[Samba] Upgrading from Samba 4.0.1 to 4.1.6

Jason Waters jwaters at h2os.com
Mon Mar 17 06:14:18 MDT 2014


root at fspa:~# kinit administrator
kinit: Cannot contact any KDC for realm 'ABC.LOCAL' while getting initial
credentials
root at fspa:~# samba-tool dns query SERVER DOMAIN @ ALL
ERROR(runtime): uncaught exception - (-1073741772,
'NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND')
  File
"/usr/local/samba/lib/python2.7/site-packages/samba/netcmd/__init__.py",
line 175, in _run
    return self.run(*args, **kwargs)
  File "/usr/local/samba/lib/python2.7/site-packages/samba/netcmd/dns.py",
line 984, in run
    dns_conn = dns_connect(server, self.lp, self.creds)
  File "/usr/local/samba/lib/python2.7/site-packages/samba/netcmd/dns.py",
line 37, in dns_connect
    dns_conn = dnsserver.dnsserver(binding_str, lp, creds)



On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 8:12 AM, Jason Waters <jwaters at h2os.com> wrote:

> I seem to be having a DNS issue.  The DNS server is really really slow
> when I use samba.  Any ideas?
>
> Jason
>
> root at fspa:~# ping google.com
> PING google.com (204.186.215.54) 56(84) bytes of data.
> 64 bytes from 204.186.215.54: icmp_req=1 ttl=61 time=13.7 ms
> 64 bytes from 204.186.215.54: icmp_req=2 ttl=61 time=11.1 ms
> 64 bytes from 204.186.215.54: icmp_req=3 ttl=61 time=10.9 ms
> 64 bytes from 204.186.215.54: icmp_req=4 ttl=61 time=13.8 ms
> ^C64 bytes from 204.186.215.54: icmp_req=5 ttl=61 time=13.1 ms
>
> --- google.com ping statistics ---
> 5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 20179ms
> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 10.907/12.562/13.896/1.284 ms
>
>
> See the 20179ms???
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Jason Waters <jwaters at h2os.com> wrote:
>
>> Marc,
>>   Sorry about just grepping the error.  Didn't know if that would flag
>> anything that you "knew" already.  Like the .pem issue before.  I figured
>> out the problem.  In smb.conf I had [print$] defined with a directory that
>> didn't exist.  As soon as I created it samba would start and stay running!
>>  Thank you for the help.  Also sorry about my calling it PDC/BDC.  I will
>> refer to them as domain controllers from now on! :)
>>
>> Jason
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 9:44 PM, Marc Muehlfeld <samba at marc-muehlfeld.de>wrote:
>>
>>> Am 16.03.2014 02:32, schrieb Jason Waters:
>>>
>>>  Got a little further.  I removed the pem files and then the one(PDC)
>>>> started and stayed working.  The BDC did not.  I got this when I grep
>>>> the
>>>> log file.
>>>>
>>>> root at fsZZ:/usr/local/samba-4.1.6/var# grep error log.samba
>>>>
>>>
>>> Please empty your logs, start samba and then have a look at _all_ the
>>> messages are shown. Only with the lines containing the word "error" in
>>> lower cases it would be very hard to help.
>>>
>>>
>>> What do you mean with "one(PDC) started and stayed working. The BDC did
>>> not." What is not working? Are all processes running? If not, which is
>>> missing? It Samba listening on all ports it should? If not, which ports are
>>> not listening? ....
>>>
>>>
>>> Btw: You said you have a Samba AD, then you don't have PDC/BDCs. You
>>> have Domain Controllers. Please use this term, as PDC/BDC indicate that
>>> you're running a NT4-style domain. This confuses, as for a Samba4 NT4-style
>>> domain you have to do different steps than for an AD DC.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Marc
>>>
>>>
>>
>


More information about the samba mailing list