[Samba] Performance problem with utime() on Solaris 8
Volker Lendecke
Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE
Tue Jul 31 05:33:43 GMT 2007
On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 03:34:54PM -0700, Scott Cokely wrote:
> I ran truss on smbd while the file copy was taking place, and found that
> the utime() call was taking up most of the system time. I then ran truss
> on the 2.2.5 smbd, and found that there were no utime() calls at all. I
> went to the archives, downloaded and built version 2.2.12, and found that
> the performance was the same as 2.2.5. Same with version 3.0.0, and
> version 3.0.10.
It might be possible that since then we implement some SMB
call differently from what we did before. We'd need a debug
level 10 log or a network trace to see what the client does.
Volker
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/attachments/20070731/9f7346b8/attachment.bin
More information about the samba
mailing list