Next stable version of Samba.

[Steve Williams]

> 
> 
> it-samba at computerbild.de said:
> > I think that the 2.2 for the release branch is favorable while the
> > "2.1" in the book is unfortunate.
> 
> Isn't it obvious to anyone here, that if the book says 2.1, and the released 
> version is 2.2, then the 2.2 version would obviously be newer, and obviously 
> fulfill the requirement as the 2.1 versiion was intended to in the book?
> 

Precisely...  that's why I raised the point.  I wanted to know that the
2.2 version WOULD fulfull the requiremts of the (2.1) version mentioned
in the book.

It's no big deal if it doesn't, I just wanted to mention it so that it
might be considered...

Someone mentioned putting something on the samba.org web page, that would
more than likely resolve any potential conflicts...

Whatever,
> 
> my 2c
> -- 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Allen Bolderoff <allen at gist.net.au>
> LNC -  Linux, help and commentary http://linux.netnerve.com
> CTPC - Caffeine - get it here: http://www.coffee-tea-pots-cups.com/
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> GPG fingerprint = CBB0 8626 702C 3D01 B5AD  A54A DC2C 93B7 3E4B 6472
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 
> 


-- 
	Steve Williams, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
	Genie Computer Systems Inc.
	steve at genie96.com

"A man doesn't begin to attain wisdom until he recognizes that he is 
 no longer indispensable."
- Admiral Richard E. Byrd ( 1888-1957 )