[Samba] Samba 4 AD share: Access denied
Rowland Penny
rowlandpenny at googlemail.com
Tue Jul 29 07:22:09 MDT 2014
On 29/07/14 14:01, Ryan Ashley wrote:
> I do not have libpam-krb5 installed, nor have I ever had it installed
> anywhere, on any system. I also do not modify pam settings because I
> do not want users being able to log into the servers if one decided to
> be malicious. Currently each server only has the root account on it
> and this was fine in S3.
OK, you do not need any other users on the server and as long as there
is nowhere for the users to call home, they will not be able to login.
Having said that, the computer needs to authenticate users & groups from
AD, this is where PAM comes in and you need PAM and kerberos to connect
to an AD DC.
>
> Before I change anything, I would like to know what that keytab file
> does. Just playing it safe. If I do not understand it I will not be
> able to support it. Thanks for your time and effort, I do appreciate it.
If you are going to get involved with AD, you need to get involved with
kerberos and keytabs, this subject is a bit involved to go into here,
but you could start here:
https://itservices.stanford.edu/service/kerberos/keytabs
After that, perhaps the samba wiki and there is always the internet ;-)
Rowland
>
> On 07/29/2014 03:50 AM, Rowland Penny wrote:
>> On 28/07/14 23:33, Ryan Ashley wrote:
>>> More information in another winbind log. I attempted to login to a
>>> remote Windows 7 box with a normal user account which is in both
>>> groups and should get both drives. Windows logs access denied and
>>> does not map the drives, and I get this in the logs. At this point I
>>> am fairly sure winbind is having issues speaking to the DC due to a
>>> missing module which I can find nothing about online. I did use
>>> Google for a while today and cannot find a match for the phrases
>>> below, so I am stuck.
>>>
>>> log.wb-TRUEVINE:
>>> [2014/07/28 18:24:52.880743, 3]
>>> ../source3/winbindd/winbindd_ads.c:597(query_user)
>>> ads: query_user
>>> [2014/07/28 18:24:52.883979, 1]
>>> ../source3/winbindd/winbindd_ads.c:710(query_user)
>>> nss_get_info_cached failed: NT_STATUS_NOT_FOUND
>>>
>>> log.winbind-idmap:
>>> [2014/07/28 18:24:52.883979, 3]
>>> ../lib/krb5_wrap/krb5_samba.c:266(ads_cleanup_expired_creds)
>>> ads_cleanup_expired_creds: Ticket in ccache[MEMORY:cliconnect]
>>> expiration Mon, 28 Jul 2014 20:14:44 EDT
>>> [2014/07/28 18:24:52.883991, 0]
>>> ../source3/winbindd/winbindd.c:266(winbindd_sig_term_handler)
>>> Got sig[15] terminate (is_parent=0)
>>> [2014/07/28 18:24:52.884011, 3]
>>> ../source3/winbindd/idmap.c:230(idmap_init_domain)
>>> idmap backend ad not found
>>> [2014/07/28 18:24:52.884072, 3]
>>> ../source3/winbindd/idmap.c:235(idmap_init_domain)
>>> Could not probe idmap module ad
>>>
>>> On 7/28/2014 11:16 AM, Ryan Ashley wrote:
>>>> Found the problem, I believe
>>>>
>>>> [2014/07/28 10:14:44.828015, 3]
>>>> ../lib/krb5_wrap/krb5_samba.c:266(ads_cleanup_expired_creds)
>>>> ads_cleanup_expired_creds: Ticket in ccache[MEMORY:cliconnect]
>>>> expiration Mon, 28 Jul 2014 20:14:44 EDT
>>>> [2014/07/28 10:31:37.274435, 0]
>>>> ../source3/winbindd/winbindd.c:266(winbindd_sig_term_handler)
>>>> Got sig[15] terminate (is_parent=0)
>>>> [2014/07/28 11:02:32.032341, 3]
>>>> ../source3/winbindd/idmap.c:230(idmap_init_domain)
>>>> idmap backend ad not found
>>>> [2014/07/28 11:02:32.051673, 3]
>>>> ../source3/winbindd/idmap.c:235(idmap_init_domain)
>>>> Could not probe idmap module ad
>>>>
>>>> As you can see, winbind is having issues with AD. What could cause
>>>> this? Currently I have set share permissions in Linux to 777 and am
>>>> running S4 4.1.10 from the v4-1-stable branch. Is this something I
>>>> can fix?
>>>>
>>>> On 07/28/2014 10:19 AM, Ryan Ashley wrote:
>>>>> Great, so by doing "git clone git://git.samba.org/samba.git
>>>>> samba-master" I am by default cloning the testing branch. I am
>>>>> going to do a checkout on stable and try again.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 07/28/2014 10:11 AM, Rowland Penny wrote:
>>>>>> On 28/07/14 15:00, Ryan Ashley wrote:
>>>>>>> Odd, but it says I am using 4.2.0, which is higher than 4.1.8.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> root at fs01:/usr/src/samba-master# samba-tool -V
>>>>>>> 4.2.0pre1-GIT-d097898
>>>>>>> root at fs01:/usr/src/samba-master# winbindd -V
>>>>>>> Version 4.2.0pre1-GIT-d097898
>>>>>>> root at fs01:/usr/src/samba-master# nmbd -V
>>>>>>> Version 4.2.0pre1-GIT-d097898
>>>>>>> root at fs01:/usr/src/samba-master#
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I normally clone, configure, and build. Is the stable branch not
>>>>>>> default? Am I building a testing branch? Should I checkout on
>>>>>>> the stable branch?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 07/28/2014 09:50 AM, Rowland Penny wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 28/07/14 14:41, Ryan Ashley wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Alright, I was poking around this morning trying to make this
>>>>>>>>> work, and noticed something odd. Loads of zombie nmbd
>>>>>>>>> processes. Check out the dump below and tell me, what is going
>>>>>>>>> on here? Is this my problem?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> root at fs01:~# ps x
>>>>>>>>> PID TTY STAT TIME COMMAND
>>>>>>>>> 1 ? Ss 0:02 init [2]
>>>>>>>>> 2 ? S 0:00 [kthreadd]
>>>>>>>>> 3 ? S 0:00 [ksoftirqd/0]
>>>>>>>>> 5 ? S 0:00 [kworker/u:0]
>>>>>>>>> 6 ? S 0:00 [migration/0]
>>>>>>>>> 7 ? S 0:01 [watchdog/0]
>>>>>>>>> 8 ? S< 0:00 [cpuset]
>>>>>>>>> 9 ? S< 0:00 [khelper]
>>>>>>>>> 10 ? S 0:00 [kdevtmpfs]
>>>>>>>>> 11 ? S< 0:00 [netns]
>>>>>>>>> 12 ? S 0:00 [xenwatch]
>>>>>>>>> 13 ? S 0:00 [xenbus]
>>>>>>>>> 14 ? S 0:01 [sync_supers]
>>>>>>>>> 15 ? S 0:00 [bdi-default]
>>>>>>>>> 16 ? S< 0:00 [kintegrityd]
>>>>>>>>> 17 ? S< 0:00 [kblockd]
>>>>>>>>> 19 ? S 0:00 [khungtaskd]
>>>>>>>>> 20 ? S 0:00 [kswapd0]
>>>>>>>>> 21 ? SN 0:00 [ksmd]
>>>>>>>>> 22 ? SN 0:00 [khugepaged]
>>>>>>>>> 23 ? S 0:00 [fsnotify_mark]
>>>>>>>>> 24 ? S< 0:00 [crypto]
>>>>>>>>> 173 ? S 0:00 [jbd2/xvda1-8]
>>>>>>>>> 174 ? S< 0:00 [ext4-dio-unwrit]
>>>>>>>>> 183 ? S 0:00 [kworker/u:1]
>>>>>>>>> 313 ? Ss 0:00 udevd --daemon
>>>>>>>>> 420 ? S 0:00 udevd --daemon
>>>>>>>>> 425 ? S 0:00 udevd --daemon
>>>>>>>>> 433 ? S 0:00 [khubd]
>>>>>>>>> 438 ? S< 0:00 [kpsmoused]
>>>>>>>>> 445 ? S< 0:00 [ata_sff]
>>>>>>>>> 471 ? S 0:00 [scsi_eh_0]
>>>>>>>>> 472 ? S 0:00 [scsi_eh_1]
>>>>>>>>> 1295 ? S 0:00 [jbd2/xvda2-8]
>>>>>>>>> 1296 ? S< 0:00 [ext4-dio-unwrit]
>>>>>>>>> 1297 ? S 0:01 [flush-202:0]
>>>>>>>>> 1298 ? S 0:00 [jbd2/xvda9-8]
>>>>>>>>> 1299 ? S< 0:00 [ext4-dio-unwrit]
>>>>>>>>> 1300 ? S 0:00 [jbd2/xvda10-8]
>>>>>>>>> 1301 ? S< 0:00 [ext4-dio-unwrit]
>>>>>>>>> 1302 ? S 0:00 [jbd2/xvda8-8]
>>>>>>>>> 1303 ? S< 0:00 [ext4-dio-unwrit]
>>>>>>>>> 1307 ? S 0:00 [jbd2/xvda11-8]
>>>>>>>>> 1308 ? S< 0:00 [ext4-dio-unwrit]
>>>>>>>>> 1309 ? S 0:00 [jbd2/xvda3-8]
>>>>>>>>> 1310 ? S< 0:00 [ext4-dio-unwrit]
>>>>>>>>> 1311 ? S 0:00 [jbd2/xvda4-8]
>>>>>>>>> 1312 ? S< 0:00 [ext4-dio-unwrit]
>>>>>>>>> 1313 ? S 0:00 [jbd2/xvda5-8]
>>>>>>>>> 1314 ? S< 0:00 [ext4-dio-unwrit]
>>>>>>>>> 1315 ? S 0:00 [jbd2/xvda6-8]
>>>>>>>>> 1316 ? S< 0:00 [ext4-dio-unwrit]
>>>>>>>>> 1317 ? S 0:00 [jbd2/xvda7-8]
>>>>>>>>> 1318 ? S< 0:00 [ext4-dio-unwrit]
>>>>>>>>> 1319 ? S 0:00 [jbd2/xvdb1-8]
>>>>>>>>> 1320 ? S< 0:00 [ext4-dio-unwrit]
>>>>>>>>> 1780 ? Sl 0:00 /usr/sbin/rsyslogd -c5
>>>>>>>>> 1811 ? Ss 0:00 /usr/sbin/acpid
>>>>>>>>> 1903 ? Ss 0:00 /usr/sbin/cron
>>>>>>>>> 1998 ? Ss 0:00 /usr/sbin/sshd
>>>>>>>>> 2022 tty1 Ss+ 0:00 /sbin/getty 38400 tty1
>>>>>>>>> 2023 tty2 Ss+ 0:00 /sbin/getty 38400 tty2
>>>>>>>>> 2024 tty3 Ss+ 0:00 /sbin/getty 38400 tty3
>>>>>>>>> 2025 tty4 Ss+ 0:00 /sbin/getty 38400 tty4
>>>>>>>>> 2026 tty5 Ss+ 0:00 /sbin/getty 38400 tty5
>>>>>>>>> 2027 tty6 Ss+ 0:00 /sbin/getty 38400 tty6
>>>>>>>>> 2041 ? Ss 0:03 nmbd
>>>>>>>>> 2043 ? Ss 0:03 smbd
>>>>>>>>> 2045 ? Ss 0:00 winbindd
>>>>>>>>> 2046 ? S 0:02 winbindd
>>>>>>>>> 2047 ? S 0:00 winbindd
>>>>>>>>> 2048 ? S 0:00 winbindd
>>>>>>>>> 2049 ? S 0:00 smbd
>>>>>>>>> 2067 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 2085 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 2109 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 2127 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 2145 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 2163 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 2185 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 2203 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 2223 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 2241 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 2263 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 2281 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 2299 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 2317 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 2339 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 2357 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 2375 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 2393 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 2415 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 2433 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 2451 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 2469 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 2491 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 2509 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 2527 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 2545 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 2567 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 2585 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 2603 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 2621 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 2643 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 2661 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 2679 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 2697 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 2719 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 2737 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 2755 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 2773 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 2795 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 2813 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 2831 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 2849 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 2871 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 2889 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 2907 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 2925 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 2946 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 2964 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 2982 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 3000 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 3022 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 3040 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 3058 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 3076 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 3098 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 3116 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 3134 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 3152 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 3174 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 3192 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 3210 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 3228 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 3250 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 3268 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 3285 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 3303 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 3325 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 3343 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 3361 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 3380 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 3402 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 3420 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 3438 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 3456 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 3574 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 3592 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 3610 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 3628 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 3650 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 3668 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 3686 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 3704 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 3726 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 3744 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 3762 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 3780 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 3802 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 3820 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 3838 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 3856 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 3878 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 3896 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 3914 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 3932 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 3954 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 3972 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 3990 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 4008 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 4030 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 4048 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 4066 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 4084 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 4106 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 4124 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 4142 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 4160 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 4182 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 4200 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 4220 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 4238 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 4261 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 4279 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 4297 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 4315 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 4337 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 4355 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 4373 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 4391 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 4413 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 4431 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 4449 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 4467 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 4489 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 4507 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 4525 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 4543 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 4565 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 4583 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 4601 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 4619 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 4641 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 4659 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 4677 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 4694 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 4716 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 4734 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 4752 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 4770 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 4792 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 4811 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 4829 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 4847 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 4869 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 4887 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 4905 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 4923 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 4945 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 4963 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 4981 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 4999 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 5021 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 5039 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 5057 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 5075 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 5097 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 5115 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 5133 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 5151 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 5173 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 5191 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 5209 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 5227 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 5249 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 5267 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 5285 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 5303 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 5325 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 5343 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 5361 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 5379 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 5525 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 5543 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 5571 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 5589 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 5611 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 5630 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 5648 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 5666 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 5688 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 5706 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 5724 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 5742 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 5764 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 5782 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 5800 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 5818 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 5840 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 5858 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 5876 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 5894 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 5916 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 5934 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 5952 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 5970 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 5992 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 6010 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 6028 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 6046 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 6068 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 6086 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 6104 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 6122 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 6144 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 6161 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 6179 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 6197 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 6219 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 6238 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 6256 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 6274 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 6296 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 6314 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 6332 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 6350 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 6372 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 6390 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 6408 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 6426 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 6448 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 6466 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 6484 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 6502 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 6524 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 6542 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 6560 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 6578 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 6600 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 6618 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 6636 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 6654 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 6676 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 6694 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 6712 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 6730 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 6752 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 6770 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 6789 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 6807 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 6829 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 6847 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 6852 ? S 0:01 [kworker/0:0]
>>>>>>>>> 6867 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 6885 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 6906 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 6924 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 6942 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 6960 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 6982 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 7000 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 7018 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 7036 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 7058 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 7076 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 7094 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 7112 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 7134 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 7152 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 7170 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 7188 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 7210 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 7228 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 7246 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 7264 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 7286 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 7304 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 7322 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 7340 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 7458 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 7476 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 7494 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 7512 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 7534 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 7552 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 7569 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 7587 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 7609 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 7627 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 7645 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 7665 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 7676 ? S 0:00 [kworker/0:2]
>>>>>>>>> 7687 ? Z 0:00 [nmbd] <defunct>
>>>>>>>>> 7697 ? Ss 0:00 sshd: root at pts/0
>>>>>>>>> 7699 pts/0 Ss 0:00 -bash
>>>>>>>>> 7711 ? S 0:00 [kworker/0:1]
>>>>>>>>> 7718 ? S 0:00 [flush-202:16]
>>>>>>>>> 7721 pts/0 R+ 0:00 ps x
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 07/28/2014 09:18 AM, Ryan Ashley wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> I have never even played with apparmor. I do my Debian
>>>>>>>>>> installs using a net CD and doing the expert 64bit install. I
>>>>>>>>>> disable recommended and suggested packages and install only
>>>>>>>>>> exactly what I need, so I do not have apparmor or selinux.
>>>>>>>>>> Good thought though. I also tried disabling the firewall on a
>>>>>>>>>> test PC and still no go. This has NEVER happened before so I
>>>>>>>>>> am lost.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So where else should I look? The system in question is a
>>>>>>>>>> domain member server, can resolve users and groups, and can
>>>>>>>>>> set ACLs with user and groups from AD. It is simply denying
>>>>>>>>>> access to group members of said shares.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 07/28/2014 05:02 AM, Rowland Penny wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 27/07/14 16:28, Ryan Ashley wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> I understand and I should have stated more clearly that I
>>>>>>>>>>>> have been going through those results for over a week now.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing seems to help. Funny thing is that creating a
>>>>>>>>>>>> second virtual file-server and using share authentication
>>>>>>>>>>>> works fine. Yet another reason I am leaning towards group
>>>>>>>>>>>> issues. If the file-server is share-level the Windows 7
>>>>>>>>>>>> boxes are happy. As soon as it goes AD and uses AD groups,
>>>>>>>>>>>> they stop working. I have not tried user-level security
>>>>>>>>>>>> yet. Then again I may have user-level and share-level
>>>>>>>>>>>> confused. It has been a long week. I will keep searching
>>>>>>>>>>>> but so far nothing I have found and tried works.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Is there a way to get an actual reason for the denial? If
>>>>>>>>>>>> it flat-out told me a reason I could troubleshoot. Right
>>>>>>>>>>>> now I am just shooting in random directions hoping to hit
>>>>>>>>>>>> something since all I get is "Access Denied". Is it
>>>>>>>>>>>> possible to see is S4 is denying the connection via a log
>>>>>>>>>>>> or something, or if Windows 7 is being stupid... again?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/27/2014 10:57 AM, Rowland Penny wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 27/07/14 15:15, Ryan Ashley wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That solution is for Windows 8. That also is not our
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue. The WIndows 7 Pro 64bit workstations see the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> server and shares, and they map the shares according to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> group policy, but then everybody gets access denied,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> despite being in the domain groups for which the shares
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were created. Funny thing is that if I logon as domain
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> admin, I get to access the shares. Due to this, I fully
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> believe the S4 server is ignoring or not accounting for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> group membership. The "reachfp" account is the domain
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> admin. This is also the default owner of files on the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shares. The group "administration" contains many members
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and does not grant access, despite the group being
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> granted full control. This lead e into believing I am
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still dealing with a permissions issue and not another
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue. If it was the other issue, I would assume domain
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> admin could not see the share or access it. Is that about
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You are missing the point, I probably could have chosen a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> better target but I only spent about 30secs on the search:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> windows 7 64 bit access denied samba
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> This returns About 116,000 results, here's another one:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.sevenforums.com/network-sharing/242602-can-t-connect-samba-share-win-7-ultimate-64-bit.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Try looking into this before dismissing it out of hand and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> insisting that samba is the problem.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rowland
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> OK, after more thought and re-reading your posts, a thought
>>>>>>>>>>> has popped into my head, apparmor, do you have this running
>>>>>>>>>>> on the server ?
>>>>>>>>>>> I have been caught out by this a few times, not being
>>>>>>>>>>> allowed to do things that I thought I should be able to do,
>>>>>>>>>>> or packages not running correctly because they were not
>>>>>>>>>>> allowed access, in every case it was apparmor. As I could
>>>>>>>>>>> never get apparmor to play ball with me (I thought that I
>>>>>>>>>>> had found all rights that needed modding and then another
>>>>>>>>>>> one would pop its head up and what is in the logs bares no
>>>>>>>>>>> resemblance to what you need to put in the conf file), I now
>>>>>>>>>>> disable apparmor straight after installing a new system.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Rowland
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Somebody else reported this problem, he went to 4.1.8 and the
>>>>>>>> zombie nmbd problem went away, if you upgrade to the latest
>>>>>>>> samba4 you may hit two birds with one stone, the nmbd problem
>>>>>>>> and your group problem ;-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Rowland
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi, what you are using is not the stable branch, it is the branch
>>>>>> that will become the next release i.e. 4.2. This does not mean
>>>>>> that you shouldn't use it, it just means that it could be
>>>>>> upgraded at any time until it is 'frozen' just before release.
>>>>>> These upgrades 'could' break something, not saying they will,
>>>>>> just that they could, for production use I would use the latest
>>>>>> version from here:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://ftp.samba.org/pub/samba/stable/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rowland
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> Do you have all of these packages installed:
>>
>> samba libnss-winbind winbind libpam-winbind krb5-config libpam-krb5
>> krb5-user
>>
>> If not, install what is missing and add these lines to smb.conf:
>>
>> dedicated keytab file = /etc/krb5.keytab
>> kerberos method = secrets and keytab
>>
>> Restart samba and try again, you may have to join the machine to the
>> domain again.
>>
>> Rowland
>
More information about the samba
mailing list