[Samba] Ldap & socket error messages
Tanguy LEOST
tanguy.leost at uclab.fr
Wed Apr 15 14:27:24 GMT 2009
Hello,
I run a samba (v3.0.10) PDC and openLdap server on the same machine.
They work fine, except sometimes the smb server cannot contact the ldap
server.
From a windows client, it looks like the server
gets stuck, and it takes a few minutes before the shares
are available again.
In the /var/log/messages file, i get these error messages :
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Apr 15 05:59:42 pdc smbd[27260]: [2009/04/15 05:59:42, 0]
lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_search_suffix(1155)
Apr 15 05:59:42 pdc smbd[26860]: failed to bind to server with dn=
cn=Manager,dc=mydomain,dc=fr Error: Can't contact LDAP server
Apr 15 05:59:42 pdc smbd[27261]: [2009/04/15 05:59:42, 0]
lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_search_suffix(1155)
Apr 15 05:59:42 pdc smbd[27214]: ldapsam_search_one_group: Problem
during the LDAP search: LDAP error: (unknown) (Timed out)
Apr 15 05:59:42 pdc smbd[27254]: smbldap_search_suffix: Problem during
the LDAP search: (unknown) (Timed out)
Apr 15 05:59:42 pdc smbd[27256]: failed to bind to server with dn=
cn=Manager,dc=mydomain,dc=fr Error: Can't contact LDAP server
Apr 15 05:59:42 pdc smbd[27258]: failed to bind to server with dn=
cn=Manager,dc=mydomain,dc=fr Error: Can't contact LDAP server
Apr 15 05:59:42 pdc smbd[27238]: [2009/04/15 05:59:42, 0]
lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(455)
Apr 15 05:59:42 pdc smbd[27249]: getpeername failed. Error was Noeud
final de transport n'est pas connecté
Apr 15 05:59:42 pdc smbd[27251]: getpeername failed. Error was Noeud
final de transport n'est pas connecté
Apr 15 05:59:42 pdc smbd[27243]: [2009/04/15 05:59:42, 0]
lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(430)
Apr 15 05:59:42 pdc smbd[27239]: [2009/04/15 05:59:42, 0]
lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(455)
Apr 15 05:59:42 pdc smbd[27244]: [2009/04/15 05:59:42, 0]
lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(430)
Apr 15 05:59:42 pdc smbd[27262]: [2009/04/15 05:59:42, 0]
lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_search_suffix(1155)
Apr 15 05:59:42 pdc smbd[27263]: [2009/04/15 05:59:42, 0]
lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_search_suffix(1155)
Apr 15 05:59:42 pdc smbd[27265]: (unknown)
Apr 15 05:59:42 pdc smbd[27266]: (unknown)
Apr 15 05:59:42 pdc smbd[17664]: (unknown)
Apr 15 05:59:42 pdc smbd[27264]: [2009/04/15 05:59:42, 0]
lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_search_suffix(1155)
Apr 15 05:59:42 pdc smbd[27241]: write_socket_data: write failure.
Error = Connexion ré-initialisée par le correspondant
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This occurs from time to time ;
If I browse the /var/log/messages, I can see *lots* of
error messages that occur very frequently :
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Apr 15 14:22:14 pdc smbd[30373]: nss_ldap: reconnecting to LDAP server...
Apr 15 14:22:14 pdc smbd[30373]: nss_ldap: reconnected to LDAP server
after 1 attempt(s)
Apr 15 14:22:55 pdc smbd[972]: [2009/04/15 14:22:55, 0]
lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr(1000)
Apr 15 14:22:55 pdc smbd[972]: getpeername failed. Error was Noeud
final de transport n'est pas connecté
Apr 15 14:22:55 pdc smbd[972]: [2009/04/15 14:22:55, 0]
lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr(1000)
Apr 15 14:22:55 pdc smbd[972]: getpeername failed. Error was Noeud
final de transport n'est pas connecté
Apr 15 14:22:55 pdc smbd[972]: [2009/04/15 14:22:55, 0]
lib/util_sock.c:write_socket_data(430)
Apr 15 14:22:55 pdc smbd[972]: write_socket_data: write failure. Error
= Connexion ré-initialisée par le correspondant
Apr 15 14:22:55 pdc smbd[972]: [2009/04/15 14:22:55, 0]
lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(455)
(...)
Apr 15 14:23:05 pdc nmbd[30171]: [2009/04/15 14:23:05, 0]
nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:reply_netbios_packet(975)
Apr 15 14:23:05 pdc nmbd[30171]: reply_netbios_packet: send_packet to
IP 169.254.2.2 port 137 failed
--------------------------------------------------------------------
(Connexion ré-initialisée par le correspondant = connection reset by peer.)
Does anyone know what's going on ?
I don't know if the errors are related.
I don't know either why nmbd tries to contact 169.254.2.2, which
looks like a dummy address...
Thanks in advance for your help.
Tanguy
More information about the samba
mailing list