PDC upgrade from beta4 to 2.0 failure
Todd Pfaff
todd at edge.cis.McMaster.CA
Fri Jan 22 18:38:19 GMT 1999
I think you guys are being a little too hard on yourselves. I think the
warnings about PDC support in 2.0 were sufficiently clear and anyone
running a samba-2.0.0 PDC is taking risks.
In my own case, I am running a samba-2.0.0 PDC in production for a couple
of small domains. It's working sufficiently well, and is at least as good
as the NISgina solution I was using previously.
This patch was a little inconvenient because I found I had to have each NT
workstation re-join the domain after fixing the MACHINE.SID, but since I
only have a few domain members it was not a big deal.
On Sat, 23 Jan 1999, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> > What this means is that 2.0 has broken code when used
> > as a PDC
>
> if 2.0 is used as a PDC you will run into difficulties. the rpc code is
> broken and is about 3 months out of date.
>
> > - and I'm really sorry about it. I know we didn't
> > advertise 2.0 as being PDC
>
> we also haven't taken any action to disable 2.0 from being a PDC, and also
> haven't explicitly stated that it should not really be used as a PDC in a
> production environment.
>
> > ready but this is an amateurish
> > mistake and I'm ashamed of it.
>
> my fault.
>
--
Todd Pfaff \ Email: pfaff at mcmaster.ca
Computing and Information Services \ Voice: (905) 525-9140 x22920
ABB 132 \ FAX: (905) 528-3773
McMaster University \
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8S 4M1 \
More information about the samba-ntdom
mailing list