<br>Hi,<br>Not sure if post below made it to the list, so re-sending.<br>Apologies if you already got this.<br><br>On Sep 10, 2:29 pm, Craig.B<a target="_parent" href="http://groups.google.com/groups/unlock?_done=/group/mailing.unix.rsync/browse_thread/thread/1c489b0c136e09d7&msg=a40df0e3b5329994">...</a>@<a href="http://standard.com">standard.com</a> (Craig Bell) wrote: <br>
<div id="qhide_11257" style="display: block;" class="qt">> Michal Soltys wrote: <br> <snip> <br> > > On a related note, if you call rsync locally, you will see strict boundaries <br> <p>> That's interesting! I tried this, --del does indeed behave strictly "infix" when both paths are local. <br>
> Output below -- this is exactly what I would like to see for the remote transfer. Thx... -cheers, CSB <br> <br></p></div>Hi, <br> Is NFS mount of destination a possibility? <br> Would NFS mount give the same behavior as "rsync locally"? <br>
Any shortcomings in an NFS mount/rsync local? <br> Jon<br><br><br>