt [196.3.132.3]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 24D8C420E for ; Tue, 15 May 2001 05:13:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 76350 invoked from network); 15 May 2001 12:14:35 -0000 Received: from cuscon3847.tstt.net.tt (HELO octa8on) (me@209.94.216.115) by ns3.tstt.net.tt with SMTP; 15 May 2001 12:14:35 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Christien Bunting Organization: Bunting and Associates To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Win9x accessing shares on WinNT/Win2k. Account Expired ???? Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 04:13:33 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01051504133301.04466@octa8on> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ "Account has expired" I understand this is a bug in 2.2.0 Final. Can anyone give me an Idea as to when a patch will be released and or version 2.2.1 of Samba ? BTW. Great work on the other hand. -- Christien Bunting Bunting and Associates The Linux Professionals in The Caribbean http://linux.co.tt chris@linux.co.tt Kmail the Best Mail User Agent Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ns3.tstt.net.tt (ns3.tstt.net.tt [196.3.132.3]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B35664272 for ; Tue, 15 May 2001 05:15:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 61660 invoked from network); 15 May 2001 12:16:16 -0000 Received: from cuscon3847.tstt.net.tt (HELO octa8on) (me@209.94.216.115) by ns3.tstt.net.tt with SMTP; 15 May 2001 12:16:16 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Christien Bunting Organization: Bunting and Associates To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Win9x accessing shares on WinNT/Win2k. Account Expired ???? Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 04:15:14 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01051504151402.04466@octa8on> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ "Account has expired" I understand this is a bug in 2.2.0 Final. Can anyone give me an Idea as to when a patch will be released and or version 2.2.1 of Samba ? BTW. Great work on the other hand. -- Christien Bunting Bunting and Associates The Linux Professionals in The Caribbean http://linux.co.tt chris@linux.co.tt Kmail the Best Mail User Agent Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from pm06sm.rst.cw.net (PM06SM.RST.CW.NET [204.71.247.141]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51FB34F11 for ; Tue, 15 May 2001 05:29:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Blackfoot.patapsco ([206.99.206.98]) by PM06SM.RST.CW.NET (PMDF V6.0-24 #42207) with ESMTP id <0GDD02Q0XMQBQA@PM06SM.RST.CW.NET> for samba-ntdom@samba.org; Tue, 15 May 2001 12:30:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from patapsco.com (bendigo.patapsco [192.9.200.190]) by Blackfoot.patapsco (8.9.3/8.8.7) with SMTP id IAA17663 for ; Tue, 15 May 2001 08:30:02 -0400 Received: by patapsco.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.5 (863.2 5-20-1999)) id 85256A4D.0044AAD1 ; Tue, 15 May 2001 08:30:01 -0400 Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 08:29:56 -0400 From: Joe_Pfaltzgraff@patapsco.com Subject: Re: latest results from testing SAMBA_2_2 To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Message-id: <85256A4D.0044A92B.00@patapsco.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline X-Lotus-FromDomain: PATAPSCO Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Joe Pfaltzgraff@PATAPSCO 05/15/2001 08:29 AM Has the problem of user accounts listing as \\PDC\username vs. \\Domain\username been taken care of? Gerald Carter wrote: > > Just as an FYI... > > I have finished testing the following pieces PDC of functionality with the > latest SAMBA_2_2 code and all seems well. (both --without-pam and > --with-pam). PAM functionality tested on RedHat 6.2 with pam_pwdb.so. > > o domain logons from all Windows clients > o user lists for Win9x in user mode security > o adding/deleting/changing shares from Server Manager > o browsing/accessing shares on NT4/Win2k members > servers in a Samba domain > o logon scripts > o Windows NT4 style system policies > o 'domain admin group' parameter > > So looks like things are going for 2.2.1. What did I forget? > Back to work.... Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from obelix.lci.at (obelix.lci.at [195.70.245.111]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 902C14F25 for ; Tue, 15 May 2001 05:57:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 2anecon01 ([195.70.245.213]) by obelix.lci.at with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.1600); Tue, 15 May 2001 14:58:28 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Paul Ivancsics Organization: Anecon To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: smbmount - 1st steps Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 14:59:08 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01051514590800.00583@2anecon01> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 May 2001 12:58:28.0824 (UTC) FILETIME=[BC992D80:01C0DD3E] Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I am about to introduce a linux workstation into an NT network. 1) I can mount a share on an NT server as root, but not as a user: # smbount //server/share /mnt -ousername=username/workgroup%passwd load_client_codepage: filename /usr/lib/samba/codepages/codepage.850 does not exist. load_unicode_map: filename /usr/lib/samba/codepages/unicode_map.850 does not exist. cannot mount on /mnt: Die Operation ist nicht erlaubt (Means "no permission") smbmnt failed: 1 mount.smbfs: ioctl failed, res=-1 Could not umount /mnt: Das Argument ist ung?ltig 2) When i mount as root, all users but root only have rx permission, although the share allows for write access. This is Suse 7.1, kernel 2.4, smbclnt 2.0.7 Any help would be appreciated Paul Ivancsics Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mail.valinux.com (mail.valinux.com [198.186.202.175]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 197874F4B for ; Tue, 15 May 2001 06:17:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from beefcake.hdqt.valinux.com ([10.1.0.14] helo=shells.valinux.com ident=mail) by mail.valinux.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 14zej7-0001Kf-00; Tue, 15 May 2001 06:19:01 -0700 Received: from gcarter (helo=localhost) by shells.valinux.com with local-esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 14zej6-0006Dz-00; Tue, 15 May 2001 06:19:00 -0700 Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 06:19:00 -0700 (PDT) From: Gerald Carter To: Cc: Subject: Re: latest results from testing SAMBA_2_2 In-Reply-To: <85256A4D.0044A92B.00@patapsco.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Tue, 15 May 2001 Joe_Pfaltzgraff@patapsco.com wrote: > Joe Pfaltzgraff@PATAPSCO > 05/15/2001 08:29 AM > > Has the problem of user accounts listing as \\PDC\username vs. \\Domain\username > been taken care of? Yes. But this only occurs when Samba is acting as a PDC. Could you test the CVS code and make sure though? Cheers, jerry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from BASTION.HWK-DO.DE (unknown [62.72.65.163]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81B884233 for ; Tue, 15 May 2001 06:22:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from root@localhost) by BASTION.HWK-DO.DE (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA13761 for ; Tue, 15 May 2001 14:26:52 GMT Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 15:22:43 +0200 From: Daniel Sandmeier X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.51) UNREG / CD5BF9353B3B7091 Reply-To: Daniel Sandmeier Organization: Handwerkskammer Dortmund Message-ID: <154115309586.20010515152243@hwk-do.de> To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Win9x accessing shares on WinNT/Win2k. Account Expired ???? In-Reply-To: <01051504133301.04466@octa8on> References: <01051504133301.04466@octa8on> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hallo Christien, Tuesday, May 15, 2001, 10:13:33 AM, gabst Du zum Besten: > "Account has expired" > I understand this is a bug in 2.2.0 Final. > Can anyone give me an Idea as to when a patch will be released and or version > 2.2.1 of Samba ? I think it is allready fixed in the CVS version!!! > BTW. Great work on the other hand. -- MfG, Daniel Sandmeier mailto:Daniel.Sandmeier@hwk-do.de We All live in a yellow subroutine! Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ingw.walter-becker.de (ingw.Walter-Becker.DE [194.175.105.83]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B907B4F85 for ; Tue, 15 May 2001 06:31:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ingw.walter-becker.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA01133 for ; Tue, 15 May 2001 15:35:57 +0200 Message-ID: <3B013190.A8D5740F@walter-becker.de> Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 15:39:28 +0200 From: Uwe Thiel X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.18 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Samba 2.2.0 no papersize A4 selectable (bug?) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, I have printing problems with 2.2.0 (release). There is no way to choose A4 as papersize in any printer properties. In the Papersize-list of the printserver-list there is only A4small selectable. Looking in the source code, there are entries in nt-printing.h and nt-printing.c for A4 and A4small. I changed the nt_printing.h and nt_printing.c and now, I can choose A4, but no LETTER.All other papersizes are selectable Could it be that the define-value of 9 makes the problems? Is that a known bug (evtl. patched in cvs-version of samba)? I did the following changes: nt_printing.h: #define PAPER_FIRST PAPER_A4 /* here was: PAPER_LETTER */ <---- #define PAPER_A4 1 /* A4 210 x 297 mm (value was 9) */ <---- #define PAPER_LETTERSMALL 2 /* Letter Small 8 1/2 x 11 in */ #define PAPER_TABLOID 3 /* Tabloid 11 x 17 in */ #define PAPER_LEDGER 4 /* Ledger 17 x 11 in */ #define PAPER_LEGAL 5 /* Legal 8 1/2 x 14 in */ #define PAPER_STATEMENT 6 /* Statement 5 1/2 x 8 1/2 in */ #define PAPER_EXECUTIVE 7 /* Executive 7 1/4 x 10 1/2 in */ #define PAPER_A3 8 /* A3 297 x 420 mm */ #define PAPER_LETTER 9 /* Letter 8 1/2 x 11 in (value was 1) */ <---- /* #define PAPER_A4 9 A4 210 x 297 mm (removed) */ nt_printing.c: static nt_forms_struct default_forms[] = { {"A4",0x1,0x33450,0x48828,0x0,0x0,0x33450,0x48828}, <----was: {"Letter", 0x2, 0x34b5b,.....} {"Letter",0x1,0x34b5c,0x44368,0x0,0x0,0x34b5c,0x44368}, {"Letter Small",0x1,0x34b5c,0x44368,0x0,0x0,0x34b5c,0x44368}, {"Tabloid",0x1,0x44368,0x696b8,0x0,0x0,0x44368,0x696b8}, {"Ledger",0x1,0x696b8,0x44368,0x0,0x0,0x696b8,0x44368}, {"Legal",0x1,0x34b5c,0x56d10,0x0,0x0,0x34b5c,0x56d10}, {"Statement",0x1,0x221b4,0x34b5c,0x0,0x0,0x221b4,0x34b5c}, {"Executive",0x1,0x2cf56,0x411cc,0x0,0x0,0x2cf56,0x411cc}, {"A3",0x1,0x48828,0x668a0,0x0,0x0,0x48828,0x668a0}, {"Letter",0x1,0x34b5c,0x44368,0x0,0x0,0x34b5c,0x44368}, <---was: {"A4",0x1,0x....} {"A5",0x1,0x24220,0x33450,0x0,0x0,0x24220,0x33450}, -- Uwe Thiel Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from saratoga.lib.ny.us (saratoga.lib.ny.us [208.20.128.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BEAC4F9C for ; Tue, 15 May 2001 06:39:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from josh@localhost) by saratoga.lib.ny.us (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA04753 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Tue, 15 May 2001 09:40:38 -0400 Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 09:40:38 -0400 From: Josh Kuperman To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: my admin user lacks priviledge to add machine to domain Message-ID: <20010515094038.A4654@saratoga.lib.ny.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I needed to support some Win2K workstations so I upgraded from 2.0.7 to 2.2. Actually I removed the old rpm and compiled the new 2.2. The 2.0.7 was experimental so I didn't really worry about trashing anything. I'm compliling from source on a Sparc10 with RedHat 6.2. Everything seemed to be OK, I checked for typos with testparm, etc. I recreated the machine accounts because I couldn't connect and figured I had somehow messed up the smbpasswd file. In any case, I have a workstation named WORKST1. I have an admin account on the workstation called 'admin' and an administrator account on the SAMBA 2.2 PDC called 'admin' both have the same password (not a requirement except for me to remember it.) I added the machine with smbpasswd -a -m WORKST1$ no problem. I go to WORKST1 log in as admin and try to join the domain. I get the error message "Unable to addd or change accounts on the domain. The account information does not grant sufficient priviledge to create or change accounts." So somehow I think I don't have a valid administrator account. I check my smbd log and see the following two messages: [2001/05/15 09:21:01, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(375) admin logged in as admin user (root privileges) [2001/05/15 09:21:01, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c:_samr_set_userinfo(2301) _samr_set_userinfo: Unable to get smbpasswd entry for uid 0 I check the SAMBA project documentation: Where it says, at least at the mirror I was using, " you should refer to the domain admin users and domain admin group smb.conf parameters ..." which when I look those up say to ask for help on the list as far as I can tell. domain admin group (G) domain admin users (G) This is an EXPERIMENTAL parameter that is part of the unfinished Samba NT Domain Controller Code. It may be removed in a later release. To work with the latest code builds that may have more support for Samba NT Domain Controller functionality please subscribe to the mailing list samba-ntdom available by visiting the web page at http://lists.samba.org/. -- Josh Kuperman josh@saratoga.lib.ny.us Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hall.horizondata.com (hall.horizondata.com [208.184.250.3]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A93A44458 for ; Tue, 15 May 2001 07:44:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hdc069w ([208.184.250.26]) by hall.horizondata.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with SMTP id JAA25462 for ; Tue, 15 May 2001 09:46:35 -0400 From: "Paul Seymour" To: Subject: Ports Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 10:45:17 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <20010515094038.A4654@saratoga.lib.ny.us> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Can anyone here tell me what ports are being used by samba? ---- Paul Seymour Network Administrator seymourp@horizondata.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.econia.com (mail.econia.com [213.168.80.83]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDDE14F16 for ; Tue, 15 May 2001 09:33:46 -0700 (PDT) Subject: saving profiles: Error was No such file or directory To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.7 March 21, 2001 Message-ID: From: andre.doehn@econia.com Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 18:34:58 +0200 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on koeln02/econia-ext(Release 5.0.7 |March 21, 2001) at 15.05.2001 18:35:01 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ hi list, iam using samba 2.2 (cvs from today) on a linux machine with kernel 2.2.19 acting as a PDC. (--with-pam --with-syslog --with-quotas --prefix=/usr/local/samba22acl --with-utmp --with-acl-support --with-smbwrapper) when iam trying to logout from win2k client machine i get these messages like (iam using servers stored profiles): smbd[18032]: open_directory: unable to create adoehn/Anwendungsdaten/Identities/{30B5292A-519D-40E4-96AF-F2C87F9A1AFC}. Error was No such file or directory smbd[18032]: smbd/open.c:open_directory(1037) smbd[18032]: open_directory: unable to create adoehn/Anwendungsdaten/Microsoft/SystemCertificates/My/CTLs. Error was No such file or directory smbd[18032]: smbd/open.c:open_directory(1037) smbd[18032]: open_directory: unable to create adoehn/Anwendungsdaten/Microsoft/Internet Explorer/Quick Launch. Error was No such file or directory smbd[18032]: smbd/open.c:open_directory(1037) smbd[18032]: open_directory: unable to create adoehn/Favoriten/Medium. Error was No such file or directory smbd[18032]: smbd/open.c:open_directory(1037) smbd[18032]: open_directory: unable to create adoehn/Eigene Dateien/Eigene Bilder. Error was No such file or directory smbd[18032]: smbd/open.c:open_directory(1037) smbd[18032]: open_directory: unable to create adoehn/Startmen\201/Programme/Autostart. Error was No such file or directory smbd[18032]: smbd/open.c:open_directory(1037) smbd[18032]: open_directory: unable to create adoehn/Startmen\201/Programme/Zubeh\224r/Systemprogramme. Error was No such file or directory but all directories (with now correct permission bits ;-)) are already there??! Does anyone where teh problem is located? here is the part from my configuration: [global] security = user status = yes workgroup = NTDOM netbios name = cgn-pdc interfaces = eth0 lo bind interfaces only = yes server string = Samba %v running on %h wins support = yes time server = yes encrypt passwords = yes domain logons = yes domain master = yes local master = yes preferred master = yes logon script = scripts\logon.bat logon home = \\%L\homes logon path = \\%L\Profiles\%U logon drive = z: domain admin group = @adm ;add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -g smbcl -c Machine -d /dev/null -s /bin/false %m$ share modes=no os level=65 keepalive = 60 name resolve order = wins bcast host nt acl support = yes log level = 10 log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m socket options = IPTOS_LOWDELAY TCP_NODELAY [Profiles] comment = Windows User Profiles path = /share/profiles guest ok = no browseable = no writeable = yes create mask = 0700 directory mask = 0700 locking = no thanks! andre Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp.steinmetznet.com (smtp.steinmetznet.com [38.212.142.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B68ED4FDF for ; Tue, 15 May 2001 10:44:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from steinmetznet.com (mcduff [38.212.142.70]) by smtp.steinmetznet.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA12883 for ; Tue, 15 May 2001 12:45:20 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <3B01791C.42455494@steinmetznet.com> Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 12:44:44 -0600 From: Robert Steinmetz Reply-To: rob@steinmetznet.com Organization: Steinmetz & Associates X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Samba NT Domain Subject: Stste of Roaming Profiles Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I have been following this list and am confused about the state of support for NT 4.0 roaming profiles in Samba 2.2.0. Could some one please summarize it for me. I have seen posting indicating that there are some bug. What I would like to know is if roaming profiles can be successfully implemented using 2.2.0. I would particularly like to hear for anyone who has gotten them working. I have been trying for sometime and can't seem to get them fully functional, but my problems may be configuration. -- Robert Steinmetz AIA Principal Steinmetz & Associates Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp.steinmetznet.com (smtp.steinmetznet.com [38.212.142.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43BB34FFA for ; Tue, 15 May 2001 11:43:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from steinmetznet.com (mcduff [38.212.142.70]) by smtp.steinmetznet.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA13191 for ; Tue, 15 May 2001 13:44:36 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <3B018701.DBA5CFC2@steinmetznet.com> Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 13:44:02 -0600 From: Robert Steinmetz Reply-To: rob@steinmetznet.com Organization: Steinmetz & Associates X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Samba NT Domain Subject: Samba 2.2.0 Roaming Profile Problems Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I am having trouble getting roaming profiles to work properly and with some other things related to domain logins. My problems major problems are: 1) Users cannot set a default printer. This keeps some applications from working properly 2) Profiles can be saved and copied to the server but do not appear save some information such as desktop settings ( Wallpaper is the most obvious ) 3) Very slow saving of profiles when users logout. I have included the relevant portions ( I hope ) of my smb.conf file below. The server is a SuSE Linux machine samba was compiled from source using package defaults. I hope I overlooked something simple. If more information is needed please ask. [global] ; ; Basic Server Settings ; netbiosname = OBERON workgroup = NEWORLEANS os level = 64 prefered master = yes domain master = yes local master = yes ; ; Security Setting ; security = user encrypt passwords = yes ; ; Domain Settings ; domain logons = yes wins support = yes time server = yes logon path = \\OBERON\profiles\%u logon drive = U: logon home = \\HAMLET\%U logon script = %U.bat ; ; Global Standard Settings ; printing = bsd printcap name = /etc/printcap load printers = yes guest account = arris log file = /usr/local/samba/var/log.%m ; You will need a world readable lock directory and "share modes=yes" ; if you want to support the file sharing modes for multiple users ; of the same files lock directory = /usr/local/samba/var/locks share modes = yes ; ; Domain Controller Shares ; [netlogon] path = /usr/local/samba/netlogon writable = no write list = administrator [profiles] path= /usr/local/samba/profile writable = yes create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 -- Robert Steinmetz AIA Principal Steinmetz & Associates Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from lion.cs.yorku.ca (lion.cs.yorku.ca [130.63.92.25]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4670C478D for ; Tue, 15 May 2001 11:57:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [130.63.92.56] (kangaroo.cs.yorku.ca) by lion.cs.yorku.ca id 18291; Tue, 15 May 2001 14:58:22 Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 14:58:22 -0400 (EDT) From: Jason Keltz To: Subject: The procedure number is out of range Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I am running Samba-2.2.0 with a test domain, and am trying to join the domain from a Win2k client. I have already added the machine to both /etc/passwd and smbpasswd files through our customized user system. If I use "root" for authorization with the appropriate password, the machine becomes a part of the domain successfully. If I use my regular tech group account (I added this line to the smb.conf file: domain admin group = @tech), I get the error message "The procedure number is out of range". I've read many messages from this list and have read the FAQs. What I cannot determine is whether this behaviour, which was supposed to be known to the pre-release code is actually still existing in 2.2.0. Can anyone explain why *any* authentication is necessary if the entry is in /etc/passwd and smbpasswd already? I've tried to up the debugging level, but the data in the log file really doesn't make all that much sense to me. I am interested in knowing, once and for all, whether: a) For the sake of people who are running their own scripts to add the machine to /etc/passwd, is a "root" login still the only account that can be used in the present 2.2.0 release? b) For my sake, if the account is already there, why is any authentication necessary at all? Thanks for any information you can provide.. Jason Keltz jas@cs.yorku.ca Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from lion.cs.yorku.ca (lion.cs.yorku.ca [130.63.92.25]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E14D4FFA for ; Tue, 15 May 2001 12:05:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [130.63.92.56] (kangaroo.cs.yorku.ca) by lion.cs.yorku.ca id 18726; Tue, 15 May 2001 15:06:17 Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 15:06:17 -0400 (EDT) From: Jason Keltz To: Subject: server script execution on login Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I want to be able to control which users can connect to which PDCs, essentially being able to specify which machines a user can login to. Is there a mechnism in Samba similar to the 'logon script' that, instead of executing on the PC would execute on the Unix server after/during login to do this? I want to be able to pass to this script the user who is logging in, and machine they are logging into, and have the script determine whether the user should be able to login or not. (Though I don't need this particular functionality, I could see how this could be extended to enable access time restrictions on accounts as well, if the need is there). I don't see any mention to this in the list, or the documentation, and yet I can't believe that nobody else would be interested in this functionality. I want to use the PDC for the consolidated usernames/passwords/profiles, but I don't want to allow every user access to every machine. Thanks for any help that you can provide! Jason Keltz jas@cs.yorku.ca Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from ren-5.cais.net (ren-5.cais.net [205.252.14.80]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 403E54C6B for ; Tue, 15 May 2001 12:15:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jwb (63-216-96-226.sdsl.cais.net [63.216.96.226]) by ren-5.cais.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f4FJGv876694; Tue, 15 May 2001 15:16:57 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <006401c0dd8c$2b054720$1d01a8c0@gesinc.com> From: "James W. Beauchamp" To: "Jason Keltz" , References: Subject: Re: server script execution on login Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 15:12:37 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Jason: Will the root preexec and root postexec commands accomplish what you want? James ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jason Keltz" To: Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 12:06 PM Subject: server script execution on login > I want to be able to control which users can connect to which PDCs, > essentially being able to specify which machines a user can login to. Is > there a mechnism in Samba similar to the 'logon script' that, instead of > executing on the PC would execute on the Unix server after/during login to > do this? I want to be able to pass to this script the user who is logging > in, and machine they are logging into, and have the script determine > whether the user should be able to login or not. (Though I don't need > this particular functionality, I could see how this could be extended to > enable access time restrictions on accounts as well, if the need is > there). I don't see any mention to this in the list, or the > documentation, and yet I can't believe that nobody else would be > interested in this functionality. I want to use the PDC for the > consolidated usernames/passwords/profiles, but I don't want to allow every > user access to every machine. > > Thanks for any help that you can provide! > > Jason Keltz > jas@cs.yorku.ca > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from fep03-svc.swip.net (fep03.swip.net [130.244.199.131]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A4194A8B for ; Tue, 15 May 2001 12:23:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from unjo.com ([212.151.16.14]) by fep03-svc.swip.net with ESMTP id <20010515192550.DSDX1387.fep03-svc.swip.net@unjo.com> for ; Tue, 15 May 2001 21:25:50 +0200 Message-ID: <3B0191DA.1050B871@unjo.com> Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 22:30:18 +0200 From: Hans Almqvist Organization: Unjo AB X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en,sv MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org" Subject: Performance issue Samba 2.2.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, I am running Samba 2.2.0 as PDC on RH-6.0 with NT clients. After upgrading from 2.0.7 I find that printing and file access performance has decreased significantly. (A printer job takes a lot more time before starting to print and an application I run takes 30-40 sec. before starting. Did take 10 sec. with 2.0.7 ) Looking at the hub I get the impression that the communication freezes. To confirm, I did a revert back to 2.0.7 and got the performance I was used to. Has anyone else had the same experience ? Thanks, Hasse [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of hasse.vcf] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailhub.iastate.edu (mailhub.iastate.edu [129.186.1.102]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D9F75028 for ; Tue, 15 May 2001 12:56:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Debug (webmail-6.iastate.edu [129.186.1.78]) by mailhub.iastate.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA08809; Tue, 15 May 2001 14:58:06 -0500 Message-Id: <200105151958.OAA08809@mailhub.iastate.edu> To: Jason Keltz Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org From: Justin D Davis Subject: Re: The procedure number is out of range Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 14:58:05 CST6DST X-Mailer: Endymion MailMan Professional Edition v3.0.14 ISU Version mp5 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Someone please correct me if I am wrong, but I believe this is happening because the account for the machine client$ is not the account of the user who is logging in i.e. "admin" that user has no permission to execute an smbpasswd for the machine user of client$, and this is why root is still required. Someone should probably write a routine that addresses this issue. In case you were wondering, even if the client is already in the smbpasswd, the password is reset when the machine is joined to the domain, and then the machine password is reset at some specific interval of time (which if memory serves me can be changed in smb.conf). The reason authentication is necessary at all is because NT/win2k refuses to use a null password for the machine account, so the password change must be executed as root. JD > I am running Samba-2.2.0 with a test domain, and am trying to join the > domain from a Win2k client. > > I have already added the machine to both /etc/passwd and smbpasswd > files through our customized user system. > > If I use "root" for authorization with the appropriate password, the > machine becomes a part of the domain successfully. > > If I use my regular tech group account (I added this line to the smb.conf > file: domain admin group = @tech), I get the error message "The procedure > number is out of range". > > I've read many messages from this list and have read the FAQs. What I > cannot determine is whether this behaviour, which was supposed to be known > to the pre-release code is actually still existing in 2.2.0. Can anyone > explain why *any* authentication is necessary if the entry is in > /etc/passwd and smbpasswd already? > > I've tried to up the debugging level, but the data in the log file really > doesn't make all that much sense to me. > > I am interested in knowing, once and for all, whether: > a) For the sake of people who are running their own scripts to > add the machine to /etc/passwd, is a "root" login still the only > account that can be used in the present 2.2.0 release? > b) For my sake, if the account is already there, why is any authentication > necessary at all? > > Thanks for any information you can provide.. > > Jason Keltz > jas@cs.yorku.ca > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from ren-3.cais.net (ren-3.cais.net [205.252.14.78]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EA4E5074 for ; Tue, 15 May 2001 13:14:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jwb (63-216-96-226.sdsl.cais.net [63.216.96.226]) by ren-3.cais.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f4FKFCr90401; Tue, 15 May 2001 16:15:12 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <009401c0dd94$50149b80$1d01a8c0@gesinc.com> From: "James W. Beauchamp" To: "Jason Keltz" , References: Subject: Re: server script execution on login Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 16:10:09 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Jason: Sorry but I don't think I'm much help beyond just pointing you in the right direction :( . I have not had to use the root pre/post commands so am not familiar with them but maybe someone else on the list can pick it up from here.... I'll be following the thread though because I can see wanting to do something similar myself eventually. Let me know how it comes out. James ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jason Keltz" To: "James W. Beauchamp" Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 12:58 PM Subject: Re: server script execution on login > Hi James. > > I guess I missed that option. It looks like it should do exactly what I > want! However... if I add to my smb.conf this as a test... > > root preexec = /cs/local/share/samba/smbaccess %u %m > root preexec close = yes > > And place in /cs/local/share/samba/smbaccess .. > > #!/bin/sh > exit 1 > > I don't get logged out when I try to login to the domain. > > Ideas? > > Jason Keltz > jas@cs.yorku.ca > > On Tue, 15 May 2001, James W. Beauchamp wrote: > > > Jason: > > Will the root preexec and root postexec commands accomplish what you want? > > > > James > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Jason Keltz" > > To: > > Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 12:06 PM > > Subject: server script execution on login > > > > > > > I want to be able to control which users can connect to which PDCs, > > > essentially being able to specify which machines a user can login to. Is > > > there a mechnism in Samba similar to the 'logon script' that, instead of > > > executing on the PC would execute on the Unix server after/during login to > > > do this? I want to be able to pass to this script the user who is logging > > > in, and machine they are logging into, and have the script determine > > > whether the user should be able to login or not. (Though I don't need > > > this particular functionality, I could see how this could be extended to > > > enable access time restrictions on accounts as well, if the need is > > > there). I don't see any mention to this in the list, or the > > > documentation, and yet I can't believe that nobody else would be > > > interested in this functionality. I want to use the PDC for the > > > consolidated usernames/passwords/profiles, but I don't want to allow every > > > user access to every machine. > > > > > > Thanks for any help that you can provide! > > > > > > Jason Keltz > > > jas@cs.yorku.ca > > > > > > > > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.sausage.com.au (fatguru.sausage.com.au [203.44.49.141]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A5B694581 for ; Tue, 15 May 2001 19:36:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 31912 invoked by uid 105); 16 May 2001 02:37:35 -0000 Received: from Chris.Odgers@sausage.com by fatguru with qmail-scanner-0.93 (. Clean. Processed in 0.698576 secs); 16/05/2001 12:37:34 Received: from sausage151.sausage.com.au (HELO fatboy.sausage.com.au) (203.44.49.151) by fatguru.sausage.com.au with SMTP; 16 May 2001 02:37:33 -0000 Received: by fatboy.sausage.com.au with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Wed, 16 May 2001 12:37:32 +1000 Message-ID: <9A0F63A07282D4119C4100D0B72017AA7E2C0F@fatboy.sausage.com.a u> From: Chris Odgers To: 'Paul Seymour' , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Ports Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 12:37:31 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Someone else may already have replied, but here's my two cents. 137/138 UDP (nb nameservice and something else, forget what) 139 TCP (netbios over tcp) 445 TCP (possibly, not sure -- NT RPC) > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Seymour [mailto:seymourp@horizondata.com] > Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 12:45 AM > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: Ports > > > Can anyone here tell me what ports are being used by samba? > > ---- > Paul Seymour > Network Administrator > seymourp@horizondata.com > CAUTION - This message may contain privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message is prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.valinux.com (mail.valinux.com [198.186.202.175]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D17E50C3 for ; Tue, 15 May 2001 19:40:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from beefcake.hdqt.valinux.com ([10.1.0.14] helo=shells.valinux.com ident=mail) by mail.valinux.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 14zrFj-0000Th-00; Tue, 15 May 2001 19:41:31 -0700 Received: from gcarter (helo=localhost) by shells.valinux.com with local-esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 14zrFj-0007El-00; Tue, 15 May 2001 19:41:31 -0700 Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 19:41:31 -0700 (PDT) From: Gerald Carter To: Chris Odgers Cc: 'Paul Seymour' , Subject: RE: Ports In-Reply-To: <9A0F63A07282D4119C4100D0B72017AA7E2C0F@fatboy.sausage.com. a u> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Wed, 16 May 2001, Chris Odgers wrote: > Someone else may already have replied, but here's my two cents. > > 137/138 UDP (nb nameservice and something else, forget what) > 139 TCP (netbios over tcp) > 445 TCP (possibly, not sure -- NT RPC) 445/tcp is netbios-less CIFS used by Windows 2000 clients. Neither HEAD nor SAMBA_2_2 implement this functionality right now. MS-RPC sites on top of named pipes (over SMB/CIFS). I'm ignoring dce/rpc directly over tcp here. Cheers, jerry SAMBA Team Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from indyio.rz.uni-sb.de (indyio.rz.uni-sb.de [134.96.7.3]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ED594BD5 for ; Wed, 16 May 2001 00:02:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from krzsun (krzsun.med-rz.uni-sb.de [134.96.155.18]) by indyio.rz.uni-sb.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA1025776 for ; Wed, 16 May 2001 09:03:18 +0200 (CST) Received: from ukh3029.med-in.uni-sb.de by krzsun.med-rz.uni-saarland.de (5.x/SMI-SVR4) id AA02011; Wed, 16 May 2001 09:05:00 +0200 Received: from ukh8904 (ukh8904 [134.96.44.13]) by ukh3029.med-in.uni-sb.de (8.8.8+Sun/8.7.1) with SMTP id JAA25526 for ; Wed, 16 May 2001 09:03:17 +0200 (MET DST) From: "Dr. Dieter Becker" To: "mailgruppe SAMBA" Subject: printing with 2.2.0 Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 09:03:20 +0200 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Sirs, I installed the print$ - Directory and the smb.conf-entries following the SAMBA Project documentation. Unfortunately I can't see a "New Driver" Button in this directory. What is wrong? smb.conf: [print$] comment = Netzwerkdrucker |ber Sambaserver path = /usr/local/samba/printers guest ok = yes browseable = yes ;read only = yes write list = db, netroot printer admin = db, netroot and the directory: ukh3029 ~ [557]$ ls -lR /usr/local/samba/printers/ /usr/local/samba/printers/: total 10 drwxr-xr-x 2 db develop 512 May 15 14:25 A32MIPS drwxr-xr-x 2 db develop 512 May 15 14:25 W32ALPHA drwxr-xr-x 2 db develop 512 May 15 14:25 W32PPC drwxr-xr-x 2 db develop 512 May 15 14:05 W32X86 drwxr-xr-x 2 db develop 512 May 15 14:25 WIN40 /usr/local/samba/printers/A32MIPS: total 0 /usr/local/samba/printers/W32ALPHA: total 0 /usr/local/samba/printers/W32PPC: total 0 /usr/local/samba/printers/W32X86: total 0 /usr/local/samba/printers/WIN40: total 0 ukh3029 ~ [558]$ testparm reports no errors: ukh3029 ~ [558]$ /usr/local/samba/bin/testparm Load smb config files from /usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf Processing section "[print$]" Processing section "[homes]" Processing section "[netlogon]" Processing section "[Profiles]" Processing section "[tmpp]" Processing section "[cdrom]" Processing section "[root]" Processing section "[tmpx]" Processing section "[arztbriefe]" Processing section "[winprogs]" Processing section "[winprogsp]" Processing section "[local]" Processing section "[localp]" Processing section "[siam3]" Processing section "[siam_sch]" Loaded services file OK. System: Solaris 2.6 Dr. med. Dipl.-Math. Dieter Becker Medizinische Universitdts- und Poliklinik Innere Medizin III D66421 Homburg ----------------------------------------- Tel: 06841 16 3046 / -3077 Fax: 06841 16 3043 / -3385 Email: db@med-in.uni-sb.de Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from monster.exocore.com (unknown [202.4.186.140]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB3C64BCE for ; Wed, 16 May 2001 00:15:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from shanu@localhost) by monster.exocore.com (8.11.0/8.8.7) id f4G7HJv09001 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Wed, 16 May 2001 12:47:19 +0530 Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 12:47:19 +0530 From: Shanker Balan To: Samba NT Domain Subject: Re: Stste of Roaming Profiles Message-ID: <20010516124719.B8946@monster.exocore.com> Reply-To: Shanker Balan Mail-Followup-To: Samba NT Domain References: <3B01791C.42455494@steinmetznet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3B01791C.42455494@steinmetznet.com>; from rob@steinmetznet.com on Tue, May 15, 2001 at 12:44:44PM -0600 Organisation: Exocore Consulting (P) Ltd Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello: Robert Steinmetz wrote, > I have been following this list and am confused about the state of > support for NT 4.0 roaming profiles in Samba 2.2.0. Could some one > please summarize it for me. I have seen posting indicating that there > are some bug. The profile issue has been fixed in the samba 2.2 CVS tree. > What I would like to know is if roaming profiles can be successfully > implemented using 2.2.0. Wait until 2.2.1 if you are not comfortable with CVS versions. > I would particularly like to hear for anyone who has gotten them > working. I have been trying for sometime and can't seem to get them > fully functional, but my problems may be configuration. It works fine on my test setup. YMMV. -- Shanu - - - - - - - - - - - ( Shanu ) - - Shanker Balan shanu@exocore.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.ic-bremen.de (mail.ic-bremen.de [213.168.207.91]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FD304C35 for ; Wed, 16 May 2001 03:04:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from buero (ben.ic-bremen.de [213.168.207.90]) by mail.ic-bremen.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) with SMTP id MAA13678 for ; Wed, 16 May 2001 12:07:47 +0200 Received: by localhost with Microsoft MAPI; Wed, 16 May 2001 12:07:47 +0200 Message-ID: <01C0DE00.D1F7FB30.js@ic-bremen.de> From: Jens Schwepe To: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: printing via nt-workstation leaves a file "ne00:" Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 12:07:46 +0200 Organization: Internet Center Bremen X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet E-Mail/MAPI - 8.0.0.4211 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ hi, after printing via the nt-workstations (office 97, that is), there is always a file called "ne00:" left in the directory, with zero bytes in size. is it possible to remove this file automatically after the print-job is done, or even suppress the creation of this file ? i'm using samba 2.0.7 with SuSE Linux 6.4 and a hp laserjet 1100 (printer driver lj4dith). thnx in advance Jens Schwepe Internet Center Bremen http://www.ic-bremen.de js@ic-bremen.de Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hostfw.transiciel.com (mailhost.transiciel.com [194.2.163.125]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0709C4BA3 for ; Wed, 16 May 2001 04:14:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by hostfw.transiciel.com; id MAA04810; Wed, 16 May 2001 12:55:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from defel.intranet.transiciel.com(10.2.8.17) by hostfw.transiciel.com via smap (4.0) id xma004802; Wed, 16 May 2001 12:55:24 +0200 Received: from cr2a-di.fr by mailhost.cr2a-di.fr (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA08733 for ; Wed, 16 May 2001 13:10:43 +0200 Received: from rsanchez ([10.131.10.248]) by cr2a-di.fr (8.11.0/8.7.3) with SMTP id f4GB9V401499 for ; Wed, 16 May 2001 13:09:31 +0200 Message-ID: <000a01c0ddf1$0b95d700$f80a830a@aec> From: "Christian Metge" To: Subject: Samba 2.0.7, 2 subnets, 1 firewall and NT4 server Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 12:14:51 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, my configuration is : - a unix work station on the subnet_1, with samba and a unix_user. - a router (firewall between subnet_1 and subnet_2). - a NT4 server on the subnet_2, with PDC and a NT_user. my problem is : the NT_user want to see on the NT4 server (subnet_2) the $HOME of the unix_user (subnet_1). my question is : how to configure samba, the firewall and the NT4 server? - samba (I suppose : wins server = address IP of NT4 server; usernames map...unix_user=NT_user) - firewall (I suppose : no filter) - NT4 server (I suppose : (?)) a reboot is necessary ? thanks a lot. Christian Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from cliff_a.ccpci.com (cliff_a.ccpci.com [208.229.190.6]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64A5851B6 for ; Wed, 16 May 2001 05:39:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by cliff_a.worldkitchen.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Wed, 16 May 2001 08:32:44 -0400 Message-ID: <1237B4A605ECD4119C9B0002A50A5814014862D6@newman.worldkitche n.com> From: "Yacketta,Ronald J" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: help with ERRnosuchshare Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 08:40:59 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello all! I have a just installed setup a LM 8.0 box with the latest samba 2.2 as of 9pm EST last night. the compile/install went smooth as a babies bottom. I am now running through the DIAGNOSIS.txt and stumbling on the first step. the is what I have done/received on this initial step [root@stratus /root]# smbclient -L stratus added interface ip=24.94.51.135 bcast=24.94.51.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 added interface ip=192.168.13.1 bcast=192.168.13.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 Password: Anonymous login successful Domain=[TRICE] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 2.2.0] tree connect failed: ERRDOS - ERRnosuchshare (You specified an invalid share name) [root@stratus textdocs]# If I try it with the account I added to smbpassword (root) I get this [root@stratus textdocs]# smbclient -L stratus -U root added interface ip=24.94.51.135 bcast=24.94.51.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 added interface ip=192.168.13.1 bcast=192.168.13.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 Password: session setup failed: ERRSRV - ERRbadpw (Bad password - name/password pair in a Tree Connect or Session Setup are invalid.) also strange, if I do a smbclient //stratus/tmp or any other publicly shared directory I am able to connect and get the smb: \> (this only applies to guest (anonymous) connections not using -U username) here is my smb.conf [global] workgroup = TRICE server string = Hell's Kitchen samba server hosts allow = 192.168.13. 127. load printers = no guest account = nobody log file = /usr/local/samba/var/log.%m max log size = 50 security = user socket options = TCP_NODELAY local master = yes os level = 33 wins support = yes wins proxy = yes dns proxy = yes [homes] comment = Home Directories browseable = yes writable = yes [downloads] comment = HK's File Repository path = /download browseable = yes [web] comment = HK's Web Site path = /var/www browseable = yes writable = yes [tmp] comment = Temporary file space path = /tmp read only = no public = yes please advise Regards, Ron == ______ /_____/\ Ronald J. Yacketta /____ \\ \ Solaris System Engineer /_____\ \\ / One Pyrex Place /_____/ \/ / / Elmira, NY 14902 /_____/ / \//\ \_____\//\ / / \_____/ / /\ / Phone: 607-377-8328 \_____/ \\ \ Fax: 607-377-8329 \_____\ \\ Cell: 607-368-0208 \_____\/ email: YackettaRJ@worldkitchen.com == I sense much NT in you. NT leads to Bluescreen. Bluescreen leads to downtime. Downtime leads to suffering. NT is the path to the darkside. Powerful Unix is. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from adsl223.adelaide.on.net.au (adsl223.adelaide.on.net.au [150.101.232.223]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C508E51E2 for ; Wed, 16 May 2001 06:10:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from w95vmware.ns.com (vmwarewin95.ns.aus.com [10.0.0.150]) by adsl223.adelaide.on.net.au (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id f4GGFcD22614; Thu, 17 May 2001 01:45:38 +0930 Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.20010516224203.0104cab0@10.0.2.1> X-Sender: rsharpe@10.0.2.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32) Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 22:42:03 +0900 To: "Yacketta,Ronald J" , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org From: Richard Sharpe Subject: Re: help with ERRnosuchshare In-Reply-To: <01K3NBE165WI012M3E@internode.on.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ At 08:40 AM 5/16/01 -0400, Yacketta,Ronald J wrote: >Hello all! > >I have a just installed setup a LM 8.0 box with the latest samba 2.2 as of >9pm EST last night. >the compile/install went smooth as a babies bottom. I am now running through >the >DIAGNOSIS.txt and stumbling on the first step. > >the is what I have done/received on this initial step > >[root@stratus /root]# smbclient -L stratus >added interface ip=24.94.51.135 bcast=24.94.51.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 >added interface ip=192.168.13.1 bcast=192.168.13.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 >Password: >Anonymous login successful >Domain=[TRICE] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 2.2.0] >tree connect failed: ERRDOS - ERRnosuchshare (You specified an invalid share >name) >[root@stratus textdocs]# What do the log files on the server say? Can you get a trace of the network traffic between the two machines? What is stratus, by the way? Is it a VOS machine? Regards ------- Richard Sharpe, sharpe@ns.aus.com Samba (Team member, www.samba.org), Ethereal (Team member, www.ethereal.com) Contributing author, SAMS Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours Author, Special Edition, Using Samba Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from andira.wanadoo.fr (smtp-abo-3.wanadoo.fr [193.252.19.152]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EBFC4CC5 for ; Wed, 16 May 2001 06:46:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from supertoto (193.251.82.203) by andira.wanadoo.fr; 16 May 2001 15:47:44 +0200 Message-ID: <001801c0de0f$8bcbf850$3266a8c0@cref.dyndns.org> From: "Rodolphe Kapouyan" To: Subject: Is there someone using samba and F-secure antivirus ? Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 15:53:06 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I'm trying to use f-secure with centralized management on a samba share ,and want to known if someone do the same Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.valinux.com (mail.valinux.com [198.186.202.175]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FF505234 for ; Wed, 16 May 2001 06:58:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from beefcake.hdqt.valinux.com ([10.1.0.14] helo=localhost ident=root) by mail.valinux.com with smtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 1501pw-0001DW-00; Wed, 16 May 2001 06:59:36 -0700 Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 09:01:57 -0500 From: Gerald Carter To: Josh Kuperman Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: my admin user lacks priviledge to add machine to domain Message-ID: <20010516090157.G17913@pogo.plainjoe.org> References: <20010515094038.A4654@saratoga.lib.ny.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <20010515094038.A4654@saratoga.lib.ny.us>; from josh@saratoga.lib.ny.us on Tue, May 15, 2001 at 08:40:38 -0500 X-Mailer: Balsa 1.1.4 Content-Length: 2324 Lines: 61 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Tue, 15 May 2001 08:40:38 Josh Kuperman wrote: > > In any case, I have a workstation named WORKST1. I have > an admin account on the workstation called 'admin' and > an administrator account on the SAMBA 2.2 PDC called 'admin' > both have the same password (not a requirement except for > me to remember it.) I added the machine with > > smbpasswd -a -m WORKST1$ > > no problem. I go to WORKST1 log in as admin and try > to join the domain. I get the error message "Unable to addd > or change accounts on the domain. The account information > does not grant sufficient priviledge to create or change > accounts." So somehow I think I don't have a valid > administrator account. > > I check my smbd log and see the following two messages: > > [2001/05/15 09:21:01, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(375) > admin logged in as admin user (root privileges) > > [2001/05/15 09:21:01, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c:_samr_set_userinfo(2301) > _samr_set_userinfo: Unable to get smbpasswd entry for uid 0 > > > I check the SAMBA project documentation: > > Where it says, at least at the mirror I was using, " you > should refer to the domain admin users and domain admin > group smb.conf parameters ..." which when I look those up > say to ask for help on the list as far as I can tell. Did you read the PDC HOWTO in Samba-HOWTO-Collections.pdf? I think it points out that you must be logged as a root account (not just an admin user). > domain admin group (G) > domain admin users (G) > This is an EXPERIMENTAL parameter... Yeah. These should have been documented and tested better prior to the 2.2.0 release. The 'domain admin users' does not work and has been removed from the 2.2 CVS code. 'domain admin group' does work and accespts a string of users and groups just list 'valid users'. Cheers, jerry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.valinux.com (mail.valinux.com [198.186.202.175]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCB4C526B for ; Wed, 16 May 2001 07:05:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from beefcake.hdqt.valinux.com ([10.1.0.14] helo=localhost ident=root) by mail.valinux.com with smtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 1501wN-0001av-00; Wed, 16 May 2001 07:06:15 -0700 Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 09:08:36 -0500 From: Gerald Carter To: Marco Vittone Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Again on name mapping Message-ID: <20010516090836.K17913@pogo.plainjoe.org> References: <000701c0d292$890c0b60$3d941997@vittonelibero.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <000701c0d292$890c0b60$3d941997@vittonelibero.it>; from marco.vittone@infinito.it on Tue, May 01, 2001 at 18:00:36 -0500 X-Mailer: Balsa 1.1.4 Content-Length: 1074 Lines: 27 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Tue, 01 May 2001 18:00:36 Marco Vittone wrote: > > in the source) what is the meaning of the "domain > groups" option? And what about the "groupname map" option > found in the source? Does it works if enabled in the build? 'domain groups' has been removed. don;t use groupname map. > Another question. From the W2K point of view how domain .. > It's not a critic, is only an opinion from a user point > of view, but the 2.2 approach seems quite a step backward. JF is working on a better group apping implementation now. No estimate on complemention though. Cheers, jerry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mail.valinux.com (mail.valinux.com [198.186.202.175]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D0C55248 for ; Wed, 16 May 2001 07:11:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from beefcake.hdqt.valinux.com ([10.1.0.14] helo=localhost ident=root) by mail.valinux.com with smtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 150231-00020u-00; Wed, 16 May 2001 07:13:07 -0700 Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 09:15:28 -0500 From: Gerald Carter To: "Dr . Dieter Becker" Cc: mailgruppe SAMBA Subject: Re: printing with 2.2.0 Message-ID: <20010516091528.M17913@pogo.plainjoe.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: ; from db@med-in.uni-sb.de on Wed, May 16, 2001 at 02:03:20 -0500 X-Mailer: Balsa 1.1.4 Content-Length: 909 Lines: 27 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Wed, 16 May 2001 02:03:20 Dr. Dieter Becker wrote: > Sirs, > > I installed the print$ - Directory and the smb.conf-entries > following the SAMBA Project documentation. > Unfortunately I can't see a "New Driver" Button in > this directory. What is wrong? The "New Driver..." button is on the printer properties page (right-click on a printer in the "Printers..." folder and select properties). Cheers, jerry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp-server2.tampabay.rr.com (smtp-server2.cfl.rr.com [65.32.2.69]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12F8D52BA for ; Wed, 16 May 2001 07:54:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from home.localdomain (242836hfc177.tampabay.rr.com [24.28.36.177]) by smtp-server2.tampabay.rr.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with SMTP id f4GEtwv08759; Wed, 16 May 2001 10:55:58 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Seth Reply-To: seth@hollen.org To: rob@steinmetznet.com, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Samba 2.2.0 Roaming Profile Problems Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 10:55:57 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: <3B018701.DBA5CFC2@steinmetznet.com> In-Reply-To: <3B018701.DBA5CFC2@steinmetznet.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01051610555700.01015@home.localdomain> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I also had very slow saving of profiles-very slow! I went back to 2.07 though Seth On Tuesday 15 May 2001 15:44, you wrote: > I am having trouble getting roaming profiles to work properly and with > some other things related to domain logins. > > My problems major problems are: > > 1) Users cannot set a default printer. This keeps some applications from > working properly > > 2) Profiles can be saved and copied to the server but do not appear save > some information such as desktop settings ( Wallpaper is the most > obvious ) > > 3) Very slow saving of profiles when users logout. > > > I have included the relevant portions ( I hope ) of my smb.conf file > below. > The server is a SuSE Linux machine samba was compiled from source using > package defaults. > > I hope I overlooked something simple. If more information is needed > please ask. > > [global] > ; > ; Basic Server Settings > ; > netbiosname = OBERON > workgroup = NEWORLEANS > os level = 64 > prefered master = yes > domain master = yes > local master = yes > ; > ; Security Setting > ; > security = user > encrypt passwords = yes > > ; > ; Domain Settings > ; > domain logons = yes > wins support = yes > time server = yes > logon path = \\OBERON\profiles\%u > logon drive = U: > logon home = \\HAMLET\%U > logon script = %U.bat > ; > ; Global Standard Settings > ; > printing = bsd > printcap name = /etc/printcap > load printers = yes > guest account = arris > log file = /usr/local/samba/var/log.%m > > ; You will need a world readable lock directory and "share modes=yes" > ; if you want to support the file sharing modes for multiple users > ; of the same files > lock directory = /usr/local/samba/var/locks > share modes = yes > ; > ; Domain Controller Shares > ; > > [netlogon] > > path = /usr/local/samba/netlogon > writable = no > write list = administrator > > [profiles] > > path= /usr/local/samba/profile > writable = yes > create mask = 0600 > directory mask = 0700 > > -- > Robert Steinmetz AIA > Principal > Steinmetz & Associates -- Seth seth@hollen.org Lottery: The excitement of bad math. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.valinux.com (mail.valinux.com [198.186.202.175]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1FC4463E; Wed, 16 May 2001 10:11:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from legion.hdqt.valinux.com ([10.6.11.17] helo=valinux.com ident=jeremy) by mail.valinux.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 1504qI-000675-00; Wed, 16 May 2001 10:12:10 -0700 Message-ID: <3B0298E4.F9833CA1@valinux.com> Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 11:12:36 -0400 From: Jeremy Allison Organization: VA Linux Systems X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.13-0.7 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Shanker Balan Cc: Samba NT Domain , Samba technical Subject: Re: Stste of Roaming Profiles References: <3B01791C.42455494@steinmetznet.com> <20010516124719.B8946@monster.exocore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Shanker Balan wrote: > > Wait until 2.2.1 if you are not comfortable with CVS versions. FYI: We're planning to do 2.2.1 on Friday (US Pacific time) once the packaging issues have been worked out. If you know of any showstopper bugs in 2.2 CVS now's the time to tell us.... Jeremy. -- -------------------------------------------------------- Buying an operating system without source is like buying a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions. -------------------------------------------------------- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.econia.com (mail.econia.com [213.168.80.83]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 843B44C9C for ; Wed, 16 May 2001 10:49:03 -0700 (PDT) Subject: again: problems with saving roaming profile To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.7 March 21, 2001 Message-ID: From: andre.doehn@econia.com Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 19:50:12 +0200 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on koeln02/econia-ext(Release 5.0.7 |March 21, 2001) at 16.05.2001 19:50:14 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ hi list, iam getting confused :-(( well, the situation: ive the latest samba 2.2 cvs version (with acl support and quotas) installed on my linux host. ive created a linux user with useradd -g users -u 1000 -c 'Karl Schlonz' -m -s /bin/false u490001 and finally smbpasswd -a u490001 to add this user to my user pdc list all what i want is to store the local profile on the samba-pdc with "700" permission bits in a special folder /share/profiles/ - here is the part of my global and profile section: [global] logon script = scripts\logon.bat logon path = \\%L\Profiles\%U logon drive = z: logon home = \\%L\homes [Profiles] comment = Windows User Profiles path = /share/profiles read only = No create mask = 0700 directory mask = 0700 browseable = No locking = No when i loged off from my win2k client back to the log on screnn of win2k. what happend: i got several syslog messages (lvl 10) while storing the profile on the sambapdc: ... smbd[3121]: smbd/open.c:open_directory(1037) smbd[3121]: open_directory: unable to create \ u490001/Anwendungsdaten/Microsoft/SystemCertificates/My/CTLs. Error was No such file or directory .. and when i list me the permission bits of the stored profile i got this: root@cgn-lnx06:/share/profiles/u490001 > ls -l total 276 drwxrwx---+ 4 u490001 users 4096 May 16 19:20 Anwendungsdaten drwxrwx---+ 2 u490001 users 4096 May 16 19:21 Cookies drwxrwx---+ 2 u490001 users 4096 May 16 19:21 Desktop drwxrwx---+ 2 u490001 users 4096 May 16 19:20 Druckumgebung drwxrwx---+ 3 u490001 users 4096 May 16 19:20 Eigene Dateien drwxrwx---+ 4 u490001 users 4096 May 16 19:21 Favoriten -rwx------ 1 u490001 users 180224 May 16 19:20 NTUSER.DAT drwxrwx---+ 2 u490001 users 4096 May 16 19:20 Netzwerkumgebung drwxrwx---+ 2 u490001 users 4096 May 16 19:21 Recent drwxrwx---+ 2 u490001 users 4096 May 16 19:21 SendTo drwxrwx---+ 3 u490001 users 4096 May 16 19:20 Startmen? drwxrwx---+ 2 u490001 users 4096 May 16 19:20 Vorlagen -rwx------ 1 u490001 users 1024 May 16 19:20 ntuser.dat.LOG -rw------- 1 u490001 users 192 May 16 19:21 ntuser.ini root@cgn-lnx06:/share/profiles/u490001 > here is the acl e.g. "getfacl Anwendungsdaten": # file: Anwendungsdaten/ # owner: u490001 # group: users user::rwx group::rwx mask:rwx other:--- default:user::rwx default:group::--- default:mask:rwx default:other:--- I dont want full rights for group members - what iam doing wrong???? bye andre Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from fenix.uam.mx (fenix.uam.mx [148.206.65.143]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 408694AB6 for ; Wed, 16 May 2001 13:09:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (linux@localhost) by fenix.uam.mx (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA06031; Wed, 16 May 2001 14:22:26 -0500 Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 14:22:26 -0500 (CDT) From: Lista linux To: Jason Keltz Cc: Subject: Re: server script execution on login In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi Jason, I suggest a machine-user based profile subdirectory, so when a user logs into a machine he is not authorized for, w2k will not find his subdirectory, then the user will be denied from the w2k machine. c u. romy. On Tue, 15 May 2001, Jason Keltz wrote: > I want to be able to control which users can connect to which PDCs, > essentially being able to specify which machines a user can login to. Is > there a mechnism in Samba similar to the 'logon script' that, instead of > executing on the PC would execute on the Unix server after/during login to > do this? I want to be able to pass to this script the user who is logging > in, and machine they are logging into, and have the script determine > whether the user should be able to login or not. (Though I don't need > this particular functionality, I could see how this could be extended to > enable access time restrictions on accounts as well, if the need is > there). I don't see any mention to this in the list, or the > documentation, and yet I can't believe that nobody else would be > interested in this functionality. I want to use the PDC for the > consolidated usernames/passwords/profiles, but I don't want to allow every > user access to every machine. > > Thanks for any help that you can provide! > > Jason Keltz > jas@cs.yorku.ca > -- Ing. Romy Perez Moreno e-mail: romy@fenix.uam.mx, romy@correo.azc.uam.mx http://fenix.uam.mx/romy tel: 5318 9067 / 5382-7157 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from moutvdom01.kundenserver.de (moutvdom01.kundenserver.de [195.20.224.200]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB51F525A for ; Wed, 16 May 2001 13:12:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [195.20.224.219] (helo=mrvdom03.kundenserver.de) by moutvdom01.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #2) id 1507gO-0003WD-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Wed, 16 May 2001 22:14:08 +0200 Received: from p3ee2d671.dip.t-dialin.net ([62.226.214.113] helo=eridiani.forouher.de) by mrvdom03.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #2) id 1507fR-0004AW-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Wed, 16 May 2001 22:13:09 +0200 Received: from altair.forouher.de (altair.forouher.de [192.168.0.10]) by eridiani.forouher.de (Postfix (Forouher Mailgateway)) with ESMTP id 87BEE2A852 for ; Wed, 16 May 2001 19:57:07 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 19:57:07 +0200 (CEST) From: Dariush Forouher X-Sender: dariush@Altair To: Samba NT Domain Mailing List Subject: Win2K ServicePack 2 - Logon Problems Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, after updating Win2000 to SP2 i can't logon anylonger! In detail: The Logon works, but downloading the profile fails, everytime i try, he creates a new folder in the local profile directory icluding the complete tree, but when he tries to download the files from the samba server, he prints out an "access denied" and starts with a temporary profile. Another thing is that i can't delete any half-downloaded profile, win says only that some program is using the dirs and it cant delete it. I've also tried to reconect the client to the samba server, but when i try to join the domain, i get the well known error "the processcall is out of range" (or similar :-). Ok, it's one,two months ago since the last time, i've tried that, so this problem can be an otherone. I'm using samba 2.2.0 stable and Win2000 German i hadn't the time to make an more usefull debugreport yet. The "debuglevel = 1"-log had no unusual errors. regards Dariush Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailhub.iastate.edu (mailhub.iastate.edu [129.186.1.102]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83641517C for ; Wed, 16 May 2001 13:14:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Debug (webmail-6.iastate.edu [129.186.1.78]) by mailhub.iastate.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA17820; Wed, 16 May 2001 15:15:30 -0500 Message-Id: <200105162015.PAA17820@mailhub.iastate.edu> To: Lista linux Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org From: Justin D Davis Subject: Re: server script execution on login Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 15:15:28 CST6DST X-Mailer: Endymion MailMan Professional Edition v3.0.14 ISU Version mp5 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I believe this technique will only result in the user having separate profiles, one for each machine...... > Hi Jason, > > I suggest a machine-user based profile subdirectory, so when a user logs > into a machine he is not authorized for, w2k will not find his > subdirectory, then the user will be denied from the w2k machine. > > c u. > > romy. > > On Tue, 15 May 2001, Jason Keltz wrote: > > > I want to be able to control which users can connect to which PDCs, > > essentially being able to specify which machines a user can login to. Is > > there a mechnism in Samba similar to the 'logon script' that, instead of > > executing on the PC would execute on the Unix server after/during login to > > do this? I want to be able to pass to this script the user who is logging > > in, and machine they are logging into, and have the script determine > > whether the user should be able to login or not. (Though I don't need > > this particular functionality, I could see how this could be extended to > > enable access time restrictions on accounts as well, if the need is > > there). I don't see any mention to this in the list, or the > > documentation, and yet I can't believe that nobody else would be > > interested in this functionality. I want to use the PDC for the > > consolidated usernames/passwords/profiles, but I don't want to allow every > > user access to every machine. > > > > Thanks for any help that you can provide! > > > > Jason Keltz > > jas@cs.yorku.ca > > > > -- > Ing. Romy Perez Moreno > e-mail: romy@fenix.uam.mx, romy@correo.azc.uam.mx > http://fenix.uam.mx/romy > tel: 5318 9067 / 5382-7157 > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.valinux.com (mail.valinux.com [198.186.202.175]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D388534A for ; Wed, 16 May 2001 13:17:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from beefcake.hdqt.valinux.com ([10.1.0.14] helo=shells.valinux.com ident=mail) by mail.valinux.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 1507kr-0002un-00; Wed, 16 May 2001 13:18:45 -0700 Received: from gcarter (helo=localhost) by shells.valinux.com with local-esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 1507kr-0007sw-00; Wed, 16 May 2001 13:18:45 -0700 Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 13:18:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Gerald Carter To: Dariush Forouher Cc: Samba NT Domain Mailing List Subject: Re: Win2K ServicePack 2 - Logon Problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Wed, 16 May 2001, Dariush Forouher wrote: > Hi, > > after updating Win2000 to SP2 i can't logon anylonger! In detail: The > Logon works, but downloading the profile fails, everytime i try, he > creates a new folder in the local profile directory icluding the > complete tree, but when he tries to download the files from the samba > server, he prints out an "access denied" and starts with a temporary > profile. Another thing is that i can't delete any half-downloaded > profile, win says only that some program is using the dirs and it cant > delete it. > > I've also tried to reconect the client to the samba server, but when i > try to join the domain, i get the well known error "the processcall is > out of range" (or similar :-). Ok, it's one,two months ago since the > last time, i've tried that, so this problem can be an otherone. > > I'm using samba 2.2.0 stable and Win2000 German > > i hadn't the time to make an more usefull debugreport yet. The > "debuglevel = 1"-log had no unusual errors. This problem has been reported. We have not had a chance to fix the problem yet. Cheers, jerry > > regards > Dariush > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.xavier.sa.edu.au (mail.xavier.sa.edu.au [203.17.192.8]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1580453A5 for ; Wed, 16 May 2001 15:40:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xavier.sa.edu.au (alpha.xavier.sa.edu.au [203.17.192.2]) by mail.xavier.sa.edu.au (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f4GLHqx03574; Thu, 17 May 2001 06:47:52 +0930 Message-ID: <3B031138.9F314B0C@xavier.sa.edu.au> Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 09:16:00 +0930 From: Matthew Geddes Organization: Xavier College X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2-XFS i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jens Schwepe Cc: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: Re: printing via nt-workstation leaves a file "ne00:" References: <01C0DE00.D1F7FB30.js@ic-bremen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Jens Schwepe wrote: > > hi, > > after printing via the nt-workstations (office 97, that is), there is > always a file called "ne00:" left in the directory, with zero bytes in > size. > is it possible to remove this file automatically after the print-job is > done, or even suppress the creation of this file ? It happens here when you print using Windows NT's LPR implementation (we have it happen even on machines that print from NT to NT using LPR. Hope it helps, Matt Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from fenix.uam.mx (fenix.uam.mx [148.206.65.143]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E31D253CD for ; Wed, 16 May 2001 16:53:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (linux@localhost) by fenix.uam.mx (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA06279; Wed, 16 May 2001 18:07:05 -0500 Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 18:07:05 -0500 (CDT) From: Lista linux To: Justin D Davis Cc: Subject: Re: server script execution on login In-Reply-To: <200105162015.PAA17820@mailhub.iastate.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ hi, On Wed, 16 May 2001, Justin D Davis wrote: > I believe this technique will only result in the user having separate profiles, > one for each machine...... but, don't make a subdirectory-profile for the user not wanted on a specific machine. romy. > > > > Hi Jason, > > > > I suggest a machine-user based profile subdirectory, so when a user logs > > into a machine he is not authorized for, w2k will not find his > > subdirectory, then the user will be denied from the w2k machine. > > > > c u. > > > > romy. > > > > On Tue, 15 May 2001, Jason Keltz wrote: > > > > > I want to be able to control which users can connect to which PDCs, > > > essentially being able to specify which machines a user can login to. Is > > > there a mechnism in Samba similar to the 'logon script' that, instead of > > > executing on the PC would execute on the Unix server after/during login to > > > do this? I want to be able to pass to this script the user who is logging > > > in, and machine they are logging into, and have the script determine > > > whether the user should be able to login or not. (Though I don't need > > > this particular functionality, I could see how this could be extended to > > > enable access time restrictions on accounts as well, if the need is > > > there). I don't see any mention to this in the list, or the > > > documentation, and yet I can't believe that nobody else would be > > > interested in this functionality. I want to use the PDC for the > > > consolidated usernames/passwords/profiles, but I don't want to allow every > > > user access to every machine. > > > > > > Thanks for any help that you can provide! > > > > > > Jason Keltz > > > jas@cs.yorku.ca > > > > > > > -- > > Ing. Romy Perez Moreno > > e-mail: romy@fenix.uam.mx, romy@correo.azc.uam.mx > > http://fenix.uam.mx/romy > > tel: 5318 9067 / 5382-7157 > > > > > > -- Ing. Romy Perez Moreno e-mail: romy@fenix.uam.mx, romy@correo.azc.uam.mx http://fenix.uam.mx/romy tel: 5318 9067 / 5382-7157 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from tesla.wrestpoint.com.au (unknown [203.33.128.110]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5BE645B5 for ; Wed, 16 May 2001 19:50:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wp101 ([192.168.1.101]) by tesla.wrestpoint.com.au (8.9.2/8.9.2) with SMTP id MAA36549 for ; Thu, 17 May 2001 12:52:07 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from chris.williams@wrestpoint.com.au) From: chris.williams@wrestpoint.com.au Reply-To: To: Subject: Samba 2.2.0 win2k logons Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 12:50:52 +1000 Message-ID: <7ECA2B65E056D411AD2B00508B73270E09AA83@EXCH_SERVER> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, I have found a bug with samba 2.2.0 and win2k sp2 you cannot join the domain with sp2. Is this known and if so is there a fix. please help. Chris Williams Computer Support Officer Wrest Point Hotel Casino Email: chris.williams@wrestpoint.com.au Phone: 03 6221 1706 (Work) 04 0738 2979 (Mob) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.valinux.com (mail.valinux.com [198.186.202.175]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1989423C for ; Wed, 16 May 2001 20:03:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from beefcake.hdqt.valinux.com ([10.1.0.14] helo=shells.valinux.com ident=mail) by mail.valinux.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 150E5t-0001mF-00; Wed, 16 May 2001 20:04:53 -0700 Received: from gcarter (helo=localhost) by shells.valinux.com with local-esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 150E5t-0002yZ-00; Wed, 16 May 2001 20:04:53 -0700 Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 20:04:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Gerald Carter To: Cc: Subject: Re: Samba 2.2.0 win2k logons In-Reply-To: <7ECA2B65E056D411AD2B00508B73270E09AA83@EXCH_SERVER> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Thu, 17 May 2001 chris.williams@wrestpoint.com.au wrote: > Hi, > I have found a bug with samba 2.2.0 and win2k sp2 you cannot > join the domain with sp2. Is this known and if so is there a fix. > please help. I thought I already responded to this once today? Is this a duplicate message? I don;t remember the original sender....anyways, sorry if this is a second response to the same message. There are issues with a Samba PDc and Win2k SP2. This is a known issue. We are working on it. No fix currently. Cheers, jerry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.infosun.fmi.uni-passau.de (vivaldi.fmi.uni-passau.de [132.231.64.49]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B07CE424E for ; Thu, 17 May 2001 00:44:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from duplont (duplo-nt.fmi.uni-passau.de [132.231.64.131]) by mail.infosun.fmi.uni-passau.de (Postfix) with SMTP id 3D4C930C01 for ; Thu, 17 May 2001 09:45:37 +0200 (MET DST) From: "Michael Forster" To: "Samba NT Domain Mailing List" Subject: RE: Win2K ServicePack 2 - Logon Problems Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 09:45:30 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Dariush wrote: > Another thing is that i can't delete any half-downloaded > profile, win says only that some program is using the dirs and it cant > delete it. Do you have PGP installed? If you have, this can be your problem. There are two Services PGPsdkService PGPService which seem to be responsable. Try to deactivate automatic start for them in the Management console. I was not able to stop them, so I had to do it this way. After rebooting I was able to delete the profiles. Just re-enable the services and start them afterwards. regards Mike -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use iQA/AwUBOwOBmseYjj0YYPBiEQLrXgCgkQq15sEP9FDXhlO7zfOTe3l1iLYAoK7O 1skvLenhcDJ/h7uELzcRt99x =C3pV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.infosun.fmi.uni-passau.de (vivaldi.fmi.uni-passau.de [132.231.64.49]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FC584856 for ; Thu, 17 May 2001 00:51:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from duplont (duplo-nt.fmi.uni-passau.de [132.231.64.131]) by mail.infosun.fmi.uni-passau.de (Postfix) with SMTP id A531130C01; Thu, 17 May 2001 09:52:19 +0200 (MET DST) From: "Michael Forster" To: "Samba NT Domain" , "Samba technical" Subject: Samba 2.2.1 Showstopper (was: Stste of Roaming Profiles) Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 09:52:13 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <3B0298E4.F9833CA1@valinux.com> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Jeremy wrote: > FYI: We're planning to do 2.2.1 on Friday (US Pacific time) > once the packaging issues have been worked out. If you know > of any showstopper bugs in 2.2 CVS now's the time to tell > us.... How about the Windows 2000 Service Pack 2 issues? For me, this definitely is a showstopper. regards Mike -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use iQA/AwUBOwODLMeYjj0YYPBiEQIXNQCgrjntQehw6pVsddU2HprHOF57YCMAoLwZ IBVFKFZ4Tcd7TjYbPlcjCBCg =CMvh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from noe.lyon.cemagref.fr (noe.lyon.cemagref.fr [195.221.113.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF1B347FB for ; Thu, 17 May 2001 02:26:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from info6 (info6.lyon.cemagref.fr [195.221.113.209]) by noe.lyon.cemagref.fr (8.9.3/jtpda-5.3.1) with ESMTP id LAA04923 for ; Thu, 17 May 2001 11:27:20 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20010517105849.009546e0@noe.lyon.cemagref.fr> X-Sender: info05@noe.lyon.cemagref.fr (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 11:27:51 +0200 To: samba-ntdom@samba.org From: Bich TRINH Subject: Trouble with Winbind Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Sir, I am trying to install the version Samba-Aplliance-0.5-tar.gz in my Linux Redhat PC. This one is included in a local network mastered by a NT server (domain name is ARCHE). After succeeding to connect at the NT server, I can't unfortunately to login under the password user in NT domain. Here are the list when I use the command getent passwd : root:x:0:0:root:/root:/bin/bash bin:x:1:1:bin:/bin: daemon:x:2:2:daemon:/sbin: adm:x:3:4:adm:/var/adm: lp:x:4:7:lp:/var/spool/lpd: sync:x:5:0:sync:/sbin:/bin/sync shutdown:x:6:0:shutdown:/sbin:/sbin/shutdown halt:x:7:0:halt:/sbin:/sbin/halt mail:x:8:12:mail:/var/spool/mail: news:x:9:13:news:/var/spool/news: uucp:x:10:14:uucp:/var/spool/uucp: operator:x:11:0:operator:/root: games:x:12:100:games:/usr/games: gopher:x:13:30:gopher:/usr/lib/gopher-data: ftp:x:14:50:FTP User:/home/ftp: nobody:x:99:99:Nobody:/: gdm:x:42:42::/home/gdm:/bin/bash postgres:x:100:233:PostgreSQL Server:/var/lib/pgsql:/bin/bash xfs:x:101:234:X Font Server:/etc/X11/fs:/bin/false info05:x:500:500::/home/info05:/bin/bash ARCHE+info03:x:10107:10000:stagiaire (12/12/00 au 06//04/01) MHG:/home/ARCHE/info03:/bin/bash ARCHE+info04:x:10108:10000:stagiaire du 2 avril au 31 juillet 2001:/home/ARCHE/info04:/bin/bash ARCHE+info05:x:10109:10000:stagiaire du 2 avril au 31 juillet 2001:/home/ARCHE/info05:/bin/bash ....... The /etc/pam.d/login file is like this : #%PAM-1.0 auth required /lib/security/pam_securetty.so auth sufficient /lib/security/pam_winbind.so auth required /lib/security/pam_pwdb.so use_first_pass shadow nullok auth required /lib/security/pam_nologin.so account required /lib/security/pam_winbind.so password required /lib/security/pam_cracklib.so password required /lib/security/pam_pwdb.so nullok use_authtok md5 shadow session required /lib/security/pam_pwdb.so session optional /lib/security/pam_console.so And the /etc/pam.d/su file like this : #%PAM-1.0 #auth required /lib/security/pam_securetty.so (IF I USE THIS LINE, I CAN'T LOGIN WITH LINUX USER !!) auth required /lib/security/pam_nologin.so auth sufficient /lib/security/pam_winbind.so auth required /lib/security/pam_pwdb.so use_first_pass shadow nullok account required /lib/security/pam_winbind.so password required /lib/security/pam_cracklib.so password required /lib/security/pam_pwdb.so shadow use_authtok nullok session required /lib/security/pam_pwdb.so session optional /lib/security/pam_xauth.so Otherwise, the SWAT doesn't work (Incorrect password !!) . I don't know why ! Would you help me please. Bich Trinh Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from indyio.rz.uni-sb.de (indyio.rz.uni-sb.de [134.96.7.3]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D11BC454E for ; Thu, 17 May 2001 04:58:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from krzsun (krzsun.med-rz.uni-sb.de [134.96.155.18]) by indyio.rz.uni-sb.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA1147202; Thu, 17 May 2001 13:59:12 +0200 (CST) Received: from ukh3029.med-in.uni-sb.de by krzsun.med-rz.uni-saarland.de (5.x/SMI-SVR4) id AA12995; Thu, 17 May 2001 14:00:54 +0200 Received: from ukh8904 (ukh8904 [134.96.44.13]) by ukh3029.med-in.uni-sb.de (8.8.8+Sun/8.7.1) with SMTP id NAA19824; Thu, 17 May 2001 13:59:11 +0200 (MET DST) From: "Dr. Dieter Becker" To: "Gerald Carter" Cc: "mailgruppe SAMBA" Subject: RE: printing with 2.2.0 Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 13:59:11 +0200 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20010516091528.M17913@pogo.plainjoe.org> X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Ia am sorry, no. At this moment, the list of printers is empty and when I push the right mouse-button, I can only see "server properties" where I can't change anything. Perhaps I made some mistake in the configuration. Dieter I attach my smb.conf Dr. med. Dipl.-Math. Dieter Becker Medizinische Universitdts- und Poliklinik Innere Medizin III D66421 Homburg ----------------------------------------- Tel: 06841 16 23046 / -23077 Fax: 06841 16 23043 / -23349 Email: db@med-in.uni-saarland.de -----Original Message----- From: Gerald Carter [mailto:gcarter@valinux.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 4:15 PM To: Dr . Dieter Becker Cc: mailgruppe SAMBA Subject: Re: printing with 2.2.0 On Wed, 16 May 2001 02:03:20 Dr. Dieter Becker wrote: > Sirs, > > I installed the print$ - Directory and the smb.conf-entries > following the SAMBA Project documentation. > Unfortunately I can't see a "New Driver" Button in > this directory. What is wrong? The "New Driver..." button is on the printer properties page (right-click on a printer in the "Printers..." folder and select properties). Cheers, jerry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which had a name of smb.conf] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mailc.telia.com (mailc.telia.com [194.22.190.4]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 209004FFC for ; Thu, 17 May 2001 05:24:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from svenskabutiker.se (t2o79p31.telia.com [62.20.200.151]) by mailc.telia.com (8.11.2/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f4HCPSH09984 for ; Thu, 17 May 2001 14:25:28 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <3B03C3A5.D0E4E804@svenskabutiker.se> Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 14:27:17 +0200 From: Martin Nilsson X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: SAMBA ntdom Subject: Problems with W2K Server licenses and Samba as PDC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Dear SMB Gurus, I have this strange setup: 1 FreeBSD 4.3 server with Samba 2.2.0 as PDC 1 Win2k Server holds files and printers NOT PDC/BDC, just standalone server that is member of the domain run by the Sama server. 16 clients with win2k or win98 My problem is that the W2k server only accepts 10 simultaneous connections. If I go into license manager when logged in as administrator on the domain I get an error message saying that license manager is unable to connnect to the domain. I have logged in as administrator locally and raised the client license count but this does not help me as still only 10 clients are allowed to connect. Have anyone seen this before, what should I do? I'm considering junking the W2k machine and replacing it with another FreeBSD/Samba machine but this will leave us without support for the specific windows application that we use the Win2k server for. Any comments? /Martin -- Martin Nilsson, Civilingenjvr M.Sc. CS&E Svenska Butiker AB, S:t Larsvdg 44, 222 70 Lund martin@svenskabutiker.se Tel: 046-304130 www.svenskabutiker.se Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mailc.telia.com (mailc.telia.com [194.22.190.4]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A3364AA3 for ; Thu, 17 May 2001 05:38:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from filex.se (t2o79p31.telia.com [62.20.200.151]) by mailc.telia.com (8.11.2/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f4HCd6H25671 for ; Thu, 17 May 2001 14:39:07 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <3B03C6D8.586772C4@filex.se> Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 14:40:56 +0200 From: Martin Nilsson X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: SAMBA ntdom Subject: Problems with W2K Server licenses and Samba as PDC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Dear SMB Gurus, I have this strange setup: 1 FreeBSD 4.3 server with Samba 2.2.0 as PDC 1 Win2k Server holds files and printers NOT PDC/BDC, just standalone server that is member of the domain run by the Sama server. 16 clients with win2k or win98 My problem is that the W2k server only accepts 10 simultaneous connections. If I go into license manager when logged in as administrator on the domain I get an error message saying that license manager is unable to connnect to the domain. I have logged in as administrator locally and raised the client license count but this does not help me as still only 10 clients are allowed to connect. Have anyone seen this before, what should I do? I'm considering junking the W2k machine and replacing it with another FreeBSD/Samba machine but this will leave us without support for the specific windows application that we use the Win2k server for. Any comments? /Martin -- Martin Nilsson, Civilingenjvr M.Sc. CS&E Svenska Butiker AB, S:t Larsvdg 44, 222 70 Lund martin@svenskabutiker.se Tel: 046-304130 www.svenskabutiker.se Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A2185332 for ; Thu, 17 May 2001 06:18:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 6014cwpza006 (adam.rutgersinsurance.com [10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA24358 for ; Thu, 17 May 2001 09:32:14 -0400 Message-ID: <008301c0ded4$2586d400$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: "SAMBA ntdom" References: <3B03C3A5.D0E4E804@svenskabutiker.se> Subject: Re: Problems with W2K Server licenses and Samba as PDC Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 09:20:30 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Wouldn't your life be easier if you swapped the duties of the two servers? If Win2K acted as the BDC and Linux as the file print server, life would probably be easier. Second, are you using the retail version of Win2K? Sounds like you are using a "Not for Resale" copy. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Martin Nilsson" To: "SAMBA ntdom" Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 8:27 AM Subject: Problems with W2K Server licenses and Samba as PDC > Dear SMB Gurus, > > I have this strange setup: > > 1 FreeBSD 4.3 server with Samba 2.2.0 as PDC > 1 Win2k Server holds files and printers NOT PDC/BDC, just standalone server > that is member of the domain run by the Sama server. > 16 clients with win2k or win98 > > My problem is that the W2k server only accepts 10 simultaneous connections. > If I go into license manager when logged in as administrator on the domain I > get an error message saying that license manager is unable to connnect to the > domain. > > I have logged in as administrator locally and raised the client license count > but this does not help me as still only 10 clients are allowed to connect. > > Have anyone seen this before, what should I do? > > I'm considering junking the W2k machine and replacing it with another > FreeBSD/Samba machine but this will leave us without support for the specific > windows application that we use the Win2k server for. > > Any comments? > /Martin > -- > Martin Nilsson, Civilingenjvr M.Sc. CS&E > Svenska Butiker AB, > S:t Larsvdg 44, 222 70 Lund > martin@svenskabutiker.se > Tel: 046-304130 > www.svenskabutiker.se Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from w102.web2010.com (w102.web2010.com [216.157.40.254]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1BA25397 for ; Thu, 17 May 2001 06:36:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from graphiks (vsat-148-75-103-234.ssa7.mcl.starband.net [148.75.103.234]) by w102.web2010.com (8.9.3/8.9.0) with SMTP id JAA13069 for ; Thu, 17 May 2001 09:37:19 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <000801c0ded6$e08a1fd0$1400a8c0@graphiks> From: "Erik Peirson" To: Subject: Procedure out of range Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 09:39:23 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.3018.1300 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, I was curious if anyone has found a definitive answer to this "Procedure out of range" problem yet? I am dead in the water on it. I have been monitoring the boards, and have tried all that has been suggested so far with no luck. My 98 clients are logging into the domain fine now, with the exception that they have to be listed in the admin users group in samba.conf. (sure it's a config prob) Please, if anyone has some insight to this, I would be most gracious to hear from you. On a side note, has anyone else had a problem connecting to swat through Konquerer? I had it working at 1 time but no more. I get "Server error, could not connect to the server" Though Mozilla works fine. Hmm Many thanks, Erik Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from maile.telia.com (maile.telia.com [194.22.190.16]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1974D4B39 for ; Thu, 17 May 2001 07:13:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from filex.se (t2o79p34.telia.com [62.20.200.154]) by maile.telia.com (8.11.2/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f4HEDK709684; Thu, 17 May 2001 16:13:20 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <3B03DCEC.3F7BBAEA@filex.se> Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 16:15:08 +0200 From: Martin Nilsson X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dominic Baines Cc: SAMBA ntdom Subject: Re: Problems with W2K Server licenses and Samba as PDC References: <3B03C3A5.D0E4E804@svenskabutiker.se> <04d101c0ded5$995b1f20$0764a8c0@domain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Dominic Baines wrote: > > How was the W2K server installed ? Seat or Server Licence > Mode ? Server mode, and I upped the license count to a sufficient number at install time. > Usually you can install W2K from a licencing perspective > by either seat licence or by server.... > this sounds like you accepted the defaulted for the server > with it's standard 10 connection licence default.... > > I don't believe you can change the mode once installed. W2k told me that I can change it one time. > For more than 10 connections the W2K server will be > attempting to verify licences with the PDC which acts as > a licence server when you exceed 10 connections it > expects it to verify with a licence server that needs to > be a W2K PDC server I believe.... hence the error. That explains it. > This sounds like the situation you have. Does this make > sense ? Yes. > I mention this because I don't see the same problem here > with a W2K server running as a colour printer server in > a similar set-up but I KNOW the server was installed > using the client licence not the server licence option so no > need for the licence server. But what is a client license, where do I install that? /Martin > > Regards, > > Dominic > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Martin Nilsson" > To: "SAMBA ntdom" > Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 1:27 PM > Subject: Problems with W2K Server licenses and Samba as PDC > > > Dear SMB Gurus, > > > > I have this strange setup: > > > > 1 FreeBSD 4.3 server with Samba 2.2.0 as PDC > > 1 Win2k Server holds files and printers NOT PDC/BDC, just standalone > server > > that is member of the domain run by the Sama server. > > 16 clients with win2k or win98 > > > > My problem is that the W2k server only accepts 10 simultaneous > connections. > > If I go into license manager when logged in as administrator on the domain > I > > get an error message saying that license manager is unable to connnect to > the > > domain. > > > > I have logged in as administrator locally and raised the client license > count > > but this does not help me as still only 10 clients are allowed to connect. > > > > Have anyone seen this before, what should I do? > > > > I'm considering junking the W2k machine and replacing it with another > > FreeBSD/Samba machine but this will leave us without support for the > specific > > windows application that we use the Win2k server for. > > > > Any comments? > > /Martin > > -- > > Martin Nilsson, Civilingenjvr M.Sc. CS&E > > Svenska Butiker AB, > > S:t Larsvdg 44, 222 70 Lund > > martin@svenskabutiker.se > > Tel: 046-304130 > > www.svenskabutiker.se -- Martin Nilsson, Civilingenjvr M.Sc. CS&E Svenska Butiker AB, S:t Larsvdg 44, 222 70 Lund martin@svenskabutiker.se Tel: 046-304130 www.svenskabutiker.se Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mail.deltaregional.com (network.deltaregional.com [216.220.137.129]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E79634C63 for ; Thu, 17 May 2001 07:16:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by EMAIL with Internet Mail Service (5.5.1960.3) id ; Thu, 17 May 2001 09:18:43 -0500 Message-ID: From: "McEldowney, Michael" To: SAMBA ntdom , "'martin@svenskabutiker.se'" Subject: RE: Problems with W2K Server licenses and Samba as PDC Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 09:18:42 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.1960.3) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Martin, Are you certain you are specifically using Win2K "Server", and not Win2K "Professional"? I don't use either here, but I do have NT servers and workstations. NT Workstation only allows 10 connections, and I'm willing to bet that Win2K Pro is the same. That limit is set by M$. They, of course, want you to buy the server product and pay thru the nose for Client Access Licenses. I agree with Adam, unless you have to have it on the Win box, move your file and print services to Samba. If that's not an option for your software, then you'll have to pay the M$ tax and buy the server edition. --Mike > -----Original Message----- > From: Adam Lang [mailto:aalang@rutgersinsurance.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 8:21 AM > To: SAMBA ntdom > Subject: Re: Problems with W2K Server licenses and Samba as PDC > > > Wouldn't your life be easier if you swapped the duties of the > two servers? > If Win2K acted as the BDC and Linux as the file print server, > life would > probably be easier. > > Second, are you using the retail version of Win2K? Sounds > like you are > using a "Not for Resale" copy. > > Adam Lang > Systems Engineer > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company > http://www.rutgersinsurance.com > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Martin Nilsson" > To: "SAMBA ntdom" > Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 8:27 AM > Subject: Problems with W2K Server licenses and Samba as PDC > > > > Dear SMB Gurus, > > > > I have this strange setup: > > > > 1 FreeBSD 4.3 server with Samba 2.2.0 as PDC > > 1 Win2k Server holds files and printers NOT PDC/BDC, just > standalone > server > > that is member of the domain run by the Sama server. > > 16 clients with win2k or win98 > > > > My problem is that the W2k server only accepts 10 simultaneous > connections. > > If I go into license manager when logged in as > administrator on the domain > I > > get an error message saying that license manager is unable > to connnect to > the > > domain. > > > > I have logged in as administrator locally and raised the > client license > count > > but this does not help me as still only 10 clients are > allowed to connect. > > > > Have anyone seen this before, what should I do? > > > > I'm considering junking the W2k machine and replacing it > with another > > FreeBSD/Samba machine but this will leave us without support for the > specific > > windows application that we use the Win2k server for. > > > > Any comments? > > /Martin > > -- > > Martin Nilsson, Civilingenjvr M.Sc. CS&E > > Svenska Butiker AB, > > S:t Larsvdg 44, 222 70 Lund > > martin@svenskabutiker.se > > Tel: 046-304130 > > www.svenskabutiker.se > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from amoa.org (amoa.org [207.207.51.226]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8E9E8545A for ; Thu, 17 May 2001 07:32:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by amoa.org(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.5 (863.2 5-20-1999)) id 86256A4F.004FBA05 ; Thu, 17 May 2001 09:30:49 -0500 X-Lotus-FromDomain: AMOA From: ctooley@amoa.org To: Martin Nilsson Cc: Dominic Baines , SAMBA ntdom Message-ID: <86256A4F.004FB944.00@amoa.org> Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 09:43:33 -0500 Subject: Re: Problems with W2K Server licenses and Samba as PDC Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Choose Per Seat licensing and up your count. Samba obviously can't act as a license server and since this box is part of the domain, it's looking to the authoritative box for it's licensing. Chris Tooley Martin Nilsson on 05/17/2001 09:15:08 AM To: Dominic Baines cc: SAMBA ntdom (bcc: Chris Tooley/AMOA) Subject Re: Problems with W2K Server licenses and : Samba as PDC Dominic Baines wrote: > > How was the W2K server installed ? Seat or Server Licence > Mode ? Server mode, and I upped the license count to a sufficient number at install time. > Usually you can install W2K from a licencing perspective > by either seat licence or by server.... > this sounds like you accepted the defaulted for the server > with it's standard 10 connection licence default.... > > I don't believe you can change the mode once installed. W2k told me that I can change it one time. > For more than 10 connections the W2K server will be > attempting to verify licences with the PDC which acts as > a licence server when you exceed 10 connections it > expects it to verify with a licence server that needs to > be a W2K PDC server I believe.... hence the error. That explains it. > This sounds like the situation you have. Does this make > sense ? Yes. > I mention this because I don't see the same problem here > with a W2K server running as a colour printer server in > a similar set-up but I KNOW the server was installed > using the client licence not the server licence option so no > need for the licence server. But what is a client license, where do I install that? /Martin > > Regards, > > Dominic > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Martin Nilsson" > To: "SAMBA ntdom" > Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 1:27 PM > Subject: Problems with W2K Server licenses and Samba as PDC > > > Dear SMB Gurus, > > > > I have this strange setup: > > > > 1 FreeBSD 4.3 server with Samba 2.2.0 as PDC > > 1 Win2k Server holds files and printers NOT PDC/BDC, just standalone > server > > that is member of the domain run by the Sama server. > > 16 clients with win2k or win98 > > > > My problem is that the W2k server only accepts 10 simultaneous > connections. > > If I go into license manager when logged in as administrator on the domain > I > > get an error message saying that license manager is unable to connnect to > the > > domain. > > > > I have logged in as administrator locally and raised the client license > count > > but this does not help me as still only 10 clients are allowed to connect. > > > > Have anyone seen this before, what should I do? > > > > I'm considering junking the W2k machine and replacing it with another > > FreeBSD/Samba machine but this will leave us without support for the > specific > > windows application that we use the Win2k server for. > > > > Any comments? > > /Martin > > -- > > Martin Nilsson, Civilingenjvr M.Sc. CS&E > > Svenska Butiker AB, > > S:t Larsvdg 44, 222 70 Lund > > martin@svenskabutiker.se > > Tel: 046-304130 > > www.svenskabutiker.se -- Martin Nilsson, Civilingenjvr M.Sc. CS&E Svenska Butiker AB, S:t Larsvdg 44, 222 70 Lund martin@svenskabutiker.se Tel: 046-304130 www.svenskabutiker.se Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mailc.telia.com (mailc.telia.com [194.22.190.4]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80D945454 for ; Thu, 17 May 2001 07:41:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from filex.se (t2o79p34.telia.com [62.20.200.154]) by mailc.telia.com (8.11.2/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f4HEgeS04695; Thu, 17 May 2001 16:42:40 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <3B03E3C9.1EA3817D@filex.se> Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 16:44:25 +0200 From: Martin Nilsson X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "McEldowney, Michael" Cc: SAMBA ntdom Subject: Re: Problems with W2K Server licenses and Samba as PDC References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ "McEldowney, Michael" wrote: > > Martin, > > Are you certain you are specifically using Win2K "Server", and not Win2K > "Professional"? I don't use either here, but I do have NT servers and > workstations. NT Workstation only allows 10 connections, and I'm > willing to bet that Win2K Pro is the same. That limit is set by M$. I started with a w2k Pro as I thought that would do, I didn't want any of the server functions that I use Samba for. When it maxed out at 10 connections, I replaced it with a w2k server that our local computershop let us borrow to se if it would work. Same problem. > They, of course, want you to buy the server product and pay thru the > nose for Client Access Licenses. I don't have anything against paying for licenses _if_ it will work. I have a lot against buying extra licenses and still have a system that only wants to talk to 10 clients at a time! > I agree with Adam, unless you have to have it on the Win box, move your > file and print services to Samba. If that's not an option for your > software, then you'll have to pay the M$ tax and buy the server edition. I'm considering doing just that. I just have to stress test the windows app to see if it likes having its shared file database on a Samba server. I'll start with the settings that are recomended for running an access db on Samba. /Martin -- Martin Nilsson, Civilingenjvr M.Sc. CS&E Svenska Butiker AB, S:t Larsvdg 44, 222 70 Lund martin@svenskabutiker.se Tel: 046-304130 www.svenskabutiker.se Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.valinux.com (mail.valinux.com [198.186.202.175]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54D085487; Thu, 17 May 2001 08:02:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from beefcake.hdqt.valinux.com ([10.1.0.14] helo=localhost ident=root) by mail.valinux.com with smtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 150PJm-0005qH-00; Thu, 17 May 2001 08:03:58 -0700 Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 10:06:17 -0500 From: Gerald Carter To: Michael Forster Cc: Samba NT Domain , Samba technical Subject: Re: Samba 2.2.1 Showstopper (was: Stste of Roaming Profiles) Message-ID: <20010517100617.Q25275@pogo.plainjoe.org> References: <3B0298E4.F9833CA1@valinux.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: ; from forster@fmi.uni-passau.de on Thu, May 17, 2001 at 02:52:13 -0500 X-Mailer: Balsa 1.1.4 Content-Length: 745 Lines: 22 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Thu, 17 May 2001 02:52:13 Michael Forster wrote: > > How about the Windows 2000 Service Pack 2 issues? > For me, this definitely is a showstopper. We're working on it. Just out of curiousity, what fix in SP2 is critical for you? Cheers, jerry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from ms90.vtex.lt (ms90.vtex.lt [194.176.54.226]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 76A6554A4 for ; Thu, 17 May 2001 08:08:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 1152 invoked from network); 17 May 2001 15:08:42 -0000 Received: from c2x.vtex.vmt (HELO c2x.vtex.lt) (10.0.0.11) by ms90.vtex.lt with SMTP; 17 May 2001 15:08:42 -0000 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.0.20010517170040.00a852b0@ms90.vtex.lt> X-Sender: sarunas@ms90.vtex.lt X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 17:08:41 +0200 To: samba-ntdom@samba.org From: Sarunas Subject: Re: Problems with W2K Server licenses and Samba as PDC In-Reply-To: <3B03E3C9.1EA3817D@filex.se> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ At 04:44 PM 5/17/01 +0200, Martin Nilsson wrote: >"McEldowney, Michael" wrote: >I started with a w2k Pro as I thought that would do, I didn't want any of >the server functions that I use Samba for. When it maxed out at 10 >connections, >I replaced it with a w2k server that our local computershop let us borrow to >se if it would work. Same problem. Check the version of W2k Server that you borrowed. I was in similar situation with Win NT 4 server. It turned out the version of NT 4 server that I we received for testing purposes was a "Promotional. Not for resale". It allowed only for 10 connections no matter what the Licence Manager was configured for. Regards, Sarunas Burdulis Head Electronic Publishing, VTEX Ltd. sarunas@vtex.lt Office +370 2 729609, GSM +370 98 24498 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from gw.ordix.de (gw.ordix.de [212.218.179.18]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F4675476; Thu, 17 May 2001 08:17:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ordix.de (asteroid.ordix.de [192.168.7.11]) by gw.ordix.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA17469; Thu, 17 May 2001 17:18:20 +0200 Message-ID: <3B03EBB5.3336A9A@ordix.de> Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 17:18:13 +0200 From: Andre Dirr Organization: ORDIX AG X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: de,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba , samba-ntdom Subject: samba 2.2.0 and quotas Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ hi there, system: red hat 7.1 kernel: 2.4.4 samba : 2.2.0 i use this configuration compiled with quota. samba works fine, but the quota... sometimes it works and when a user gets over the hard limit the nt4-client says: "hard drive full" and cancel the copying. but sometimes samba don4t care about quota and copy on... over the quota. first of all i tried the quota-package that comes with red hat 7.1 (v3.0.0..). then i tried (and still try) the latest version from www.sourceforge.net (v3.0.1..). it4s the same problem. i don4t know. is ist a problem by samba or a quota problem??? has someone experienced the same problem??? thanks for answers, andy Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from subexgroup.com (unknown [164.164.82.20]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D333547F for ; Thu, 17 May 2001 08:44:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ROY by subexgroup.com with SMTP (MDaemon.v3.5.0.R) for ; Thu, 17 May 2001 21:12:48 +0530 Received: by localhost with Microsoft MAPI; Thu, 17 May 2001 21:23:50 -0000 Message-ID: <01C0DF17.AAC54230.royt@subexgroup.com> From: Roy Thomas Reply-To: "royt@subexgroup.com" To: 'Jeremy Allison' , 'Gerald Carter' Cc: "'samba-ntdom@samba.org'" Subject: RE: latest results from testing SAMBA_2_2 Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 21:23:49 -0000 Organization: SSL X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet E-mail/MAPI - 8.0.0.4211 X-Return-Path: royt@subexgroup.com X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ hi all pls someone update me on the status of o user lists for Win9x in user mode security where sould i get this Regards Roy -----Original Message----- From: Roy Thomas [SMTP:royt@subexgroup.com] Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 11:34 AM To: 'Jeremy Allison'; Gerald Carter Cc: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: RE: latest results from testing SAMBA_2_2 HI all It was updated recently that Samba latest testing has been done on o user lists for Win9x in user mode security (this one patch update i need very badly) And a few other things....... could someone help me on where i could download this samba version(which has all these updates) from should i use the CVS or the alpha version.................. Thanks Roy -----Original Message----- From: Jeremy Allison [SMTP:jeremy@valinux.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 5:38 AM To: Gerald Carter Cc: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Re: latest results from testing SAMBA_2_2 Gerald Carter wrote: > > Just as an FYI... > > I have finished testing the following pieces PDC of functionality with the > latest SAMBA_2_2 code and all seems well. (both --without-pam and > --with-pam). PAM functionality tested on RedHat 6.2 with pam_pwdb.so. > > o domain logons from all Windows clients > o user lists for Win9x in user mode security > o adding/deleting/changing shares from Server Manager > o browsing/accessing shares on NT4/Win2k members > servers in a Samba domain > o logon scripts > o Windows NT4 style system policies > o 'domain admin group' parameter > > So looks like things are going for 2.2.1. What did I forget? > Back to work.... Password changing. This works non-pam, but I need to add some docs and the "old password" prompt in password chat for that to be fixed. Andrew Bartlett has sent 3 patches for some of this. I'm looking at them but maybe for 2.2.2, not 2.2.1. Jeremy. -- -------------------------------------------------------- Buying an operating system without source is like buying a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions. -------------------------------------------------------- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mail.valinux.com (mail.valinux.com [198.186.202.175]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB33954AE for ; Thu, 17 May 2001 08:53:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from beefcake.hdqt.valinux.com ([10.1.0.14] helo=localhost ident=root) by mail.valinux.com with smtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 150Q6W-0001gJ-00; Thu, 17 May 2001 08:54:20 -0700 Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 10:56:39 -0500 From: Gerald Carter To: "royt @ subexgroup . com" Cc: 'Jeremy Allison' , "'samba-ntdom @ samba . org'" Subject: Re: latest results from testing SAMBA_2_2 Message-ID: <20010517105639.C26231@pogo.plainjoe.org> References: <01C0DF17.AAC54230.royt@subexgroup.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <01C0DF17.AAC54230.royt@subexgroup.com>; from royt@subexgroup.com on Thu, May 17, 2001 at 16:23:49 -0500 X-Mailer: Balsa 1.1.4 Content-Length: 621 Lines: 22 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Thu, 17 May 2001 16:23:49 Roy Thomas wrote: > > hi all > pls someone update me on the status of o user lists for > Win9x in user mode security where sould i get this .. > It was updated recently that Samba latest testing has been done on > o user lists for Win9x in user mode security > (this one patch update i need very badly) > And a few other things....... could someone help me on where > i could download this samba version(which has all > these updates) from should i use the CVS or the > alpha version.................. See http://samba.org/samba/cvs.html Use the SAMBA_2_2 branch. Cheers, jerry Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from halcyon.rmci.net (halcyon.rmci.net [205.162.184.63]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9D7C954C6 for ; Thu, 17 May 2001 09:00:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 14054 invoked from network); 17 May 2001 16:01:20 -0000 Received: from webmail.rmci.net (205.162.184.25) by mx20.rmci.net with SMTP; 17 May 2001 16:01:20 -0000 Received: (from nobody@localhost) by webmail.rmci.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA29488; Thu, 17 May 2001 10:01:20 -0600 Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 10:01:20 -0600 Message-Id: <200105171601.KAA29488@webmail.rmci.net> To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Re: Problems with W2K Server licenses and Samba as PDC From: X-Mailer: WebMail : massey@rmci.net (216.222.104.2) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ For testing only you can turn off the License Logging service.\\Only for testing though\\ -----Original Message----- FROM: Sarunas TO: samba-ntdom@samba.org DATE: Thu 5/17/01 9:49 SUBJECT: Re: Problems with W2K Server licenses and Samba as PDC At 04:44 PM 5/17/01 +0200, Martin Nilsson wrote: >"McEldowney, Michael" wrote: >I started with a w2k Pro as I thought that would do, I didn't want any of >the server functions that I use Samba for. When it maxed out at 10 >connections, >I replaced it with a w2k server that our local computershop let us borrow to >se if it would work. Same problem. Check the version of W2k Server that you borrowed. I was in similar situation with Win NT 4 server. It turned out the version of NT 4 server that I we received for testing purposes was a "Promotional. Not for resale". It allowed only for 10 connections no matter what the Licence Manager was configured for. Regards, Sarunas Burdulis Head Electronic Publishing, VTEX Ltd. sarunas@vtex.lt Office +370 2 729609, GSM +370 98 24498 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mta6.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (mta6.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.5.17]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A118649C5 for ; Thu, 17 May 2001 11:32:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dc300.dlevitan.com (ool-18bc5bae.dyn.optonline.net [24.188.91.174]) by mta6.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.0 Patch 2 (built Dec 14 2000)) with ESMTP id <0GDH001ZESVAWC@mta6.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Thu, 17 May 2001 14:33:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from dlevitan.com (p2400.dlevitan.com [192.168.1.26]) by dc300.dlevitan.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 945768855; Thu, 17 May 2001 14:33:12 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 14:33:15 -0400 From: David Levitan Subject: Re: Samba 2.2.1 Showstopper (was: Stste of Roaming Profiles) To: Gerald Carter Cc: Michael Forster , Samba NT Domain , Samba technical Message-id: <3B04196B.E623F361@dlevitan.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Accept-Language: en References: <3B0298E4.F9833CA1@valinux.com> <20010517100617.Q25275@pogo.plainjoe.org> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I think that although it is not a "required" update (according to http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/zd/20010517/tc/second_service_pack_for_win_2000_released_1.html), many people will install it anyway, just because it probably will make system performance, security, etc... better. If you want businesses to go over to samba, then you need to support the latest from microsoft, or else they'll ignore you. Maybe most people don't need SP2, but they'll install it anyway. Gerald Carter wrote: > > On Thu, 17 May 2001 02:52:13 Michael Forster wrote: > > > > How about the Windows 2000 Service Pack 2 issues? > > For me, this definitely is a showstopper. > > We're working on it. Just out of curiousity, what fix > in SP2 is critical for you? > > Cheers, jerry > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services > \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com > http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org > http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org > > "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." > - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) -- David Levitan LIS Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.valinux.com (mail.valinux.com [198.186.202.175]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE4055504; Thu, 17 May 2001 11:35:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from beefcake.hdqt.valinux.com ([10.1.0.14] helo=shells.valinux.com ident=mail) by mail.valinux.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 150Sdg-0004mc-00; Thu, 17 May 2001 11:36:44 -0700 Received: from gcarter (helo=localhost) by shells.valinux.com with local-esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 150Sdg-0001KH-00; Thu, 17 May 2001 11:36:44 -0700 Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 11:36:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Gerald Carter To: David Levitan Cc: Michael Forster , Samba NT Domain , Samba technical Subject: Re: Samba 2.2.1 Showstopper (was: Stste of Roaming Profiles) In-Reply-To: <3B04196B.E623F361@dlevitan.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Thu, 17 May 2001, David Levitan wrote: > I think that although it is not a "required" update (according to > http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/zd/20010517/tc/second_service_pack_for_win_2000_released_1.html), > many people will install it anyway, just because it probably will make > system performance, security, etc... better. If you want businesses to > go over to samba, then you need to support the latest from microsoft, or > else they'll ignore you. Maybe most people don't need SP2, but they'll > install it anyway. Nobody said we wouldn't support it. Just that all the bugs will probably not be addresses in 2.2.1. We don'y currently have AD and Kerberos support but people are still using Samba. I'm not saying this aren't important. But the fact is that 2.2.1 will fix several major bugs and we can't delay it's release indefinitely until all issues are addressed. 2.2.2 will include more bug fixes and so will 2.2.3, etc... Make sense? Cheers, jerry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.commerceflow.com (corp.commerceflow.com [208.185.105.100]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24F605515 for ; Thu, 17 May 2001 12:26:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from seph.commerceflow.com (seph.auctionflow.com [10.0.0.21]) by mail.commerceflow.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-6) with ESMTP id MAA10820 for ; Thu, 17 May 2001 12:28:06 -0700 Received: from seph by seph.commerceflow.com with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 150TRO-0006Mp-00 for ; Thu, 17 May 2001 12:28:06 -0700 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: samba and ldap From: seph Date: 17 May 2001 12:28:06 -0700 Message-ID: <6yheyjlqrd.fsf@seph.commerceflow.com> Lines: 7 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ can samba 2.2.0 pull user account information out of ldap? I found someone's notes online about setting it up with pre-2.1, using various ldap commands in the smb.conf file, but I can find those directives mentioned in the 2.2.0 docs. did this feature get dropped? seph Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from w102.web2010.com (w102.web2010.com [216.157.40.254]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EA5E45C2 for ; Thu, 17 May 2001 13:21:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from RMTSERVE (vsat-148-75-103-234.ssa7.mcl.starband.net [148.75.103.234]) by w102.web2010.com (8.9.3/8.9.0) with SMTP id QAA24821 for ; Thu, 17 May 2001 16:22:06 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: root To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Procedure out of range Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 16:20:17 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: <200105171658.LAA13915@mailhub.iastate.edu> In-Reply-To: <200105171658.LAA13915@mailhub.iastate.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01051713205001.17756@RMTSERVE> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi Justin, Yes I have been using only root account to try and join the domain. I am just about out of gas on this. If you can think of anything else I could try, that would be great. I might also try to send some logging info to the tech list and see if I get any responses there as well. Thanks for taking the time to reply. Many thanks, Erik On Thursday 17 May 2001 13:58, you wrote: > Have you been using the root account to add to the domain? Right now, no > matter how much privilege you give an admin account, it won't work without > truely being the root account..... > > > Hi, > > I was curious if anyone has found a definitive answer to this "Procedure > > out of range" > > problem yet? I am dead in the water on it. I have been monitoring the > > boards, and > > have tried all that has been suggested so far with no luck. > > My 98 clients are logging into the domain fine now, with the exception > > that they > > have to be listed in the admin users group in samba.conf. (sure it's a > > config prob) > > > > Please, if anyone has some insight to this, I would be most gracious to > > hear from > > you. > > On a side note, has anyone else had a problem connecting to swat through > > Konquerer? > > I had it working at 1 time but no more. I get "Server error, could not > > connect to > > the server" Though Mozilla works fine. Hmm > > > > Many thanks, > > Erik Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id ADE6849D3; Thu, 17 May 2001 14:20:58 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 14:20:58 -0700 To: seph Cc: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Re: samba and ldap Message-ID: <20010517142058.A21070@va.samba.org> References: <6yheyjlqrd.fsf@seph.commerceflow.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <6yheyjlqrd.fsf@seph.commerceflow.com>; from seph@commerceflow.com on Thu, May 17, 2001 at 12:28:06PM -0700 From: idra@samba.org (Simo Sorce) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 12:28:06PM -0700, seph wrote: > can samba 2.2.0 pull user account information out of ldap? > > I found someone's notes online about setting it up with pre-2.1, using > various ldap commands in the smb.conf file, but I can find those > directives mentioned in the 2.2.0 docs. did this feature get dropped? > The support of ldap is under heavy re-design, so it is not available right now in samba 2.2.0 It may be added in future 2.2.x releases. -- Simo Sorce ------------------------------ Unix IS user friendly, it is just selective about who his friends are. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from deakin.edu.au (hestia.its.deakin.edu.au [128.184.136.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08FB15564; Thu, 17 May 2001 16:21:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from itsfdave (128-184-137-191.its.deakin.edu.au [128.184.137.191]) by deakin.edu.au (8.11.2/8.11.2) with SMTP id f4HNJha16601; Fri, 18 May 2001 09:20:09 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <007f01c0df27$ebf8bec0$bf89b880@addev.deakin.edu.au> From: "David Schwarz" To: "Gerald Carter" Cc: "Samba NT Domain" , "Samba technical" References: <3B0298E4.F9833CA1@valinux.com> <20010517100617.Q25275@pogo.plainjoe.org> Subject: Re: Samba 2.2.1 Showstopper (was: Stste of Roaming Profiles) Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 09:19:20 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Gerald, you asked > We're working on it. Just out of curiousity, what fix > in SP2 is critical for you? The Bug we have to fix, and is fixed in SP2, is the time that My Computer takes to display all the network shares when you click on it. This problem is caused it seems by the workstation doing a RPC to see if there is a Job Scheduler on the server the share is on, before it shows the share. The time taken for the share to then display, seems to be dependent on how long the RPC call takes to time out. This problem is documented in the Microsoft Knowledge Base, but only on Netware and Win98 shares, I assume the bug is the same on Samba. The Article IDs are Q269590 and Q245800 Dave... Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.valinux.com (mail.valinux.com [198.186.202.175]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 711D04C77; Thu, 17 May 2001 18:31:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from legion.hdqt.valinux.com ([10.6.11.17] helo=valinux.com ident=jeremy) by mail.valinux.com with esmtp (Cipher SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 150Z7C-00042x-00; Thu, 17 May 2001 18:31:38 -0700 Message-ID: <3B045F75.DBC315DC@valinux.com> Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 19:32:05 -0400 From: Jeremy Allison Organization: VA Linux Systems X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.13-0.7 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Schwarz Cc: Gerald Carter , Samba NT Domain , Samba technical Subject: Re: Samba 2.2.1 Showstopper (was: Stste of Roaming Profiles) References: <3B0298E4.F9833CA1@valinux.com> <20010517100617.Q25275@pogo.plainjoe.org> <007f01c0df27$ebf8bec0$bf89b880@addev.deakin.edu.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ David Schwarz wrote: > The Bug we have to fix, and is fixed in SP2, is the time that My Computer > takes to display all the network shares when you click on it. > > This problem is caused it seems by the workstation doing a RPC to see if > there is a Job Scheduler on the server the share is on, before it shows the > share. > > The time taken for the share to then display, seems to be dependent on how > long the RPC call takes to time out. > > This problem is documented in the Microsoft Knowledge Base, but only on > Netware and Win98 shares, I assume the bug is the same on Samba. FYI: I just fixed the W2KSP2 joing a Samba 2.2.x PDC bug. It will be in the 2.2.1 release (more testing needed on the printer problem...). I can log in correctly as a UNIX user and get my profile loaded with W2kSP2. If you have CVS access you should try it out (2.2 or HEAD). Jeremy. -- -------------------------------------------------------- Buying an operating system without source is like buying a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions. -------------------------------------------------------- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ns2.hta-bi.bfh.ch (ns2.hta-bi.bfh.ch [147.87.1.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33FB5441B for ; Fri, 18 May 2001 00:12:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hta-bi.bfh.ch (extra.hta-bi.bfh.ch [147.87.65.240]) by ns2.hta-bi.bfh.ch (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f4I7Dod06363 for ; Fri, 18 May 2001 09:13:50 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from hta-bi.bfh.ch [147.87.65.116] by hta-bi.bfh.ch with Novonyx SMTP Server $Revision: 2.74 $; Fri, 18 May 2001 09:14:29 +0100 (MEST) Message-ID: <3B04CBD3.F36B6C98@hta-bi.bfh.ch> Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 09:14:27 +0200 From: Benjamin Grogg Organization: Biel School of Engineering and Architecture X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Version number. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi all, Yesterday I update Samba 2.0.7 to 2.2.0 because I want run a PDC (Clients are Win NT4.0 and Win2000). The UpDate works great, no errors and all files are copyed into the rigth location. But If I check the version number I have still 2.0.7. I can't join the Clients to the PDC. Whats wrong? Greetings Benny Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hotmail.com (f232.law11.hotmail.com [64.4.17.232]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E745422C for ; Fri, 18 May 2001 02:11:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Fri, 18 May 2001 02:12:04 -0700 Received: from 202.33.252.82 by lw11fd.law11.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Fri, 18 May 2001 09:12:04 GMT X-Originating-IP: [202.33.252.82] From: "Jean-Christian Imbeault" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: How to put a Samba server on an NT Domain? Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 09:12:04 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 May 2001 09:12:04.0731 (UTC) FILETIME=[9B1654B0:01C0DF7A] Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ In my continuing saga to get Samba going the way I want . . Now I am trying to get the samba server to show up in the network neighbourhood . . . The samba book I have says that to "Add a samba server to a Windows NT Domain" 1- add the machine to the domain by using the "Windows NT Server Manager" on the PDC 2- smbpasswd -j DOMAIN -r PDCname 3- add to smb.conf security = domain password server = PDCname workgroup = DOMAIN domain logons = yes Tried all that but the machine still does not show up when I browse the domain. If I try and access the machine using \\sambaName I get "the network path was not found". But if I try \\10.2.100.72 the machine comes up ... What am I doing wrong? How can I get the samba server to show up when I browse the domain? Jc _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id 1BB364605; Fri, 18 May 2001 02:20:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 02:20:40 -0700 To: Jean-Christian Imbeault Cc: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Re: How to put a Samba server on an NT Domain? Message-ID: <20010518022040.A29811@va.samba.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from jean_christian@hotmail.com on Fri, May 18, 2001 at 09:12:04AM -0000 From: idra@samba.org (Simo Sorce) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Do you have a WINS server in your lan? if so add wins server = On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 09:12:04AM -0000, Jean-Christian Imbeault wrote: > In my continuing saga to get Samba going the way I want . . > > Now I am trying to get the samba server to show up in the network > neighbourhood . . . > > The samba book I have says that to "Add a samba server to a Windows NT > Domain" > > 1- add the machine to the domain by using the "Windows NT Server Manager" on > the PDC > 2- smbpasswd -j DOMAIN -r PDCname > 3- add to smb.conf > > security = domain > password server = PDCname > workgroup = DOMAIN > domain logons = yes > > Tried all that but the machine still does not show up when I browse the > domain. If I try and access the machine using \\sambaName I get "the network > path was not found". > > But if I try \\10.2.100.72 the machine comes up ... > > What am I doing wrong? How can I get the samba server to show up when I > browse the domain? > > Jc > _________________________________________________________________________ > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. -- Simo Sorce ------------------------------ Unix IS user friendly, it is just selective about who his friends are. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.infosun.fmi.uni-passau.de (vivaldi.fmi.uni-passau.de [132.231.64.49]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E0854623 for ; Fri, 18 May 2001 02:38:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mephisto (vpn-forster [132.231.64.224]) by mail.infosun.fmi.uni-passau.de (Postfix) with SMTP id 97A7C30C01; Fri, 18 May 2001 11:39:01 +0200 (MET DST) From: "Michael Forster" To: "Samba NT Domain" , "Samba technical" Subject: RE: Samba 2.2.1 Showstopper (was: Stste of Roaming Profiles) Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 11:47:01 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <20010517100617.Q25275@pogo.plainjoe.org> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Gerald wrote: > On Thu, 17 May 2001 02:52:13 Michael Forster wrote: > > How about the Windows 2000 Service Pack 2 issues? > > For me, this definitely is a showstopper. > > We're working on it. Just out of curiousity, what fix > in SP2 is critical for you? Well, there is no SP2 fix which is "critical" for me. Most important are the security fixes and stability improvements that every Service Pack has, see David's posting. Gerald wrote in another posting: > Nobody said we wouldn't support it. Just that all the bugs will > probably not be addresses in 2.2.1. We don'y currently have AD and > Kerberos > support but people are still using Samba. I'm not saying this aren't > important. There is a difference: Missing AD and Kerberos support is a documented missing feature. Not being able to log on with SP2 is a bug in a feature documented to work. > But the fact is that 2.2.1 will fix several major bugs > and we can't delay it's release indefinitely until all issues are > addressed. 2.2.2 will include more bug fixes and so will 2.2.3, etc... > > Make sense? Of course. I just wanted to suggest to wait a few days for a (potentially trivial) fix for this severe bug. regards Mike p.s: Gerald: sorry, if you got this mail two times :-( -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use iQA+AwUBOwThhceYjj0YYPBiEQKGYQCYsgEbj3JzB0duEsAbf0+LM6juygCgw4Hh vdPIU9QNBDdzQKbj/ddSvAA= =UAp6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.infosun.fmi.uni-passau.de (vivaldi.fmi.uni-passau.de [132.231.64.49]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60B1F4623 for ; Fri, 18 May 2001 02:42:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mephisto (vpn-forster [132.231.64.224]) by mail.infosun.fmi.uni-passau.de (Postfix) with SMTP id E67D330C28; Fri, 18 May 2001 11:43:49 +0200 (MET DST) From: "Michael Forster" To: "Samba NT Domain" , "Samba technical" Subject: RE: Samba 2.2.1 Showstopper (was: Stste of Roaming Profiles) Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 11:51:47 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <3B045F75.DBC315DC@valinux.com> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Jeremy wrote: > FYI: I just fixed the W2KSP2 joing a Samba 2.2.x PDC > bug. It will be in the 2.2.1 release (more testing > needed on the printer problem...). > > I can log in correctly as a UNIX user and get my profile > loaded with W2kSP2. Great. Is this the same as Dariush's Problem, not being able to log on any more after a SP2 update? > If you have CVS access you should try it out (2.2 or HEAD). I'd like to, but unfortunately I can't at the moment. Regards Mike -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use iQA/AwUBOwTipMeYjj0YYPBiEQLkKgCg927u7O1lJ2DxqyOLxS+Rnn9/MxEAnReF Kc5QPIzRlpYSsjpOpvo8zm0H =4gqT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from indyio.rz.uni-sb.de (indyio.rz.uni-sb.de [134.96.7.3]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FDBA455F for ; Fri, 18 May 2001 03:56:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from caesar.rz.uni-saarland.de (IDENT:sUa/GfcH6MU+nTei7hJHYuwNPduy/UWB@caesar.rz.uni-sb.de [134.96.7.20]) by indyio.rz.uni-sb.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA1217912; Fri, 18 May 2001 12:57:34 +0200 (CST) Received: from studcs.uni-sb.de (IDENT:pehu@cc2-002.wiwi.uni-sb.de [134.96.119.3]) by caesar.rz.uni-saarland.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA16759280; Fri, 18 May 2001 12:57:33 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <3B050014.9098031C@studcs.uni-sb.de> Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 12:57:24 +0200 From: Peter =?iso-8859-1?Q?H=FCbschen?= X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [de] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.17-14 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: OT: Unsubscribe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, This is for the list-maintainer: I'm subscribed to this list under pehu@wiwi.uni-sb.de. The mailserver crashed yesterday, so I can't receive any mail over this address anymore and I don't know, when this address is available again. Unfortuneatly I've forgotten my subscribtion password, so I can't unsubscribe on the "normal" way (lists.samba.org....) (I've tried to guess my password, but it was always wrong). Please remove my address (pehu@wiwi.uni-sb.de) from this list or please change it to my other address (klf@studcs.uni-sb.de). Please don't blame me for that unsubscribe-mail, I've seen the answers, when other users tried to unsubscribe over the list. If you want to answer me, please contact me directly and not over the list, because I don't get this messages (see above ;-) ) Thanks in advance Peter Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mentos.hig.se (Mentos.HIG.SE [130.243.0.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E191D4A7C for ; Fri, 18 May 2001 04:30:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (magnus@localhost) by mentos.hig.se (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA15657 for ; Fri, 18 May 2001 13:31:42 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 13:31:42 +0200 (MET DST) From: Magnus Larsson X-Sender: magnus@mentos To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Samba 2.2.0 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, I have a problem with the new Samba 2.2.0 because after a few hours it stop releaseing the smbd processes and the connections gets very slow because of the all the smbd deamons on the server. Then I have to restart the samba server and then it's ok a few hours again. Im running Samba on a Solaris 7 enviroment. smb.conf; [global] workgroup = HIG-STUDENT netbios name = ADEPTUS log file = /usr/local/samba/var/log.%m max log size = 1000 log level = 1 deadtime = 3 socket options = TCP_NODELAY username map = /usr/local/samba/lib/users.map username = root, administrator, @student update encrypted = yes logon script = Ntlogin.bat domain logons = Yes os level = 36 preferred master = Yes domain master = Yes dns proxy = No wins proxy = Yes wins support = Yes valid chars = 0206:0217 0204:0216 0224:0231 0345:0305 0344:0304 0366:03\26 remote announce = 130.243.0.10/HIG hosts allow = 130.243.0.0/255.255.252.0, 130.243.12.0/255.255.252.0, 13\0.243.7.0/255.255.255.0 130.243.9.0/255.255.255.128 print command = /bin/lp -c -o nobanner -d %p %s ; rm %s lpq command = /bin/echo oplocks = No oplock break wait time = 2000 include = /etc/samba/conf.%a wide links = No time server = true read list = * write list = root, @staff a clip from a log file; [2001/05/18 13:20:25, 0] smbd/oplock.c:request_oplock_break(995) request_oplock_break: no response received to oplock break request to pid 27099 on port 65482 for dev = 8001f0, inode = 13107237 for dev = 8001f0, inode = 13107237, tv_sec = 3b050253, tv_usec = 6829d [2001/05/18 13:20:48, 0] smbd/oplock.c:request_oplock_break(995) request_oplock_break: no response received to oplock break request to pid 28498 on port 34105 for dev = 8001f0, inode = 717065 for dev = 8001f0, inode = 717065, tv_sec = 3b050508, tv_usec = e7c71 //Regards Magnus Larsson Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from gorkon.nms.s-net (f-155-161.hamburg.ipdial.viaginterkom.de [62.180.161.155]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB74D4B80 for ; Fri, 18 May 2001 04:35:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.3.6] (nathan.nms.s-net [192.168.3.6]) by gorkon.nms.s-net (8.9.3/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) with ESMTP id NAA06099 for ; Fri, 18 May 2001 13:33:09 +0200 User-Agent: Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.02.2106 Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 13:36:02 +0200 Subject: ACLs on member servers From: Sven Siemsen To: Samba NTDOM Mailingliste Message-ID: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, I'm using daily CVS samba 2.2 with POSIX ACL support an a patched 2.2.18 kernel. ACLs and the file perm. dialog work very well on the samba pdc. Now I have got a samba member server (cvs on 2.4.4-acl kernel) and changing and even viewing file acls there is impossible. Only plain old UNIX perms. are visible, they can't be changed. When trying to add a domain user to a file acl the log simply states: [2001/05/18 13:18:55, 0] smbd/posix_acls.c:create_canon_ace_lists(702) create_canon_ace_lists: unable to map SID S-1-5-21-3835460492-4097341591-3431380829-2002 to uid or gid. Of course the mentioned user does exist on the member server. Anything I forgot? Thanks in advance Sven Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from launchpad.private.net (unknown [24.216.65.114]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EEDB4D16; Fri, 18 May 2001 06:07:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from maestro ([10.10.10.1]) by launchpad.private.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id IAA20649; Fri, 18 May 2001 08:15:37 -0500 Message-ID: <021f01c0df9b$f766faa0$010a0a0a@private.net> From: "Kyle Herbert" To: "Samba NT Domain" , "Samba technical" References: <3B0298E4.F9833CA1@valinux.com> <20010517100617.Q25275@pogo.plainjoe.org> <007f01c0df27$ebf8bec0$bf89b880@addev.deakin.edu.au> <3B045F75.DBC315DC@valinux.com> Subject: Re: Samba 2.2.1 Showstopper (was: Stste of Roaming Profiles) Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 08:10:12 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Just thought I'd drop a line to say : "This team is amazing". Thanks for the great work. > FYI: I just fixed the W2KSP2 joing a Samba 2.2.x PDC > bug. It will be in the 2.2.1 release (more testing > needed on the printer problem...). > > I can log in correctly as a UNIX user and get my profile > loaded with W2kSP2. > > If you have CVS access you should try it out (2.2 or HEAD). > > Jeremy. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.valinux.com (mail.valinux.com [198.186.202.175]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1293647A4; Fri, 18 May 2001 06:14:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from beefcake.hdqt.valinux.com ([10.1.0.14] helo=localhost ident=root) by mail.valinux.com with smtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 150k5v-0004aM-00; Fri, 18 May 2001 06:15:03 -0700 Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 08:18:16 -0500 From: Gerald Carter To: David Schwarz Cc: Gerald Carter , Samba NT Domain , Samba technical Subject: Re: Samba 2.2.1 Showstopper (was: Stste of Roaming Profiles) Message-ID: <20010518081816.A4922@pogo.plainjoe.org> References: <3B0298E4.F9833CA1@valinux.com> <20010517100617.Q25275@pogo.plainjoe.org> <007f01c0df27$ebf8bec0$bf89b880@addev.deakin.edu.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <007f01c0df27$ebf8bec0$bf89b880@addev.deakin.edu.au>; from dave@deakin.edu.au on Thu, May 17, 2001 at 18:19:20 -0500 X-Mailer: Balsa 1.1.4 Content-Length: 914 Lines: 26 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Thu, 17 May 2001 18:19:20 David Schwarz wrote: > > The Bug we have to fix, and is fixed in SP2, is the > time that My Computer takes to display all the network > shares when you click on it. > > This problem is caused it seems by the workstation > doing a RPC to see if there is a Job Scheduler on the server > the share is on, before it shows the share. Thanks for the information. Good to know. Cheers, jerry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from gw.adixein.lnet (dyn-21-241.dialin.uq.net.au [203.100.21.241]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A78AD51AF for ; Fri, 18 May 2001 07:04:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 800 invoked from network); 18 May 2001 14:04:56 -0000 Received: from macka.adixein.lnet (HELO macka) (192.168.1.4) by gw.adixein.lnet with SMTP; 18 May 2001 14:04:56 -0000 From: "Elliot Mackenzie" To: "SAMBA - NTDOM" Subject: share timeout Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 00:04:49 +1000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <20010518081816.A4922@pogo.plainjoe.org> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I seem to have run into a rather interesting problem. I am running Samba as a PDC for Win2kSP1 machines. Everything behaves as it should except in one circumstance. If I leave my PC logged in (say I use lock computer or just leave it open as a guest user) for a couple of days, when I go to logout, it seems it has trouble writing to the profile. Under normal circumstances I log in and out and the profile does what it should, but if I am logged in for up to 48 hours and then logout I get the error "Unable to write profile: Access is denied" (for the same user). The PC does not sleep or "hibernate", though the screen goes into low power mode (I am currently running a PC for a few days with this switched off to see what happens). I was wondering, is there some timeout I have overlooked? I am running Samba 2.2.0 on a 2.4.xx linux kernel. If logs would be useful I will paste them up after I catch the error on the test PC. At present I am just hoping I have overlooked something. Regards, Elliot. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from itsdsv1.enc.edu (fw1.enc.edu [63.85.52.127]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 259B94F5E for ; Fri, 18 May 2001 08:25:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from enc.edu (r2s1.r.its.enc.edu [10.100.0.21]) by itsdsv1.enc.edu (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA21162; Fri, 18 May 2001 11:19:32 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3B054144.382E5B9E@enc.edu> Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 11:35:33 -0400 From: "Charles N. Owens" Organization: Eastern Nazarene College X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Martin Nilsson Cc: Dominic Baines , SAMBA ntdom Subject: Re: Problems with W2K Server licenses and Samba as PDC References: <3B03C3A5.D0E4E804@svenskabutiker.se> <04d101c0ded5$995b1f20$0764a8c0@domain> <3B03DCEC.3F7BBAEA@filex.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > Dominic Baines wrote: > > > > For more than 10 connections the W2K server will be > > attempting to verify licences with the PDC which acts as > > a licence server when you exceed 10 connections it > > expects it to verify with a licence server that needs to > > be a W2K PDC server I believe.... hence the error. So here's a question. We know that W2K (server or workstation) boxes can be run in NT4-PDC compitibility mode... and thus can work with a NT4ish PDC (WinNT or Samba). How does this license verfication stuff work in such a scenerio? Does a WinNT4 PDC have the license server functionality that a W2K server wants? Does a Samba PDC (2.2.x or TNG) support this functionality? In the case of Terminal Services there is a separate licensing daemon for tracking Termanal Services CALs. This can run on any Win2K box on the net... doesn't need to be a domain controller. So this part is okay in a Samba PDC setting. I'm a bit worried about this other W2K CAL tracking issue though. Can anyone shed light on this? cno > > > This sounds like the situation you have. Does this make > > sense ? > > Yes. > > > I mention this because I don't see the same problem here > > with a W2K server running as a colour printer server in > > a similar set-up but I KNOW the server was installed > > using the client licence not the server licence option so no > > need for the licence server. > > But what is a client license, where do I install that? > > /Martin > > > > Regards, > > > > Dominic > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Martin Nilsson" > > To: "SAMBA ntdom" > > Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 1:27 PM > > Subject: Problems with W2K Server licenses and Samba as PDC > > > > > Dear SMB Gurus, > > > > > > I have this strange setup: > > > > > > 1 FreeBSD 4.3 server with Samba 2.2.0 as PDC > > > 1 Win2k Server holds files and printers NOT PDC/BDC, just standalone > > server > > > that is member of the domain run by the Sama server. > > > 16 clients with win2k or win98 > > > > > > My problem is that the W2k server only accepts 10 simultaneous > > connections. > > > If I go into license manager when logged in as administrator on the domain > > I > > > get an error message saying that license manager is unable to connnect to > > the > > > domain. > > > > > > I have logged in as administrator locally and raised the client license > > count > > > but this does not help me as still only 10 clients are allowed to connect. > > > > > > Have anyone seen this before, what should I do? > > > > > > I'm considering junking the W2k machine and replacing it with another > > > FreeBSD/Samba machine but this will leave us without support for the > > specific > > > windows application that we use the Win2k server for. > > > > > > Any comments? > > > /Martin > > > -- > > > Martin Nilsson, Civilingenjvr M.Sc. CS&E > > > Svenska Butiker AB, > > > S:t Larsvdg 44, 222 70 Lund > > > martin@svenskabutiker.se > > > Tel: 046-304130 > > > www.svenskabutiker.se > > -- > Martin Nilsson, Civilingenjvr M.Sc. CS&E > Svenska Butiker AB, > S:t Larsvdg 44, 222 70 Lund > martin@svenskabutiker.se > Tel: 046-304130 > www.svenskabutiker.se -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles N. Owens Email: owensc@enc.edu http://www.enc.edu/~owensc Senior Technology Officer Information Technology Services Eastern Nazarene College ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from dep.oprit.rug.nl (dep.oprit.rug.nl [129.125.36.9]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E24F65156 for ; Fri, 18 May 2001 08:26:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from arie (flits101-227.flits.rug.nl [129.125.101.227]) by dep.oprit.rug.nl (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with SMTP id RAA20160 for ; Fri, 18 May 2001 17:27:39 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <002d01c0dfaf$13ab2cf0$0200a8c0@arie> From: "Bert Jan Wezeman" To: Subject: time server Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 17:27:40 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi all, I've got a samba pdc up and running and everythings seems to be working except the time server. when i have the samba server running and on my win2k workstation i do the following: net time \\pdc i get this output: Current time at \\pdc is 5/18/2001 1:51 PM Local time (GMT-01:00) at \\pdc is 5/18/2001 10:51 AM The command completed successfully. When i set the time with net time \\pdc /SET the time is set to the current time and not the localtime And the localtime is the time i want to use on my workstation. time server = yes time offset = 60 i am in the +1 gmt timezone (the netherlands). does anyone have any idea how this can be fixed ? Bert Jan Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from moutvdom00.kundenserver.de (moutvdom00.kundenserver.de [195.20.224.149]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B68346DD; Fri, 18 May 2001 08:52:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [195.20.224.208] (helo=mrvdom01.schlund.de) by moutvdom00.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #2) id 150mZj-0003Pn-00; Fri, 18 May 2001 17:53:59 +0200 Received: from p3e9bbc1b.dip.t-dialin.net ([62.155.188.27] helo=eridiani.forouher.de) by mrvdom01.schlund.de with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #2) id 150mYo-00035r-00; Fri, 18 May 2001 17:53:03 +0200 Received: from altair.forouher.de (altair.forouher.de [192.168.0.10]) by eridiani.forouher.de (Postfix (Forouher Mailgateway)) with ESMTP id A44AB2A9A9; Fri, 18 May 2001 17:52:58 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 17:52:58 +0200 (CEST) From: Dariush Forouher X-Sender: dariush@Altair To: Michael Forster Cc: Samba NT Domain , Samba technical Subject: RE: Samba 2.2.1 Showstopper In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Fri, 18 May 2001, Michael Forster wrote: > Jeremy wrote: > > FYI: I just fixed the W2KSP2 joing a Samba 2.2.x PDC > > bug. It will be in the 2.2.1 release (more testing > > needed on the printer problem...). > > > > I can log in correctly as a UNIX user and get my profile > > loaded with W2kSP2. > > Great. Is this the same as Dariush's Problem, not being able to log on any > more after a SP2 update? I've checked the current (17:00 CEST) cvs out: joining win2k sp-1 works, sp-2 not. Should I wait 24 hours until anonymous cvs is updated? regards Dariush Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.net [194.221.183.20]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 34C0D55CD for ; Fri, 18 May 2001 09:56:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 2390 invoked by uid 0); 18 May 2001 16:57:37 -0000 Received: from pop-be-4-2-dialup-219.freesurf.ch (HELO apollo) (194.230.167.219) by mail.gmx.net (mp002-rz3) with SMTP; 18 May 2001 16:57:37 -0000 Message-ID: <002401c0dfbb$a60381e0$0200a8c0@jupiter> From: "Samuel Suter" To: "Bert Jan Wezeman" Cc: "Samba ntdom" References: <002d01c0dfaf$13ab2cf0$0200a8c0@arie> Subject: Re: time server Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 18:57:35 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi I think you have the wrong time set on your server. You wrote, that the "net time" command gives this output: "Local time (GMT-01:00) at \\pdc is 5/18/2001 10:51 AM". There you can see, that your server has the timezone GMT -01:00). I recommend you, to set the time ond your PDC via a NTP server. I am from switzerland (and have GMT +01:00 too). I use the timeserver from one of our universities. Try "ntpdate swisstime.ethz.ch" on your PDC. Or search another NTP server in your country. Samuel Suter ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bert Jan Wezeman" To: Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 5:27 PM Subject: time server > Hi all, > > I've got a samba pdc up and running and everythings seems to be working except > the time server. > when i have the samba server running and on my win2k workstation i do the > following: > > net time \\pdc > > i get this output: > > Current time at \\pdc is 5/18/2001 1:51 PM > > Local time (GMT-01:00) at \\pdc is 5/18/2001 10:51 AM > > The command completed successfully. > > When i set the time with > > net time \\pdc /SET > > the time is set to the current time and not the localtime And the localtime is > the time > i want to use on my workstation. > > > > time server = yes > time offset = 60 > > > > i am in the +1 gmt timezone (the netherlands). > > does anyone have any idea how this can be fixed ? > > > Bert Jan > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from zabumba.coltec.ufmg.br (zabumba.coltec.ufmg.br [150.164.102.68]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5943B5637 for ; Fri, 18 May 2001 10:29:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 25714 invoked by uid 5004); 18 May 2001 17:29:59 -0000 Message-ID: <20010518172959.25713.qmail@zabumba.coltec.ufmg.br> From: "Leonardo Luiz Padovani da Mata" To: "Samba-NT" Subject: User rights Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 17:29:59 GMT Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ 1-I whant to shutdown my NT workstations using the microsoft shutdown.exe program, but i can't do that with the admin user group(staff) user. why? 2-When i whant to see a list of user to add the right to do something, the nt doesn't shown the entire list (my list has 600 users). Why? 3-I think that when i choose the right to 'domain adim' in a NT workstation, the user that is part of that group (in linux) isn't reconized part of that group (in my network the adim is the staff group). Am i rigth? Help me with these problems. This is my smb.conf: [global] workgroup = n2m netbios name = zabumba server string = SAMBA PDC hosts allow = 150.164.102. security = user status = yes encrypt passwords = yes domain admin group = @staff # username map = /etc/smbusers socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 os level = 65 domain logons = yes logon script = scripts\%U.bat logon home = \\%L\%U\.profiles # logon path = \\%L\%U\Profiles # utilizado para roaming profiles #logon path = # eh utilizado para perfil local logon path = share modes = no unix password sync = true passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u passwd chat = *password* %n\n *password* %n\n *successful* time server = yes guest account = nobody logon drive = z: [homes] # comment = Home Directories browseable = yes writable = yes [staff] #comment = root directory path = /home valid users = helena, lilica, fantini, humberto, alfredo, barroca admin users = helena, lilica, fantini, humberto, alfredo, barroca browseable = yes writeable = yes [web_coltec] path = /home/httpd/html valid users = root, humberto, barroca, alfredo admin users = root, humberto, barroca, alfredo browseable = yes writeable = yes [web_n2m] path = /home/httpd/html/n2m valid users = root, humberto, helena, lilica, barroca, alfredo admin users = root, humberto, helena, lilica, barroca, alfredo browseable = yes writeable = yes [biomas] path= /home/setores/biomas valid users = crono, blackpig, alfredo admin users = alfredo browseable = yes writable = yes [trabalho] #comment = root directory path = /home/alunos/trabalho browseable = yes writeable = no [pemja] #comment = root directory path = /home/pemja valid users = ccvieira admin users = ccvieira browseable = yes writeable = yes [netlogon] comment = Network Logon Service path = /home/samba/netlogon # guest ok = yes locking = no public = no browseable = yes writable = no share modes = no [zabuprn] # coment = zabuprn valid users = root,alfredo,helena,lilica,barroca,macarrao,humberto,mchiaretto,fantini,lucia,ccvieira ; printing command = /usr/bin/lpr -r %s printer = zabuprn public = no writable = no printable = yes printing = BSD Leonardo Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.valinux.com (mail.valinux.com [198.186.202.175]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17E465699 for ; Fri, 18 May 2001 11:54:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from legion.hdqt.valinux.com ([10.6.11.17] helo=valinux.com ident=jeremy) by mail.valinux.com with esmtp (Cipher SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 150pOz-00074U-00; Fri, 18 May 2001 11:55:05 -0700 Message-ID: <3B055405.1EE657F7@valinux.com> Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 12:55:33 -0400 From: Jeremy Allison Organization: VA Linux Systems X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.13-0.7 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sven Siemsen Cc: Samba NTDOM Mailingliste Subject: Re: ACLs on member servers References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Sven Siemsen wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm using daily CVS samba 2.2 with POSIX ACL support an a patched 2.2.18 > kernel. ACLs and the file perm. dialog work very well on the samba pdc. > Now I have got a samba member server (cvs on 2.4.4-acl kernel) and changing > and even viewing file acls there is impossible. Only plain old UNIX perms. > are visible, they can't be changed. > When trying to add a domain user to a file acl the log simply states: > [2001/05/18 13:18:55, 0] smbd/posix_acls.c:create_canon_ace_lists(702) > create_canon_ace_lists: unable to map SID > S-1-5-21-3835460492-4097341591-3431380829-2002 to uid or gid. > Of course the mentioned user does exist on the member server. > Anything I forgot? You need a working winbindd to make this work. Winbindd provides the mapping between domain users and unix users that allows this to be done. winbindd will be rolled into Samba 2.2.2, and is currently seperately buildable in CVS HEAD. Warning - pre-alpha code warnings apply.... Regards, Jeremy Allison, Samba Team. -- -------------------------------------------------------- Buying an operating system without source is like buying a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions. -------------------------------------------------------- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ray.srv.compu-aid.net (ray.srv.compu-aid.net [63.114.48.11]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F8A54408 for ; Sun, 20 May 2001 06:41:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (sean@localhost) by ray.srv.compu-aid.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA05230 for ; Sun, 20 May 2001 09:42:22 -0400 Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 09:42:22 -0400 (EDT) From: "Sean E. Millichamp" X-Sender: To: Subject: joining NetApp Filer in Samba NT domain Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Has anyone had any success with this? I am working with someone who has an existing NetApp Filer (release 5.3.7R3) and we are in the process of installing a Samba controlled NT domain where no NT domain existed before. I have tried a number of times to join the filer to the new domain (previously it was standalone) but it keeps telling me that it was unable to join to the domain. I have read in mailing list archives that seem to indicate that the filer was known to not work with any of the CVS code but I thought perhaps with real PDC support in 2.2 someone might have made it work. I can provide logs at any debug level you would like and packet traces of the attempt to join if that would be of any help in resolving it. My eventual goal is to convince them to replace the Filer with a free Unix running Samba but for now it has to stay and it would be fabulous if I could make the additional password prompting go away. If someone can help me make this work I'll provide the pizza :) Thanks in advance. Sean PS: The NT domain support is fabulous! Many thanks to all the Samba team members! ------------------------------------------ Sean E. Millichamp, Consultant Ingematics - A Division of Compu-Aid, Inc. Return-Path: <9Mager@uppingham.co.uk> Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from intsrv (mail.uppingham.leics.sch.uk [195.59.103.130]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 86CF64755; Sun, 20 May 2001 07:04:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: From EMAILSRV.UPPINGHAM.CO.UK (172.16.0.14[172.16.0.14 port:1918]) by intsrv Mail essentials (server 2.422) with SMTP id: <1386@intsrv> for ; Sun, 20 May 2001 15:05:01 +0100 smtpmailfrom <9Mager@uppingham.co.uk> Received: by EMAILSRV with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Sun, 20 May 2001 15:05:10 +0100 Message-ID: <293BE1A6609BD411AEC300A0C9FC055E749328@EMAILSRV> From: Mager Charles WB <9Mager@uppingham.co.uk> To: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" , "'samba@lists.samba.org'" Subject: Email... Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 15:05:06 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Slightly off the point, I know - but does anyone know of a decent, free Exchange-Server equivalent for Linux? I would really like internal email on my network, and I don't really fancy spending hours trying to follow instuctions on how to do it with about a million pieces of software.... -- Charles Mager charlie@csmager.co.uk This email and the information that it contains may be confidential, legally privileged and protected by law. Access by the intended recipient only is authorised. Any liability (in negligence or otherwise) arising from any third party acting, or refraining from acting, on any information contained in this email is hereby excluded. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the informationin any medium. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.valinux.com (mail.valinux.com [198.186.202.175]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A53634854 for ; Sun, 20 May 2001 07:11:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from beefcake.hdqt.valinux.com ([10.1.0.14] helo=shells.valinux.com ident=mail) by mail.valinux.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 151TwR-0008Gm-00; Sun, 20 May 2001 07:12:19 -0700 Received: from gcarter (helo=localhost) by shells.valinux.com with local-esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 151TwR-0008DB-00; Sun, 20 May 2001 07:12:19 -0700 Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 07:12:18 -0700 (PDT) From: Gerald Carter To: "Sean E. Millichamp" Cc: Subject: Re: joining NetApp Filer in Samba NT domain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Sun, 20 May 2001, Sean E. Millichamp wrote: > I can provide logs at any debug level you would like and packet traces > of the attempt to join if that would be of any help in resolving it. Send me (offlist) a raw tcpdump file and a level 10 debug output from the smbd and I'll look at it. tcpdump -w /tmp/output.dump -s 65535 -i eth0 Cheers, jerry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id AF69E47A3; Sun, 20 May 2001 10:33:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 10:33:50 -0700 To: Mager Charles WB <9Mager@uppingham.co.uk> Cc: samba-ntdom@samba.org, samba@samba.org Subject: Re: Email... Message-ID: <20010520103350.A31045@va.samba.org> References: <293BE1A6609BD411AEC300A0C9FC055E749328@EMAILSRV> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <293BE1A6609BD411AEC300A0C9FC055E749328@EMAILSRV>; from 9Mager@uppingham.co.uk on Sun, May 20, 2001 at 03:05:06PM +0100 From: idra@samba.org (Simo Sorce) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ You may be interested in HP OpenMail. http://www.openmail.com/cyc/om/00/index.html On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 03:05:06PM +0100, Mager Charles WB wrote: > Slightly off the point, I know - but does anyone know of a decent, free > Exchange-Server equivalent for Linux? I would really like internal email on > my network, and I don't really fancy spending hours trying to follow > instuctions on how to do it with about a million pieces of software.... > > -- > Charles Mager > charlie@csmager.co.uk > > This email and the information that it contains may be confidential, > legally privileged and protected by law. Access by the intended > recipient only is authorised. Any liability (in negligence or otherwise) > arising from any third party acting, or refraining from acting, on any > information contained in this email is hereby excluded. If you are > not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately > and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for > any purpose, or store or copy the informationin any medium. -- Simo Sorce ------------------------------ Unix IS user friendly, it is just selective about who his friends are. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mindiq.com (unknown [63.90.83.182]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D06EC4A6C; Sun, 20 May 2001 10:52:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.75] (HELO kat) by mindiq.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.6) with SMTP id 620152; Sun, 20 May 2001 13:53:14 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: kathee To: idra@samba.org (Simo Sorce), Mager Charles WB <9Mager@uppingham.co.uk> Subject: Re: Email... Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 13:53:40 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] Cc: samba-ntdom@samba.org, samba@samba.org References: <293BE1A6609BD411AEC300A0C9FC055E749328@EMAILSRV> <20010520103350.A31045@va.samba.org> In-Reply-To: <20010520103350.A31045@va.samba.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01052013534000.00968@kat> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ CommuniGate Pro -- awesome.. $495 for 50 users.... -kat On Sunday 20 May 2001 01:33 pm, Simo Sorce wrote: > You may be interested in HP OpenMail. > http://www.openmail.com/cyc/om/00/index.html > > On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 03:05:06PM +0100, Mager Charles WB wrote: > > Slightly off the point, I know - but does anyone know of a decent, free > > Exchange-Server equivalent for Linux? I would really like internal email > > on my network, and I don't really fancy spending hours trying to follow > > instuctions on how to do it with about a million pieces of software.... > > > > -- > > Charles Mager > > charlie@csmager.co.uk > > > > This email and the information that it contains may be confidential, > > legally privileged and protected by law. Access by the intended > > recipient only is authorised. Any liability (in negligence or otherwise) > > arising from any third party acting, or refraining from acting, on any > > information contained in this email is hereby excluded. If you are > > not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately > > and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for > > any purpose, or store or copy the informationin any medium. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from buckeye-express.com (angas400.accesstoledo.com [208.16.180.15]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BE3F46A0; Sun, 20 May 2001 14:14:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scot.wcnet.org [207.12.173.235] by buckeye-express.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-6.06) id A2625B120092; Sun, 20 May 2001 17:08:50 -0400 Message-Id: <5.0.0.25.2.20010520171312.01cb09a0@mcewen.wcnet.org> X-Sender: skmail@mcewen.wcnet.org X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0 Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 17:14:33 -0400 To: idra@samba.org (Simo Sorce), Mager Charles WB <9Mager@uppingham.co.uk> From: Scot Kreienkamp Subject: Re: Email... Cc: samba-ntdom@samba.org, samba@samba.org In-Reply-To: <20010520103350.A31045@va.samba.org> References: <293BE1A6609BD411AEC300A0C9FC055E749328@EMAILSRV> <293BE1A6609BD411AEC300A0C9FC055E749328@EMAILSRV> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Unfortunately HP Openmail is a dead program. I would not suggest deploying it in anything but a lab. There are still many bugs and they aren't going to get fixed as HP has dropped development of it. At 01:33 PM Sunday 5/20/01, Simo Sorce wrote: >You may be interested in HP OpenMail. >http://www.openmail.com/cyc/om/00/index.html > >On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 03:05:06PM +0100, Mager Charles WB wrote: > > Slightly off the point, I know - but does anyone know of a decent, free > > Exchange-Server equivalent for Linux? I would really like internal email on > > my network, and I don't really fancy spending hours trying to follow > > instuctions on how to do it with about a million pieces of software.... > > > > -- > > Charles Mager > > charlie@csmager.co.uk > > > > This email and the information that it contains may be confidential, > > legally privileged and protected by law. Access by the intended > > recipient only is authorised. Any liability (in negligence or otherwise) > > arising from any third party acting, or refraining from acting, on any > > information contained in this email is hereby excluded. If you are > > not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately > > and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for > > any purpose, or store or copy the informationin any medium. > >-- >Simo Sorce >------------------------------ > Unix IS user friendly, it is just selective about who his friends are. >-- >To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the >instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from clerk.pi.huji.ac.il (clerk.pi.huji.ac.il [132.64.71.100]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02C61446C; Sun, 20 May 2001 22:14:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (schapiro@localhost) by clerk.pi.huji.ac.il (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA30380; Mon, 21 May 2001 08:15:09 +0300 Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 08:15:09 +0300 (IDT) From: Schlomo Schapiro To: Mager Charles WB <9Mager@uppingham.co.uk> Cc: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" , "'samba@lists.samba.org'" Subject: Re: Email... In-Reply-To: <293BE1A6609BD411AEC300A0C9FC055E749328@EMAILSRV> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, replying also to other mails ... We deployed HP OpenMail last year. While it works well and does what it should, configuring it is a pain and Client support is not too good (e.g. we couldn't get Outlook 2000 to work with it well, their own client sucks). Tried also IntraStore 2000 (by CDC). Just one word on it: DO NOT TOUCH IT !!! It is even worse than HP OpenMail in mostly every aspect ... Finally we bought the SuSE Email Server II. It's basically cyrus+procmail+IMP+postfix & a very good web-based admin piece written by SuSE. It's only email, though. Priced at $255 per SERVER (unlimited users) I think its worth the money since I never would be able to put it ALL together for this amount (in work-hours), includes 2 years of support ... I decided against CommuniGate for it's high price and per user pricing ... Let us know if you find something REALLY good ! Schlomo PS: For calendaring we use Star Office Scheduler. Sucks too but it's possible to survive. PPS: If you have a NetWare server standing around, they have 2 rather good products: GroupWise & NIMS. Especially if you need a corporation-wide solution this might be worthwhile. On Sun, 20 May 2001, Mager Charles WB wrote: > Slightly off the point, I know - but does anyone know of a decent, free > Exchange-Server equivalent for Linux? I would really like internal email on > my network, and I don't really fancy spending hours trying to follow > instuctions on how to do it with about a million pieces of software.... > > -- Schlomo Schapiro Computation Authority Hebrew University of Jerusalem Tel: ++972 / 2 / 65-84404 Fax: 65-27349 email: schapiro@clerk.pi.huji.ac.il WWW: http://shum.cc.huji.ac.il/~schapiro Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.webbewusa.net (c960008-a.cstvl1.sfba.home.com [24.10.177.9]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A19AB44DC for ; Sun, 20 May 2001 23:01:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 19124 invoked from network); 21 May 2001 05:59:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ntws) (kevin@i-cho.com@192.168.1.99) by c960008-a.cstvl1.sfba.home.com with SMTP; 21 May 2001 05:59:26 -0000 Message-ID: <001001c0e1ba$bbe668a0$6301a8c0@inside.icho.com> From: "Kevin Cho" To: Subject: domain group question Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 22:56:09 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I've been using 2.2 with W2K advance server as domain members running Citrix Metaframe XP. So far, it's been wonderful. I do have one question regarding domain groups that I cannot seem to get an answer from anywhere. When I select the samba PDC domain for application security in Citrix, I see only two user groups - domain administrators and domain users. When I click the show users, I see all samba users. What I would like to do is to create additional domain groups and assign users to them. In Citrix, I want to publish applications with security set at domain group level and not at individual user level. In /etc/passwd, I already have users assigned to different groups for file security purpose but I don't see these groups under W2K. I've ran into few archives that discuss use of "domain group map" parameters but this appears to be not supported in 2.2. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks in advance. Kevin Cho Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.valinux.com (mail.valinux.com [198.186.202.175]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A90F4560 for ; Sun, 20 May 2001 23:04:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from beefcake.hdqt.valinux.com ([10.1.0.14] helo=shells.valinux.com ident=mail) by mail.valinux.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 151ip2-0000jp-00; Sun, 20 May 2001 23:05:40 -0700 Received: from gcarter (helo=localhost) by shells.valinux.com with local-esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 151ip2-0006PY-00; Sun, 20 May 2001 23:05:40 -0700 Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 23:05:40 -0700 (PDT) From: Gerald Carter To: Kevin Cho Cc: Subject: Re: domain group question In-Reply-To: <001001c0e1ba$bbe668a0$6301a8c0@inside.icho.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Sun, 20 May 2001, Kevin Cho wrote: > I've been using 2.2 with W2K advance server as domain members running > Citrix Metaframe XP. So far, it's been wonderful. I do have one > question regarding domain groups that I cannot seem to get an answer > from anywhere. When I select the samba PDC domain for application > security in Citrix, I see only two user groups - domain administrators > and domain users. When I click the show users, I see all samba users. > What I would like to do is to create additional domain groups and > assign users to them. In Citrix, I want to publish applications with > security set at domain group level and not at individual user level. > In /etc/passwd, I already have users assigned to different groups for > file security purpose but I don't see these groups under W2K. proper domain group support is forthcoming in a future Samba release. It is not in the 2.2 branch yet. CHeers, jerry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from magnum.mpi-bremen.de (magnum.mpi-bremen.de [194.95.6.213]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A55A54213 for ; Mon, 21 May 2001 00:38:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from postgate.mpi-bremen.de (mpi-fw2-0.mpi-bremen.de [194.95.6.253]) by magnum.mpi-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88AAB2EA0C for ; Mon, 21 May 2001 09:02:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mpi-bremen.de (flavea.mpi-bremen.de [194.95.6.73]) by postgate.mpi-bremen.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA13038 for ; Mon, 21 May 2001 09:05:21 +0200 Message-ID: <3B08D9FB.6B050F3A@mpi-bremen.de> Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:03:55 +0200 From: Florian Lorenzen Organization: Max-Planck-Institut =?iso-8859-1?Q?f=FCr?= marine Mikrobiologie Bremen X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.74 [de] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Migration problem Samba 2.0.5a -> 2.2.0 / Samba as PDC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Dear all, we want to upgrade from Samba 2.0.5a to Samba 2.2.0. The 2.0.5a-version was succesfully running as PDC for all our Windows NT-clients. SO, we have a working and complete smbpasswd-file with all those machine accounts and all NT-workstations are registered to our domain. On updating to Samba 2.2.0, we encountered the following problem: we of course wanted to reuse our smbpasswd-file and .conf-file as well. Those were moved to Samba's new config-file-directory and 2.2.0 started without errors. All 9x-clients successfully logged on to the domain but the NTs had trouble and the message "The system cannot log you on to this domain because the systems computer account in its primary domain is missing or the password on that account is incorrect." appeared on logon. The user's password was correct. After a locasl login to the workstation we could access the Samba-server without problems via the Network Neighbourhood, i. e. encrypted passwords work correctly. We could solve this problem by newly creating the machine account with the Samba 2.2.0 smbpasswd-tool and then removing and readding the NT to the domain. The (important) question now is, whether it's possible to migrate without recreating all those machine accounts and without readding all the NTs to the domain (we have several hundred of those). That is to resuse the smbpasswd-file that was created by the previous 2.0.5a-Samba-version. Please help quickly, we need 2.2.0 because of W2K. Thanks in advance to everybody, Florian Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from dican.se (sdu179-199.ppp.algonet.se [195.163.199.179]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07FBC4793 for ; Mon, 21 May 2001 00:40:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dican.se (fs_nt1 [192.168.2.142]) by dican.se (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f4L7fGF12979; Mon, 21 May 2001 09:41:16 +0200 Message-ID: <3B08C9F3.ADBF40C4@dican.se> Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 09:55:31 +0200 From: Magnus Sundberg Organization: Dican AB X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.71 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: sv,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rodolphe Kapouyan Cc: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Re: Is there someone using samba and F-secure antivirus ? References: <001801c0de0f$8bcbf850$3266a8c0@cref.dyndns.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, I have tried without any greater luck. The latest method I have had no luck with is with the communications directory on the samba server and running backweb on one of the clients. I had some luck with Defining a local account on one of the clients. client\commdir Then running backweb, and central administration from that client. Note that when you specify the account name you have often to precide the account name with clientname\account. If you want to check if your configuration changes, then you have to start and stop the F-secure management agent. The logfile from the management agent is also useful I am seriously considering another virus protection software regards, Magnus Rodolphe Kapouyan wrote: > > I'm trying to use f-secure with centralized management on a samba share ,and > want to known if someone do the same Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from magnum.mpi-bremen.de (magnum.mpi-bremen.de [194.95.6.213]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6105D49A9 for ; Mon, 21 May 2001 00:58:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from postgate.mpi-bremen.de (mpi-fw2-0.mpi-bremen.de [194.95.6.253]) by magnum.mpi-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AB102EA0C for ; Mon, 21 May 2001 09:22:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mpi-bremen.de (flavea.mpi-bremen.de [194.95.6.73]) by postgate.mpi-bremen.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA13310 for ; Mon, 21 May 2001 09:25:20 +0200 Message-ID: <3B08DEA8.3A8C371A@mpi-bremen.de> Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:52 +0200 From: Florian Lorenzen Organization: Max-Planck-Institut =?iso-8859-1?Q?f=FCr?= marine Mikrobiologie Bremen X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.74 [de] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Migration problem Samba 2.0.5a -> 2.2.0 / Samba as PDC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Dear all, we want to upgrade from Samba 2.0.5a to Samba 2.2.0. The 2.0.5a-version was succesfully running as PDC for all our Windows NT-clients. SO, we have a working and complete smbpasswd-file with all those machine accounts and all NT-workstations are registered to our domain. On updating to Samba 2.2.0, we encountered the following problem: we of course wanted to reuse our smbpasswd-file and .conf-file as well. Those were moved to Samba's new config-file-directory and 2.2.0 started without errors. All 9x-clients successfully logged on to the domain but the NTs had trouble and the message "The system cannot log you on to this domain because the systems computer account in its primary domain is missing or the password on that account is incorrect." appeared on logon. The user's password was correct. After a locasl login to the workstation we could access the Samba-server without problems via the Network Neighbourhood, i. e. encrypted passwords work correctly. We could solve this problem by newly creating the machine account with the Samba 2.2.0 smbpasswd-tool and then removing and readding the NT to the domain. The (important) question now is, whether it's possible to migrate without recreating all those machine accounts and without readding all the NTs to the domain (we have several hundred of those). That is to resuse the smbpasswd-file that was created by the previous 2.0.5a-Samba-version. Please help quickly, we need 2.2.0 because of W2K. Thanks in advance to everybody, Florian Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from maties2.sun.ac.za (maties2.sun.ac.za [146.232.128.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13A7C4A6F for ; Mon, 21 May 2001 01:01:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.cae.sun.ac.za ([146.232.145.5]) by maties2.sun.ac.za with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #5) id 151kdV-0002R9-00; Mon, 21 May 2001 10:01:53 +0200 Received: by www.cae.sun.ac.za (Postfix, from userid 239) id 364F8E02F; Mon, 21 May 2001 10:11:06 +0200 (SAST) Received: from cae.co.za (bgmilne.cae.sun.ac.za [146.232.146.2]) by www.cae.sun.ac.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ABE4E02F; Mon, 21 May 2001 10:11:00 +0200 (SAST) Message-ID: <3B08CB43.EC19B410@cae.co.za> Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 10:01:07 +0200 From: Buchan Milne Organization: CAE X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3-20mdk i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: charlie@csmager.co.uk Cc: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM Subject: Re: Email Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ It's a bit dangerous saying "Exchange" if all you want is email, since Exchange provides groupware also. We have the following: -Samba 2.2.0 PDC -Postfix as packaged with our linux distribution -wu-imap (which serves as pop and imap server) as packaged with our distribution -pam_smb (to authenticate for wu-imap from the samba password) compiled from source -Star Schedule Server for groupware (shared calendar, tasks) - Comes on StarOffice CD - $39 (Unfortunately the Star Schedule component has been dropped from OpenOffice and hence StarOffice 6, so I'm looking for a replacement ...) To set this up on a decent linux distibution should take you less than an hour (including the 30 minutes to install Star Schedule Server and 15 minutes to compile pam_smb from source) We then also added a mail virus scanner (amavis with McAfee) If you don't have a domain, or don't mind having different passwords, you only need postfix (or sendmail, qmail, exim ...) and wu-imap, or whatever comes with your distro. Mail if you need help ... > Slightly off the point, I know - but does anyone know of a decent, free > Exchange-Server equivalent for Linux? I would really like internal email on > my network, and I don't really fancy spending hours trying to follow > instuctions on how to do it with about a million pieces of software.... > > -- > Charles Mager > charlie@csmager.co.uk -- |----------------Registered Linux User #182071-----------------| Buchan Milne Mechanical Engineer, Network Manager Cellphone * Work +27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 808 2497 Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailer2.lut.ac.uk (mailer2.lut.ac.uk [158.125.1.206]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CECB944FA; Mon, 21 May 2001 01:50:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [158.125.1.116] (helo=staffpop1.lboro.ac.uk ident=root) by mailer2.lut.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.10 #1) id 151lPt-0005HJ-00; Mon, 21 May 2001 09:51:53 +0100 Received: from nobody by staffpop1.lboro.ac.uk with local (Exim 3.13 #1) id 151lPt-0004hm-00; Mon, 21 May 2001 09:51:53 +0100 To: Mager Charles WB <9Mager@uppingham.co.uk> Subject: Re: Email... Message-ID: <990435113.3b08d72936d18@staff-webmail.lboro.ac.uk> Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 09:51:53 +0100 (BST) From: R.J.Mckeating@lboro.ac.uk Cc: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" , "'samba@lists.samba.org'" References: <293BE1A6609BD411AEC300A0C9FC055E749328@EMAILSRV> In-Reply-To: <293BE1A6609BD411AEC300A0C9FC055E749328@EMAILSRV> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.1 X-Originating-IP: 131.231.80.5 X-Lboro-Filtered: mailer2.lut.ac.uk, Mon, 21 May 2001 09:51:54 +0100 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Well we average about 1 million emails per week through our service and we run it on exim under linux. You may also be interested to know that because exim allows such good filtering we did not get one single user suffering from any of the VB type viruses of late. From a user base of 17000 users that is not bad. check out www.exim.org, it is free, fast and very flexible. RonMac Quoting Mager Charles WB <9Mager@uppingham.co.uk>: > Slightly off the point, I know - but does anyone know of a decent, free > Exchange-Server equivalent for Linux? I would really like internal email > on > my network, and I don't really fancy spending hours trying to follow > instuctions on how to do it with about a million pieces of software.... > > -- > Charles Mager > charlie@csmager.co.uk > > This email and the information that it contains may be confidential, > legally privileged and protected by law. Access by the intended > recipient only is authorised. Any liability (in negligence or otherwise) > > arising from any third party acting, or refraining from acting, on any > information contained in this email is hereby excluded. If you are > not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately > and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for > any purpose, or store or copy the informationin any medium. > > Ron McKeating Computing Services Loughborough University 01509 222329 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mailer2.lut.ac.uk (mailer2.lut.ac.uk [158.125.1.206]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D93BD4AC1 for ; Mon, 21 May 2001 02:42:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [158.125.1.116] (helo=staffpop1.lboro.ac.uk ident=root) by mailer2.lut.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.10 #1) id 151mDq-0007RI-00 for samba-ntdom@samba.org; Mon, 21 May 2001 10:43:30 +0100 Received: from nobody by staffpop1.lboro.ac.uk with local (Exim 3.13 #1) id 151mDq-0007Rz-00 for samba-ntdom@samba.org; Mon, 21 May 2001 10:43:30 +0100 To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Further Email Message-ID: <990438210.3b08e34285fd5@staff-webmail.lboro.ac.uk> Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 10:43:30 +0100 (BST) From: R.J.Mckeating@lboro.ac.uk MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.1 X-Originating-IP: 131.231.80.5 X-Lboro-Filtered: mailer2.lut.ac.uk, Mon, 21 May 2001 10:43:31 +0100 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ The recent questions about email had me thinking, I know this is a samba list and this is off topic, but we are all trying to solve the same problems so if I could just take a few seconds of your time. If you are using exim already could you let me know what you think of it. If you want (as we do) to have your students (users?) access email from anywhere then do you use an IMAP web based mailer. We use IMP (http://horde.org/imp/) and our students are very happy with it. As they can use ir from Hall, Home or Lab it suits their needs. Does anybody have any other/better solutions. RonMac Ron McKeating Computing Services Loughborough University 01509 222329 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from estate1.whitemice.org (host193.64-31-7.bignet.net [64.31.7.193]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76BF84BA2; Mon, 21 May 2001 03:40:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from estate1.whitemice.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by estate1.whitemice.org (8.11.2/linuxconf) with SMTP id f4LAf6L26914; Mon, 21 May 2001 06:41:06 -0400 Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 06:41:06 -0400 From: Adam Tauno Williams To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, samba@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Email... Message-Id: <20010521064106.278702da.awilliam@whitemice.org> In-Reply-To: <990435113.3b08d72936d18@staff-webmail.lboro.ac.uk> References: <293BE1A6609BD411AEC300A0C9FC055E749328@EMAILSRV> <990435113.3b08d72936d18@staff-webmail.lboro.ac.uk> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.4.64 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu) Organization: Whitemice.Org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ >Well we average about 1 million emails per week through our service and we run it >on exim under linux. You may also be interested to know that because exim allows >such good filtering we did not get one single user suffering from any of the VB >type viruses of late. From a user base of 17000 users that is not bad. >check out www.exim.org, it is free, fast and very flexible. Trade Server from Byarni supports iCalendar, IMAP, LDAP, etc... http://www.bynari.net/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mark.labs.trema.com (mark.labs.trema.com [194.103.215.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4D4D4C10 for ; Mon, 21 May 2001 04:59:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hpnico (pclabs169.labs.trema.com [194.103.215.169]) by mark.labs.trema.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA11014 for ; Mon, 21 May 2001 14:00:04 +0200 (MET DST) From: "Nico" To: Subject: redirected folders on W2k roaming profiles and samba 2.07 Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 14:01:27 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, I have a W2k network and using samba 2.07 to access to our unix file server from W2k workstations. I set up the roaming profiles on our W2k server and redirect the applications data, desktop and my documents from the roaming profile to a share on the unix server. The pb is that the folders are well created on the unix share but not the content of the folders. I set the permissions with rwx for everybody on the share but the pb is still the same. I would be very grateful for any help someone would know, Thx a lot Nicolas URIEN System & Network technician - TREMA Laboratories email : nicolas.urien@trema.com 1300 route des cretes Phone : +33-492388178 Zi Sophia Antipolis Fax : +33-492388199 06500 Valbonne ________________________ Beyond the Buzzwords: How to benefit from ASP, Bluetooth, mFinance, eCRM, eFX, eSTP, FAS/IAS, GIPS, XML...? Trema World Forum 2001, Monaco, 30-31 May. Book online at http://www.trema.com/forum Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from magnum.mpi-bremen.de (magnum.mpi-bremen.de [194.95.6.213]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DA3145D6 for ; Mon, 21 May 2001 05:39:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from postgate.mpi-bremen.de (mpi-fw2-0.mpi-bremen.de [194.95.6.253]) by magnum.mpi-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 432322EA10; Mon, 21 May 2001 14:03:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mpi-bremen.de (flavea.mpi-bremen.de [194.95.6.73]) by postgate.mpi-bremen.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA18254; Mon, 21 May 2001 14:06:38 +0200 Message-ID: <3B092095.F837C54E@mpi-bremen.de> Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 16:05:09 +0200 From: Florian Lorenzen Organization: Max-Planck-Institut =?iso-8859-1?Q?f=FCr?= marine Mikrobiologie Bremen X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.74 [de] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nico , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: redirected folders on W2k roaming profiles and samba 2.07 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi Nico, did you check the directory-permission on the Unix-share directly after the W2K-workstation wrote the directories there on logoff? Strangely, it occurs with W2K and roaming-profiles, that the directory-permissions aren't set as specified in smb.conf (create mask = xxx). You can solve this issue by adding inherit permissions = yes and map archive = yes to your smb.conf-file. Then delet the profiles from the W2K-box to have a clean start, also clean your profile-locations on the Unix-server and then try again. It worked for me. Hope this helps, Florian Nico wrote: > > Hi, > > I have a W2k network and using samba 2.07 to access to our unix file server > from W2k workstations. > I set up the roaming profiles on our W2k server and redirect the > applications data, desktop and my documents from the roaming profile to a > share on the unix server. > The pb is that the folders are well created on the unix share but not the > content of the folders. I set the permissions with rwx for everybody on the > share but the pb is still the same. > > I would be very grateful for any help someone would know, > > Thx a lot > > Nicolas URIEN > > System & Network technician - TREMA Laboratories > email : nicolas.urien@trema.com 1300 route des cretes > Phone : +33-492388178 Zi Sophia Antipolis > Fax : +33-492388199 06500 Valbonne > > ________________________ > > Beyond the Buzzwords: How to benefit from > ASP, Bluetooth, mFinance, eCRM, eFX, eSTP, > FAS/IAS, GIPS, XML...? > > Trema World Forum 2001, Monaco, 30-31 May. > Book online at http://www.trema.com/forum Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp2.home.se (smtphost5.home.se [195.66.35.201]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF5684C3C for ; Mon, 21 May 2001 05:53:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lennart.henang@home.se [195.43.201.126] by home.se with Novell Internet Messaging System Web Client; Mon, 21 May 2001 14:51:01 Subject: Win2K won't join the 2.2 SAMBA server From: Lennart Hen?g To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Cc: lennart.henang@vibyskolan.com Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 12:51:01 GMT X-Sender: Novell Internet Messaging System Web Client MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <990449461.309lennart.henang@home.se> Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello! I've configured the new SAMBA server to become an NT Domain Controller. And it works perfectly. I've been joining many W2K machines to the domain, but suddenly when trying to join another W2K laptop, I get a message like "The requested domain does not exist or could not be contacted" (translated from swedish). This happens before I even get a prompt for a userid and password. The smbd.log says matstp (10.1.1.27) couldn't find service ::{2227a280-3aea- 1069-a2de-08002b3030 9d} What can be wrong? Thanks in advance, Len... Lennart Henang, Vibyskolan, Stockholm, Sweden Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from npc.be (unknown [194.7.12.154]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81A6C4C40 for ; Mon, 21 May 2001 05:56:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by gateway.npc.be id <119041>; Mon, 21 May 2001 14:49:57 +0200 Message-Id: <01May21.144957cest.119041@gateway.npc.be> Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 14:50:31 +0200 From: Michael Stoltz Reply-To: michael.stoltz@npc.be X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Procedure out of range References: <200105171658.LAA13915@mailhub.iastate.edu> <01051713205001.17756@RMTSERVE> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi Eric, We initially had the same problem. I solved it by adding root as a samba user with smbpasswd (I used the SWAT Password Tab). Since then I can join from an NT admin account using Solaris user root/. In the [global] section of smb.conf my domain admin permission reads: domain admin group = @root Hope it helps Michael > > Hi Justin, > Yes I have been using only root account to try and > join the domain. I am just about out of gas on this. If you can think of > anything else I could try, that would be great. I might also try to send some > logging info to the tech list and see if I get any responses there as well. > Thanks for taking the time to reply. > > Many thanks, > Erik > > On Thursday 17 May 2001 13:58, you wrote: > > Have you been using the root account to add to the domain? Right now, no > > matter how much privilege you give an admin account, it won't work without > > truely being the root account..... > > > > > Hi, > > > I was curious if anyone has found a definitive answer to this "Procedure > > > out of range" > > > problem yet? I am dead in the water on it. I have been monitoring the > > > boards, and > > > have tried all that has been suggested so far with no luck. > > > My 98 clients are logging into the domain fine now, with the exception > > > that they > > > have to be listed in the admin users group in samba.conf. (sure it's a > > > config prob) > > > > > > Please, if anyone has some insight to this, I would be most gracious to > > > hear from > > > you. > > > On a side note, has anyone else had a problem connecting to swat through > > > Konquerer? > > > I had it working at 1 time but no more. I get "Server error, could not > > > connect to > > > the server" Though Mozilla works fine. Hmm > > > > > > Many thanks, > > > Erik [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of michael.stoltz.vcf] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6418E4C5C for ; Mon, 21 May 2001 06:25:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 6014cwpza006 (adam.rutgersinsurance.com [10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA08953 for ; Mon, 21 May 2001 09:39:38 -0400 Message-ID: <00ac01c0e1f9$dde43240$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: References: <990438210.3b08e34285fd5@staff-webmail.lboro.ac.uk> Subject: Re: Further Email Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 09:28:04 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I use Sendmail and wu-imap. When I get a chance, I'm going to roll my own HTTP client in PHP. I figure it will take me a couple weeks once I get started. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 5:43 AM Subject: Further Email > The recent questions about email had me thinking, I know this is a samba list > and this is off topic, but we are all trying to solve the same problems so if I > could just take a few seconds of your time. > > If you are using exim already could you let me know what you think of it. If you > want (as we do) to have your students (users?) access email from anywhere then > do you use an IMAP web based mailer. We use IMP (http://horde.org/imp/) and our > students are very happy with it. As they can use ir from Hall, Home or Lab it > suits their needs. > > Does anybody have any other/better solutions. > > RonMac > > Ron McKeating > Computing Services > Loughborough University > 01509 222329 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.valinux.com (mail.valinux.com [198.186.202.175]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1504E4684 for ; Mon, 21 May 2001 07:11:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from beefcake.hdqt.valinux.com ([10.1.0.14] helo=localhost ident=root) by mail.valinux.com with smtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 151qPz-0001Kq-00; Mon, 21 May 2001 07:12:19 -0700 Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 08:39:05 -0500 From: Gerald Carter To: Nico Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: redirected folders on W2k roaming profiles and samba 2.07 Message-ID: <20010521083905.C572@pogo.plainjoe.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: ; from nicolas.urien@trema.com on Mon, May 21, 2001 at 07:01:27 -0500 X-Mailer: Balsa 1.1.4 Content-Length: 947 Lines: 26 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Mon, 21 May 2001 07:01:27 Nico wrote: > > I have a W2k network and using samba 2.07 to access to > our unix file server from W2k workstations. I set up > the roaming profiles on our W2k server and redirect the > applications data, desktop and my documents from the > roaming profile to a share on the unix server. I have recently tested this using the latest Samba 2.2. CVS code and 2.2.0. All works fine. Don't know about 2.0.x Cheers, jerry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) Return-Path: <9Mager@uppingham.co.uk> Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from intsrv (mail.uppingham.co.uk [195.59.103.130]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 032A74CB4; Mon, 21 May 2001 07:54:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: From EMAILSRV.UPPINGHAM.CO.UK (172.16.0.14[172.16.0.14 port:4843]) by intsrv Mail essentials (server 2.422) with SMTP id: <762@intsrv> for ; Mon, 21 May 2001 15:54:31 +0100 smtpmailfrom <9Mager@uppingham.co.uk> Received: by EMAILSRV with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 21 May 2001 15:54:42 +0100 Message-ID: <293BE1A6609BD411AEC300A0C9FC055E74933F@EMAILSRV> From: Mager Charles WB <9Mager@uppingham.co.uk> To: "Samba (E-mail)" , "SNTDom (E-mail)" Subject: Email 2 & Others... Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 15:54:41 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Again another email ALMOST off the point, but not quite. The first question, which is to do with samba, is - How can I make samba load on the bootup of the server in RedHat 7.0? The second is that I have downloaded exim for use as an email server as it was recommended by someone (mainly because it is completely free!). When I try to make the config file before installing it (ie just typing "make"), it says "command: make: not found" or something like that - what am I missing? -- C.S.Mager charlie@csmager.co.uk This email and the information that it contains may be confidential, legally privileged and protected by law. Access by the intended recipient only is authorised. Any liability (in negligence or otherwise) arising from any third party acting, or refraining from acting, on any information contained in this email is hereby excluded. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the informationin any medium. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailer2.lut.ac.uk (mailer2.lut.ac.uk [158.125.1.206]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B313E4CAF; Mon, 21 May 2001 08:03:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [158.125.1.116] (helo=staffpop1.lboro.ac.uk ident=root) by mailer2.lut.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.10 #1) id 151rED-0005Uc-00; Mon, 21 May 2001 16:04:13 +0100 Received: from nobody by staffpop1.lboro.ac.uk with local (Exim 3.13 #1) id 151rED-0003ip-00; Mon, 21 May 2001 16:04:13 +0100 To: Mager Charles WB <9Mager@uppingham.co.uk> Subject: Re: Email 2 & Others... Message-ID: <990457453.3b092e6d7e559@staff-webmail.lboro.ac.uk> Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 16:04:13 +0100 (BST) From: R.J.Mckeating@lboro.ac.uk Cc: "Samba (E-mail)" , "SNTDom (E-mail)" References: <293BE1A6609BD411AEC300A0C9FC055E74933F@EMAILSRV> In-Reply-To: <293BE1A6609BD411AEC300A0C9FC055E74933F@EMAILSRV> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.1 X-Originating-IP: 131.231.80.5 X-Lboro-Filtered: mailer2.lut.ac.uk, Mon, 21 May 2001 16:04:14 +0100 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Quoting Mager Charles WB <9Mager@uppingham.co.uk>: > Again another email ALMOST off the point, but not quite. The first > question, > which is to do with samba, is - How can I make samba load on the bootup > of > the server in RedHat 7.0? You should be able to do that with chkconfig (I think) > > The second is that I have downloaded exim for use as an email server as > it > was recommended by someone (mainly because it is completely free!). When > I > try to make the config file before installing it (ie just typing > "make"), it > says "command: make: not found" or something like that - what am I > missing? If you are in as root then /usr/bin is not in your path, use /usr/bin/make or failing that use locate make to find out where your copy is. RonMac > > -- > C.S.Mager > charlie@csmager.co.uk > > > This email and the information that it contains may be confidential, > legally privileged and protected by law. Access by the intended > recipient only is authorised. Any liability (in negligence or otherwise) > > arising from any third party acting, or refraining from acting, on any > information contained in this email is hereby excluded. If you are > not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately > and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for > any purpose, or store or copy the informationin any medium. > > Ron McKeating Computing Services Loughborough University 01509 222329 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from lightning.hereintown.net (lightning.hereintown.net [207.196.96.3]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 524B54CAF; Mon, 21 May 2001 08:14:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cgi0.hereintown.net ([207.196.96.8]) by lightning.hereintown.net with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 151rMm-00022L-00; Mon, 21 May 2001 11:13:04 -0400 Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 10:00:57 -0400 (EDT) From: Kenny To: Mager Charles WB <9Mager@uppingham.co.uk> Cc: "Samba (E-mail)" , "SNTDom (E-mail)" Subject: Re: Email 2 & Others... In-Reply-To: <293BE1A6609BD411AEC300A0C9FC055E74933F@EMAILSRV> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I'd put the commands to start smbd and nmbd on boot in /etc/rc.d/rc.local ... As far as exim goes ... you need to read first: