[distcc] Cygwin Status

[Paul_Donovan at scee.net]

> Heiko Elger wrote:
>I tried the version 1.21. There are compile problem cause of missing
"in_addr_t"
>in cygwin header files.
>But its already known and so you can patch the headerfile (
>http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2003-02/msg00637.html).

You beat me to it by about 5 minutes :-)

I had another compilation problem under Cygwin - VA_COPY doesn't seem to be
defined in any of the system include files that I have, only va_copy and
__va_copy.

src/snprintf.c defines its own VA_COPY, but only if

#if defined(HAVE_SNPRINTF) && defined(HAVE_VSNPRINTF) &&
defined(HAVE_C99_VSNPRINTF)

(line84) doesn't evaluate to true, which it does on my system. I fixed this
by copying the lines that define VA_COPY in src/snprintf.c into the section
that is conditionally compiled by line 84.

Sorry it that's a bit vague - I don't know how to use diff, and I can't
access the cvs server from work to check the latest code. I'd appreciate
info on how to create patches using diff.


--
Paul Donovan
Senior Programmer,
Sony Computer Entertainment Europe





**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
postmaster at scee.net

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been checked
for all known viruses.

**********************************************************************
 SCEE 2002