AW: [Samba] About SOCKET options

[Benjamin Weber]

Yep I am using "large readwrite=yes" as it is set on by default. That might
have anything to do with it?

--
Benjamin



-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: samba-admin at lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-admin at lists.samba.org]Im
Auftrag von Chris Smith
Gesendet: Freitag, 27. September 2002 19:05
An: samba at lists.samba.org
Betreff: Re: [Samba] About SOCKET options


On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 10:50, David Morel wrote:
> Le jeu 26/09/2002 à 14:47, Benjamin Weber a écrit :
> > Ok, as some of you read I was the guy who experimented with SOCKET
options.
> >
> > In my last post, where I figured that I needed to use the right syntax I
> > found out that SO_SNDBUF=4096 and SO_RCVBUF=4096 worked way better than
with
> > 8192 as value. Today I verified this behavior.
> >
>
> so did I! 4069 is much faster here (Win XP pro for the clients,
> 2.4.19(gentoo) kernel, samba 2.2.5.

Are either of you using "large readwrite = yes" as well?


--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba