[Samba] the desktop.ini incident again

Holger Wesser wesser at gmx.com
Wed Apr 20 13:56:07 GMT 2005


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Well, you're right. But I remember following email sent on 09/24/2004:

Samuel Partida wrote:

|Hi there, we had some problems with that issue, i know it is covered
|and i solved it with veto file = /*ktop.ini/ etc...
|
|But now i'm thinking about it again, it's because Windows XP saves
|some metainformation in some hidden files, one of them is desktop.ini,
|which is very annoying because notepad is opened on every user session,
|but, there is another file, thumbs.db, it becomes visible on remote
|shares and roaming profiles.

The following line is from one of the emails from the thread the other
day regarding this. I don't recall anyone saying to use 'veto file'.

hide files = /desktop.ini/ntuser.ini/NTUSER.*/

So I ask myself, what's the difference between "veto files" and "hide
files"? In my eyes, veto files are totally ignored by the client. Hide
files only gets the "hidden"-attribute and can be read by the client.

Greets
Holger

Paul Gienger wrote:
| Wasn't the workaround actually to do a
| veto files = /desktop.ini/
|
| The few mentions I found were to that effect, although my syntax could
| be wrong.
|
|

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCZl93O0QDuZMdP0sRAmqfAKCkFXnlom3Fs9h7yCj9BkMZb3wJGQCgne4z
1Zbya5MnTAQ+TG4ndz1AQ0U=
=NXxD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the samba mailing list