[cifs-protocol] RE: [Pfif] Microsoft Client tool expectatations

Hongwei Sun hongweis at microsoft.com
Tue Sep 23 19:36:15 GMT 2008


Andrew,

>> Andrew,
>>
>>    Does this  mean that you cannot duplicate the issue any more ?

>Correct.  However, my original reporter still reproduces the issue.

Could you explain a little bit more about this ?   If you put everything back to original condition, you can still see the problem with XP ADCU.  After some changes made to schema, the problem doesn't occur any more.  Is my understanding right ?

Should I still concentrate on the original condition under which we have a capture ?

Is it possible for you to send us a network trace for the current successful condition so we can compare ?

Thanks

----------------------------------------------------------
Hongwei  Sun - Sr. Support Escalation Engineer
DSC Protocol  Team, Microsoft
hongweis at microsoft.com
Tel:  469-7757027 x 57027
-----------------------------------------------------------





-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abartlet at samba.org]
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 5:22 PM
To: Hongwei Sun
Cc: pfif at tridgell.net; cifs-protocol at samba.org
Subject: RE: [cifs-protocol] RE: [Pfif] Microsoft Client tool expectatations

On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 14:31 -0700, Hongwei Sun wrote:
> Andrew,
>
>    Does this  mean that you cannot duplicate the issue any more ?

Correct.  However, my original reporter still reproduces the issue.

>  Can you give us some clarification at your earliest convenience ?
> The only information I have been using for my investigation  is
> winxp-aduc-fail.cap attached in your original e-mail ?  Is it still
> relevant ?

That shows the original failure - but as this could be any part of the whole schema that is incorrect, it is hard to tell what is wrong.

Andrew Bartlett

--
Andrew Bartlett                                http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Red Hat Inc.                  http://redhat.com



More information about the cifs-protocol mailing list